ExtremePool
Features
•2% Fee
•Payouts after 60 block confirmations
•Address Validation
•Latest pool code from Zone117x which includes built in .1% fee for DEV fund.
•Variable Difficulty based on your individual CPU performance
•Verified Secure
•Server located on the West Coast USA.
Come mine with us at http://mro.extremepool.org!
http://www.extremepool.org
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1714. (Read 4670972 times)
Thanks Aminorex. Its good to see that healthy debate and constructive critticism are welcomed here. In my opinion being able to acknowledge areas of deficiency is a critical first step in improving. Much better than pretending everything is great and getting stomped by competitors.
Thank you, Mumbles, for voicing these constructive concerns. In my experience the core devs are quite diligent in monitoring these matters, and prioritize them carefully. You can be assured that the software is progressing well, and the foundations for ease of use are already coming together, although the end applications will take a long time to achieve their full potential. iPod usability is not something that just falls from the sky. There is a lot of carefully managed complexity under the veneer of exquisitely designed usability. I think that in XMR, so much is at stake that the happy end-point is quite sufficiently motivated. You can have confidence that it will arrive, although perhaps not as quickly as you would like. Do please contribute your own efforts and other forms of support, including constructive criticism, on an ongoing basis!
This is pretty much the manifestation of my concerns in one post. XMR needs to be so easy to use that we no longer need to watch this forum for help from people trying to do basic things like store their money in a wallet or transfer it. The faster Monero reaches that level of one click usability, the more likely it will be that it succeeds.
Keep your eyes open, fellas.
I am an investor who has bought heavily into xmr.
I asked a question in this thread, and didn't get an answer.
You guys have to be on the alert for the opportunity to reach out to people like me.
I asked a question that was so simple it was apparently worth ignoring in the high level discussion going on here.
If I can't get up to speed on the wallet I then must choose between leaving my holdings on an exchange into the indeterminate future or dumping, which is bad for me and bad for everybody else.
Please make monero useful to people who know less than you do. It shouldn't be beneath you to give a beginner a helping hand.
I am an investor who has bought heavily into xmr.
I asked a question in this thread, and didn't get an answer.
You guys have to be on the alert for the opportunity to reach out to people like me.
I asked a question that was so simple it was apparently worth ignoring in the high level discussion going on here.
If I can't get up to speed on the wallet I then must choose between leaving my holdings on an exchange into the indeterminate future or dumping, which is bad for me and bad for everybody else.
Please make monero useful to people who know less than you do. It shouldn't be beneath you to give a beginner a helping hand.
Thank you, Mumbles, for voicing these constructive concerns. In my experience the core devs are quite diligent in monitoring these matters, and prioritize them carefully. You can be assured that the software is progressing well, and the foundations for ease of use are already coming together, although the end applications will take a long time to achieve their full potential. iPod usability is not something that just falls from the sky. There is a lot of carefully managed complexity under the veneer of exquisitely designed usability. I think that in XMR, so much is at stake that the happy end-point is quite sufficiently motivated. You can have confidence that it will arrive, although perhaps not as quickly as you would like. Do please contribute your own efforts and other forms of support, including constructive criticism, on an ongoing basis!
And of course.... yvg1900 is just lying.
The requested IP address is not blacklisted http://eais.rkn.gov.ru/en/#form
moneropool.com is not blacklisted lmao....nice try troll.
Russia doesnt allow Youtube, China doesnt allow google and youtube...
Those countries are horrible places honestly with really corrupt governments.
moneropool.com blacklisted and blocked in Russia by government.
Can be checked by entering its IP address at http://eais.rkn.gov.ru/en/ (blocked by IP address)
I think owner of moneropool.com shall file complain to them.
Can be checked by entering its IP address at http://eais.rkn.gov.ru/en/ (blocked by IP address)
I think owner of moneropool.com shall file complain to them.
gcc-4.8-base:
Installiert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
Versionstabelle:
4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
Installiert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
Versionstabelle:
4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
OK. Disclaimer: I have never tried this myself. But if you have your virgin snapshot and still want to try it:
Code:
sudo apt-get install gcc-4.8-base
Not sure if this will deinstall 4.9, though. Try the gcc --version again after apt-get is finished.
Edit: You may have to do the same with g++-4.8
Anyway, never surrender.
I'll just unpack a new virgin and play with it.
So far, many thanks for your suggestions. Once I have results, whether positive or negative, I'll get back here.
gcc-4.8-base:
Installiert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
Versionstabelle:
4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
Installiert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
Versionstabelle:
4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
OK. Disclaimer: I have never tried this myself. But if you have your virgin snapshot and still want to try it:
Code:
sudo apt-get install gcc-4.8-base
Not sure if this will deinstall 4.9, though. Try the gcc --version again after apt-get is finished.
Edit: You may have to do the same with g++-4.8
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
I get this:Code:
gcc --version
?Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]
That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that
Code:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1
works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.
Quote
gcc-4.8-base:
Installiert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
Versionstabelle:
4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
Hmm. What is the output ofInstalliert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 4.8.2-19ubuntu1
Versionstabelle:
4.8.2-19ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages
Code:
apt-cache policy gcc-4.8-base
on your machine?Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
I get this:Code:
gcc --version
?Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]
That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that
Code:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1
works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.
Hmm. What is the output of
Code:
apt-cache policy gcc-4.8-base
on your machine? 
^You are running out of RAM.
But (while running it) I have about 1GB free *0.8-1.1
It eats all my RAM, if I look at task manager>Free
But, I still do have 25% (~750MB) free, as I can open more files and programs while it's running.
Problem is strange, as it does affects SOMETHING about RAM, but I cannot findout what it is.
Will try in a couple of days with and system upgrade and RAM upgrade as well, so I hope it will resolve the current problem.
I just don't like how it works... My Video Editor does not eats that much!
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
I get this:Code:
gcc --version
?Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]
That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that
Code:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1
works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe?But...
How can I downgrade? I still a noob.
Thanks for your help.
after beeing unable to sync, I deleted the complete blockchain yesterday and it worked afterwards. however, today, the same problem appeared:
this is beeing spammed all over again. I can't completely resync every day...
Code:
2014-Jun-29 22:59:23.080790 [P2P1][194.150.103.58:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 106607 -> 107262 [655 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.594392 [P2P2]tx with id: <81f4b8b388136110aec5dc58d2cacf45dce5c65c56e78bcf124eedae121d78db> in block id: <4cc12670a1133168d800d28c09f3ff1f0f6c687c9555c3e8b90d889ad7610aa0> already in blockchain
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.604392 [P2P2]Block with id: <4cc12670a1133168d800d28c09f3ff1f0f6c687c9555c3e8b90d889ad7610aa0> failed to add transaction to blockchain storage
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.611393 [P2P2][194.150.103.58:18080 OUT]Block verification failed, dropping connection
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.594392 [P2P2]tx with id: <81f4b8b388136110aec5dc58d2cacf45dce5c65c56e78bcf124eedae121d78db> in block id: <4cc12670a1133168d800d28c09f3ff1f0f6c687c9555c3e8b90d889ad7610aa0> already in blockchain
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.604392 [P2P2]Block with id: <4cc12670a1133168d800d28c09f3ff1f0f6c687c9555c3e8b90d889ad7610aa0> failed to add transaction to blockchain storage
2014-Jun-29 22:59:33.611393 [P2P2][194.150.103.58:18080 OUT]Block verification failed, dropping connection
this is beeing spammed all over again. I can't completely resync every day...
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
I get this:Code:
gcc --version
?Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]
That... looks kind of cool. Did you compile gcc yourself? All I can say is that
Code:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04) 4.8.1
works for me. If it isn't too much of a hassle, you could try to downgrade maybe? In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:
Code:
cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh
It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:
Quote
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
Code:
gcc --version
?Quote
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9-20140406-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20140405 (experimental) [trunk revision 209157]
^How much RAM the virtual machine have? It could run out of RAM when compiling.
2 G RAM. At an earlier trial I had only 1 G RAM, this was not enough. But the shown errors were completly different: I got a message, that it runs out of memory. Now I get this:
Quote
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
Obviously it has nothing to do with RAM. /home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:
Code:
cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh
It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:
Quote
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.
Your compiler complains about lines that it should not complain about. Are you using a gcc version 4.8 or higher? What is the output of
Code:
gcc --version
? 
^How much RAM the virtual machine have? It could run out of RAM when compiling.
In http://monero.cc/getting-started there is a script written by Quanttek:
Code:
cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget https://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh
It will install all the pre-requirements and then it'll compile it for you.Please could anyone tell me the meaning of these errors:
Quote
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp: In function ‘void cryptonote::mul(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t&, uint64_t&)’:
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:33:22: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘__int128’
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:34:5: error: ‘uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope
uint128_t res = (uint128_t) a * (uint128_t) b;
^
/home/user/bitmonero/bitmonero/src/cryptonote_core/difficulty.cpp:35:22: error: ‘res’ was not declared in this scope
low = (uint64_t) res;
I dont think those are the errors to worry about, its the compiler just pointing out a few minor issues, it looked to me like your problem is with the make command trying to create folders, but I dont understand the error msgs.
Additional information: The OS runs in a virtual machine and I took a snapshot of the virgin. Each trial was done with an unaffected OS.
I was wondering if you could help me
i recently updated my cryptonote wallet as ive had XMR in cold storage for the past month and a half or so... as more updates came out i thought i should update... however i type my password i created on the old wallet and it now says invalid password and closes..
i have not forgotten my password as i saved it on a txt doc ... i checked 5 previously saved versions of the txt doc for the last 2 months to make sure nothing had changed....it says my password has remained the same since i created it, yet it is invalid using the updated simplewallet using my .keys file ...
thanks guys
i recently updated my cryptonote wallet as ive had XMR in cold storage for the past month and a half or so... as more updates came out i thought i should update... however i type my password i created on the old wallet and it now says invalid password and closes..
i have not forgotten my password as i saved it on a txt doc ... i checked 5 previously saved versions of the txt doc for the last 2 months to make sure nothing had changed....it says my password has remained the same since i created it, yet it is invalid using the updated simplewallet using my .keys file ...
thanks guys
Hi,
I just compiled bitmonerod and simplewallet and for warm-up did some small transaction back and forth between my wallet and poloniex. Works a charm :-)
Now, my problem: after a while, bitmonerod throws lots of error msgs like this:
..../bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
I wouldn't care really, but I suspect this has something to do for one of my transactions from poloniex to my wallet not showing up in my wallet for more than an hour.
When I restarted bitmonerod and simplewallet, my missing transaction was there imediately, so it looks like the daemon (bitmonerod) "hang" somehow...
Any hints, maybe I should configure something in a certain way to reduce probability of such hangs?
Thanks!
There is no connection between this error message and your transaction from poloniex. Ignore the error. Enter 'refresh' in the wallet (after your daemon is synchronized) and if your transaction is not there (and in the blockchain - monerochain.info) contact poloniex support with the details. I just compiled bitmonerod and simplewallet and for warm-up did some small transaction back and forth between my wallet and poloniex. Works a charm :-)
Now, my problem: after a while, bitmonerod throws lots of error msgs like this:
..../bitmonero/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
I wouldn't care really, but I suspect this has something to do for one of my transactions from poloniex to my wallet not showing up in my wallet for more than an hour.
When I restarted bitmonerod and simplewallet, my missing transaction was there imediately, so it looks like the daemon (bitmonerod) "hang" somehow...
Any hints, maybe I should configure something in a certain way to reduce probability of such hangs?
Thanks!
Jump to: