Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 471. (Read 1484191 times)

hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
and I'm not just picking on XC fwiw

I don't see why it always has to be the open source model - at the moment
it's important to build trust and confidence but ultimately there might be other models. If e.g. the XC infrastructure/code were bought
out by e.g. apple, for sure future developments would no longer be open source.
(Of course we'd all have to rely on the goodness of apple to preserve the trustless principle but that's a different question.)

And anyway first mover advantage is everything - delayed open source still keeps XC ahead of the pack.

Dude, you think the general public gives 2 shits about if something is open sourced or not? I will use the KFC analogy again, people dont care as long as its yummy... same with cryptos, they wont care as long as it "works" and is as easy as possible with all the features they want. Simple as that.
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 537
....I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?


What, you impatient? Say it isn't so.  ahahah   Grin



...I do not want to set s shit-storm just asking for few updates



Any News on what will be the reward for XC Holders with the Qibuck agreement? Are the XC daily Updates Over? Any Updates on Rev2.5?

Thank you


Im getting nervous


Announcement? not 2359PM Us time please


...also but the waiting is killing me we had no updates anymore for rev2.5 since very long and the undisclosed privacy feature is still disclosed


When we will know a bit more about Rev 2.5??

Has been how long two months since the Rev2 revision? It is nearly September... I thought It was going to be ready by now.. frustration grows...


How is going with the GUI for Rev 2.5 Teka can you give us a little preview Smiley Smiley
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Quote
I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?


Look at Monero.  They don't even have an official wallet yet.  And their website hasn't been updated in 2 months.  

And yet this very coin is traded at a higher price than XC... tell me how that works ?

the bitcoin dark and librex pump got me depressed a lot today....
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Quote
I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?


Look at Monero.  They don't even have an official wallet yet.  And their website hasn't been updated in 2 months.  

And yet this very coin is traded at a higher price than XC... tell me how that works ?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
and I'm not just picking on XC fwiw

I don't see why it always has to be the open source model - at the moment
it's important to build trust and confidence but ultimately there might be other models. If e.g. the XC infrastructure/code were bought
out by e.g. apple, for sure future developments would no longer be open source.
(Of course we'd all have to rely on the goodness of apple to preserve the trustless principle but that's a different question.)

And anyway first mover advantage is everything - delayed open source still keeps XC ahead of the pack.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501

From the article - "With development led by Boston based Dan Metcalk, XCurrency is still technically a DAC."

Where did he get the idea that XC is a DAC?  As far as I knew, there isn't anything contained within XC that would qualifies anything of that nature at this time.  Is he confusing XC with the recent BTSX excitement or is there a veiled hint in there?

Web 3.0

Finally the outside world is catching up on the fact of XC being a company instead of "just a coin" And those XC "coins" you are holding? well those are stock. I've been saying this for months.
I wouldn't be surprised if some bigshot company swoops down and says "listen Dan, we want to buy ALL of your tech, the messaging, your web 3.0 EVERYTHING" Well when that happens, any XC holder will have a very big grin on their face. If you hold 1k+ XC and such a takeover is even suggested you won't need to work another day in your life again. I am not saying that XC will ever be sold, but take it from me there will be huge interest.

It won't be tomorrow, but the fundamentals are being laid out further every day. Just hold on to your "coins" and don't ever make the mistake of selling them because you are impatient.

The trick to being succesful in this crazy crypto world is to invest in platforms that offer real world applicability, not just in "crypto currencies". Crypto won't be going away, you can count on that. But in the end only a couple of currencies will prevail, which are being used in infrastructures or platforms. These platforms have to offer something that people either need or want, with XC it's privacy and that's something that, in the light of current and future world affairs, everybody needs and wants. That gives intrinsic value to the XC platform, regardless of current unit price or market cap.

Except everything is delayed opensource?  So to call it a company is to say it's a company that owns nothing (except whatever code has been written since last time it was opensourced)

Huh

This "Open Source Coins = DAC" make no sense


In a way think of it as a trade secret. Ask KFC for the recipe for the breading on the chicken and I bet you will be laughed out of the office. XC is the same way, but it IS open sourced, just on a delay ... that way when the next 100 clones come out they use tech that is old.
legendary
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009
Quote
I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?

For whatever it's worth - from what I can tell XC is moving much faster than other coins.  There are coins that have features XC doesn't have and so they run out and try to grab it (include advertising and call it a touring "platform"), anon chat, etc.

Look at Monero.  They don't even have an official wallet yet.  And their website hasn't been updated in 2 months.  
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Dev Team I admire all of you but with the speed of the new tech releases nowadays in the crypto world we will need to move our ass a bit faster with the releases, updates, and start to deliver our features much faster. I don't know if Dan is working on is own or not he is not posting here since very long time and I would like to know where we are at the moment and what we can expect for the next upcoming future. Rev 2.5 was expected at the beginning a while ago... I am excited by where the XC project is headed but I see other coins delivering decentralised Markets, first android staking wallets bitshares...etc

I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?
legendary
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009
and I'm not just picking on XC fwiw
legendary
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009

From the article - "With development led by Boston based Dan Metcalk, XCurrency is still technically a DAC."

Where did he get the idea that XC is a DAC?  As far as I knew, there isn't anything contained within XC that would qualifies anything of that nature at this time.  Is he confusing XC with the recent BTSX excitement or is there a veiled hint in there?

Web 3.0

Finally the outside world is catching up on the fact of XC being a company instead of "just a coin" And those XC "coins" you are holding? well those are stock. I've been saying this for months.
I wouldn't be surprised if some bigshot company swoops down and says "listen Dan, we want to buy ALL of your tech, the messaging, your web 3.0 EVERYTHING" Well when that happens, any XC holder will have a very big grin on their face. If you hold 1k+ XC and such a takeover is even suggested you won't need to work another day in your life again. I am not saying that XC will ever be sold, but take it from me there will be huge interest.

It won't be tomorrow, but the fundamentals are being laid out further every day. Just hold on to your "coins" and don't ever make the mistake of selling them because you are impatient.

The trick to being succesful in this crazy crypto world is to invest in platforms that offer real world applicability, not just in "crypto currencies". Crypto won't be going away, you can count on that. But in the end only a couple of currencies will prevail, which are being used in infrastructures or platforms. These platforms have to offer something that people either need or want, with XC it's privacy and that's something that, in the light of current and future world affairs, everybody needs and wants. That gives intrinsic value to the XC platform, regardless of current unit price or market cap.

Except everything is delayed opensource?  So to call it a company is to say it's a company that owns nothing (except whatever code has been written since last time it was opensourced)

Huh

This "Open Source Coins = DAC" make no sense
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

doing a technical analysis on that small datasets and markets that have a low marketcap is nonesense and won't provide any future predictions you should count on. Nearly all crypto markets are manipulated as only a small amount of BTC/LTC is needed to create a sudden price increase.

It has the same amount of information as the "richlist"

Not sure I agree. Manipulated or not, if TA was completely invalid you wouldn't see the same patterns in crypto as normal stocks, but
if anything the TA patterns are more precisely followed - e.g. the accuracy of resistance and support lines is often
amazing including for XC. On the other hand you can ask if TA "predictions" in general aren't just confirmation bias and there I might have to agree - if you go
on tradingview you get as many conflicting predictions of future btc/usd movements as there are assholes - (i.e. a lot). But  
anyway I'll throw my hat in the ring and say that TA's indicating a movement (probably up) before the 11th.  EDIT: by the way I'm sure we
can revisit these pages on the 12th and see how we did.  
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250

doing a technical analysis on that small datasets and markets that have a low marketcap is nonesense and won't provide any future predictions you should count on. Nearly all crypto markets are manipulated as only a small amount of BTC/LTC is needed to create a sudden price increase.

It has the same amount of information as the "richlist"
legendary
Activity: 971
Merit: 1000
So what's the status on the Multipool?

The MP is being worked on and we will have some more news soon.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Btw am I the only one seeing the XC logarithmic chart on mintpal as a giant falling wedge that will reach it's target between 1st and 9th of September?

Relax. You are not alone Smiley  

What does that mean?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Jump to: