Topic: ㅤ - page 7. (Read 4961 times)

Bravo!
Some random dude joined the forum on June 13th, 2019

🚩 Starting from the first post he knows what he wants
Result: Earned a lot of merit.

🚩 Fooled the merit senders, the entire community.

🚩 An arrogant lower level cheap disrespectful towards others who he does not like and trash talker. I don't need to quote anymore to prove it. Anyone can see it from his attitude towards others.

Read his posts history. How many will agree with me that his English is very good, better than my English who lived in England for over nine and half years and had a higher degree from one of the University there. It's like in only 8 months he had a massive change from using auxiliary tools.

Takes:
Ratimov was not someone who started the account Ratimov. Before creating the account Ratimov this guy had months if not years of experience on the forum. After the introduction of merit system when he was not ranking up because of shit posting and realized that shit-posting will not earn him good money, he drafted a blueprint and the product is Ratimov. I would not wonder if this guy has more accounts and milking this forum at its top level. How this guy or guys like him are not dangerous for this bitcointalk community?

---

So Ratimov came up with a nice theory. One guy can manage 60+ accounts.

The pharmacist as usual, "Right/wrong, I agree/not agree, ..... keep reading, ..... keep reading, keep reading...."
(You don't need to read, he really do not add any value. 50+ posts a week is what he cares)

As usual LoyceV but hey at least you do better than few others, follow and respect rules.

nutildah (huh! you are killing it man! 5K+ merit!) Stop this shit of connecting account with no solid evidences but guessing from post history.

Suchmoon, right? How about F**K you!

Good old DdmrDdmr. Keep it up mate.

Where is xtraelv? Lafu? Hilary (I have no bad feeling for you anymore, but I will still say that you ruined me on the forum. I was a dedicated loyal forum user. But you thought me as an alt of S_Therapist which was a complete wrong accusation and I could not take that easily), where is moronboroza (I have no bad feeling for you too anymore.)

This place hasn't improved at all, sadly.

---

I have no love, sympathy for anyone who is plagiarist but this is ironic when you all are finding plagiarist, banning them from a thread that have been created by a well-known plagiarist and no one is even talking about it anymore LOL

I think you guys are doing the same mistake that have done on me and S_Therapist.

RainbowKun has been targeted and Ratimov is having fun. You did the same to mdayonliner when xtraelv was just having fun. If anyone is dangerous for this community then it's users like Ratimov and xtraelv

PS: Ratimov and xtraelv has their differences in interest ofc.

This post, can make you easier to understand.


All troops are lowered in that thread.

I'm citing your community's main point of view.

What are you talking about, don't pretend you don't know.
you yourself say, you yourself do not understand, strange.

I really don't quite understand,
Like you said, there is a company in an office,Is there any benefit to posting on this forum? Can it make money?
Does this matter need cost? Can cost and benefit be equated?
If a company does this, I think their boss may be that IQ is not online.

And I have said many times, I don’t know what account farm, what legion, it’s ridiculous, I will never accept slander, it’s too bullying.

How magical is this Merit,This can be turned into a battlefield. If this Merit is Bitcoin, I can understand it, but Merit cannot be exchanged for Bitcoin or cash. I really don’t understand.

No that's not slander, it's a fact, you are a Chinese community consisting of several people, some of you are using alternative accounts, some are honest, you guys are sneaky at this, you guys are greedy to dominate Bitcointalk but that's not the case, we have the best people here, to undermine your will.

I tried to see one by one the participants in this thread, it does look a little bit different in the [Chinese] proverb, almost all the accounts here, especially those involved in [Merit] as alleged in this thread, it can be said that all languages ​​[of the Chinese community] if translated, into Chinese, are easily obtained on google.

I have my opinion and conclusion in this thread [two] things.
1.Chinese community, can say one office, company with different people, but have this one senior person in Bitcointalk who guides them in posting on Bitcointalk.
2. The Chinese community, which consists of several Alternative Accounts that they manage here, can be seen in terms of their style of posting, but they have a specific purpose.

What was suspected by: nutildah and Ratimov were right, his guess was right, unfortunately we can't draw a valid conclusion, because they haven't been involved in the transaction, just been involved in abusing [Merit].

There is something interesting here in the future, if it is not revealed from now on, we will see more of them making mistakes, now they are alert to connect with each other.

If they "widely circulated", that must mean you've published them somewhere first. You can make all doubt go away by linking your original article. If I'd ever publish some of my posts in a different language elsewhere, I'd instantly add a link saying: "previously posted in English on Bitcointalk".
If your answer is going to be that your original is no longer available, but only copies created by others, you're not making a very convincing point.


Please do.

Please post in English.
It seems correct: the article on https://www.ibtctrade.com/college/941.html?lang=en has a later date than the post on Bitcointalk. I don't know if posting dates can be manipulated though.

Oh, that's fun.


My comments stand for themselves without my name or any account attached.


I have not checked this forum for the past two weeks. This summer of my posting was fun and cathartic, but I am now busy with regular work so that activity won't return soon.
Much more importantly, I stopped posting because I would like to have 100 activity and 200 merit. It's too cute, so didn't want to ruin that too soon with the wrong post. (edit: Oh crap, I forgot about how things add +14 activity.. Hmm, I should have thought about this more. I will have to see whether I can get a different integer multiple.) Which in part is why I was silently editing two meta-wiki posts that could translate portions to the public wiki.

Now I am in the awkward position of having to have an uneven amount of activity and merit.

Oh well. C'est la vie.

This is all my explanation of this matter. Don't mention my name again.

What is loli.net, to be honest, I haven't studied it carefully. I don’t think it’s the meaning of pornography mentioned above...I only know that this website can convert my pictures into bbcode.（If you have a better picture converted into bbcode website, you can tell me, I will try to use.）

I have sent a PM to Mr. nutildah, and put "I am RainbowKun on Bitcointalk" on my social media signature as he requested to prove that I am the original author of these articles. I published some articles in China's encrypted media in 2018. However, many of the contents are too long and have a certain time effect, so the articles published on bitcointalk are all modified and improved based on my original views. But now most of the articles are rewritten by me in the past two months. This took up almost all of my energy.

Then I will continue to collect data and let everyone take a closer look at whether I am abusing merit. Please wait for my next evidence.

I hope that everyone in the forum can communicate peacefully, instead of saying that rainbowkun is a liar, he is forming a legion to abuse merit, and he is defrauding community assets. Then a group of people shouted that this was a big liar and killed him. I hope that each of us can have our own independent judgment ability and the most basic thinking ability. Otherwise it will really make people look at jokes.

Most likely it's because the word "loli" is in your search result, which would potentially relate to lolicon.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5347137

This is the same article. I published it on bitcointalk on July 2. Please take a closer look at the time.

As I said in this post, I am Kun Yuan from China, and I never shy away from my Chinese identity. Since 2018, some of the articles I wrote have been widely circulated on the Chinese Internet. Some articles are signed, and some articles are not signed. I am the original author of these articles. I am now revising some of these points and publishing them on bitcointalk, and more of them are new articles. I myself have a very high reputation and influence in the crypto world in China. I also mentioned this in a previous post. I will introduce my experience in the crypto world in detail later.

My current main energy lies in writing and the design and development of smart contracts, which has taken up all of my energy. So when I was framed for building a merit farm, I was very angry. As I said earlier, if you see the faces of people from your own country on Bitcointalk, you will feel cordial.

Later I will show some evidence that I am Kun Yuan himself. For the past three or four years, I have been working hard for the Bitcoin consensus building.Similarly, I will continue to provide evidence that I am not abusing merit.

Because loli, or lolicon is a term (slang) for underaged children, in Japanese culture. Similar to hentai = animated Japanese porn, loli leans towards characters that look like kids/ pre-adolescents.

Therefore when some enters it, Google would think its about searching for the genre, or porn of the sort.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon

Have we been manipulated here by every topic created by RainbowKun I accidentally found one of the posts made by RainbowKun.

Topic: Bitcoin is the only thing that humans cannot control.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5347137

比特币是人类唯一无法控制的东西吗?
https://www.ibtctrade.com/college/941.html?lang=en

From the data I saw, RainbowKun's post on Bitcointalk with the one in Article ibtctrade, is exactly the same, the difference is in English and Chinese translations.

And I don't know who wrote this article first from the release date on Bitcointalk to the one released on ibtctrade, also different but there is a slight difference in every post done by RainbowKun on Bitcointalk, if translated into Chinese almost on average you can find the same words, on google.

There is a possibility RainbowKun translates Chinese articles into English, this is just my guess maybe those who have expertise in that field can try the two language options, English and Chinese, you will find it.

It's possible to sell off higher-ranked accounts with a lot of merits/sMerits.  That's one way to make money from having a bunch of ranked-up accounts.  Another way is to actually create a bounty farm, with friends/family members participating with the accounts once they've achieved a rank where their earnings can be at least near maximized.  It doesn't have to be only one person doing all the work, you know.

Did you report that guy for plagiarism?  I'm going to do it now just in case.  I've had enough of this shit.

Edit:  Never mind, it appears that post is gone.  Hopefully that means he got banned.

Edit2: Yay!

As Imgur is unavailable in China, they use SM.MS, a Chinese image hosting service. loli.net domain is just their CDN.

I'm not sure how to search for an image url through ninjastic.space and whether it's possible at all, but you can get some results using google:

edit:
No. It doesn't work with Google either.

When searching for loli.net on Ninjastic.Space, I get no hits. I was curious to see how often this domain is used to host images on Bitcointalk.

Why do I get a Warning: "Report it or find help. Images of child abuse are illegal" notification when I search Google for "loli.net"?


I checked a part of my own archive, and it seems to be a site used by Chinese (spammers):
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5193/51932853.html
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5216/52166645.html
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5239/52392977.html

The latest Ratimov proof of the massive use of the same photo hosting is very convincing!

Someone from the discussion participants can logically explain: what could be the plan (or intent) in creating so many clones of one person.  
Why does he need it?

^^^
That is certainly a piece of the puzzle.

Most of these accounts have been copy/translate/pasting -- the best way to slow them down is to get them banned for plagiarism. And like I said, if the mods can't recognize non-English plagiarism for what it is, I will tag these accounts as cheaters in the meanwhile.

Not banned yet:


Copied word-for-word but with a few minor changes from this article:


How does bitcoin protect private property from violence, anyway??

I’ll start with the second part of the quote. Let’s start by understanding briefly what plagiarism on this forum means:
It’s the intent to pass somebody else’s content as one’s own. Now this can be done for a wide variety of reasons, as my time here on the forum has shown me. Reasons such as the following would come to mind (non-exhaustive):

-   To pretend to know more than one really knows.
-   To go merit fishing.
-   To create a content with minimal effort.
-   To build-up Activity (again with no effort).
-   To make-up for one’s limitations on posting skills and/or language.

Note that I am not implying that any one of those applies to you here, as I’m simply trying to set a basis for a common understanding on what plagiarism here is.

Now plagiarism can be total (all the content is plagiarized), partial (a small or not so small part), or word-spun based (instead of a copy/paste, it’s a copy/spin/paste).

In order to avoid being accused of plagiarism, it is sufficient to add a reference to the correct sources at the time of creating the post. Some may disagree if that should exonerate all content from falling under the said categorization, but it seems to be the consensus and tradition here. Some people additionally add them simply as a means to reference further reading.

Of course, you may encounter situations whereby the referenced source is really not the source to the content, or that the source is added in the aftermaths to being accused of plagiarism. It falls upon the moderators to determine if a text is plagiarized to some extent, and if the source is present (and possibly, if it was in a timely manner and if it even points to where it should). I figure a report of such accusations to the moderators is a prerequisite, which does not mean it may be debated here and there amongst forum members.

In general terms, most of what we post on the forum is rehashed from somewhere, be it some recent article, video, book, essay or whatever we’ve used as a cognitive source. When one expresses that content in his own words, it is logically not going to fall under the plagiarism categorization.
Historical facts are obviously cognitively obtained from multiple sources at different points in time. Hell, I know people who could depict factual correct historical from the top of their mind, with no need to consult any reference.

The bottom line is not what is reflected per se, but whether it is totally or partially attributable to the exercise of the prior depicted meaning and implications of the forum’s understanding on plagiarism.


Now as to what I meant in my prior post, which you indicate you understood. The question stands on why the extract of text depicted by @nutildah show an apparent exercise of text spinning. You must admit that this does seem like a (small) exercise of text spinning. To make it easier to follow my narrative, I’ll replicate the said post here:

The discussion is not over the historical facts, but rather, specifically, if in order to expose them here, some intended word spinning was used. Bear in mind that, additionally, at the time of publication on the forum, the article bore no reference links.

The second part of the question was simple: Why add references to 5 threads today, are they the real sources used?
Rather that infer a reason, I believe it’s reasonable to ask you openly in a thread such as this, since the above quoted case cropped-up here.

No, you don't seem to understand. There are elements in your posts that appear to be plagiarized, and what's even worse is that you're using an article spinner to create the illusion that you have a unique piece and that you don't need to reference the source.

You added Wikipedia references only today, after being exposed.