Pages:
Author

Topic: 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Bets! - page 33. (Read 15353 times)

hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 11, 2024, 04:26:37 PM
She has always been a more extremist left wing component of democrat party, and that is why the party tried to keep the candidature of Biden for reelection the maximum they could. They knew Kamala's views would be immediately explored and exposed by Trump campaign, what can prejudice her acceptance among americans who have traditional views regards economy and society.

On the other hand, Biden was still able to gain the sympathy from this portion of the country, despite being a democrat and having extremist left wing allies behind him.

The point is that most people don't understand the backgrounds of politics, so politicians use the ignorance of the masses to benefit themselves and to put their plans in practice, doesn't matter if it's going to be good for the country or not, and doesn't matter if most people are adept of it or not.

I understand, because well, the truth is that I have a very radical opinion on everything that has to do with being communist/socialist, which for me is the worst trap set for humanity, that is something that is like a cancer instead of being eradicated it multiplies, I hope the USA does not fall into that because it would truly be the end for the Nation, in case of a risk of communism and if Trump were the only option, they should save themselves from that terrible current, those who say that socialism is something else, no, I tell them that they do not even know what they are getting into, they have no idea how terrible it is.
You are from Venezuela, right? So you have more than enough reasons to feel disgusted regards leftist extremist tendencies. You know how it tastes for real, while in countries like USA people only have thoughts about it, without having never tried on practice. Communism/socialism is like a food which stinks and tastes bad, but most people have never tried themselves or seen it in front of their eyes. And even thought it's terrible, the marketing around this is powerful enough to make people believe it's actually good!

Not that in another models of government and society everything works perfectly, but at least in Capitalism you have more opportunities and chances to thrive. USA has been always an example of that, but it seems their own people aren't proud about it anymore.

It's like that song says: don't know what you got till it's gone...
hero member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 595
https://www.betcoin.ag
September 11, 2024, 04:09:19 PM
Trump and the republicans got a nasty blow thanks to Taylor Swift acknowledging her support for Harris and the democrats just like she supported Biden-Harris way back in 2020.

Trump's pathetic fake Swift support using AI blew up in his face. Harris just became a lot more popular thanks to Swift's fans rallying behind her all of a sudden.

I saw the news about that but haven't read it, but when I check the odds, Harris is now leading Trump, 1.95 to 2.05 as per Stake.

So this is the swing that Harris and her camp could have been waiting for. The last time I check it was still Trump leading amongst, bettors, but there is a sudden shift maybe because of the Taylor Swift support or as the result of the debate.

Yep, after a successful debate for Harris she is ready for a new one, Trump though is wary of a new debate but I think he just needs time to prepare for a new one. Besides, Harris has some problems in her plans, either she will ruin the economy or she will not realise half of what she promised, and the attention to cryptocurrencies can be forgotten in this case. The problem is that when she proposed her ideas during the debate on various payments to families, professionals and so on - the total amount of such payments can reach 1.7 trillion dollars. Naturally, this is a bad sign for the economy and for her, because either she won't do it - or she will do it badly to the economy

Trump will not be on ABC anymore. Did you see how he was fact-checked while Kamala wasn't?  The debate is 1 vs 3 and Trump is just one.

Kamala said she was there on Jan 6 but was just there in the morning and gone after a few minutes. But she said she was there while it was happening lol she wasn't fact-checked. And it's also true Pelosi was also in charge of the security in the capital at that time as said by Trump but the mods are crazy about saying abortion is not happening. Many things Harris said are not true, but ABC mods are just working for their boss.

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
September 11, 2024, 04:00:56 PM
She has always been a more extremist left wing component of democrat party, and that is why the party tried to keep the candidature of Biden for reelection the maximum they could. They knew Kamala's views would be immediately explored and exposed by Trump campaign, what can prejudice her acceptance among americans who have traditional views regards economy and society.

On the other hand, Biden was still able to gain the sympathy from this portion of the country, despite being a democrat and having extremist left wing allies behind him.

The point is that most people don't understand the backgrounds of politics, so politicians use the ignorance of the masses to benefit themselves and to put their plans in practice, doesn't matter if it's going to be good for the country or not, and doesn't matter if most people are adept of it or not.

I understand, because well, the truth is that I have a very radical opinion on everything that has to do with being communist/socialist, which for me is the worst trap set for humanity, that is something that is like a cancer instead of being eradicated it multiplies, I hope the USA does not fall into that because it would truly be the end for the Nation, in case of a risk of communism and if Trump were the only option, they should save themselves from that terrible current, those who say that socialism is something else, no, I tell them that they do not even know what they are getting into, they have no idea how terrible it is.


And what are you thoughts on Fascism?

Because Trump is a hell of lot closer to Fascism than Kamala, or really anyone that could reasonably be considered a future democrat candidate for president, is to Communism.

I always assumed the reason in America Communism is considered evil is for the same reason Fascism is considered evil - all the power is consolidated away from the general public to one person or a small group of people.  If anything Fascism should be considered worse since having a dictator is a feature that the whole idea is centered on.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1883
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 11, 2024, 03:36:25 PM
She has always been a more extremist left wing component of democrat party, and that is why the party tried to keep the candidature of Biden for reelection the maximum they could. They knew Kamala's views would be immediately explored and exposed by Trump campaign, what can prejudice her acceptance among americans who have traditional views regards economy and society.

On the other hand, Biden was still able to gain the sympathy from this portion of the country, despite being a democrat and having extremist left wing allies behind him.

The point is that most people don't understand the backgrounds of politics, so politicians use the ignorance of the masses to benefit themselves and to put their plans in practice, doesn't matter if it's going to be good for the country or not, and doesn't matter if most people are adept of it or not.

I understand, because well, the truth is that I have a very radical opinion on everything that has to do with being communist/socialist, which for me is the worst trap set for humanity, that is something that is like a cancer instead of being eradicated it multiplies, I hope the USA does not fall into that because it would truly be the end for the Nation, in case of a risk of communism and if Trump were the only option, they should save themselves from that terrible current, those who say that socialism is something else, no, I tell them that they do not even know what they are getting into, they have no idea how terrible it is.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1300
September 11, 2024, 03:32:27 PM
Trump and the republicans got a nasty blow thanks to Taylor Swift acknowledging her support for Harris and the democrats just like she supported Biden-Harris way back in 2020.

Trump's pathetic fake Swift support using AI blew up in his face. Harris just became a lot more popular thanks to Swift's fans rallying behind her all of a sudden.

I saw the news about that but haven't read it, but when I check the odds, Harris is now leading Trump, 1.95 to 2.05 as per Stake.

So this is the swing that Harris and her camp could have been waiting for. The last time I check it was still Trump leading amongst, bettors, but there is a sudden shift maybe because of the Taylor Swift support or as the result of the debate.

Yep, after a successful debate for Harris she is ready for a new one, Trump though is wary of a new debate but I think he just needs time to prepare for a new one. Besides, Harris has some problems in her plans, either she will ruin the economy or she will not realise half of what she promised, and the attention to cryptocurrencies can be forgotten in this case. The problem is that when she proposed her ideas during the debate on various payments to families, professionals and so on - the total amount of such payments can reach 1.7 trillion dollars. Naturally, this is a bad sign for the economy and for her, because either she won't do it - or she will do it badly to the economy
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
September 11, 2024, 03:28:22 PM
Obviously, the guy doesn't;t know a thing about crypto or Bitcoin, he probably thinks it's some sort of stocks or Paypal money at best, nor do I see him actually waiting one second of his life to learn more about it, he doesn't care about anything other than votes, and if he is elected then votes don't matter as he can't be president 3 times so he will just go after the money, shitcoind and mamecoins, pump and dump on hype and then that's it, and the morons who voted him for that would be left speechless, or at least I hope they won't open their mouths ever again!
Fact is that even Trump's supporters within this forum and elsewhere know that he is simply faking it to making it and it's seriously hilarious watching them trying to justify how he actually cares about cryptocurrencies.

They just want him to become the president for other reasons(Not crypto), but don't have the gall to actually admit it. Sad state of affairs.
hero member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 595
https://www.betcoin.ag
September 11, 2024, 02:40:49 PM
Obviously, the guy doesn't;t know a thing about crypto or Bitcoin, he probably thinks it's some sort of stocks or Paypal money at best, nor do I see him actually waiting one second of his life to learn more about it, he doesn't care about anything other than votes, and if he is elected then votes don't matter as he can't be president 3 times so he will just go after the money, shitcoind and mamecoins, pump and dump on hype and then that's it, and the morons who voted him for that would be left speechless, or at least I hope they won't open their mouths ever again!

You are right, the Bitcoin system is not difficult to learn. Trump has not made any effort to understand the system which is why he speaks about the industry shallowly. Trump is talking about Bitcoin because he wants to get as many donations as he can get. His family are well known for shady business so it will be easy for them to promote shitcoins and make more money.   

The town next to me had their swans eaten out of their community pond. The swans had been living and breeding there for decades. This was about 2 years ago in Arizona, so I am 100% positive that animals are being eaten by immigrants. I don’t know how bad it has become, but it isn’t imaginary. Maybe not worthy of a political talking point, but it is real.

The recent claim by JD Vance that immigrants were abducting pets and eating them has been debunked by the local police. The story emanated from a Springfield Facebook group which cannot be proven to be true. This news can just emanate from an individual who wants to discredit the 15,000 to 20,000 in the small city. Except they have proof that the swan was eaten by immigrants, it might just be another rumour. Many other factors can make the swan to leave that location. But I am not also saying that these immigrants are innocent of the accusation.

Idk, the locals seem to be sure those guys killed their cats and are eating pets they could find roaming. We've seen locals reporting it on youtube, they can't just make it up they didn't even blame anyone.

But Damn! Kamala is leading again. Crazy stuff going and never have seen Kamala equipped she usually just laughs at things even when it's not funny. Very unusual for her to answer things. I don't see Trump trying much, it should be funny but maybe the rules are just not fit for funny Trump.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1101
September 11, 2024, 11:56:23 AM
Obviously, the guy doesn't;t know a thing about crypto or Bitcoin, he probably thinks it's some sort of stocks or Paypal money at best, nor do I see him actually waiting one second of his life to learn more about it, he doesn't care about anything other than votes, and if he is elected then votes don't matter as he can't be president 3 times so he will just go after the money, shitcoind and mamecoins, pump and dump on hype and then that's it, and the morons who voted him for that would be left speechless, or at least I hope they won't open their mouths ever again!

You are right, the Bitcoin system is not difficult to learn. Trump has not made any effort to understand the system which is why he speaks about the industry shallowly. Trump is talking about Bitcoin because he wants to get as many donations as he can get. His family are well known for shady business so it will be easy for them to promote shitcoins and make more money.   

The town next to me had their swans eaten out of their community pond. The swans had been living and breeding there for decades. This was about 2 years ago in Arizona, so I am 100% positive that animals are being eaten by immigrants. I don’t know how bad it has become, but it isn’t imaginary. Maybe not worthy of a political talking point, but it is real.

The recent claim by JD Vance that immigrants were abducting pets and eating them has been debunked by the local police. The story emanated from a Springfield Facebook group which cannot be proven to be true. This news can just emanate from an individual who wants to discredit the 15,000 to 20,000 in the small city. Except they have proof that the swan was eaten by immigrants, it might just be another rumour. Many other factors can make the swan to leave that location. But I am not also saying that these immigrants are innocent of the accusation.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 11, 2024, 11:30:55 AM
Trumpists in denial mode, he got trashed!
The moment your candidate is fact checked on a claim that illegal immigrants are robbing people's pets and eating them is the moment you realize he might not be the saviour of the world, right?

Stake has moved Kamala as favorite:


As for the Crypto President he was supposed to be, he never mentioned bitcoin even once,  and this should be a lesson, the moment he will/(if) become president he will forget everything about it also, just as he did with the coal industry, the oil industry, the wall and everything else.

The town next to me had their swans eaten out of their community pond. The swans had been living and breeding there for decades. This was about 2 years ago in Arizona, so I am 100% positive that animals are being eaten by immigrants. I don’t know how bad it has become, but it isn’t imaginary. Maybe not worthy of a political talking point, but it is real.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
September 11, 2024, 09:19:51 AM
Neither has he mentioned Bitcoin in this debate, nor in the previous one, nor in any public appearance other than the Bitcoin conference that I know of.

He did an interview and it went terribly wrong:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6359799256112

Quote
"Who knows? Maybe we'll pay off our $35 trillion dollars, hand them a little crypto check, right?" Trump suggested to Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo in an interview. "We'll hand them a little bitcoin and wipe out our $35 trillion."
Obviously, the guy doesn't;t know a thing about crypto or Bitcoin, he probably thinks it's some sort of stocks or Paypal money at best, nor do I see him actually waiting one second of his life to learn more about it, he doesn't care about anything other than votes, and if he is elected then votes don't matter as he can't be president 3 times so he will just go after the money, shitcoind and mamecoins, pump and dump on hype and then that's it, and the morons who voted him for that would be left speechless, or at least I hope they won't open their mouths ever again!
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
September 11, 2024, 08:42:26 AM
As for the Crypto President he was supposed to be, he never mentioned bitcoin even once,  and this should be a lesson, the moment he will/(if) become president he will forget everything about it also, just as he did with the coal industry, the oil industry, the wall and everything else.

This is something I think about a lot. He surely went to the Bitcoin conference because he has people around him who will have advised him, for example his vice-presidential candidate and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are bitcoiners. But he went there to win votes and it is clear that bitcoin is not going to be a priority for him. Neither has he mentioned Bitcoin in this debate, nor in the previous one, nor in any public appearance other than the Bitcoin conference that I know of.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 120
September 11, 2024, 07:56:58 AM
Many polls came up with reports about who was better in the debate. But most of them reported that Harris was better than Trump. However, statistics show that the debate might changed the minds of only 4% of the respondents about whom they would vote for. We still have a long time to go before the elections. I would have to wait until the close of the elections before placing my bet.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13836785/amp/Kamala-harris-donald-trump-winner-Debate-snap-poll.html
In a debate, with two super biased moderators who tried as their best as possible to debate directly with Trump, as their ways to support Kamala Harris, but Trump was not beaten. It's a win for Trump.

Polls from biased media like this are not trusted and not good sources to see who is the winner of debate. Watch the debate and have your own thinking on each nominee and make own insightful conclusion.

It seems everything is in favor with Harris since she manage to continue to take this lead. also for sure Trumps camp is in nervous mode regarding on this consistent polls result.
I don't think they will be panic but Trump actually wasted some good opportunities to destroy Kamala in this debate. It's success of Kamala and two moderators to minimize failure and consequence for Kamala from this debate but she did not win it.

What's her plan that audience of this debate can know from her after 1 hour of debate?
Nothing. She only said "I have plan", no more details.

Years ago, I did not believe such things existed against Trump but this debate and two moderators told me that it actually existed.
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 783
September 11, 2024, 07:46:04 AM
They are contradicting each other, Harris is actively trying trigger Trump on a few points to emphasize his flaws etc.  I dont feel the debate is going to be the deciding factor in the election judging it mid way, theres some fact checking to cap the Trump effect but its not overly different to other debates.
Many polls came up with reports about who was better in the debate. But most of them reported that Harris was better than Trump. However, statistics show that the debate might changed the minds of only 4% of the respondents about whom they would vote for. We still have a long time to go before the elections. I would have to wait until the close of the elections before placing my bet.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13836785/amp/Kamala-harris-donald-trump-winner-Debate-snap-poll.html

It seems everything is in favor with Harris since she manage to continue to take this lead. also for sure Trumps camp is in nervous mode regarding on this consistent polls result. I guess with this matter the race for presidency will became more intense especially that for sure Trump would provably conduct more PR to maximize his presence and win the heart of the voters. But I guess the past issues with Trump is haunting him and Harris would provably go out more stronger since people might think that its better to elect a woman president rather than a racist man who want to get the seat of power again.

Its like crypto stints of Trump is not working now but let see the further more developments since the same with you I will also watch how this drama goes and place my bet on near election since I guess we can get a good insights towards which of them really have a huge chance to win.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
September 11, 2024, 07:19:18 AM
Trumpists in denial mode, he got trashed!
The moment your candidate is fact checked on a claim that illegal immigrants are robbing people's pets and eating them is the moment you realize he might not be the saviour of the world, right?

Stake has moved Kamala as favorite:


As for the Crypto President he was supposed to be, he never mentioned bitcoin even once,  and this should be a lesson, the moment he will/(if) become president he will forget everything about it also, just as he did with the coal industry, the oil industry, the wall and everything else.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 554
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 11, 2024, 06:51:11 AM
They are contradicting each other, Harris is actively trying trigger Trump on a few points to emphasize his flaws etc.  I dont feel the debate is going to be the deciding factor in the election judging it mid way, theres some fact checking to cap the Trump effect but its not overly different to other debates.
Many polls came up with reports about who was better in the debate. But most of them reported that Harris was better than Trump. However, statistics show that the debate might changed the minds of only 4% of the respondents about whom they would vote for. We still have a long time to go before the elections. I would have to wait until the close of the elections before placing my bet.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13836785/amp/Kamala-harris-donald-trump-winner-Debate-snap-poll.html
hero member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 555
September 11, 2024, 04:08:19 AM
Trump and the republicans got a nasty blow thanks to Taylor Swift acknowledging her support for Harris and the democrats just like she supported Biden-Harris way back in 2020.

Trump's pathetic fake Swift support using AI blew up in his face. Harris just became a lot more popular thanks to Swift's fans rallying behind her all of a sudden.

I saw the news about that but haven't read it, but when I check the odds, Harris is now leading Trump, 1.95 to 2.05 as per Stake.

So this is the swing that Harris and her camp could have been waiting for. The last time I check it was still Trump leading amongst, bettors, but there is a sudden shift maybe because of the Taylor Swift support or as the result of the debate.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1496
September 11, 2024, 03:08:22 AM
but this time it is going to be Trump.

How can you be so sure? If it's just an intuition, or a preference, then there's no question. Because based on the current state of affairs, it is impossible to confidently name a winner. Too many multidirectional factors can affect the outcome of an election. I think Kamala will win the election. That doesn't mean I like her. I'm thinking in terms of a winning bet. Of course, not with 100% certainty, but with a probability of ~ 55%.. This is my kind of subjective conclusion, which does not pretend to be true.

I am not sure, I only express my prediction based on the mood of people around. Just my two cents - I dont think that majority gamblers are the same politics professionals, like they are in sport. They see it simple. Biden is old and weird. Trump is a businessman. Harris - who is she? Making prediction in sports is more simple, politics have way to many things to take into consideration. I think I am going to change my prediction into random if that would be possible Cheesy I would better pass such election betting, as you never know all the behind the games things.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
September 11, 2024, 01:14:34 AM
Trump and the republicans got a nasty blow thanks to Taylor Swift acknowledging her support for Harris and the democrats just like she supported Biden-Harris way back in 2020.

Trump's pathetic fake Swift support using AI blew up in his face. Harris just became a lot more popular thanks to Swift's fans rallying behind her all of a sudden.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
September 10, 2024, 10:08:03 PM
Overall Kamala did very well.  I don't expect the debate to move many people, but because Kamalas brain didn't stop working like Bidens, and she was effective in pointing out Trumps ridiculous lies (immigrants eating peoples pets and democrats deciding to get abortions after the child is born were my favorites) I expect right wing media to do what they always do when Trump doesn't have total and complete victory.  They will repeat say it was rigged and cry about "the media" and all the magatards will parrot all of that right back to anyone who will listen.


I'm Trump will be able to shake it off...

Quote
Like many of you, I watched the debate tonight. If you haven’t already, now is a great time to do your research on the issues at hand and the stances these candidates take on the topics that matter to you the most. As a voter, I make sure to watch and read everything I can about their proposed policies and plans for this country.

Recently I was made aware that AI of ‘me’ falsely endorsing Donald Trump’s presidential run was posted to his site. It really conjured up my fears around AI, and the dangers of spreading misinformation. It brought me to the conclusion that I need to be very transparent about my actual plans for this election as a voter. The simplest way to combat misinformation is with the truth.

I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election. I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos. I was so heartened and impressed by her selection of running mate @timwalz, who has been standing up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and a woman’s right to her own body for decades.

I’ve done my research, and I’ve made my choice. Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make. I also want to say, especially to first time voters: Remember that in order to vote, you have to be registered! I also find it’s much easier to vote early. I’ll link where to register and find early voting dates and info in my story.

With love and hope,

Taylor Swift
Childless Cat Lady
STT
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1454
September 10, 2024, 09:08:18 PM
Im watching the debate now and it seems more even then I expected, both sides putting their points across however effective those might be with the public.   Trump declared Israel will fall in 2 years for example if he isnt elected, as always he doesnt do little statements.   Harris comes across as more reasonable and justified but again that doesnt mean it resonates with the public for votes.  

 They are contradicting each other, Harris is actively trying trigger Trump on a few points to emphasize his flaws etc.  I dont feel the debate is going to be the deciding factor in the election judging it mid way, theres some fact checking to cap the Trump effect but its not overly different to other debates.
  Mostly I will argue this whole circus with national TV views will favor Harris for publicity on every point and maybe gaining votes as in effect she is new to the job, Trump already knows his audience and alot of it is repeated.
Pages:
Jump to: