[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1103.

pa

hero member

Activity: 528

Merit: 501

Quote from: tacotime on March 02, 2015, 01:30:40 PM

We're mainly interested in an improvement in overall complexity, and both schemes here are O(n). There is a sublinear ring signature paper that in O(log n) in size that we're looking at more closely.

Good to see your name in this thread, TT. Monero is in good hands.

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

We're mainly interested in an improvement in overall complexity, and both schemes here are O(n). There is a sublinear ring signature paper that in O(log n) in size that we're looking at more closely.

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Fritwakky on March 02, 2015, 06:08:33 AM

price growing fast, what's new?

Whales shaking weak hands out is over it looks like. For now at least.

Quote from: opennux on March 02, 2015, 08:28:08 AM

Thanks for taking the suggestion in a positive manner.

This is one great thing about this coin, The Devs don't fly off the handle and deal with things in a very professional manner.

Quote from: dreamspark on March 02, 2015, 12:14:14 PM

Quote from: uvt9 on March 02, 2015, 12:10:10 PM

that was a pretty big drop in price. Is there any reason or just someone dumping ?

https://vid.me/ima7

Fuck, Knew that Mintpal release was fucked up timing.

dreamspark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: uvt9 on March 02, 2015, 12:10:10 PM

that was a pretty big drop in price. Is there any reason or just someone dumping ?

https://vid.me/ima7

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

that was a pretty big drop in price. Is there any reason or just someone dumping ?

dEBRUYNE

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1141

Quote from: drawingthesun on March 02, 2015, 09:24:56 AM

Quote from: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 05:34:02 AM

Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

ring signature efficiency
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10619684

is worth sharing here.

To make a long story short Adam Back is speculating on how reducing ring signature used in cryptonote:

Quote from: adam3us on March 01, 2015, 08:19:30 AM

This alternate linkable ring signature tends to 1/2 the size of the crypto note ring signature as the signature is 3+n values vs 2+2n values.

I haven't the skill to validate his claims but I thought than monero devs would be interested in such a claim.

What are the implications of this? Could we use this research to make Monero more efficient?

Quoting smooth to give you some answers:

Quote from: smooth on March 01, 2015, 05:29:54 PM

Yes it could be incorporated but its not something to jump into, especially given the modest gain. Any cryptographic scheme, even small modifications to one, needs a lot of peer review and scrutiny before being ready for adoption.

Now by contrast something that made ring signatures fixed (modest) size, that would be quite something. You still wouldn't want to rush into it, but studying it and carefully reviewing it would be a matter of more urgency.

Quote from: wpalczynski on March 01, 2015, 05:24:34 PM

Is this something that could be implemented in XMR and would it be beneficial overall (due to smaller rings being larger)?

Quote from: smooth on March 01, 2015, 05:18:23 PM

Quote from: pa on March 01, 2015, 12:13:55 PM

Anyone have a tl;dr for Adam Back's post on ring-signatures: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10619684

He came up with a way to make cryptonote ring signatures about half the size (for larger rings; for smaller rings it is larger) and twice as fast to verify.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 05:34:02 AM

Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

ring signature efficiency
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10619684

is worth sharing here.

To make a long story short Adam Back is speculating on how reducing ring signature used in cryptonote:

Quote from: adam3us on March 01, 2015, 08:19:30 AM

This alternate linkable ring signature tends to 1/2 the size of the crypto note ring signature as the signature is 3+n values vs 2+2n values.

I haven't the skill to validate his claims but I thought than monero devs would be interested in such a claim.

What are the implications of this? Could we use this research to make Monero more efficient?

Quicken

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Hello,
I went to run Lightwallet today, and it can't get a connection with the default daemon ip.

It seems coolmining club has closed:
http://monero.coolmining.club/

Quote

This pool is closed, not enough miners who are dumb enough to concentrate hashrate on 2 or 3 big pools.
Too stupid and too bad.
I would like to thank all the miners who supported this pool so far, i can count them on my left hand

UPDATE: I switched over to localhost in the config file, and fired up bitmonerod, and it has synced up fine now.

wpalczynski

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Nice to see some new names contributing to the discussion.

opennux

full member

Activity: 231

Merit: 100

Quote from: David Latapie on March 02, 2015, 06:27:15 AM

Quote from: opennux on March 01, 2015, 08:43:39 PM

Quote from: David Latapie on March 01, 2015, 08:22:28 PM

Quote from: fluffypony on March 01, 2015, 07:11:40 PM

Quote from: pandher on March 01, 2015, 05:31:55 PM

Quote from: David Latapie on March 01, 2015, 05:00:51 PM

I uploaded my presentation at Coinfest Estonia on the official forum: https://forum.getmonero.org/14/events/188/coinfest-estonia-2015. The video is not available yet.

Feel free to use is for advocacy (temporary direct link to the PDF)

The presentation was beautiful, waiting for the video

Thanks - that was two days of my life spent making that damn presentation:-P

Two days, that much? I thought it was only one day, you have been discreet to me, Ric

For information, my original presentation with Google Slides. You can judge the difference.

You could make the moneroeconomy.com website look like the presentation-design. It looks very nice. I might be able to help, depending.

Good idea! I'll check with Lyt0s if it is doable. We have a test website for just this. By the way, did you notice we changed the design recently (not much, mostly font-size, fonct-color and background)? http://moneroeconomy.com/forum/appearance-requests

I suppose install a theme with the ability to tweak it to look somewhat like that is a way to go. I am also fond of the sleek mymonero design. A mix of those could be cool. They a both fresh. The current design is a bit ehem.. archaic and heavy and lacks basic spiffy things such as favicons, vector-logo (for retina screens), decent cropping of images etc. (I apologise for being upfront, but that has been the community sentiment)

Thanks for taking the suggestion in a positive manner.

David Latapie

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 503

Monero Core Team

Quote from: opennux on March 01, 2015, 08:43:39 PM

Quote from: David Latapie on March 01, 2015, 08:22:28 PM

Quote from: fluffypony on March 01, 2015, 07:11:40 PM

Quote from: pandher on March 01, 2015, 05:31:55 PM

Quote from: David Latapie on March 01, 2015, 05:00:51 PM

I uploaded my presentation at Coinfest Estonia on the official forum: https://forum.getmonero.org/14/events/188/coinfest-estonia-2015. The video is not available yet.

Feel free to use is for advocacy (temporary direct link to the PDF)

The presentation was beautiful, waiting for the video

Thanks - that was two days of my life spent making that damn presentation:-P

Two days, that much? I thought it was only one day, you have been discreet to me, Ric

For information, my original presentation with Google Slides. You can judge the difference.

You could make the moneroeconomy.com website look like the presentation-design. It looks very nice. I might be able to help, depending.

Good idea! I'll check with Lyt0s if it is doable. We have a test website for just this. By the way, did you notice we changed the design recently (not much, mostly font-size, fonct-color and background)? http://moneroeconomy.com/forum/appearance-requests

sickpig

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Quote from: smooth on March 02, 2015, 05:54:17 AM

Not noise at all. Please continue to post anything relevant.

I will

Fritwakky

full member

Activity: 375

Merit: 101

price growing fast, what's new?

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 05:51:41 AM

Quote from: smooth on March 02, 2015, 05:41:39 AM

Quote from: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 05:34:02 AM

Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

Yes it was discussed here a few pages back, and our researchers are examining it.

sorry for the noise then.

Not noise at all. Please continue to post anything relevant.

Quote

and keep up the good work!

Thank you!

Quote

edit: feel free to delete my post if you wish

Not a moderated thread; only you can delete it. Not necessary though.

sickpig

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Quote from: smooth on March 02, 2015, 05:41:39 AM

Quote from: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 05:34:02 AM

Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

Yes it was discussed here a few pages back, and our researchers are examining it.

sorry for the noise then.

and keep up the good work!

edit: feel free to delete my post if you wish

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 05:34:02 AM

Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

Yes it was discussed here a few pages back, and our researchers are examining it.

sickpig

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Don't know if someone already find it, but it seems to me that this thread

ring signature efficiency
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10619684

is worth sharing here.

To make a long story short Adam Back is speculating on how reducing ring signature used in cryptonote:

Quote from: adam3us on March 01, 2015, 08:19:30 AM

This alternate linkable ring signature tends to 1/2 the size of the crypto note ring signature as the signature is 3+n values vs 2+2n values.

I haven't the skill to validate his claims but I thought than monero devs would be interested in such a claim.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: osensei on March 01, 2015, 10:53:28 PM

Hi there!

Today I came across blocks 457254 up to 457258 which seem pretty odd to me. They all contain many transactions with fees of 0.1 XMR for small size transactions, this one http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/457255 , for example, has 23 transactions with a fee of 0.1 XMR plus a couple of normal transactions, totaling ~2.34 XMR in fees for the block.

Any thoughts about it?

I can explain the 0.1 XMR fee easily enough. That is what happens if you haven't upgraded your wallet to the version with per-KB fees. As you saw, on small transactions, you will significantly overpay.

I can't explain why someone would generate so many transactions like that.

osensei

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

https://monerohash.com

Hi there!

Today I came across blocks 457254 up to 457258 which seem pretty odd to me. They all contain many transactions with fees of 0.1 XMR for small size transactions, this one http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/457255 , for example, has 23 transactions with a fee of 0.1 XMR plus a couple of normal transactions, totaling ~2.34 XMR in fees for the block.

Any thoughts about it?

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote

This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked Firefox to connect securely to xmrmonero.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.

Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.

If you understand what's going on, you can tell Firefox to start trusting this site's identification. Even if you trust the site, this error could mean that someone is tampering with your connection.

Don't add an exception unless you know there's a good reason why this site doesn't use trusted identification.

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1103. (Read 4670673 times)