Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1462. (Read 4670972 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
As your blockchain is already past the fork, you can go back to the old version (that you said worked fine).
OK, If i use old version of binary... but what about transactions 0.1 XMR?
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Quote
Here is the previous version: http://monero.cc/downloads/monero.win.x64.20140824.zip
Feel free to use it, you have no reason or obligation to stay on the latest version right now.
I didn't understand why i have to use the previous version of binary?
fluffypony, please explain me this!  Roll Eyes

Well, you said the previous version worked fine for you. The new version makes sure that your blockchain is synced up to the right fork. As your blockchain is already past the fork, you can go back to the old version (that you said worked fine).

If you still have problems then it is an issue with your machine/Windows install. Have you got another machine you can try it on?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Quote
Here is the previous version: http://monero.cc/downloads/monero.win.x64.20140824.zip
Feel free to use it, you have no reason or obligation to stay on the latest version right now.
I didn't understand why i have to use the previous version of binary?
fluffypony, please explain me this!  Roll Eyes
donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
  We have problems...
  & i have problem with XMR too!  Angry

2014-Sep-08 14:26:29.917842 [P2P7][176.227.205.210:28080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 208402 -> 208793 [391 blocks (0 days) behind]

You're WAY WAY WAY past the fork. If it'll make you feel better you can run the previous binaries no problem. Any issues you're encountering have NOTHING to do with the fork patch, and are likely a result of something else we can't figure out.

Here is the previous version: http://monero.cc/downloads/monero.win.x64.20140824.zip

Feel free to use it, you have no reason or obligation to stay on the latest version right now.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Hello to all!  Wink
The beginning of my almost successful  sync (traffic is more 500Mb ): http://pastebin.com/iE44yhmy
My joy was short-lived...Sync of bitmonerod have stopped at block height: 208402 for hours,without any responding.
The ending of my almost successful  sync: http://pastebin.com/XUiPtvfR
(I use the command SAVE but in the end i nonetheless exit without saving because i was afraid the red blocks! I just decided to resync later.)
Then I was able to run simplewallet:  http://pastebin.com/fEMZCVi0
But simplewallet just showed me: no_connection_to_daemon!
After this sync the inscription -  
"You are now synchronized with the network. You may now start simplewallet." no longer appears, because bitmonerod pretty quickly freezes &  even makes me push RESET 'cause RELOAD in WIN7 doesn't work properly! Unfortunate last attempt to sync of bitmonerod: http://pastebin.com/BKAEtYjW
I'm terrified even now do not know what to do...
Why does XMR wallet work pretty well before?
May be is better use blockchain.bin from OP...AGAIN?
But simplewallet just can't connect to daemon?
Anybody have some smart ideas about my endless horror?  Shocked
I hope for your help, Saviors...  Sad
  http://crypto-prices.com/XMR
  We have problems...
  & i have problem with XMR too!  Angry
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100

Try to delete your wallet.bin cache (backup wallet.bin.keys before) and then run simplewallet --wallet-file wallet.bin to rescan blockchain, your coins might come back to your wallet if you sent after fork issue. If not, contact support.

VERY BIG THANKS!
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
A few days ago I transfer from my wallet a few coin transactions on bittrex. The two transactions are not reached and I do not see them in blokcheyne, it is about 25 coins. Dear developers, help me find moent. transactions  24264b00e715d25e1dbc5a8e3d0f30fcdaf28165894976db6c58547bf1440a92   and 3bf10c4cbafba43dd091359a8959579ed9eb4a11f86310714b78f6d7cbc66797.


P.S. wallet i am already update, but i dont see any coins them and on bittrex.

Try to delete your wallet.bin cache (backup wallet.bin.keys before) and then run simplewallet --wallet-file wallet.bin to rescan blockchain, your coins might come back to your wallet if you sent after fork issue. If not, contact support.

thanks for explanation it works like a charm
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
I'm really impressed by the DEVS response to the attack. I hope the price dipps so I can buy back in. Smiley

Have you sold all your XMR holdings in the wake of the attack? Wink

There's never been so much bid support near the price. Imagine: in the range of 0...-10% of the current price, and in one exchange alone, there is BTC388 waiting for the seller of 108,000 XMR (3.3% of all XMR). Now is the time to dump if anyone likes, next week the price will be quite much higher if no one dumps now Wink

I am not sure
the price can go down very quickly. I already have a lost on my investition, I am not going to dump right now
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
A few days ago I transfer from my wallet a few coin transactions on bittrex. The two transactions are not reached and I do not see them in blokcheyne, it is about 25 coins. Dear developers, help me find moent. transactions  24264b00e715d25e1dbc5a8e3d0f30fcdaf28165894976db6c58547bf1440a92   and 3bf10c4cbafba43dd091359a8959579ed9eb4a11f86310714b78f6d7cbc66797.


P.S. wallet i am already update, but i dont see any coins them and on bittrex.

Try to delete your wallet.bin cache (backup wallet.bin.keys before) and then run simplewallet --wallet-file wallet.bin to rescan blockchain, your coins might come back to your wallet if you sent after fork issue. If not, contact support.
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100
A few days ago I transfer from my wallet a few coin transactions on bittrex. The two transactions are not reached and I do not see them in blokcheyne, it is about 25 coins. Dear developers, help me find moent. transactions  24264b00e715d25e1dbc5a8e3d0f30fcdaf28165894976db6c58547bf1440a92   and 3bf10c4cbafba43dd091359a8959579ed9eb4a11f86310714b78f6d7cbc66797.


P.S. wallet i am already update, but i dont see any coins them and on bittrex.
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 14
Hi,I found after my pool's XMR wallet&daemon  upgrade to 0.8.8.3,the pool's payments module can not  work as well as before:

while pool payout reward XMR to miners,will always get a failure with a message:"Transaction was rejected by daemon" or "not enough outputs to mix".

Dev,can you give me some helps?

Have you increased your tx fee to 0.1 XMR for payments?
thanks a lot!
donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
Hi,I found after my pool's XMR wallet&daemon  upgrade to 0.8.8.3,the pool's payments module can not  work as well as before:

while pool payout reward XMR to miners,will always get a failure with a message:"Transaction was rejected by daemon" or "not enough outputs to mix".

Dev,can you give me some helps?

Have you increased your tx fee to 0.1 XMR for payments?
donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
I wonder who was the first to provide the solution? CN devs seemed to come up with the solution somewhat faster. Although, if you think about it, it doesn't really matter who was the first. All I'm worried about is what if the next attack will be more sophisticated than the previous. That blockchain split was pretty scary I must say. Turns out Monero has some crafty rivals.  

Not really, we identified and patched it first: https://github.com/rfree2monero/bitmonero/commit/b417abfb7a297d09f1bbb6de29030f8de9952ac8

Thereafter the CN devs emailed a patch, but as there are edge-cases their patch doesn't cover (and we'd already almost finished a more robust patch) we decided not to implement their change.

Of course, if they (or any developer of any one of the CN coins) finds and patches a critical bug we will be eternally grateful for their efforts. Fixing exploitable code is all of our jobs, after all.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
I'm really impressed by the DEVS response to the attack. I hope the price dipps so I can buy back in. Smiley

Have you sold all your XMR holdings in the wake of the attack? Wink

There's never been so much bid support near the price. Imagine: in the range of 0...-10% of the current price, and in one exchange alone, there is BTC388 waiting for the seller of 108,000 XMR (3.3% of all XMR). Now is the time to dump if anyone likes, next week the price will be quite much higher if no one dumps now Wink

An experienced trader will know that is a negative drag on price. If it gets removed, then there is a positive effect.

Especially if it gets removed via unleashing it to the almost nonexisting sell side  Grin

(In reality if "ex traders know" something, it follows that "more exp traders know that exp traders know" etc. and in the end it does not matter, I have much data on XMR markets and the correlations are so small that not even worth publishing)
hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 1000
Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable
At this point the attack has been handled with neither a persistent fork nor a roll-back.  Well done.


