Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero Speculation - page 1304. (Read 3314316 times)

legendary
Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000
May 16, 2016, 04:08:14 PM
LOL.. Never saw that, that's hilarious. Grin

Edit - Where is truecryptonaire? Cheesy

He fell off the shuttle...
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
May 16, 2016, 03:44:28 PM
popcorn!

Need SOME excitement, anyway, with these low volumes.


Here you go:

LOL.. Never saw that, that's hilarious. Grin

Edit - Where is truecryptonaire? Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
May 16, 2016, 03:14:11 PM
popcorn!

Need SOME excitement, anyway, with these low volumes.


Here you go: https://i.imgur.com/Kjjj5tG.jpg
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 16, 2016, 12:54:50 PM
popcorn!

Need SOME excitement, anyway, with these low volumes.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
May 16, 2016, 11:20:30 AM
And soon confidential transactions will also be protocol-level....

There were just 4 RingCT commits from our resident coding cow.

You can follow the branch here:

https://github.com/moneromooo-monero/bitmonero/commits/rct
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
May 16, 2016, 10:33:52 AM
Troll activity possibly at an all-time high. Is that a buy signal? Sell signal? Smoke signal? Traffic signal?

Adding signal, or possibly noise.  Time will tell.

BTW, if Shelby Moore isn't elected the President of Monero this November, I'm moving to Malla.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1118
May 16, 2016, 10:30:31 AM
Troll activity possibly at an all-time high. Is that a buy signal? Sell signal? Smoke signal? Traffic signal?
full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 100
May 16, 2016, 08:16:57 AM
What's Monero's problem? None at all really, there are just a lot of shitcoin scammers and their sock puppets (most of the posts on this thread probably, and the other one run by one of those scammers where my replies are selectively deleted) who hate us, and that's a sign we're doing something right.

No smooth there is another problem.

Monero has this attitude that they are the shit and every one else is shit. And your community disrespects those who have supported Monero.

I took so much abuse from Shen-noether, iCEBREAKER, and various other members of your community.

Now it is time for payback. Do you really think I would post that I have a technical solution to eliminate the simultaneity in CoinJoin if I don't. Sheesh. You need to teach your community that I am legit. I am really disappointed with your shit community.

So now I am shopping around for someone who can take my technical idea and make it a Monero-killer asap. So I can teach your community a lesson that they deserve.

"Who are Monero"? How can a crypto-currency have an attitude?

What makes one a member of the "Monero Community"? When does one speak on behalf of one-self, and when does one speak on behalf of the community?

"Your Community", it makes no sense? Individuals come and go, and come in contact with Monero. Doesn't make them part of the community, doesn't make them not part of the community, and certainly does not make them able to speak on behalf of "The Community". With the same logic because of your interactions with Monero in any capacity that makes YOU a member and part of the Monero community. What's the difference between a "Community Member", and a "Monero Supporter"?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
May 16, 2016, 05:26:09 AM

WOW...

thanks for your appreciation, but you have to realize that i never meant to disrespect you. but these are development  for Dash, not for Monero hence the remark.

ill post this in Dash thread, as this surely not belong in Xmr thread. i hope you understand.




wow... this is new development    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin  

im preparing popcorn now... LOL   Cheesy

... and the post has now being removed. Frankly fixing Darksend could be worth a lot of money so no hard feelings towards TPTB_need_war for trying. If TPTB_need_war actually has a solution, I am sure the Dash community will pay him for it and it will be money well earned. Does the Monero community have to be concerned about all of this. I doubt it.

All mixing that is active requires, obviously, activity. If you don't get activity up you won't ever significantly increase transaction speed of CoinJoin / DarkSend transactions. Fortunately, Monero mixes passively and therefore doesn't require activity of other participants on the network.

Actually there is only an activity threshold above which offchain mixing can be just as fast as onchain. Actually to do ring mixing correctly so that rings never can overlap in ways that allow combinatorial unmasking, Monero should require activity, but I was apparently never able to get Shen-Noether to understand this during our Reddit discussions last year (because he is a condescending prick in the same mold as Gregory Maxwell who thinks he is too smart, actually they appear to hobknob together sometimes), so afaik Monero remains "broken" (suboptimal). The advantage of adopting my idea for preventing combinatorial unmasking, is it would also make the block chain entirely prunable, not just compressable (which afaik is what Monero and BBR erroneously label "pruning").

The key breakthrough is to remove the simultaneity requirement (lol, I am the one who fixes Gregory Maxwell's broken CoinJoin in 10 minutes of my spare time while my head is deep in designing a programming language), and on further thought I've decided I want to embarrass noobtrader (to show my appreciation for his disrepect) so I went ahead and I think figured out how to eliminate the simultaneity requirement in CoinJoin! I figured out how to eliminate the short-term trust aspect! Another advantage is it can radically improve the robustness of decentralized exchange as well.

It will reduce the block chain size considerably. I also see how to put a viewkey in it. And the mix anonymity sets can be huge, say 50 or 100 transactions per mix (or more!). The disadvantage is the masternode can see the correlation of inputs to outputs. But just like any mixing method, if mix over and over, the probability of your anonymity set being known to any one party diminishes in probability.

You'd still need stealth addresses to achieve the delinking from the recipient's public key.

Another potential advantage may be that this technique I've just invented gives you IP address obfuscation inherently, which is one of the big weakness of Monero. Monero adds I2P integration to attempt to overcome this weakness.

My apologies to ArticMine. I am rushing so much, that I mistakenly (cross-eyed) attributed the above quoted disrespect to him.

Edit: my discovery for offchain mixing (fixing CoinJoin) to remove the simultaneity requirement, is essentially something like a ring signature, but the signers don't need to include the other signers in their signature. The ring is formed by the masternode. It is quite clever. I don't know why I didn't think of it before! The reason Gmaxwell didn't think of this, is it because it requires the knowledge I did for the fixing the atomic DE protocol of TierNolan. The insight comes from the work I did there.
legendary
Activity: 1245
Merit: 1004
May 16, 2016, 04:16:17 AM
ok well 2036 is a long while away? why so long? does XMR have some type of amazing new tech they will unveil in 2036  Shocked quantum GUI ? and whats this?Huh
...
Everything OK?? Should i buy some XMR?? HELP ME??
The V2 block issue was patched 4 months ago.
I performed the exploit that lead to the Monero network consensus failure 4 months ago and posted screenshots of me doing so using a Mac Mini(twitter also proves date/time). Monero cost me two SSD's in the process leading up to the exploit. These types of bugs (lack of validation) only come from amateur computer programmers. There are 12 ZeroDay flaws left to be exploited unless I discover more. I will keep you informed. Feel free to try and debunk this fact. Cool

You are appearing on stage several monthes to early! This part of the Schmierenkomödie usually starts late in September: Evil Archwizard and Antagonistic of Monero threatens to fud down the price below 0.0010 levels threatens to destroy Monero, so some well known Whale can get in again, prepping up for the next spring season pump.

Would you be so kind, waiting behind the theater curtain until early in September, please? Thank you for your support!
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
May 16, 2016, 02:42:32 AM
And you advocate illegal decentralized file sharing systems wherein it is impossible to for the copyright holder to have the illegal content removed. You want to create a society of theft, which is precisely what Socialism is.

I've never understood how you reconcile your strong anarchist views with intellectual property laws that require a world government to enforce.  It just makes 0 sense.  It is required there be an inconsistency in there somewhere no matter how you want to phrase the debate.

I would say it really doesn't really matter what people advocate. If these systems are technologically feasible they will exist. It is 100% pointless to argue what 'should' occur in this exact context. The context is important because it is suggested that it is "impossible" for a copyright holder to enforce. That being the case, if you don't like it or don't think it leads to the kind of society you want, that's just too fucking bad; get over it.

The same is true for decentralized and private cryptocurrencies, to the extent they have a demand at all.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
May 16, 2016, 02:36:43 AM
And you advocate illegal decentralized file sharing systems wherein it is impossible to for the copyright holder to have the illegal content removed. You want to create a society of theft, which is precisely what Socialism is.

I've never understood how you reconcile your strong anarchist views with intellectual property laws that require a world government to enforce.  It just makes 0 sense.  It is required there be an inconsistency in there somewhere no matter how you want to phrase the debate.
legendary
Activity: 874
Merit: 1000
monero
May 16, 2016, 02:31:06 AM
on topic: can't wait for paybee, I got so much ideas :-)

off topic(more or less):

oh dear, looks like shelby completely lost his mind this time. pretty sure this is going to end very embarrasing, poor guy.  Sad

one is always temtped to mark his spam accounts with negative trust to warn others that they might be wasting their time, but after remembering the drama that happenend after smoothie left him negative feedback once I doubt this would help with his condition.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
May 16, 2016, 02:27:46 AM
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
May 16, 2016, 02:07:10 AM
While I don't see a better cryptocurrency than XMR  I'm still gonna invest in it.  At the end - what do u expect from a currency more than security and privacy? - to wash your car?    And while all other cryptocurrency also don't have official GUIs but only unofficial ones but simply approved why are some people bitching  so much about the Monero official GUI Huh   I don't get it.   Kids...
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
May 16, 2016, 01:36:04 AM
...

Not really. I removed the simultaneity requirement in CoinJoin. Since when has CoinJoin been similar to Cryptonote.

...

It will reduce the block chain size considerably. I also see how to put a viewkey in it. And the mix anonymity sets can be huge, say 50 or 100 transactions per mix (or more!). The disadvantage is the masternode can see the correlation of inputs to outputs. But just like any mixing method, if mix over and over, the probability of your anonymity set being known to any one party diminishes in probability.

You'd still need stealth addresses to achieve the delinking from the recipient's public key.
...

Stealth addresses and viewkeys. This is starting to look like a Monero - Dash hybrid and technically I can see why. By the way your idea from a technical and theoretical point view is actually quite interesting, with a dose of shall we say "community irony" thrown in for good measure.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
May 16, 2016, 01:18:28 AM
Step 1) Open a short position in XMR
Step 2) Come to speculation thread and get "mad" about something
Step 3) Tell everyone you found an exploit/breakthrough/whatever and XMR is about to be "REKT"
Step 4) Profit

Sound familiar?

I have no speculative position in cyrpto-currency.

I have not consulted with anyone else on this technological idea who does have a speculative position on Monero or Dash, other than what I have communicated here to all of you thus all of you with equal opportunity to speculate on what I wrote.

I am not here in CC to play silly games. I don't speculate in CC. I work on technology. That is all I do. Day in an day out.

I had my head deep in creating a new programming language and I stopped suddenly because an idea popped into my head. Then I realized I had a mistake it wasn't fully formed, so I deleted the post I had made about it. Then noobtrader attacked my reputation with his snide quote of a post I deleted within 60 seconds of posting it.

So then later the next day, I thought about it again for a another minute or two, and I realized I could actually make it fully formed and prevent all the trust in the system in terms of making sure that no party can steal funds and that no party can jam the protocol.

So then I realized I had stumbled onto a way to remove the simultaneity requirement (and jamming problem) that plagues CoinJoin. I got excited. I posted about it again here and specifically to take revenge on noobtrader for disrespecting me and being a jerk.

And so what I have received so far is more of the same shit attitude from the Monero community.

Now you guys will learn that I am legit. I have no idea why you think I am not legit. If you even took the time to understand my technical research over the past 3 years, you'd realize I had made major technical insights.

Whatever! Fuck.

...something that can best be described as a hybrid between Monero and Dash.

Not really. I removed the simultaneity requirement in CoinJoin. Since when has CoinJoin been similar to Cryptonote.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
May 16, 2016, 01:07:56 AM
What's Monero's problem? None at all really, there are just a lot of shitcoin scammers and their sock puppets (most of the posts on this thread probably, and the other one run by one of those scammers where my replies are selectively deleted) who hate us, and that's a sign we're doing something right.

No smooth there is another problem.

Monero has this attitude that they are the shit and every one else is shit. And your community disrespects those who have supported Monero.

I took so much abuse from Shen-noether, iCEBREAKER, and various other members of your community.

Now it is time for payback. Do you really think I would post that I have a technical solution to eliminate the simultaneity in CoinJoin if I don't. Sheesh. You need to teach your community that I am legit. I am really disappointed with your shit community.

So now I am shopping around for someone who can take my technical idea and make it a Monero-killer asap. So I can teach your community a lesson that they deserve.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
May 16, 2016, 12:50:43 AM
...

Post a link to the tweet showing a timestamp before the incident was already known to the public ...


C'est impossible. 16:06 - 15 de mai de 2016.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
May 16, 2016, 12:40:00 AM
I performed the exploit that lead to the Monero network consensus failure 4 months ago and posted screenshots of me doing so using a Mac Mini(twitter also proves date/time). ... Feel free to try and debunk this fact. Cool

Post a link to the tweet showing a timestamp before the incident was already known to the public or consider yourself debunked.
Jump to: