Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1302. (Read 4670643 times)

legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
personally, I think BTC x100 is less likely than XMR x100, but that is just me speculating off course Wink

Yep, that's a very good point. However, if BTC continues the current trend, XMR x100 will mean "only" 75x profit... :-/





On another note, did I miss a missive, or it didn't come at all? (Shouldn't they be every week?)
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
Does anyone here think monero could explode 100 times, during the next bitcoin bubble?


That depends on the bubble. For now, monero seems to be for the geeks only. I don't see the average user install it manually and operating it from a command line. That does not stop the public from trading it, of course.

Before the next btc bubble Monero will be usable by my fellow drooling masses.

Is btc going to explode 100x?  lol Grin  This May I heard btc was going to be 5k in July.

I've given up dreams of being rich.  My dinner tonight is a peanut butter and jam sandwich.  Though it will contain fine French raspberry jam. Smiley

personally, I think BTC x100 is less likely than XMR x100, but that is just me speculating off course Wink
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Nothing (I'll type it again: NOTHING) is anonymous if it happens online. There are allegedly anonymous solutions like Tor or secure VPNs, but if somebody wants to find you (provided he has the resources) he will do so. A word for XMR. Do not post your addresses online, for this is the only address you have. I've seen many people doing so; dood if you don't mind revealing your address, what's the point of using XMR anyway?

This is small misunderstanding. Monero addresses are safe to post online, list in a public directory etc. They don't appear on the blockchain, and the only thing you can do with an address is send coins to it. You can't identify transactions that were sent to the address.

Of course, nothing is ever quite 100%, it is possible there may be bugs or flaws. However, that is the intent of the design.


If you buy your XMR on a centralized exchange, though, and the exchange keeps records of your withdrawals to that address, it could be linked back to your personal information if the exchange's records are ever disclosed.

Even though somebody else knows that you own that address, they cannot see what is inside that address. You can send money from that address to another address. That would make it unlinkable.

Yes that is correct. I think what he meant was something like: If you have your public address on your web site (along with your name) and use that same address for an (otherwise anonymous) exchange, then the exchange account can then be linked to you, not through the blockchain, but through the exchange's own records of your address matching the address on your website.

Then that's not the protocol's fault but that of the laziness of the user
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Nothing (I'll type it again: NOTHING) is anonymous if it happens online. There are allegedly anonymous solutions like Tor or secure VPNs, but if somebody wants to find you (provided he has the resources) he will do so. A word for XMR. Do not post your addresses online, for this is the only address you have. I've seen many people doing so; dood if you don't mind revealing your address, what's the point of using XMR anyway?

This is small misunderstanding. Monero addresses are safe to post online, list in a public directory etc. They don't appear on the blockchain, and the only thing you can do with an address is send coins to it. You can't identify transactions that were sent to the address.

Of course, nothing is ever quite 100%, it is possible there may be bugs or flaws. However, that is the intent of the design.


If you buy your XMR on a centralized exchange, though, and the exchange keeps records of your withdrawals to that address, it could be linked back to your personal information if the exchange's records are ever disclosed.

Even though somebody else knows that you own that address, they cannot see what is inside that address. You can send money from that address to another address. That would make it unlinkable.

Yes that is correct. I think what he meant was something like: If you have your public address on your web site (along with your name) and use that same address for an (otherwise anonymous) exchange, then the exchange account can then be linked to you, not through the blockchain, but through the exchange's own records of your address matching the address on your website.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Nothing (I'll type it again: NOTHING) is anonymous if it happens online. There are allegedly anonymous solutions like Tor or secure VPNs, but if somebody wants to find you (provided he has the resources) he will do so. A word for XMR. Do not post your addresses online, for this is the only address you have. I've seen many people doing so; dood if you don't mind revealing your address, what's the point of using XMR anyway?

This is small misunderstanding. Monero addresses are safe to post online, list in a public directory etc. They don't appear on the blockchain, and the only thing you can do with an address is send coins to it. You can't identify transactions that were sent to the address.

Of course, nothing is ever quite 100%, it is possible there may be bugs or flaws. However, that is the intent of the design.


If you buy your XMR on a centralized exchange, though, and the exchange keeps records of your withdrawals to that address, it could be linked back to your personal information if the exchange's records are ever disclosed.

Even though somebody else knows that you own that address, they cannot see what is inside that address. You can send money from that address to another address. That would make it unlinkable.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
always test things out with small amounts until you get the hang of it.

 i am waiting for new wallet
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Another thought: Would it be possible to implement side chains with Monero technology?
It is possible to extend Monero to include the facilities necessary for side chains.

And the big difference with Bitcoin is that Monero is anonymous by default.


Smiley

Maybe a stupid question, but: Could side chains be used to mitigate scaling issues with a bloating block chain?

Not a stupid question. It is possible and it is something we've discussed. There are a number of ways this could work, but here is one to think about: You could have multiple side chains just like the original except each with only a fraction of the transactions. In fact it is possible to imagine an almost arbitrary number of these. Some complications arise, but nothing that seems totally infeasible.

Interesting, huh?


Yes, that sounds extremely important for mass adaption!

With side chains you could create temporary sub chains to store (millions of) transactions without bloating the main chain. Imagine you are a credit card company, you could create a side chain for your business operations on a monthly basis. At the beginning of the month, you create a sub chain, run your (mass) business on that one, and at the end of the month, you simply merge it (its current state) back into the main chain to start all over with the same procedure the next month.

For Monero, that would be a 'HELLO WORLD' event.


ADD: https://coinreport.net/tree-chains-vs-side-chains-controversy-explained

ADD2: Regarding treechains, distributed (over the internet) hash tables might be useful as well...

full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 125
Hello, and welcome to our sixteenth Monero Monday Missive!

Major Updates

1. We have made major strides in the initial database implementation (you'll recall from our last Missive that our first implementation will use LMDB), and it is very nearly ready for broader testing. Specifically: the new blockchain is working for most things, but there are bugs with certain aspects of block verification that need to be fixed before it can be more widely tested. If you are particularly intrepid you can already grab it here: https://github.com/tewinget/bitmonero/tree/blockchain and compile it, and thus assist in identifying areas where it breaks down, although such reports are probably best submitted as github issues to tewinget's repository to reduce duplication. Once these and any other major issues have been weeded out the next steps would involve a bit of refactoring, fix cross-platform nigglies, and open it up for general testing.

...SKIPPED...

PS. this Missive has the very great honour of being the first one to be finalised and very nearly posted from the airWink

- updated by fluffypony

May be late, but I give thanks to Monero devs that they keep new weekly schedule of Monero missive intact. I consider word 'missive' as your 'mission', dear devs! Smiley

Sorry I have no time right now to comment the Missive in depth. But I am very optimistic about ongoing progress and about you devs have selected LMDB to be the first Monero's underlying database.

Keep your progress! I am with you by soul!

P.S. Very nice photo from air, fluffypony! Wink
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Another thought: Would it be possible to implement side chains with Monero technology?
It is possible to extend Monero to include the facilities necessary for side chains.

And the big difference with Bitcoin is that Monero is anonymous by default.


Smiley

Maybe a stupid question, but: Could side chains be used to mitigate scaling issues with a bloating block chain?

Not a stupid question. It is possible and it is something we've discussed. There are a number of ways this could work, but here is one to think about: You could have multiple side chains just like the original except each with only a fraction of the transactions. In fact it is possible to imagine an almost arbitrary number of these. Some complications arise, but nothing that seems totally infeasible.

Interesting, huh?

full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Another thought: Would it be possible to implement side chains with Monero technology?
It is possible to extend Monero to include the facilities necessary for side chains.

And the big difference with Bitcoin is that Monero is anonymous by default.


Smiley

Maybe a stupid question, but: Could side chains be used to mitigate scaling issues with a bloating block chain?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1131
Another thought: Would it be possible to implement side chains with Monero technology?
It is possible to extend Monero to include the facilities necessary for side chains.

And the big difference with Bitcoin is that Monero is anonymous by default.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Another thought: Would it be possible to implement side chains with Monero technology?

It is possible to extend Monero to include the facilities necessary for side chains.

full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Another thought: Would it be possible to implement side chains with Monero technology?
full member
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Have a look here:

Darkcoin gets a free promotion at ibtimes.co.uk.. however, in the comments below the article Monero is mentioned (and bashed).

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/darkcoin-perfect-e-cash-cryptocurrency-emerging-dark-web-trump-bitcoin-1472144

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Nothing (I'll type it again: NOTHING) is anonymous if it happens online. There are allegedly anonymous solutions like Tor or secure VPNs, but if somebody wants to find you (provided he has the resources) he will do so. A word for XMR. Do not post your addresses online, for this is the only address you have. I've seen many people doing so; dood if you don't mind revealing your address, what's the point of using XMR anyway?

This is small misunderstanding. Monero addresses are safe to post online, list in a public directory etc. They don't appear on the blockchain, and the only thing you can do with an address is send coins to it. You can't identify transactions that were sent to the address.

Of course, nothing is ever quite 100%, it is possible there may be bugs or flaws. However, that is the intent of the design.


If you buy your XMR on a centralized exchange, though, and the exchange keeps records of your withdrawals to that address, it could be linked back to your personal information if the exchange's records are ever disclosed.

There are two cases here:

1. The exchange (or other party) knows your identity. In this case it doesn't matter if you use an address that publicly identifies you, as the exchange records include your identity already.

2. The exchange records do not include your identity and you don't want the exchange or anyone with access to the exchange's records to find out your identity. In this case, yes, you should not use the same address is associated with you (either publicly or in the records of some other party whose records might also become available).

I suspect that #2 in the case of centralized exchanges will become increasingly rare and perhaps non-existant, but is worth keeping in mind. And it is definitely valid for other non-exchange parties you may deal with.


legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1085
Money often costs too much.
Does anyone here think monero could explode 100 times, during the next bitcoin bubble?
No, due to lack of a next Bitcoin bubble.
Face it, Bitcoin is Altcoin Pump in slow motion, currently on the decline. Joe Average no more mines BTC, nor buys them to the moon.

