[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 328.

pookielax31

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 500

Quote from: Dungor on September 18, 2014, 08:55:21 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good Embarrassed

, Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

He should sell advice, all people have to do is the exact opposite of him and they will get rich. Pokie´s strategy seems to be buy high, sell low.

Really cause heres some more PMs.... get lost and learn to fucking trade

BTW my trading classes are free!!! Grin

reebokasss

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

dropping very fast, only 151k left Sad

(

pookielax31

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 500

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 08:50:17 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good Embarrassed

, Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

Pookie How many BTC did you lost when you dumped XC the last time For Cloak? Trader my ass please sell and gtfo for good this time.

HAHAHAH u fucking moron, LOST NONE from cloak.. sold at 275.... Then took that profit to dark... gave chatrts to the communityat told them when to sell at the direct top u dumb fuck... then went to stelath and said sell at 120 and theycalled me insane now look at my PM inbox begging for info or thanking me... SO u GTFO

PS I told PEOPLE to sell in CLOAK and they called me CRAZY

Dungor

full member

Activity: 178

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good Embarrassed

, Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

He should sell advice, all people have to do is the exact opposite of him and they will get rich. Pokie´s strategy seems to be buy high, sell low.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good Embarrassed

, Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

Pookie How many BTC did you lost when you dumped XC the last time For Cloak? Trader my ass please sell and gtfo for good this time.

Dungor

full member

Activity: 178

Merit: 100

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 08:14:29 AM

Quote from: Dungor on September 18, 2014, 08:03:03 AM

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

Quote

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

I don't agree.

Point 1- The article was written by a bitcoin Magazine employee, It is not paid PR, If the shills want to complain as they have been mentioned they should complain directly with who wrote the article not involving XC.

Point 2- It is in the right of who wrote the article to mention the coin that implement a semi-decentralized coinjoin supernode approach of anonimity to make the comparison since XC announced the Coin-join Killer with Final REV-2 release. The question is it is true or not? IT IS PERIOD. Dark-nodes ar semi centralized as it is a limit of coinjoin based implementations.

Point 3- Going against what the truth is will be counter productive for an establish magazine as this one in the Crypto world. I think they make their thoughts on what they wrote what do you think?

Now they can go cry back home with their reputation in the trash.

But the truth hurt their feelings, so of cause they lash out. Their perception of what is true didn't match the article so they see it as an aggression, this is very normal group behavior. Because the technical nature of cryptocurrencies very few people actually understands the features they are buying into, so a lot of people are investing by trust. Also FUD attacks come and go so the different communities has to be defensive not to be manipulated.

reebokasss

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

i throught that we will see huge rise after all good news, but it seems that we are going to the fucking same level as before news (~130k).... so now i dont know what need to happen that price would rise... fucking dumpers!!

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: CryptoChronic on September 18, 2014, 08:28:42 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 08:25:32 AM

Quote from: CryptoChronic on September 18, 2014, 08:22:46 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 07:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

Same problem.... all 7 0f my fucking Mixer Transactions have taken coins from me.... Let me congratulate the XC team for fucking up yet again... First it was overhyping, then missing deadlines... Now You guys make a big fucking deal about this wallet release and get all the fucking publicity and hype over it just to release a broken fucking wallet that debits you for mixing some1 else transactions... You put out broken fucking tech and the market is reacting.... Back to 120.. And never touching this coin again

Calm down, if it's that big of a deal to you take your wallet offline until problem is fixed.

Ur missing the point.... This is a problem that will turn investors away, u cant fuck up like this when all eyes are on you.... surprise surprise XC team does it again

You've completely exaggerated things and got emotional for insufficient reason.

Come back to your senses, please:

The wallet works pretty damn well.

XC's tech is a very long way ahead of the competition.

There are peripheral niggles we're ironing out.

Man, what's up with you? Why is your take on XC's past releases so negative? I see severely insufficient justification for your interpretation.

dida

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

SoNiC BooM

Quote from: synechist on September 18, 2014, 08:09:57 AM

Quote from: dida on September 18, 2014, 07:57:31 AM

Quote from: dida on September 15, 2014, 03:05:17 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 14, 2014, 06:58:40 PM

Quote from: tr8kr on September 14, 2014, 05:34:43 PM

We are testing a strong resistance builded from 4 july with many testing without breaking it.

https://cryptrader.com/c/wMHxewsn

If we break out this resitance tomorrow this is going to be another history.

Nice observation there.

It means that 0.002, perceived by many as some sort of ceiling, isn't one at all.

The ceiling on Mintpal is 0.00157 and XC is right on it already.

I can't wait to see what tomorrow's news does to the price.

This coin reminds me of one stock that I buy few years ago ....long story short...it didn't move for 3 years despite good news. I hope that same will not happen here Wink

....I told you Cheesy

XC just broke its 3-month descending wedge and you think it's not going to go up?

While no-one can be certain what it'll do, both price action and fundamentals look pretty great.

