Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 2035. (Read 4670562 times)
anyone want to explain why Monero is a good investment?
http://198.199.79.100 (aka moneropool.org) successfully submitted a block. Miners will be paid for their work once payments start working. 
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
Is there a separate thread I'm just not finding for this pool? Trying to figure out my disconnects from multiple machines/locations as well as why hashing shows lower than solo.
When I quit already save, but each will need to re-update, 
why?
why?It looks like your blockhain is corrupted. Replace it the recent one and wait for sync.
Does MRO will be next DRK?
Looking forward...
Looking forward...
if we work together to make something for this coin ,i think it can
When I quit already save, but each will need to re-update, why?
why? 
Does MRO will be next DRK?
Looking forward...
24 Hr VolumeLooking forward...
6608.893 BTC
Last Price
0.01337000
wow
Tested https://github.com/Lucasjones/cpuminer-multi . Cpuminer-multi ~ 10h/s , simpleminer ~50h/s with my 24 cores.
Assuming you didn't do anything really stupid, that's quite a gap. It could mean that the author implemented it pretty badly. What CPU is it, perhaps I can improve the performance?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz (2 sockets).
I checked hash rate with http://198.199.79.100 statistics
Okay, er... wut?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 -- 24 processors? Nah, he probably meant cores; typo
(2 sockets) -- Wait, if he's running two Xeon L5639s... that would be 8 physical cores and 16 threads. Where is 24 coming from?
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+L5639+%40+2.13GHz&cpuCount=2
Looks like it is 6 physical cores x 2 cpus = 12 physical cores --> 24 threads.
Yes, I incorrectly said. 24 threads
Oops, yeah, they are hexa-core. Now it makes sense. Anyway, I compiled one just for you, to test. Tell me the hashrate.
WARNING: No one else use this. If you're not using a Xeon L5639, its behavior is undefined. Meaning I have no clue what's going to happen - maybe it will crash, maybe it will cause the FBI to raid your house, or maybe it will make your computer explode. Just don't.
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/cpuminer-multi-win64-05-15-2014-git-XEON-L5639.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/cpuminer-multi-win64-05-15-2014-git-XEON-L5639.zip.sig
I use linux
Oh, I see. Did you compile it with -O3 and -march=native? It wouldn't matter with the original cpuminer, because most of its speed-critical code is handled in assembly, but it probably matters for this. If you want even more of a speedup, see what you can do with the OpenSSL lib, and link with your custom-built one.
I don't think it uses openssl for the CryptoNight hashing but -march certainly might make a difference, or possibly other compiler options (though -O3 should be pretty good).
Does MRO will be next DRK?
Looking forward...
Looking forward...
Complex wallet, no simple wallet it?
On ubuntu with my quad core i3, I get ~5 h/s with cpuminer. That is slightly more than what I get solo mining.
Also LucasJones pushed an update to Github a few hours ago that optimizes the cryptonight hash for cpuminer a bit...
Also LucasJones pushed an update to Github a few hours ago that optimizes the cryptonight hash for cpuminer a bit...
Tested https://github.com/Lucasjones/cpuminer-multi . Cpuminer-multi ~ 10h/s , simpleminer ~50h/s with my 24 cores.
Assuming you didn't do anything really stupid, that's quite a gap. It could mean that the author implemented it pretty badly. What CPU is it, perhaps I can improve the performance?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz (2 sockets).
I checked hash rate with http://198.199.79.100 statistics
Okay, er... wut?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 -- 24 processors? Nah, he probably meant cores; typo
(2 sockets) -- Wait, if he's running two Xeon L5639s... that would be 8 physical cores and 16 threads. Where is 24 coming from?
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+L5639+%40+2.13GHz&cpuCount=2
Looks like it is 6 physical cores x 2 cpus = 12 physical cores --> 24 threads.
Yes, I incorrectly said. 24 threads
Oops, yeah, they are hexa-core. Now it makes sense. Anyway, I compiled one just for you, to test. Tell me the hashrate.
WARNING: No one else use this. If you're not using a Xeon L5639, its behavior is undefined. Meaning I have no clue what's going to happen - maybe it will crash, maybe it will cause the FBI to raid your house, or maybe it will make your computer explode. Just don't.
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/cpuminer-multi-win64-05-15-2014-git-XEON-L5639.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/cpuminer-multi-win64-05-15-2014-git-XEON-L5639.zip.sig
I use linux
http://198.199.79.100 (aka moneropool.org) successfully submitted a block. Miners will be paid for their work once payments start working.
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
Please, add payment statistic!
Can't check my balance....
IF ON the trading platform? I want to buy it.
Tested https://github.com/Lucasjones/cpuminer-multi . Cpuminer-multi ~ 10h/s , simpleminer ~50h/s with my 24 cores.
Assuming you didn't do anything really stupid, that's quite a gap. It could mean that the author implemented it pretty badly. What CPU is it, perhaps I can improve the performance?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz (2 sockets).
I checked hash rate with http://198.199.79.100 statistics
Okay, er... wut?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 -- 24 processors? Nah, he probably meant cores; typo
(2 sockets) -- Wait, if he's running two Xeon L5639s... that would be 8 physical cores and 16 threads. Where is 24 coming from?
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+L5639+%40+2.13GHz&cpuCount=2
Looks like it is 6 physical cores x 2 cpus = 12 physical cores --> 24 threads.
Yes, I incorrectly said. 24 threads
Tested https://github.com/Lucasjones/cpuminer-multi . Cpuminer-multi ~ 10h/s , simpleminer ~50h/s with my 24 cores.
Assuming you didn't do anything really stupid, that's quite a gap. It could mean that the author implemented it pretty badly. What CPU is it, perhaps I can improve the performance?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz (2 sockets).
I checked hash rate with http://198.199.79.100 statistics
Okay, er... wut?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 -- 24 processors? Nah, he probably meant cores; typo
(2 sockets) -- Wait, if he's running two Xeon L5639s... that would be 8 physical cores and 16 threads. Where is 24 coming from?
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+L5639+%40+2.13GHz&cpuCount=2
Looks like it is 6 physical cores x 2 cpus = 12 physical cores --> 24 threads.
Tested https://github.com/Lucasjones/cpuminer-multi . Cpuminer-multi ~ 10h/s , simpleminer ~50h/s with my 24 cores.
Assuming you didn't do anything really stupid, that's quite a gap. It could mean that the author implemented it pretty badly. What CPU is it, perhaps I can improve the performance?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz (2 sockets).
I checked hash rate with http://198.199.79.100 statistics
Okay, er... wut?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 -- 24 processors? Nah, he probably meant cores; typo
(2 sockets) -- Wait, if he's running two Xeon L5639s... that would be 8 physical cores and 16 threads. Where is 24 coming from?
Dell Poweredge C6100 2U 8X SIX CORE L5639 2.13GHz
http://198.199.79.100 (aka moneropool.org) successfully submitted a block. Miners will be paid for their work once payments start working.
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
Please, add payment statistic
http://198.199.79.100 (aka moneropool.org) successfully submitted a block. Miners will be paid for their work once payments start working.
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/
Tested https://github.com/Lucasjones/cpuminer-multi . Cpuminer-multi ~ 10h/s , simpleminer ~50h/s with my 24 cores.
Assuming you didn't do anything really stupid, that's quite a gap. It could mean that the author implemented it pretty badly. What CPU is it, perhaps I can improve the performance?
24 x Intel Xeon L5639 @ 2.13GHz (2 sockets).
I checked hash rate with http://198.199.79.100 statistics
Jump to: