I am not looking forward to a 1 billion share block any time soon. I think our worst has maybe been a 4x - 5x difficulty block, but I can't recall off the top of my head.
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 13. (Read 499702 times)
September 18, 2013, 12:42:18 AM
September 17, 2013, 11:19:29 PM
Yeah some people don't understand bitcoin ... or how to interpret mining software results intelligently 
September 05, 2013, 12:42:58 PM
Email and PM sent.
September 17, 2013, 07:37:08 PM
8 hours 20 minutes in the current round. WTF...
373M shares. This is really bad luck.
What's up with block 258562? BTC81 in transaction fees?
373M shares. This is really bad luck.
What's up with block 258562? BTC81 in transaction fees?
373M is not that bad of luck (only a little over 3x diff). Just wait til a pool gets their first 1 billion+ share round (not even 10x difficulty to hit 1b).
September 17, 2013, 07:30:00 PM
8 hours 20 minutes in the current round. WTF...
373M shares. This is really bad luck.
What's up with block 258562? BTC81 in transaction fees?
373M shares. This is really bad luck.
What's up with block 258562? BTC81 in transaction fees?
September 05, 2013, 06:24:25 AM
The payment lock is still active on my account. Can you remove it manually? Thanks.
September 17, 2013, 07:41:05 AM
Seems like that is also broken now, too. Used to be able to get the missing charts by doing that.
September 17, 2013, 07:38:09 AM
Better to just click on worker name...
Code:
That worker does not exist or does not belong to you!
but worker is online/
September 04, 2013, 04:00:03 PM
Minimum difficulty will be changing to 4 in the next couple of days.
af_newbie: It depends on which server you're talking about. Typically mostly defaults though.
af_newbie: It depends on which server you're talking about. Typically mostly defaults though.
Thanks.
Any reason my account has a payout lock?
September 17, 2013, 07:34:47 AM
Better to just click on worker name...
September 17, 2013, 07:30:15 AM
don't work button "Income per worker Graph" 
August 30, 2013, 03:13:12 PM
It was probably this block: http://blockchain.info/block-index/411831/000000000000000e574e965e02234f21e3b5dd1ff5d830bd5e47005da9996146
Which was actually found by BTCguild. It often happens that two blocks are found in fairly close proximity time wise, when that happens, they don't even show up as invalids, since they did not even have time to get paid out, so they are just discarded. The only time you'll see an invalid is if there is a significant time delay between when a block was found and when it's validated by the network.
Which was actually found by BTCguild. It often happens that two blocks are found in fairly close proximity time wise, when that happens, they don't even show up as invalids, since they did not even have time to get paid out, so they are just discarded. The only time you'll see an invalid is if there is a significant time delay between when a block was found and when it's validated by the network.
Inaba,
I just setup my own solo stratum pool to try my Luck.
I have few questions for you:
What do you use for
rpctimeout=30
rpcthreads=50
maxconnections=50
dbcache=250
blockmaxsize=400000
blockprioritysize=50000
in your bitcoind setup? Did you modify bitcoind (net.cpp) to support more inbound/outbound connections?
Considering the size of your pool, you probably run multiple bitcoind instances, no?
September 14, 2013, 01:23:29 AM
5% fee on PPS.
August 28, 2013, 05:31:45 PM
It was probably this block: http://blockchain.info/block-index/411831/000000000000000e574e965e02234f21e3b5dd1ff5d830bd5e47005da9996146
Which was actually found by BTCguild. It often happens that two blocks are found in fairly close proximity time wise, when that happens, they don't even show up as invalids, since they did not even have time to get paid out, so they are just discarded. The only time you'll see an invalid is if there is a significant time delay between when a block was found and when it's validated by the network.
Which was actually found by BTCguild. It often happens that two blocks are found in fairly close proximity time wise, when that happens, they don't even show up as invalids, since they did not even have time to get paid out, so they are just discarded. The only time you'll see an invalid is if there is a significant time delay between when a block was found and when it's validated by the network.
That sucks.
BTW, just solved a block with difficulty 3.45G!!! block 254729
http://tinypic.com/r/15wcsqo/5
September 13, 2013, 11:28:16 PM
I must have messed it but whats the Fee for PPS mining?
Thanks, also where you able to fix the web page yet, been running a plugin for fire fox that auto refreshes for me now
Thanks, also where you able to fix the web page yet, been running a plugin for fire fox that auto refreshes for me now
September 13, 2013, 02:05:46 PM
Yeah, it dynamically adjusts your difficulty based on your mining speed and targets around 20 shares per minute I think is what I have it set to.
August 27, 2013, 11:47:01 AM
Inaba,
My miner solved a block at around 11:37am EST today. bfgminer shows that 149.71M share was submitted.
Can you please verify? I don't see it in the solved block list.
{"STATUS":[{"STATUS":"S","When":1377625747,"Code":11,"Msg":"Summary","De
scription":"bfgminer 3.1.4"}],"SUMMARY":[{"Elapsed":81029,"MHS av":451857.685,"Found Blocks":1,"Getworks":1526,"Accepted":200
81,"Rejected":1610,"Hardware Errors":42869,"Utility":14.869,"Discarded":243894,"Stale":0,"Get Failures":0,"Local Work":896338
1,"Remote Failures":0,"Network Blocks":158,"Total MH":36613775855.4163,"Work Utility":6311.596,"Difficulty Accepted":8509657.
12171855,"Difficulty Rejected":23743.97358199,"Difficulty Stale":0.00000000,"Best Share":149705260}],"id":1}
My miner solved a block at around 11:37am EST today. bfgminer shows that 149.71M share was submitted.
Can you please verify? I don't see it in the solved block list.
{"STATUS":[{"STATUS":"S","When":1377625747,"Code":11,"Msg":"Summary","De
scription":"bfgminer 3.1.4"}],"SUMMARY":[{"Elapsed":81029,"MHS av":451857.685,"Found Blocks":1,"Getworks":1526,"Accepted":200
81,"Rejected":1610,"Hardware Errors":42869,"Utility":14.869,"Discarded":243894,"Stale":0,"Get Failures":0,"Local Work":896338
1,"Remote Failures":0,"Network Blocks":158,"Total MH":36613775855.4163,"Work Utility":6311.596,"Difficulty Accepted":8509657.
12171855,"Difficulty Rejected":23743.97358199,"Difficulty Stale":0.00000000,"Best Share":149705260}],"id":1}
September 13, 2013, 12:48:45 PM
It does it's own thing, but it adjust pretty rapidly. Difficulty starts out at 10 regardless, though.
Depending on the amount of hashes you have?
September 13, 2013, 12:40:03 PM
It does it's own thing, but it adjust pretty rapidly. Difficulty starts out at 10 regardless, though.
August 27, 2013, 10:12:22 AM
gigavps is good for stability, very ASIC friendly, but it does not make as much money as this pool.
Pools have good luck and bad luck unless you are using PPS. My pool has been unlucky for the last week or so which should account for your payments.
I must say though, your time scales for comparison are far from what is needed to make any kind of proper judgement.
It took 6 months for my pool to have a run of luck that brought it back to 100% PPS.
http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2013/08/151-semi-private-mining-pool.html
True, but "in the long-term we are all dead"
Jump to: