I conducted a large-scale investigation, checking a huge amount of data, checking and comparing absolutely all accounts, and came to the conclusion that all these accounts belong to the same person. And now in detail and about everything in order.
..
In general, if we look at the list of accounts, then there are often very close registration dates, or similar nicknames. Sometimes the cheater lacked imagination and he repeated himself. For example: RainbowKun - Rainbow-queen, Louis Harper - Harper32, ROSEDF - ROSERTY. In general, the style of many nicknames is repeated and has a similar style.
If there is a bot farm, then what links it to RainbowKun? How do we not know that it is run by the very own Ratimov! Or any of the users that merited this post?? I am not suggesting any of those, but suggesting that the evidence is lacking. Suggesting that because he was merited by them is enough evidence is not sufficient. His account posted frequently. Merit sources also changed, so there was more recent merit given out, which you might expect.
They "absolutely have a connection"? Consider me skeptical of this statement unless you have hard evidence. It's a public forum for a topic over a decade old with a lot of publicity, when bitcoin has reached all time highs (again). There could be accounts that are connected with each other (e.g. ROSEDF and ROSEDTRY is likely the same person), but that does not mean a connection to the others.
What evidence do you have? You only posted that you did analysis -- but I don't see a description of that analysis. Would you describe it to forum members? Or describe it in more detail privately to admin/mods if you think that is better? I see screen shots of user names posted, but not sufficient logic for why one should believed these are linked.
I will concede that what looks like FIRSTNAME LASTNAME user accounts are probably linked, as this was a common feature of account farms on reddit during several elections. It is also unlikely for people to use their firstname lastname as a user account, although not impossible if due to an external (albeit dumb) campaign.
I hate to be the one to point this out, but even here, the logic is contradicted:
For them, there are still not enough coincidences for one or another criterion, and there is no overflow of merits.
The user has registered several dozen accounts, is engaged in the overflow of merit
I am not saying that there are not bot farms, but that if there are, it needs more evidence since there are "not enough coincidences".
As ddmr writes:
I noticed a certain groupie effect on some of his threads (all included in OP’s list of suspects). My hypothesis is that they are all friends and such, working towards a common objective of creating a name on the forum, to launch his (Rainbow) DAO project shortly. The strategy is fine if playing by the book, but this thread is questioning whether the play is legit or foul (i.e. meriting alt accounts, or friend accounts for the sake of being friends and working towards a common goal), and whether content was partially built through intended cross-language + spinning techniques. @nutildah’s post above seems to exemplify the latter clearly in a sample case.
There is also the groupie effect that new users will find more camaraderie in new users in every group in existence.
So, you'd also have to argue that this was not the case with a small amount of merit being shared among them, especially because they are more likely to be active and reading each other's posts.