Hi Josh, everyone
If i ask the miner software to request a certain difficulty (say, 16) is there a way I can ensure EMC accepts this? Or does it like doing its own thing.
Thanks
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 14. (Read 499491 times)
September 13, 2013, 01:17:24 PM
September 13, 2013, 01:13:51 PM
If you changed your email, then yes it will be active until it expires. There's no way to remove it.
September 13, 2013, 04:51:15 AM
There was a bug that should be corrected now. It locked all of the payout lock accounts temporarily. If it's still locked and shouldn't be, let me know.
I think i got this bug, my auto payout has stopped (over the threshold). It says payout lock is active with 1170 mins remaining.
EDIT: i did change my email to have miner fail notification to my phone. If this lock is a feature, how can i remove it?
Thanks
September 08, 2013, 02:43:38 PM
Yeah, I'm looking into that issue, not sure why that's occurring.
September 08, 2013, 02:14:20 PM
Nothing too big but when left on the account page of the web site the miners hash rate just disappears, and Error shows up, have to hit the refresh button to update the page and problem is gone, till page auto updates.
August 27, 2013, 10:45:06 AM
Looks like the pool is wonky again. Gone from 389mh to 1.93 gh in 2 mins. My average on bfg showing as 3.34gh/s
You know, this pool might have some issues reporting rates and other statistics, BUT it seems it is an honest 0% pool.
I've tried many pools (btcguild, slush, eligius, gigavps to name few), and I come back here because it makes most money. I don't know if it just
pool luck or the way it distributes work, but it does find more blocks per pool hash rate than any other ASIC pool I've tried.
gigavps is good for stability, very ASIC friendly, but it does not make as much money as this pool. I'm sure other pool operators are honest, but somehow I get 0.7/block when this pool rate was 40GH/s on my 900-950 GH/s vs 0.6/block on gigavps (~40GH/s). AND EMC finds more
blocks/day. Not sure if gigavps is "taxing" by keeping some blocks, but my 900 GH/s just makes more money here on this pool.
If anyone has suggestions for a better pool. Let me know.
September 06, 2013, 04:16:06 PM
I've made some code changes and database optimizations that should speed things up and alleviate if not eliminate the "drop outs" some people were experiencing, which was not actual drop outs as far as hashrate goes, just the servers getting backed up.
It should also make the site more snappy going forward.
It should also make the site more snappy going forward.
September 05, 2013, 03:52:18 PM
Your account appears to be fine, I don't see any issues with it.
September 05, 2013, 12:56:23 PM
Can you please send me a screen shot of your My Account page? [email protected]
September 04, 2013, 08:34:28 PM
There was a bug that should be corrected now. It locked all of the payout lock accounts temporarily. If it's still locked and shouldn't be, let me know.
September 04, 2013, 03:45:43 PM
Minimum difficulty will be changing to 4 in the next couple of days.
af_newbie: It depends on which server you're talking about. Typically mostly defaults though.
af_newbie: It depends on which server you're talking about. Typically mostly defaults though.
August 27, 2013, 11:31:28 PM
It was probably this block: http://blockchain.info/block-index/411831/000000000000000e574e965e02234f21e3b5dd1ff5d830bd5e47005da9996146
Which was actually found by BTCguild. It often happens that two blocks are found in fairly close proximity time wise, when that happens, they don't even show up as invalids, since they did not even have time to get paid out, so they are just discarded. The only time you'll see an invalid is if there is a significant time delay between when a block was found and when it's validated by the network.
Which was actually found by BTCguild. It often happens that two blocks are found in fairly close proximity time wise, when that happens, they don't even show up as invalids, since they did not even have time to get paid out, so they are just discarded. The only time you'll see an invalid is if there is a significant time delay between when a block was found and when it's validated by the network.
August 27, 2013, 11:16:24 AM
True, but "in the long-term we are all dead" 
Again, your timescales for comparing pools is too small.
You'd need at least 1-2 months to do any type of proper comparison.
August 27, 2013, 11:09:50 AM
gigavps is good for stability, very ASIC friendly, but it does not make as much money as this pool.
Pools have good luck and bad luck unless you are using PPS. My pool has been unlucky for the last week or so which should account for your payments.
I must say though, your time scales for comparison are far from what is needed to make any kind of proper judgement.
It took 6 months for my pool to have a run of luck that brought it back to 100% PPS.
http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2013/08/151-semi-private-mining-pool.html
August 27, 2013, 10:54:54 AM
Looks like the pool is wonky again. Gone from 389mh to 1.93 gh in 2 mins. My average on bfg showing as 3.34gh/s
You know, this pool might have some issues reporting rates and other statistics, BUT it seems it is an honest 0% pool.
I've tried many pools (btcguild, slush, eligius, gigavps to name few), and I come back here because it makes most money. I don't know if it just
pool luck or the way it distributes work, but it does find more blocks per pool hash rate than any other ASIC pool I've tried.
gigavps is good for stability, very ASIC friendly, but it does not make as much money as this pool. I'm sure other pool operators are honest, but somehow I get 0.7/block when this pool rate was 40GH/s on my 900-950 GH/s vs 0.6/block on gigavps (~40GH/s). AND EMC finds more
blocks/day. Not sure if gigavps is "taxing" by keeping some blocks, but my 900 GH/s just makes more money here on this pool.
If anyone has suggestions for a better pool. Let me know.
You have how much gh?
August 27, 2013, 10:50:50 AM
I just think that you get better results here because of DGM. Other pools use PPS or PPLNS.
August 27, 2013, 10:48:45 AM
I like the pool also. I've ued eligius btc and deepbit but this is the only pool I use now
August 27, 2013, 10:18:26 AM
Looks like the pool is wonky again. Gone from 389mh to 1.93 gh in 2 mins. My average on bfg showing as 3.34gh/s
August 26, 2013, 08:12:46 PM
Intel based for the most part.
August 26, 2013, 07:06:52 PM
What kind of hardware do you run the servers on?
Jump to: