Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1705. (Read 4670972 times)

Confirm. I've tested Monero on 3 different computers under 64-bit Windows 7. When I switched to 64-bit Monero, ALL GOES PERFECTLY. Instructions to migrate to 64-bit Monero I've posted earlier this thread bold instructions.

Monero is actually zero-configuration coin, no peers or seends or any other parameters you need to fine tuning. Stupidly run bitmonerod.exe and simplewallet.exe and type "help" at command prompt. Sure GUI is often less trivial to learn, than CLI interfaces. Just type "help" and copy-paste commands...

If something goes wrong, it's internet connection problem. My 3 computers uses internet of 2 different providers, and all works fine, while internet is alive. If connection drops, I just type "exit" and restart monero executables.

gpu mining destroyed the coin value
everyday its lower and lower

3.6 mBTC Price is so low I should buy a tone. Buy right now and sell x3 in less than a month.

Wow you need to chill dude, just because you cant use a simple command line interface doesnt make the wallet half assed at all. It means you need to spend two seconds learning how to use it. I was going to help you but with that attitude and the fact you want to mine directly to an exchange means its not really worth anyones while. Come back, ask direct questions and act like you need help rather than deserve it and people will be more accommodating.

First of all there is nothing wrong with the command line wallet.  I have used it to transfer thousands of coins.  If you are not patient or smart enough it is not the wallets fault.  I would not usually be so blunt but you come in with all this attitude and then ask for help like you're the fucking Queen of Denmark.

I am under no impression you need to add seed nodes to the current daemon.  It finds the network fine.

1.  Run bitmonerod.  Let it run long enough to get the blockchain (or downlod a copy like the OP mentions).
2.  Run simplewallet and create a new (or login to an old) wallet.

It's that damn simple.

thank for GUI link

Reason for the the half ass monero wallet is that you cannot mine directly to the crypto exchange. Before the crytpo exchange accepts payment it needs to generate a payment ID that you add to command along with the amount and address when attempt a withdrawal with the half ass wallet to process payments.  The payment id is generated along with address with on the crypto exchange. They are two different sets of numbers and letter. The mining pools dont use payment Ids.


Please someone "EXPLAIN" how do you add the seed nodes to this crap wallet. Do I make a .conf file, do i go through the command line? I don't have a file that says peerlist or seed node, typing help in the simplewallet is no help. Please help how do I add the seeds to this wallet so it can become sync?      If need a tip to help just say it please

Relax, why do you need a wallet anyway ? You can use the wallet exchange on poloniex.com if it's too complicated for you.
It is the same as having an online wallet.

There are GUI wallet being developed :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-for-open-source-bytecoinmonero-gui-589561
Check Jojatekok or neozaru work.

GOOD COIN ........SUCK ASS WALLET!!!!           Devs why release a wallet update when it doesn't work for half your investors or miners? This is a Great Coin with a half ass wallet both Window and Mac wallets. I should not have to go thru all this bullshit to get a wallet. Just make a online wallet to bypass the Bullshit.

Please someone "EXPLAIN" how do you add the seed nodes to this crap wallet. Do I make a .conf file, do i go through the command line? I don't have a file that says peerlist or seed node, typing help in the simplewallet is no help. Please help how do I add the seeds to this wallet so it can become sync?


 

who dump?

xmr.farm fast and reliable monero pool !  

Is it technically possible to side-embed monero to bitcoin?

I have one big probleme .
Many users is not happy by chance in my pool .
Is very low and quit my pool .

I know my methode is best ( same of MPOS per exemple ).

I lose users with my methode. For joke, I have used the same methode of standard pool and find 446%
http://monero.crypto-pool.fr/testttt.html#pool_blocks

Lucky: 446% is liard.
Pool Efficiency: 103% Is already very good number  ( between 90% and 100% , is good number ).

If you explain "285% luck factor!"
Please explain me 446% luck factor

Yes, if my server is down or all composant of my pool not running as not impact of efficiancy.
The principal probleme of pool monero is daemon bitmonerod crashed or not response RPC.

I've been trying to work out if the "luck factor" stat shows anything useful at all for the last couple of days, but not been getting much feedback so I'm not sure anyone cares 

First of all, there are two different luck calculations being used, crypto-pool.fr and cryptonotepool.org.uk implemented one based on calculating (hashes to find block) / (block difficulty), the Zone117x released a pool update which included a luck calculation based on (block difficulty) / (hashes to find block). I may well be biased but I prefer the former as I believe it produces more easily comparable results, take a look at the sites to see what you think. The standard pool method produces exponential results, and I havent see any of the sites using it trying to explain what their "285% luck factor!" actually means, other than the implied bigger is better.

After pondering here's what I believe you need to consider when looking at luck scores:

• I prefer to refer to it as "efficiency" rather than luck, when using my pool's calculation method 100% efficiency should be average for the network
• Network difficulty lags behind the actual network hash power, so when it is increasing miners should overall be luckier than the implied average
• The difficulty is time based, aiming to set the mining efficiency at a level which produces a block every 60secs on average. However the pool efficiency calculation isnt time based, as it assumes 100% uptime, pool downtime wont affect the efficiency displayed
• When all other factors are equal, i.e. difficulty remains constant and pools have no downtime, then the efficiency across all pools should average 100%. If some pools are consistently over 100% then that must be at the expense of some other pools running at less than 100%.

To answer your original question, unfortunately the block explorer doesnt record hashes required per block, so you cant get a luck factor that way. You could look at the average block generation time to see if it is 60secs as intended, if it averages much lower then the coins generated per day will be higher than expected, which could affect price.

if anyone has any interest im willing to sell silver bullion for xmr

New features on pool
Features uniq for the moment.

I wonder if the high luck recently reported by several pools is having a downward impact on price?

Can anyone extrapolate a cohesive "mining luck" formula that can be scraped or otherwise determined from the block explorer?

there are now close to 400 cryptos, getting confused is understandable and you are confused stilll, vertcoin is VTC

Devs are still working hard on the core code, look at the forks of the main monero-project in github and you will see plenty of commits for improvements. There is a thread in http://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/ looking for people to test new developments, which is one way that most people can contribute (other than donating!).

In general one has to remember that this is not like all the Bitcoin derived altcoins, who have inherited four years of extensive development work to ensure that the basic technology they are using is well tested and optimised. I know it has been said that if the major issues like blockchain size and gui wallet aren't resolved quickly then Monero is at risk of being overtaken by a clone of itself, but that would require the clone devteam to produce their own solutions to those issues so I doubt its a major concern for now.

Would be nice to see the slick new website, but I believe that's imminent...

I am constantly confused between vericoin (vrc) and vertcoin (vrt).  I imagine that I am not the only one.  Nominally, it boils down to whether one dots one's I or crosses one's T.
Verisend is a mixer, I believe.