Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 811. (Read 4670673 times)

Hey Monero-ites... I have a question RE: MyMonero vs. the offline-wallet generator software.

I made an offline address and then tried to "open" it with the given mnemonic seed words in MyMonero, i.e. I was kinda just testing how all this might work IF some day I wanted to make a safe address, to put some monero on it, and then later (eventually) access it again to move/spend the money.

But the ADDRESSES that resulted were NOT the same!

Is that correct?  How is this supposed to work, exactly?

For sake of illustration since I'm not gonna USE these addresses now, here is what I got:

Offline Generated Address:
4AYrGeied2XEbaL3uk3gBK1z95DQrcVwncMr5kXPUd7T4RoHhjxyryRWU7qvsp2wJ6L4g1eFaqM6YbD 6RX52j4KQ8PfuBk8

MyMonero Address:
4AYrGeied2XEbaL3uk3gBK1z95DQrcVwncMr5kXPUd7T4UcUpNefenD8HSZ7d9XWSXhmELmfCkvRQGT hzNeCUkaJKDd9nTV

MyMonero View Key (Private)
0ce617dbd51845dd6ada2f3b2d040b5deb6dde38f6640f65abc2a36518045802

MyMonero Spend Key (Private)
8c81ca3b40ae5c199ee10819b9c29959dcc4e97242d93cc6119938ea3858c303


Mnemonic Seed Was:
gigantic motherly lordship worry pool karate lopped certain major demonstrate pepper colony jobs people befit merger lending envy lectures sifting puzzled nanny lodge paper certain

So...?  IF I had sent money to that first address WOULD IT have BEEN there at this "second" address?  I suppose I could just test it with a few cents worth, LOL, but seriously this doesn't seem RIGHT.

An address is an address and for normal humans to EVER be able to understand any of this stuff I think at least THAT has to be consistent.

fluffypony & co,

Just a quick update to say that I've sync'ed from scratch on my Windows box using the beta binaries, took me about 50 minutes to be fully up-to-date. This is on a relatively recent desktop (about 2 years old, with an SSD), and shoddy Internet access.

The only interesting observation I have at the moment, is that it was much faster to get me a fully sync'ed blockchain, than it is to get simplewallet to perform a full wallet rescan (as when doing a wallet restore). I have no clue if this is due to less parallelization of the simplewallet code, or just the nature & complexity of the work in this instance.

Task Manager tells me that a freshly started bitmonerod, is using about 26MB of RAM, though I figure it might not be fully settled yet.
w00t w00t 

In the next day or two, I'll try out some tiny transfers in-and-out, as well as daemon solo'ing (which I am willing to bet that I'll give up before I've found a block  ).
Big Cheers!

Is there an OS X beta?

Whats this i here about a new beta?

Thanks dEBRUYNE and double-thanks fluffypony.
Trying out the beta now, will report back any issues I might have (or on IRC if it looks lengthy for whatever reason).

Smooth has given neg trust to a few other people that support bcn before, only to remove it after .. get this .. : Private Conversation.

In case you're unsure of what that is:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+is+a+private+conversation

.. Should get you started in the right direction.

Your arguing by emotion on a public forum is only gonna piss off both yourself and him more, and just cause ya both to dig in further.

This is from last week: https://downloads.getmonero.org/monero.win.x64.v0-9-beta.zip

Exercise the appropriate level of care with it being a beta. We've recently found and solved what we hope to be the only major, breaking database issue (that could have caused major issues if we'd tagged prematurely), but that means that prior LMDB sync ups have to be resynced from scratch or imported from a fresh blockchain.raw export.

Posted it anyway, see -> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3hpbxm/could_the_block_size_be_dynamic_like_the/cu9j1t1


I think luigi1111 has, you could send him a PM (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/luigi1111-171499) or try to contact him on IRC. Most of the time he's present in either #monero or #monero-dev.

The commit is this one I think: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/e5d2680094ee15889934fe28901e4e133cda56f2

Awesome, nice tunes!

I don't have the technical knowledge to explain the adaptive block size myself - and I understand that you may not think it worthwhile/worth the risk of being banned (if that is indeed a risk). But I do not think that a mention of monero's adaptive block size would be OT on such a thread, particularly at a time when the Bitcoin community is finding itself in such a bind regarding block size. I would have thought that possible solutions to the problem, or at least feasible alternatives, would be welcome. I may be wrong though.

And get banned for mentioning another coin on /r/Bitcoin?

Looks like some people are questioning Bitcoins fixed blocks and considering adaptive blocks instead. No mention of Monero so far in the conversation, could be a good opportunity for one of our devs to show off one of Monero's best characteristics!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3hpbxm/could_the_block_size_be_dynamic_like_the/

smart,

I just moved and I now have my decks and records unpacked from the shed. woo hooo 

You should rebuild your DB after that update, but I don't remember seeing anything that makes the code do it by itself. So this still seems like bit of a mystery to me why it is happening.

This pull request probably, see the comments -> https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/pull/364

Fantastic work Vanderi!

I really love this one.

nice one!

I've noticed that the bitmonerod on Windows that I just compiled yesterday wants to start downloading the lmdb blockchain from scratch, even when I already have an up-to-date lmdb blockchain copy, synced using a previously compiled version of bitmonerod from around May 5th. What changes since then are forcing a fresh download of the blockchain?

monero is very good currency  monero > dash