What are the chances for a recurrent attack?

New accounts have warned quite much about it. The Monero devs do their best to prevent attacks, and C_Z is helping also. The community has also shown that even a technically successful attack (fork did happen) does not cause the loss of trust (price trend did not change).

In the long term, we are open to pursue a diplomatic solution to this conflict and I can be a diplomatic middleman if so desired.

I wonder who was the first to provide the solution? CN devs seemed to come up with the solution somewhat faster. Although, if you think about it, it doesn't really matter who was the first. All I'm worried about is what if the next attack will be more sophisticated than the previous. That blockchain split was pretty scary I must say. Turns out Monero has some crafty rivals.  

I already said that Monero devs defend the coin to the best of their ability, but if there is something to negotiate about, I am all ears.
CN devs provided kind of a solution just after they saw the Monero devs already had one. As a matter of fact Monero devs were first, but if CN devs were first I doubt they were going to get any credibility because of it - their credibility in the cryptocurrency world is lost and it's lost most probably forever.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
I'm really impressed by the DEVS response to the attack. I hope the price dipps so I can buy back in. Smiley

Have you sold all your XMR holdings in the wake of the attack? Wink

There's never been so much bid support near the price. Imagine: in the range of 0...-10% of the current price, and in one exchange alone, there is BTC388 waiting for the seller of 108,000 XMR (3.3% of all XMR). Now is the time to dump if anyone likes, next week the price will be quite much higher if no one dumps now Wink

An experienced trader will know that is a negative drag on price. If it gets removed, then there is a positive effect.
jr. member
Activity: 38
Merit: 14
Hi,I found after my pool's XMR wallet&daemon  upgrade to 0.8.8.3,the pool's payments module can not  work as well as before:

while pool payout reward XMR to miners,will always get a failure with a message:"Transaction was rejected by daemon" or "not enough outputs to mix".

Dev,can you give me some helps?
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
At this point the attack has been handled with neither a persistent fork nor a roll-back.  Well done.


What are the chances for a recurrent attack?

New accounts have warned quite much about it. The Monero devs do their best to prevent attacks, and C_Z is helping also. The community has also shown that even a technically successful attack (fork did happen) does not cause the loss of trust (price trend did not change).

In the long term, we are open to pursue a diplomatic solution to this conflict and I can be a diplomatic middleman if so desired.

I wonder who was the first to provide the solution? CN devs seemed to come up with the solution somewhat faster. Although, if you think about it, it doesn't really matter who was the first. All I'm worried about is what if the next attack will be more sophisticated than the previous. That blockchain split was pretty scary I must say. Turns out Monero has some crafty rivals.  

I already said that Monero devs defend the coin to the best of their ability, but if there is something to negotiate about, I am all ears.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
At this point the attack has been handled with neither a persistent fork nor a roll-back.  Well done.


What are the chances for a recurrent attack?

New accounts have warned quite much about it. The Monero devs do their best to prevent attacks, and C_Z is helping also. The community has also shown that even a technically successful attack (fork did happen) does not cause the loss of trust (price trend did not change).

In the long term, we are open to pursue a diplomatic solution to this conflict and I can be a diplomatic middleman if so desired.

I wonder who was the first to provide the solution? CN devs seemed to come up with the solution somewhat faster. Although, if you think about it, it doesn't really matter who was the first. All I'm worried about is what if the next attack will be more sophisticated than the previous. That blockchain split was pretty scary I must say. Turns out Monero has some crafty rivals.  
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
At this point the attack has been handled with neither a persistent fork nor a roll-back.  Well done.


What are the chances for a recurrent attack?

Nobody can answer that in general. There is no chance of another attack using the same mechanism but there may be different ones. We do our best to prevent and prepare to respond. Efforts continue for both.
Jump to: