Hello for those people saying PBA is monopolized and everything is business
Maybe true in some cases especially in giving trade rights but not on a Finals series between two different companies. Maybe if between sister teams, that is possible although it's on the officiating and not on the team and players themselves.
Even Brownlee's poor performance in the first half makes people think that it's already scripted and Meralco will control the game. The low scoring in the first half was also even pointed out. But in the second half, Brownlee does his Brownlee thing.
2 months from now I think, the next conference will commence.
I'm one of the few people who thinks like this and maybe lets change the word "monopoly" into "duopoly" since the league isn't for one company only but 2 of them namely SMC and MVP
. Maybe we can disregard the PBA Finals on this one but... I want to see an independent team going into the PBA Finals or even Semis and not the same SMC and MVP teams always.
Now with regards to PBA is business, it really is business
. What is the main reason why companies wanted to join the PBA? To advertise their company and its part of their business
. Why would the PBA wants to continue the league? We can say for entertainment yes but its very hypocrite if we will say that it isn't because of money. Again business
. Not debating whatsoever but I just want to share my opinion regarding PBA a monopoly and a business.
Brownlee played poorly I agree but this is where the Locals stepped up especially Tenorio who made the dagger three to seal the deal in the final quarter. Congrats to Scottie Thompson as well in his Finals MVP. Well deserved.