Interesting comments in there about how this is a bad move. Anyone here have a good argument against them?
What comments do you find interesting?
All I see are people talking about some drama that broke out between Moolah's CEO and Dogecoin's founder in /r/dogecoin.
Seeing as how this drama is unrelated to Moolah and its ability to manage and operate Mintpal, I don't see that they have much of a point.
Moolah is no different than any altcoin in this space - they are constantly bombarded with FUD and nonsense detractions.
And that's all that is - FUD.
I don't see how this can be so quickly regarded as a bad move.
The only bad move for everyone in the crypto space would have been to do nothing with Mintpal.
The hack at Mintpal really shocked this space.
New ownership/oversight of Mintpal is the best possible outcome.
I can understand that people might be skeptical that Moolah is the best fit for the takeover. But to say that this was a bad move is to imply that there would have been a better move. What is that better move? I can't think of one. No one trusts anyone in this space right now.
Let's see what Moolah can do. I know that Moolah's CEO has invested his personal finances in this acquisition so he is going to be very motivated to make Mintpal and Moolah the best it can be.
Thanks, that's along the lines of what I was wanting to hear. I wasn't aware of the FUD campaign against Moolah. Hopefully this is a great move!