There was too much of a buzz about Zeit, it was bound to crash.
Lots of talk about an ordinary coin usually equals shills and pre-dump rhetoric.
The PoS didn't work either, at least not for me, and that was despite opening the wallet every day.
Buy Dimecoin, it's small, not hyped, cheap, and has a future based on cautious moves and committed support from a minority.
read the Zeit rhetoric earlier in the thread ... so very typical of a coin that is floating on hot air.
In saying that, it had nice design.
Talk about being a shill. You come in here and bash ZEIT while promoting DIME, which you also have linked in your signature as proof that you are a talking piece for that coin. And you have no room to say anything about pre-dump rhetoric when your coin's dev dumped his premine and abandoned the coin. Our dev left for personal reasons, but he never dumped the premine. He used it for giveaways and giveaways.
+1 Steve.
We have the power to delete the troll's posts,
but we are community. Everybody should have an opinion, but claiming that Zeit POS is not working makes me facepalming.
Well, all I can say is that the Zeitcoin POS wallet has worked well for me. Two substantial mintings so far, with more due later this month and early next. Lots of coins simply for opening and unlocking my wallet every now and then. You did unlock yours to allow minting didn't you?
Yes of course I unlocked my wallet, I ended up with greyed out unconfirmed payouts.
But I sold after that anyway, maybe it would have fixed itself.
What you have described is a perfectly normal occurrence that happens occasionally to all POS coins. It simply means that another node has generated a block within a few seconds of yours. What happens then is that the transaction will not be accepted and will become greyed out. Others will then be generated shortly afterwards until one connects with your wallet. Within a short period of minting you will eventually receive a block that will confirm your POS interest. The Proof of Stake amount will be isolated from your balance and after maturing for 50 blocks, your original stake amount will appear back in your balance along with the amount of coins due to you in interest. The unaccepted block/s will become greyed out and appear in your Transactions list together with the accepted block. Reference to them is retained as a matter of record.
Greyed out transactions did occur during my second minting, but within a few minutes other blocks were generated until one became accepted. Within 30 minutes of minting my interest coins were happily residing in my wallet. Your assumption that "... maybe it would have fixed itself" is correct, but I suspect you knew that already. That's how POS coins do work. I thought it odd that you chose to try to criticise Zeitcoin on its wallet, which is one of its strengths - and a credit to Zeitcoin's current Development Team.
Regarding hype, I disagree with you. Zeitcoin has not, to my knowledge, been overly hyped. Just the opposite and that was one of the reasons that attracted me to this coin in the first place. I made a comment to that effect in one of my earlier postings.
Your posting reveals your true intent - to lure Zeitcoin holders away to the coin that you are promoting. Your signature claims that Dimecoin is: "Revolutionary". "$$$$$$" signs follow seemingly promising riches as does the Dimecoin website. Revolutionary? Quite some hype for a coin that by its own admission was originally designed to be just another "pump and dump" coin. The promise of riches? - a rather extravagant claim I would think in the circumstances. So who is doing the hyping?
Dimecoin also proclaims that it "is closely related to Quark" and can be mined "using a CPU with a Quark type miner." I have a lot of respect for Quark. If Dimecoin is simply a copy of Quark then there might be legal problems ahead in that parts of Quark have been copyrighted. If the SHA-3 concoction chosen by Dimecoin veers away from Quark's e.g. in using the NSA developed and controversial Secp256r1 curve, as other coins have done, then there might be a gaping backdoor in the Dimecoin wallet - and who wants an exploitable backdoor in their wallet?
http://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/nsa-backdoors-and-bitcoin/ Dimecoin do mention the U.S. Government’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) involvement in their coin. Quark, I believe have gotten around this problem by using a different sep curve in light of NSA revelations.
Finally, there is a body of opinion growing that Proof of Stake (POS) is the way forward in the cryptocurrency world. Proof of Work (POW) mining in comparison is expensive. It is also becoming riskier. Some POW based coins seem to be complacent about possible attack and the loss of control. If it is ever referred to at all, it is commonly called 'the 51% attack' when in actual fact these type of attacks can be achieved at very low percentages. The maximum security from a mining attack ever achievable is less than 33%: Ittay Eyal, Emin Gun Sirer [2013] (arXiv:1311.0243 [cs.CR])
http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243 for the summarised version.
To underline this, there is a serious move to try to hard fork Bitcoin into becoming a POS coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ai-coin-development-diary-584719Rather than getting too bogged down, it boils down to this: I believe that your criticism of Zeitcoin is unjustified and ill-informed, if not purposefully mischievous. People in glass houses should not throw stones.