To non technical people just comparing the two coins, Dark may seem good enough. And what additionally worries me in a way is that many people thought OS' like Windows would eventually fall away as they were so problematic (e.g. Blue Screen of Death) but money was put into marketing. I was a DBA for Sybase in the 90's and I found it superior (at the time) and easier to use than Oracle. This was both functionally and technically (e.g. File systems on oracle and no raw partitions at the time), yet Oracle slammed Sybase with an inferior product.
The best doesn't win and since market cap / price might be the big attractor (LTC excluded lol), we should be careful with Monero in not "hedging" our bets regarding getting the word out on podcasts and such.
I'm not sure if the huge rise today in DRK is just inside buying but the volume on Poloniex has just shifted from XMR to DRK, so it makes one wonder.
You worry too much, look at Bitcoin, its miles away of any altcoin, yet facing growing technical problems like the apparent lack of fungibility and privacy, no scam will get to come near Bitcoin. Monero may.
see paycoin, aurora, etc...
The only other coin that can compete with Monero is another cryptonote coin, and it has to be better and gather larger confidence and support.
Zerocoin/Zerocash doesn't exist and looks like will never make a viable cryptocurrency, crypto is not vhs/beta, its not an operational system and not a new Internet, its layers of financial software, and people in the end will use the best, with their best interest in mind.
Not sure why you equate preparation/planning with worrying? I'm more in a creative helpful mode. If you equate inaction with contentedness, I would say it depends on many factors. Likewise, suggestions and worry are not really connected in general. Perhaps some caring, sure.
My basic perspective is that we probably would benefit from a well rounded approach to getting Monero out there. I don't see strong disagreement to that idea.
Now, you can argue that one approach is accumulation, and those early adopters then reinvest - That is fine, was mentioned before and I don't disagree for sure.
You can argue to let it come in time, that is fine as long as it works, but that is an unknown. Sitting idly in a fast moving market is probably not the best strategy.
I don't want to pay per say for spots on podcasts and such, but it would be interesting to see the point spoken about. If we have podcasts talking about anonymous Cryptos, we should be in the discussion for many obvious reasons. Anyway, I think we should be open here and not decide to hastily. We are talking about the future of Cryptos to a point.
I'm not really familiar with Zero cash, but it certainly sounds interesting. If a few BTC whales get behind anything though, look out. This small market can be easily moved.