Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE 251 blocks solved! - page 473. (Read 1514087 times)

Nice!

Thank you

Done.

Enter your workername at the end of: http://solo.ckpool.org/workers/ or http://solo.ckpool.org/tube/workers/

Remember that if you have multiple connections going to the same workername the statistics will be the combined total for that workername.

I don't have a problem with it. Not like the stats are important for pool payouts or anything.

Well ckolivas I'm up for it ... anyone else?

I have a way of enabling that with a code change but it would require a pool restart. As I said before you wouldn't notice anything at your miners apart from the stats resetting. Do people want that for the sake of per worker stats?

You can use a different Bitcoin address for each one.

Is there anyway we can see stats per worker?

I have around 800gh pointed to you. Monday i will go to 1.3th. tues  1.8th

I'm quite sure it's intentional since the username has to be a testnet bitcoin address. They're mining with approximately 107GH. (Now up to 36 blocks and 900 BTC).

They have now been running for 24 hours, and the issue seems to have resloved itself, But thank you for the advice. Just hoping for some good luck now 

Thanks Again!

Load balance takes hours to even out, and because different pools end up running at different diff values, it may not look like they're balanced but will end up being so.

Does anyone do much "Load Balance" in the "Miner Configuration" with 3 pools at the same time with their S3?

Just wanted someone's experience with that before I tried it.

I did it with two miners for approximately 2 minutes.  I saw my estimated reward go up on Slush BUT my shares contributed to current round was -5816015570 [A negative number).  Don't know WHY it was negative?  So, I took it off of "Load Balance" and put it back to "Failover" in both of those miners.

I did notice my hash rate go down on ghash during that 2 minutes.  So, I switched it back to "Failover."

Anyone ever done this?

David

priceless .  How much hash power is he or she using?

I am getting some more s-3's I will point 1.8th or 2.8th at your pool.

I restarted the testnet pool to allow for longer testnet bitcoin addresses which would have been inappropriately rejected by it. Since restarts are seamless, the only thing the (one) miner on there would notice is the stats have started at zero again. There is no need to restart the main solo pool at this stage since all ckpool code changes since it was started will have no demonstrable benefit to miners and I'm sure they'd prefer their stats to remain untouched.

Just as an aside, the testnet pool has solved 27 blocks to date. I'm hoping the one miner on there means to still be mining testnet coins.

Thank you!!!

there is no advantage to running hardware in separate instances as opposed to combining them.

IE two miner instances, running separately on individual 1 TH hardware will have the same chance as 1 miner instance that combines the 2 one TH units.

IOW 2 TH is 2 TH whether its several instances or one instance. the odds are the same either way.

EDIT: con already replied I see. asleep at the switch as usual I am..

Thanks again...

Please forgive my ignorance.

I'll start reading...

The S3 internally uses cgminer (which I wrote by the way) so whether you know it or not you are using it. There is no way to combine miners to make them more efficient or more hashrate or luckier or anything. It makes no difference.

OKAY,  THANKS for explaining the "BestShare" to me!!!

I'll read the READ ME in cgminer even though I'm not using it or bfgminer.  I have a Mac.  I downloaded cgminer in Windows 7 via Parallel's.  That's where I have the read me.  I haven't installed it because I don't know anything about commands and things to enter into it.  I would be totally lost because of my ignorance.  I was looking for a place to solo mine without cgminer.

Would I have an advantage with cgminer?

The reason I ask [I was just thinking...  uh oh...  LOL]:

I have two (2) OWC 480GB SSD's in RAID 0 installed in my 17" MacBook Pro; for a total of 960GB; and 16GB of RAM.

The reason I made mention of RAID 0 is for the sake of cgminer.  Does cgminer [In a sense] put all my miners in RAID 0 [You might say] to allow for more chance of a higher "Best Share" score BECAUSE OF a better COMBINED hash rate.  At present, it's as if the miners are both solo on solo [One might say].  Will cgminer COMBINE THE MINERS in something like a RAID 0 to increase chances?  Or will it remain like you said regardless, "BestShare is a random event."  You did have a "but" in that sentence, when you said, "...but probability based."  

IF cgminer COMBINES my miners in something like a RAID 0 to make them like ONE PIECE OF HARDWARE, that would increase hash rate and no longer be solo miners on a solo pool.  That's what I meant earlier when I said, "solo on solo."  It may be it makes no difference what so ever whether they are combined as if they were one piece of equipment or not?  Not sure...

David