Topic: 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Bets! - page 38. (Read 15310 times)

Trump is already openly sponsored by Elon Musk and other prominent people who are donating to his campaign, so I would say there are no worries when comes to funding his path towards the white house.
Ideologically, I cannot relate to Trump up to one hundred percent, as he is more authoritarian than I would like him to be, to the point of cheering on literal dictators around the world.
I continue to believe deep down in mind, Trump does not actually support cryptocurrency and only uses it as a buzzword to catch our attention. It seems to be working though.

On the other hand, there is no doubt Kamala Harris would continue with Bidens plans to regulate and limit Bitcoin in the long term, even applying high taxes onto miners, so discourage the hashrate within the country.

An obvious sell-out and a moron.
Harris has reiterated several times that she continues to support the idea of ​​taxes on unrealized gains. This is anti-human in itself, but for crypto it is expressed even more strongly and any crypto enthusiast clearly understands this. Anyone in the cryptosphere who publicly supports Harris is a sellout.

Even if they manage to raise $100K, that is nothing compared to what Trump has raised, which back in July had already raised $4M.

This has a clear explanation, and is that although many of us would like the candidate who wins to make a policy favorable to Bitcoin, ideologically it does not fit with an ideology that wants more state control, but with one that wants more freedom for individuals.

It appears that there are people from the cryptospace which have begun to declare their support for Kamala Harris hhehe. However, who is this Cleve Mesidor and what is this Blockchain Foundation? Also, what have they done to show their support on the companies in the cryptospace?

I will not be shocked if this organization was created as an operation to appear to be our friends, however, it is there to manipulate everyone and help the government control and strictly regulate the cryptospace.



Crypto investors and execs urging Vice President Kamala Harris to take a positive approach toward the industry are planning a September 13 fundraiser for the Democratic presidential nominee, Reuters reported.

Cleve Mesidor, executive director of the Blockchain Foundation and one of the group’s organisers, told Reuters that tickets range from $500 to $5,000, with a goal of raising $100,000.

While the amount is small, it signals that some in the industry are supporting Harris rather than Republican nominee Donald Trump, who has courted big donors with promises to introduce crypto-friendly policies should he be elected.

Source https://www.dlnews.com/articles/snapshot/crypto-industry-investors-plan-kamala-harris-fundraiser/

IMHO, we'd see threads like this more before the election day comes. And I am assuming that it is not only these crypto exchanges and companies that have their respective tokens that have donated for the good cause they think for each candidate that they bet.

There will be for sure Silicon valley companies and those that are part of the Fortune500 or FAANG.

For sure that we'd see that, it's known that when the reports came, he's a fan of donating to politicians for whichever sake he thought of that will be in use in the future.

Biden clearly won the primaries - millions of ordinary Americans voted for him. But in the end, a stupid, unpopular (1% in the primaries in which it once participated) stool was appointed as the candidate. What is this if not a coup and absurdity? The oligarchy appointed a candidate for the serfs.
Biden, who has done nothing but politics for 50 years, is naturally a creature of the Deep State, just like Harris. But it seems that without the help of the Deep State, Harris is simply zero.

Well, Biden won the nomination, or rather... presidents who are finishing their first term usually go and try to get their second term unchallenged, hence why their party does not hold primaries in any significant way, unlike the opposing party which holds primaries.
Biden was pressured not to continue to seek for his second term, he was definitely talked out of it by Obama, Clinton and other important people within the party. Some people who sympathize with Trump from the beginning would have rather argued Joe Biden has always been a Deep state creature, by the way.
Considering we are talking about his Vice-president, I have seen people making the case Kamala Harris is the most democratic option, as she is the closest one can get to Joe Biden in terms on governance and policies.
Though, it is true, I would have preferred to see someone completely different on the democrat ticket than her, perhaps someone younger...

I don't think that's the right explanation. Trump aside, how did a dumb, unpopular stool become the Democratic nominee? She was appointed. Biden won the primary, then he was ousted, and the entire timeline of what happened shows it was a coup. Harris is a creature of the Deep State and if voters don't understand this then they are being fooled.

This article mentioned that the biggest contributors that donate to the politicians for the election on November are Coinbase and Ripple. We have also witnessed already that Coinbase and Ripple are being cracked down by uncle Gary who might be encouraged by the people behind the Biden administration. These donations from Coinbase and Ripple are certainly going to Trump and the Republicans hehehehe. If Sam Bankman-Fried was not imprisoned and if FTX did not become a scam, we can be quite certain that he will donate more to the Democrats.



Nearly half of all the corporate money flowing into the election has come from the crypto industry, according to a report this week from the nonprofit watchdog group Public Citizen. The sum, approximately $119 million, was raised from a mix of contributors, with Coinbase
 and Ripple accounting for more than 80% of the donations.

Most of the money is going to super PACs that are backing pro-crypto candidates running for office this year. The industry has faced heightened scrutiny during the Biden administration, and Coinbase and Ripple are two of the biggest players that have been engaged in legal battles with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Read in full https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/23/crypto-companies-are-pouring-money-into-2024-election-public-citizen.html

Harris was there as a VP, a background player but is now thrust into the main job without the real run through and test of all candidates.    She might win anyway but I never thought of her being in this job previously and if the swing voters fail to see a valid candidate before them they wont vote that way.

Its really not uncommon that the deputy is really not the intended replacement for the main job, I know literally the law says otherwise in immediate succession but in political terms I dont think it works out as it appears every time.


I'd rather bet and hold onto a Dog meme over a coin not authorized or backed and reliant on a win.  We're talking about hype with such ideas, the white froth that evaporates to nothing when the heat is off.
 Obama coin I would have gone with because the movement at the time behind him was massive and it was a genuine meme all his slogans.  I'm not feeling the same for Harris right now, people quote and talk about various things but there is nothing as big and recognizable as 'Yes we can' .  Stupidly simple it worked, simple ideas work when you address an entire nation, 'its the economy stupid'  another important idea that unseated Bush snr. etc.

For you to understand what it is actually going on within the democrat voting base, you must get that most of the people within the democrat party does not want to vote for the best alternative for their party and their country, it is not about electing a good leader, rather, it is about preventing Trump from becoming the president of the country again, in that sense, it is quite irrelevant who is the democracy nominee and the personal characteristics they could have as a leader.
This is not about voting for a cantidate in specific, it is about voting for the opposite candidate, the one Trump is facing.
Again, people within the political population of the UNited States is forced to choose between a lesser evil to direct their destiny, instead the best the country has to offer in terms of leadership.

It's funny how after the one interview where she was given maximum help and which turned out to be so bad that only a truncated edited version was published, Harris' chances fell below Trump's 
She is really as dumb as a stool and it is not surprising that once in a fair election she got a shameful 1% (as a nominee from the Democrats). However, it remains a huge mystery how such a fool can be on equal terms (allegedly, according to the words of the corrupt media) with Trump - are the Democrat voters really that indiscriminate or does hatred for Trump outweigh them?

The Democratic party how Donald Trump flawed the current president Joe Biden during their debate just before Biden stepped down in the race for reelection and you don't expect them to take the risk if allowing Kamala stand against the very smart Trump in a debate again. If that happens, Trump is definitely going to use that medium to expose the inabilities of the Kamala so the Democrats are doing everything possible not to make the debate hold and the strategy they're using at the moment is influence the debate terms  in their own favor. Donald Trump I know will never want to engage in a debate that's biased and if that happens. Let's keep our fingers crossed and see what happens in the coming days.

I think you are giving the democrat party too much credit when comes to getting ready and having a long time plan to replace Biden with Harris when the Republican party was the least prepared for a movement like that. I think it happened organically: the realized Joe Biden was losing popularity and he had started to be viewed as weak and incompetent compared to Trump (regardless of the good job he has managed to do within the presidency).

Kamala Harris has a very good chance to win the election, even by a razor thin margin, still last time I was the odds on the casinos they were pretty much similar between both Kamala and Trump. It would take for any of them to commit some mistake during the incoming debate for the odds to change in a significant way...

The sad thing is that there isn't a big deal as the public makes it to be, there are about 2k people who get there illegally crossing the Mexican border, by comparison there are more people who legally came in with their visa and overstayed their visa instead, so Mexico border isn't as big of a deal as they make it out to be, and yet because they repeated it, they made it sound like it's something huge.

Having 2k people cross your border every single day is a bad thing, but this was the same at Trump period too, in fact it lowered by a significant margin during first two years of Bidens presidency, because he took over during covid time, and there was more serious checking during that time, so Biden had less immigrants overall total, just the fact that he had more during his last two years doesn't mean he had more overall.

This is why I dislike politics, they keep telling the same lie over and over again, make the numbers look huge, and convince even the smartest people to not do their own research.

There are thousands and thousands of people who enter illegally every single day, not just from Mexico and other ways, including overstaying visa, which is a serious issue that they need to take care of, but no side talks about that for some reason, it's a real threat.

It's not her change, but he tried to promise something that is wanted by the crowd, citizens with hope that she will win the Election in November. She was against the border wall idea for years, opened southern border for years, let's millions of illegal undocumented immigrants flew in the country.

Now, it's her time to change all her thinking, approach and these things to make border better?
It's too stupid to think she said all these because she saw it is right thing to do.

These illegal undocumented immigrants can help her gaining more illegal votes, that's why she let them flowing in massively.

I did not quote it because the reasons being presented in mainstream media are only speculations on why Trump wanted this bill to be killed. Also, the article's topic is on Kamala's change of policy on the southern border.

On your argument, does this also imply that if Trump will change his policy from prolife to proabortion, this will cause Kamala to become prolife? This will certainly cause vigorous headshaking heheheheheh.

Am expecting Harris to win too, but it's really, really tough to tell thanks to various reasons. Trump and his supporters are clearly feeling the heat now since the democrats are quickly gaining ground in more and more states.

His party was always prepared for Biden, but were left stunned and unprepared by Biden getting replaced with Harris which could have been the long-term plan of the Democrats all along.

But if there is maybe Trump will have some key points in the debate to be able to make Kamala do some answers that might be kind of trap that could harm Kamala, after all Trump is far superior in experience and he also holds lot of control that can be used as weapon to worsen Kamala image among the US public.
But the planning for the debate itself will be carried out on September 10 and indeed there are differences of opinion from each team between Trump and Kamala, actually if this is successful then we can see fairly fierce debate based on data from each candidate.
For now Kamala seems to be starting to get an advantage from several parties, but in the upcoming election no one knows what it will be like because some of the support that has emerged for one of the candidates does not necessarily guarantee victory.

I have suspicions that this debate can develop into a verbal squabble, because Trump likes to get his opponent going, perhaps he has such a professional habit since his business days. It is really difficult for him to oppose, but it is easy to do if you do not take everything too seriously, and operate only with facts. I think Donald will do everything to piss off Harris, and not say really important things. In addition, he will say what the crowd wants to hear, and for politicians this is the main task, to speak convincingly, in general it will be very interesting to watch this.

As for my opinion about the winner, I think that Harris will win with a minimal advantage, but of course I am not sure, because forecasts are very often wrong and I would advise not to listen to anyone, even me, but only rely on your own opinion.