Did you see Zach Chester's trading analysis on XC?

there is no volume momentum for that.... if it stays on this volume maybe and I say maybe in 2 weeks we will see the move ...if it doesn't move in next 2 weeks XC will drop to 90K satoshi - mark my words

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: oblox on September 18, 2014, 08:26:16 AM

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 08:14:29 AM

Quote from: Dungor on September 18, 2014, 08:03:03 AM

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

Quote

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

I don't agree.

Point 1- The article was written by a bitcoin Magazine employee, It is not paid PR, If the shills want to complain as they have been mentioned they should complain directly with who wrote the article not involving XC.

Point 2- It is in the right of who wrote the article to mention the coin that implement a semi-decentralized coinjoin supernode approach of anonimity to make the comparison since XC announced the Coin-join Killer with Final REV-2 release. The question is it is true or not? IT IS PERIOD. Dark-nodes ar semi centralized as it is a limit of coinjoin based implementations.

Point 3- Going against what the truth is will be counter productive for an establish magazine as this one in the Crypto world. I think they make their thoughts on what they wrote what do you think?

Now they can go cry back home with their reputation in the trash.

1. An article written from the content provided from Synechist, or as he put it, the "scoop".
2. Coin-join killah rah rah rah. I already made it a point to tackle this one, no need to do it again.
3. What truth? The article was derived entirely from Synechist. See point 1.

Face it, you guys brought it on yourselves for inaccurately describing DRK. Everything else made sense in terms of PR material but when there are inaccuracies, especially as it relates to competition, expect that competition to take note.

Functionality-wise, DRK works. That's more than I can say from XC when I used it (granted, back at 2.47h IIRC).

-XC did not bring to itself anything the article was written by a third party company not by XC Pr Team.. off course they used Synech Informations who else will they use informations from. When they write an article about dark where da fuck they take the info from? from the Pr Guy of flappy coin?

-2- where is your point? it is true period.

3- as 1 GOFUKING COMPLAIN WITH BITCOIN MAGAZINE ORGANIZE A PUBLIC PROTEST AGAINST BITCOIN MAGAZINE ARTICLE SO YOU WILL BE RIDICULED BY ALL CRYPTO COMMUNITY

PLEASE GO AHEAD AND DO IT NOW GET TFO OF THIS THREAD

CryptoChronic

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 08:25:32 AM

Quote from: CryptoChronic on September 18, 2014, 08:22:46 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 07:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

Same problem.... all 7 0f my fucking Mixer Transactions have taken coins from me.... Let me congratulate the XC team for fucking up yet again... First it was overhyping, then missing deadlines... Now You guys make a big fucking deal about this wallet release and get all the fucking publicity and hype over it just to release a broken fucking wallet that debits you for mixing some1 else transactions... You put out broken fucking tech and the market is reacting.... Back to 120.. And never touching this coin again

Calm down, if it's that big of a deal to you take your wallet offline until problem is fixed.

Ur missing the point.... This is a problem that will turn investors away, u cant fuck up like this when all eyes are on you.... surprise surprise XC team does it again

kobaya74

full member

Activity: 130

Merit: 100

Quote from: synechist on September 18, 2014, 07:37:34 AM

Quote from: ?!bennscammed!? on September 18, 2014, 07:33:06 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 07:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

No, its a known bug and Dan fixes this. Maybe your next mix will bring you back to green.

Your port is closed? So the opened Port isnt necessary anymore?
Can someone confirm this? I would feel better to close it.

My mixer's working fine without that port too.

I guess you can close it if you want then... I'm unaware of what the backend implications of doing this might be though.

If you're still getting -0.00001 fees, expect them to go away pretty soon.

I got negative payment again and I got open port. I got positive too, few posts back, so it is ok. Open port on p2p application should give you advantage over closed port in term other clients would rather negotiate with open port client, than with closed port client. Like when you are downloading torrent-it works with closed port, but you get more connections and better speed with open one. Crypto wallets work same way: if you run xnode on open port, you should get faster and more connections to network, thus this gives you better chance to be picked as node for transactions. I haven't even tried with closed port, didn't know it works. Even if it is working, it gives you a slight disadvantage.

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

Quote from: cryptico on September 18, 2014, 08:14:29 AM

Quote from: Dungor on September 18, 2014, 08:03:03 AM

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

Quote

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

I don't agree.

Point 1- The article was written by a bitcoin Magazine employee, It is not paid PR, If the shills want to complain as they have been mentioned they should complain directly with who wrote the article not involving XC.

Point 2- It is in the right of who wrote the article to mention the coin that implement a semi-decentralized coinjoin supernode approach of anonimity to make the comparison since XC announced the Coin-join Killer with Final REV-2 release. The question is it is true or not? IT IS PERIOD. Dark-nodes ar semi centralized as it is a limit of coinjoin based implementations.

Point 3- Going against what the truth is will be counter productive for an establish magazine as this one in the Crypto world. I think they make their thoughts on what they wrote what do you think?

Now they can go cry back home with their reputation in the trash.

1. An article written from the content provided from Synechist, or as he put it, the "scoop".
2. Coin-join killah rah rah rah. I already made it a point to tackle this one, no need to do it again.
3. What truth? The article was derived entirely from Synechist. See point 1.

Face it, you guys brought it on yourselves for inaccurately describing DRK. Everything else made sense in terms of PR material but when there are inaccuracies, especially as it relates to competition, expect that competition to take note.

Functionality-wise, DRK works. That's more than I can say from XC when I used it (granted, back at 2.47h IIRC).

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: CryptoChronic on September 18, 2014, 08:22:46 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 07:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

Same problem.... all 7 0f my fucking Mixer Transactions have taken coins from me.... Let me congratulate the XC team for fucking up yet again... First it was overhyping, then missing deadlines... Now You guys make a big fucking deal about this wallet release and get all the fucking publicity and hype over it just to release a broken fucking wallet that debits you for mixing some1 else transactions... You put out broken fucking tech and the market is reacting.... Back to 120.. And never touching this coin again

Calm down, if it's that big of a deal to you take your wallet offline until problem is fixed.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: synechist on September 17, 2014, 10:31:47 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 17, 2014, 09:19:31 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 17, 2014, 07:47:54 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 17, 2014, 04:15:08 AM

8
We're very grateful to Pratico for his generous funding of the following:

Paid PR on PRweb

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/09/prweb12173407.htm

I'm gonna keep a running tab of the more prominent effects of this release here:

http://bitcoinagile.com/B9090/xcurrencys-revolutionary-privacy-advancement-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-networking_stream

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/xcurrencys-revolutionary-privacy-advancement-trustless-070440783.html

Four more for the tally:

http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2014/09/17/666540/10098970/en/XCurrency-s-Revolutionary-Privacy-Advancement-Trustless-Ad-Hoc-Mesh-Networking.html

http://www.virtual-strategy.com/2014/09/17/xcurrencys-revolutionary-privacy-advancement-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-networking#axzz3DaEd8KKr

http://www.nbc26.tv/story/26552460/xcurrencys-revolutionary-privacy-advancement-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-networking

http://fundingsmes.co.uk/xcurrencys-revolutionary-privacy-advancement-trustless-ad-hoc/

A few more picks out of the vast pile of PRweb results:

Securities Technology Monitor

StreetInsider

Investingdaily.com

International Business Times

The Boston Globe

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: zetent on September 18, 2014, 08:02:49 AM

Seems I got 2 mixed transactions during the night, but no earned fee, just payed?

I'm using the RC6...

Same with me

CryptoChronic

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: sugarboy321 on September 18, 2014, 07:26:17 AM

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

Same problem.... all 7 0f my fucking Mixer Transactions have taken coins from me.... Let me congratulate the XC team for fucking up yet again... First it was overhyping, then missing deadlines... Now You guys make a big fucking deal about this wallet release and get all the fucking publicity and hype over it just to release a broken fucking wallet that debits you for mixing some1 else transactions... You put out broken fucking tech and the market is reacting.... Back to 120.. And never touching this coin again

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Dungor on September 18, 2014, 08:03:03 AM

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

Quote

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

I don't agree.

Point 1- The article was written by a bitcoin Magazine employee, It is not paid PR, If the shills want to complain as they have been mentioned they should complain directly with who wrote the article not involving XC.

Point 2- It is in the right of who wrote the article to mention the coin that implement a semi-decentralized coinjoin supernode approach of anonimity to make the comparison since XC announced the Coin-join Killer with Final REV-2 release. The question is it is true or not? IT IS PERIOD. Dark-nodes ar semi centralized as it is a limit of coinjoin based implementations.

Point 3- Going against what the truth is will be counter productive for an establish magazine as this one in the Crypto world. I think they make their thoughts on what they wrote what do you think?

Now they can go cry back home with their reputation in the trash.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: dida on September 18, 2014, 07:57:31 AM

Quote from: dida on September 15, 2014, 03:05:17 AM

Quote from: synechist on September 14, 2014, 06:58:40 PM

Quote from: tr8kr on September 14, 2014, 05:34:43 PM

We are testing a strong resistance builded from 4 july with many testing without breaking it.

https://cryptrader.com/c/wMHxewsn

If we break out this resitance tomorrow this is going to be another history.

Nice observation there.

It means that 0.002, perceived by many as some sort of ceiling, isn't one at all.

The ceiling on Mintpal is 0.00157 and XC is right on it already.

I can't wait to see what tomorrow's news does to the price.

This coin reminds me of one stock that I buy few years ago ....long story short...it didn't move for 3 years despite good news. I hope that same will not happen here Wink

....I told you Cheesy

XC just broke its 3-month descending wedge and you think it's not going to go up?

While no-one can be certain what it'll do, both price action and fundamentals look pretty great.

Did you see Zach Chester's trading analysis on XC?

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

Again, just like a female can be semi-pregnant. That's the analogy to this whole semi-centralized aspect. You either are or are not. There is no middle ground.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 328. (Read 1484189 times)