Thanks smooth.
I was hoping to get around using Ubuntu because at the moment I have no monitor with an HDMI input, and SSH is not enabled by default on Ubuntu. Guess I'll be ordering an adapter.
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 809. (Read 4670673 times)
August 22, 2015, 05:31:30 PM
August 22, 2015, 05:29:34 PM
seems to me like there is some memory leak with 0.9 beta on win 7 x64.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
Bear in mind that the memory usage is NOT constant. LMDB is greedy for free memory so it can cache aggressively, but it's also very willing to give that memory up to anything else that needs it. On an under-utilised system you can expect LMDB to suck up as much available memory as it can, whereas on a busy system you'll see it drop down to the <100mb mark for the most part.
Can confirm this, was working on my laptop yesterday whilst the daemon was open and it only used around 80 MB. Furthermore, it works like a charm. Big props to all the contributers for delivering this!
August 22, 2015, 04:54:51 PM
Getting this error trying to compile bitmonero on Raspi2 (raspbian OS)...any ideas?
Code:
[ 19%] Building CXX object contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mcpu switch
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mtune switch
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/build.make:54: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o' failed
make[3]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:289: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all' failed
make[2]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:123: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:51: recipe for target 'release' failed
make: *** [release] Error 2
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mcpu switch
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mtune switch
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/build.make:54: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o' failed
make[3]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:289: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all' failed
make[2]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:123: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:51: recipe for target 'release' failed
make: *** [release] Error 2
Looks like an out of date version of gcc that doesn't know about the specific cpu model. You could try to upgrade to a newer gcc or go into the cmake script and get rid of the -mcpu and -mtune options.
EDIT:
Quote
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
Looks like you need to upgrade gcc in any case.
I used the rpi2 Ubuntu, I guess it has a newer gcc.
August 22, 2015, 04:50:57 PM
Getting this error trying to compile bitmonero on Raspi2 (raspbian OS)...any ideas?
Code:
[ 19%] Building CXX object contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mcpu switch
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mtune switch
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/build.make:54: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o' failed
make[3]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:289: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all' failed
make[2]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:123: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:51: recipe for target 'release' failed
make: *** [release] Error 2
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mcpu switch
cc1plus: error: bad value (cortex-a7) for -mtune switch
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/build.make:54: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o' failed
make[3]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/windows_stream.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:289: recipe for target 'contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all' failed
make[2]: *** [contrib/otshell_utils/CMakeFiles/otshell_utils.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:123: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/pi/bitmonero/build/release'
Makefile:51: recipe for target 'release' failed
make: *** [release] Error 2
August 22, 2015, 01:38:26 PM
What's the word on "in the works" XMR exchanges? All the talk a few months ago was about some new fiat/XMR exchanges coming onto the scene. I believe Rpietila was mentioned as involved in at least one. What's the rumpus? The whole polo kyc/aml thing has tempered down, but the market won't properly grow until the speculative aspect has diversified and expanded. Personally I won't go within 10 blocks of an exchange that wants my firstborn just to trade crypto to crypto. So?
My plans haven't changed. The "company" is accumulating 100,000s of XMR and it takes time. I have told all in advance. When this phase is ready, we go to the next phase and open trading. September is still the timeframe.
You can ask the others how they are doing.
But the most important/interesting thing happening with XMR is still Crypto Kingdom.
* Wanderlust feels sick
Stockpiling a CN coin is no good for the anon.
Stockpiling 80% or more could be problematic. Stockpiling <1 million (<11% of current, growing, supply) is no concern at all.
August 22, 2015, 11:16:28 AM
What's the word on "in the works" XMR exchanges? All the talk a few months ago was about some new fiat/XMR exchanges coming onto the scene. I believe Rpietila was mentioned as involved in at least one. What's the rumpus? The whole polo kyc/aml thing has tempered down, but the market won't properly grow until the speculative aspect has diversified and expanded. Personally I won't go within 10 blocks of an exchange that wants my firstborn just to trade crypto to crypto. So?
My plans haven't changed. The "company" is accumulating 100,000s of XMR and it takes time. I have told all in advance. When this phase is ready, we go to the next phase and open trading. September is still the timeframe.
You can ask the others how they are doing.
But the most important/interesting thing happening with XMR is still Crypto Kingdom.
* Wanderlust feels sick
Stockpiling a CN coin is no good for the anon.
EDIT: Wow! Somebody just messed my trust rating. Is what I said incorrect?
August 22, 2015, 09:06:33 AM
seems to me like there is some memory leak with 0.9 beta on win 7 x64.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
Bear in mind that the memory usage is NOT constant. LMDB is greedy for free memory so it can cache aggressively, but it's also very willing to give that memory up to anything else that needs it. On an under-utilised system you can expect LMDB to suck up as much available memory as it can, whereas on a busy system you'll see it drop down to the <100mb mark for the most part.
yes thats what it is. the relevant number is the privately used RAM wich can not be shared with other processes. this number is nearly always below 50mb. this is the number that is shown in the non detailed task manager list.
as visible on the screenshot, 1.032 gb is reserved, but 0.992 could also be shared. difference is the private part wich can not be shared.
however in windows task manager graphic, the 1.032 gb is shown. maybe the spike i saw was because refreshing the simplewallet from scratch.
my page 1337 post went back to 1336
manipulation!! 
Ive had mine running solid for 18 hours or so, and it is using 50 megs. Pretty impressive.
August 22, 2015, 07:32:38 AM
seems to me like there is some memory leak with 0.9 beta on win 7 x64.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
Bear in mind that the memory usage is NOT constant. LMDB is greedy for free memory so it can cache aggressively, but it's also very willing to give that memory up to anything else that needs it. On an under-utilised system you can expect LMDB to suck up as much available memory as it can, whereas on a busy system you'll see it drop down to the <100mb mark for the most part.
yes thats what it is. the relevant number is the privately used RAM wich can not be shared with other processes. this number is nearly always below 50mb. this is the number that is shown in the non detailed task manager list.
as visible on the screenshot, 1.032 gb is reserved, but 0.992 could also be shared. difference is the private part wich can not be shared.
however in windows task manager graphic, the 1.032 gb is shown. maybe the spike i saw was because refreshing the simplewallet from scratch.
my page 1337 post went back to 1336
manipulation!! 
August 22, 2015, 07:20:14 AM
I often chuckle at work at 13:37 and sometimes at 4:20 too, think I may need to get out more
August 22, 2015, 06:47:44 AM
seems to me like there is some memory leak with 0.9 beta on win 7 x64.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
after letting it run 24h something like 8 gb of ram was used, but not visible in the task manager. once i stopped it ram droped down to the usual levels. will try to retest so i can give better feedback.
Bear in mind that the memory usage is NOT constant. LMDB is greedy for free memory so it can cache aggressively, but it's also very willing to give that memory up to anything else that needs it. On an under-utilised system you can expect LMDB to suck up as much available memory as it can, whereas on a busy system you'll see it drop down to the <100mb mark for the most part.
August 22, 2015, 06:14:33 AM
Haha page 1337... there are many companies, and this one is on the good side (see the discussion in Monero Speculation when I introduced it).
I don't believe the dark side is that much on accumulating XMR peacefully, they rather steal and destroy. Sometimes I wonder how so many people still want to work for them..
I don't believe the dark side is that much on accumulating XMR peacefully, they rather steal and destroy. Sometimes I wonder how so many people still want to work for them..
August 22, 2015, 03:46:09 AM
What's the word on "in the works" XMR exchanges? All the talk a few months ago was about some new fiat/XMR exchanges coming onto the scene. I believe Rpietila was mentioned as involved in at least one. What's the rumpus? The whole polo kyc/aml thing has tempered down, but the market won't properly grow until the speculative aspect has diversified and expanded. Personally I won't go within 10 blocks of an exchange that wants my firstborn just to trade crypto to crypto. So?
fiat exchange
https://www.altquick.co/buy-2.php?coin=XMR
August 22, 2015, 02:42:37 AM
What's the word on "in the works" XMR exchanges? All the talk a few months ago was about some new fiat/XMR exchanges coming onto the scene. I believe Rpietila was mentioned as involved in at least one. What's the rumpus? The whole polo kyc/aml thing has tempered down, but the market won't properly grow until the speculative aspect has diversified and expanded. Personally I won't go within 10 blocks of an exchange that wants my firstborn just to trade crypto to crypto. So?
My plans haven't changed. The "company" is accumulating 100,000s of XMR and it takes time. I have told all in advance. When this phase is ready, we go to the next phase and open trading. September is still the timeframe.
You can ask the others how they are doing.
But the most important/interesting thing happening with XMR is still Crypto Kingdom.
August 22, 2015, 01:44:55 AM
Congrats on another XMR milestone!
Is some special meaning to this other than page number?
Soon more attention come to XMR. Many new pages
August 21, 2015, 10:47:39 PM
Congrats on another XMR milestone!
August 21, 2015, 05:20:46 PM
Will you PR it to the offline generator?
https://github.com/moneromooo-monero/monero-wallet-generator/pull/1
Thanks, merged, signed, and pushed.
Addresses generated earlier are still totally valid of course, and can be restored with simplewallet.
Yes indeed. Thanks.
If someone desperately needs to restore their "cold storage" wallet to MyMonero, and they created it before this new change, they can contact me, and I'll walk them through it.
August 21, 2015, 05:14:44 PM
Will you PR it to the offline generator?
https://github.com/moneromooo-monero/monero-wallet-generator/pull/1
Thanks, merged, signed, and pushed.
Addresses generated earlier are still totally valid of course, and can be restored with simplewallet.
August 21, 2015, 04:49:56 PM
I'm using monero 0.9 beta, win7 x64 and save blockchain to disk D: and everything works fine.
Just in case you may have some error in command line, I'm using this: bitmonerod.exe --data-dir d:\coin\monero\data
Just in case you may have some error in command line, I'm using this: bitmonerod.exe --data-dir d:\coin\monero\data
I apologize. The problem seems to be related to my usb-attached harddisk (my d-drive). Under heavy load it shuts down but remains visible and "active" in Windows, thus, causing weird behavior and trouble. Usb drivers suck.
August 21, 2015, 04:20:56 PM
I don't know what actual commit that beta is on, I'm on one from Aug. 10th, and having no issues with memory. I'm usually around 40MB.
Edit: run with "--version" to see.
Code:
bitmonero v0.8.8.7-7792255
page 1337 yolo
August 21, 2015, 03:34:10 PM
DO NOT DEPOSIT XMR TO CRYPTSY !!
It's NOT POSSIBLE to withdraw coins once you deposit!!! Their system is broken or so they say. Very suspicious!
I opened a ticket almost 4 days ago, still waiting !!
It's NOT POSSIBLE to withdraw coins once you deposit!!! Their system is broken or so they say. Very suspicious!
I opened a ticket almost 4 days ago, still waiting !!
Uggh. Thanks for the heads up and keep us updated.
Jump to: