It will be like that, VAR will be very helpful for the referee on the field in certain situations. But it comes back to the main problem, which is using VAR itself. Don't let the use of VAR end up being a new controversial one. As a connoisseur of football, of course, I personally will support all the progress.
During the game, a referee some times cannot give the right decision as a result the mistake becomes contradictory. VAR is an important issue in such problems. Who helps to point out what is happen really in the field. Now VAR is an important things to play any match or tournament. It is now used in all kinds of international games. We have already heard that automated offside technology will be used in the Qatar World Cup. Which will make the game more clear to the viewers.
Even use of technology is good thing but still we need some good transparency for this as well VAR is also not perfect and for better use of this we need a referee and another one who can give his opinion very quickly to on ground referee instead of ground go and check replays about his decision here but before any final announcement they both consult and then announces may be this give some better result even having some hassle and extra specialist referee but for avoiding mistakes we need these things otherwise going without this all technology is also having good results for many decades.
But, as many already having their concerns about few decisions like offside then surely they can go for on VAR and then give their decision but for me as we already have three referees it's going okay for all parties.
VAR has many advantages, however I do not like it very much, in the South American qualifiers for the World Cup I did not like the treatment given to the Venezuelan team in one of the most controversial matches, specifically with Peru and Brazil, it was noticeable partiality at its best, and this is something that I did not like, because even though they went to review the VAR, the referee made the most biased decisions and this is something that tarnishes football, so I am in favor of the more technology there is in a football match the corruption and internal agreements that have decreased because we are all witnesses, it is incredible, but even with the VAR there is a trap.
~snip~
The list looks alright in general, but I wouldn't put England on top of Belgium for example.
Also, I think France is showing a bit higher chances than what they really have. In my mind Brazil is the one with the most chances of winning it.
I had looked at this list before Paul Pogba was badly injured on his pre-season tour. supercomputer has released the favorite team that will win the world champion Qatar, France and Brazil are the candidates who have the most potential to win the championship than other teams that will compete later in the Qatar World Cup match.
and I agree that Brazil is currently becoming the favorite compared to France because of the injury to Pogba, but the analysis is not an absolute and definitive result, even I believe some dark horse teams will stop the big teams from progressing to the next round.
This injury wont hurt France at all, Pogba is far from his best form and if he didnt get injured i dont think he would have been in the first 11 players. Also Brazil isnt the favorite because Pogba got injured that i think is just nonsence. France has a big roster and will replace Pogba easily.
From what has been shown in the French league, it could be said that yes, what happens is that there are players like Pogba who are compactly integrated with the entire team, most of the players on the squad get along with Pogba, Sometimes it is difficult to find a player with the characteristics and characteristics similar to his, however, it is as you say, France has very good players, no player is irreplaceable or essential, they all have substitutions because the team has to move on With or without stars, but it would affect at least the work that Pogba does, but between now and November 20 it is very likely that Pogba will recover.