I've given up dreams of being rich.  My dinner tonight is a peanut butter and jam sandwich.  Though it will contain fine French raspberry jam. Smiley
Not richt, but not fat either! ♪ ♪♩ ♩♩♬ Always look on the bright side of live ♬♪ ♪♩♩♩
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
When Republicans take over the Senate, we may be in for austerity as painful as a heroin addict experiences in withdrawal (complete with dead babies crawling on the ceiling nightmare hallucinations, etc.)

Because Republicans have a great track record of fiscal responsibility? I think not. (More) divided government may have that effect though.

There is more than one kind of Republican; the party is a three-legged stool.

The pro-business types are traditionally equated with fiscal conservatives, but have been deeply corrupted by crony capitalism despite most small enterprise owners still being honest.

The social conservatives are usually financially responsible unless they want to go to war against the enemies of Jesus, but they've Had Enough neocon foreign adventures for a while.  Having Johnny Biblethumper come home in a coffin with nothing to show for his sacrifice tends to do that.

The libertarians are by definition rock-ribbed beast-starvers; that wing of the party is now ascendent thanks to Ron/Rand Paul and their TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party.

Given the disaster of Krugman's Obomanomics, many non-partisan voters now wish Romney and Ryan had been in charge for the last couple of years.

So we can hope for and reasonably expect the new Senate to reign in the crazy ZIRP/NIRP QE-Nth debt-monetization plunge-protection-team money printing crowd.

That (relative) austerity will tamp down the irrational exuberance of the stock market, and we may see money flowing back into hard assets like gold, BTC, and XMR.

1000% agree with your political assessment.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
When Republicans take over the Senate, we may be in for austerity as painful as a heroin addict experiences in withdrawal (complete with dead babies crawling on the ceiling nightmare hallucinations, etc.)

Because Republicans have a great track record of fiscal responsibility? I think not. (More) divided government may have that effect though.

There is more than one kind of Republican; the party is a three-legged stool.

The pro-business types are traditionally equated with fiscal conservatives, but have been deeply corrupted by crony capitalism despite most small enterprise owners still being honest.

The social conservatives are usually financially responsible unless they want to go to war against the enemies of Jesus, but they've Had Enough neocon foreign adventures for a while.  Having Johnny Biblethumper come home in a coffin with nothing to show for his sacrifice tends to do that.

The libertarians are by definition rock-ribbed beast-starvers; that wing of the party is now ascendent thanks to Ron/Rand Paul and their TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party.

Given the disaster of Krugman's Obomanomics, many non-partisan voters now wish Romney and Ryan had been in charge for the last couple of years.

So we can hope for and reasonably expect the new Senate to reign in the crazy ZIRP/NIRP QE-Nth debt-monetization plunge-protection-team money printing crowd.

That (relative) austerity will tamp down the irrational exuberance of the stock market, and we may see money flowing back into hard assets like gold, BTC, and XMR.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 250
Nothing (I'll type it again: NOTHING) is anonymous if it happens online. There are allegedly anonymous solutions like Tor or secure VPNs, but if somebody wants to find you (provided he has the resources) he will do so. A word for XMR. Do not post your addresses online, for this is the only address you have. I've seen many people doing so; dood if you don't mind revealing your address, what's the point of using XMR anyway?

This is small misunderstanding. Monero addresses are safe to post online, list in a public directory etc. They don't appear on the blockchain, and the only thing you can do with an address is send coins to it. You can't identify transactions that were sent to the address.

Of course, nothing is ever quite 100%, it is possible there may be bugs or flaws. However, that is the intent of the design.


If you buy your XMR on a centralized exchange, though, and the exchange keeps records of your withdrawals to that address, it could be linked back to your personal information if the exchange's records are ever disclosed.


that's why we need an anonymous escrow service in the image of localbitcoins Wink
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
When Republicans take over the Senate, we may be in for austerity as painful as a heroin addict experiences in withdrawal (complete with dead babies crawling on the ceiling nightmare hallucinations, etc.)

Because Republicans have a great track record of fiscal responsibility? I think not. (More) divided government may have that effect though.

I missed you iCEBREAKER. Your posts are always thoughtful and stimulating.



I agree ... obama's bailouts were just a continuation of what Bush started.  

But this administration is beyond the pale.  I get frowned at because I hate both parties for good reason.  But I've never seen something so beyond any sense of practicality.  If something "shouldn't be that way" then it isn't.  Political correctness has made facts or situations outright denied.  From Healthcare Reform, to the handling of Ebola, to Bengahzi.

The amount of money being spent that we don't have on problems that we just don't want to exist and we can't practically fix but tell ourselves we can because is mind boggling.  People need to start looking at money as a form of energy or life.  In my lifetime I'll spend 1/3 of it earning a wage.  The government takes over 1/3 of that - so about 1/9th of my life is the governments.  That means they kill off one in nine people for taxes.  They should operate in that reality.

I don't have a problem with socialism, democracy, republic, libertarianism or anarchy.  If handled in a practical manner with some ethics any of those governments have worked during different periods of history.  But the current administration and political leaning of the US is so out of touch with anything remotely resembling reality ...
Jump to: