The ironic thing is the Stormy Daniels story could have received a blank denial, regardless of whether its true or not. The tape recordings of Trump speaking and being verbally abusive towards women had potential to be far more damaging. Clinton said after that it was over, she was preparing for office or at least thats how it came across.
Trump could do no wrong seemingly in his campaign, it wasnt a fine tuned machine to begin with as it crashed plenty. People overlooked and went with him anyway or at least the right percentages in the electoral collage etc.
The Debate with Biden on June 24th is going to be when I next bet on this especially because it could change alot. I'm not sure its the best thing for Biden to do but apparently the polls are so bad his staff have decided yes he should. He can reherase plenty of course, work to do but verbal show down with someone who breaks the rules I dont know that works out well for him this time.
https://apnews.com/article/2024-election-presidential-debates-biden-trump-6b1d1dbb2ed61c7637041b23662d7da8
Topic: 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Bets! - page 67. (Read 15310 times)
Man that’s a sorry list of human beings for the most part. You are correct OP that by the law of averages, both candidates are well over the age of male deaths in the United States, which for the first time in many years has actually gone down, instead of up. I despise them both, and both clearly are in the stages of cognitive decline. In 2016 I was sure Hilary was going to win. I voted off ballot but laid a bet on her. I obviously lost that bet. Honestly the odds are about 50/50. The electoral college helps that be the case. Sadly.
Long story short, laying no bets , at least as of right now.
Long story short, laying no bets , at least as of right now.
Well, I would dare to say most of people in the United States would rather to have different options for this presidency, instead only these two, but when comes to betting it is helpful to separate the personal preferences from our expectations on who is likely to win the election. There will be people who despise Biden who they are putting money on him as the possible winner of this incoming election, you know.
By the way, talking about the past 2016 election, Hillary had quite a good chance on getting the presidency for herself, but I the fact she was a woman could have played against her chances, it is not a coincidence all the presidents within the history of the nation have been men, after all.
Who knows, perhaps if the Stormy Daniels story had not been suppressed, then people would have rather to give Hillary a chance, instead Trump, back then politics was normal enough for people to care about their president being a womanizer.
Man that’s a sorry list of human beings for the most part. You are correct OP that by the law of averages, both candidates are well over the age of male deaths in the United States, which for the first time in many years has actually gone down, instead of up. I despise them both, and both clearly are in the stages of cognitive decline. In 2016 I was sure Hilary was going to win. I voted off ballot but laid a bet on her. I obviously lost that bet. Honestly the odds are about 50/50. The electoral college helps that be the case. Sadly.
Long story short, laying no bets , at least as of right now.
Long story short, laying no bets , at least as of right now.
I think in the end the big crypto firm heads might not be that adamant about supporting Trump either. They've put themselves in a sweet spot where they are established at the top with harsh regulation now so competitors are hard to climb the ladder.
If trump opens up the market then they're gonna lose out though this process so there's high possibility quite a few of them will want to maintain the status quo and allow Biden have a second term. Funnily enough though, the miners are very anti democrat at least on the local level given how outspoken some democrats have been against mining on environmental terms. But for the presidential race we will have to wait and see. The donations will speak for themselves.
If trump opens up the market then they're gonna lose out though this process so there's high possibility quite a few of them will want to maintain the status quo and allow Biden have a second term. Funnily enough though, the miners are very anti democrat at least on the local level given how outspoken some democrats have been against mining on environmental terms. But for the presidential race we will have to wait and see. The donations will speak for themselves.
I would like to think miners would rather to be part of the transition to clean energy instead having another four years of rule under someone like Trump, who has already proven to be as anti-democratic as one can bet within the United States. I believe democracy is more important than having easier access to energy in the next years to mine, if miners want to have someone of the republican party in the white house who would not be as strict as Biden is, then it would be healthy for the rest of the democratic system in the country for them to wait for the next republican candidate who will replace Trump as the leader of the party, once Trumps is gone for good.
It would be very difficult for anyone in the next generation of Republicans to surpass Trump in anti democratic behavior and recklessness.
It is not supposed to even been in discussion, it does not matter how pro cryptocurrency a candidate is, if that person is not willing to access the result of elections, then it is a danger.
I think in the end the big crypto firm heads might not be that adamant about supporting Trump either. They've put themselves in a sweet spot where they are established at the top with harsh regulation now so competitors are hard to climb the ladder.
If trump opens up the market then they're gonna lose out though this process so there's high possibility quite a few of them will want to maintain the status quo and allow Biden have a second term. Funnily enough though, the miners are very anti democrat at least on the local level given how outspoken some democrats have been against mining on environmental terms. But for the presidential race we will have to wait and see. The donations will speak for themselves.
If trump opens up the market then they're gonna lose out though this process so there's high possibility quite a few of them will want to maintain the status quo and allow Biden have a second term. Funnily enough though, the miners are very anti democrat at least on the local level given how outspoken some democrats have been against mining on environmental terms. But for the presidential race we will have to wait and see. The donations will speak for themselves.
Well, trying to get votes is exactly what politicians must do, that is literally the way to get elected. If Trump says that he is in favour of Crypto and if crypto people in the USA do not like the way Biden has handled the situations, then they may end up voting for Biden anyway if they hate Trump too much but there is a likeliness that Trump could get his own voters to come out and vote, independents to vote, and maybe even some dems to vote, it is a good strategy for sure.
Is the population of crypto people who would switch big enough? We do not know, I do not think so, but every vote matters, right amount of few thousand votes at the right place, could switch the winner easily, so he is going to try without a doubt.
Is the population of crypto people who would switch big enough? We do not know, I do not think so, but every vote matters, right amount of few thousand votes at the right place, could switch the winner easily, so he is going to try without a doubt.
The border situation and the wars abroad being keep by the support of the United States treasury and taxpayer dollars, sure, those are topics which many people will keep in mind when comes to voting. However, I believe they are other topics and issues which will take a good percentage of importance on the mind of the people when the time to vote comes. Or are you implying the average Republican politician is supposed to ignore the recent changes there have been with comes to the suppression of the reproductive rights of women in the States, or the growing dangerous rethoric within the American society, in which immigrants are labeled like vermin and mentally sick ones who are being shipped from all round the world?
There are both issues and problems which hurt and benefit opposing parties at the same time, Republicans ignoring those won't help their cause, in the same manner democrats won't get any support from ignoring the border situation.
There are both issues and problems which hurt and benefit opposing parties at the same time, Republicans ignoring those won't help their cause, in the same manner democrats won't get any support from ignoring the border situation.
Democrats are very clever. Illegal immigrants are not just "immigrants". They are invaders shipped in by the Democrat Party to increase their vote base. And that is exactly the reason why the states along the border (Arizona, Nevada, Texas.etc) has seen a rapid decrease in support for the Dems. Now the Democrats wants to include illegal aliens in census, so that they can inflate the population in deep-blue states such as California and thereby increase the number of House seats there.
Illegal Immigrants cannot vote in elections, though. Not even legal immigrants can, only citizens. I have seen hosts in Fox claiming the democrat party want to grant immigrants the ability to vote in November, but that is non-sense, since it would be illegal to do so.
It would make more sense in all the immigration going on in the United States had a different objective which did not necessarily involved the elections. For example, we could argue the influx of immigrants is very advantageous for companies and associations which seek to especulate with the value of real state and the renting of living spaces.
With more people in the USA, the demand will only go up for living places, do the landlords can ask for more money. That makes more sense than seeking directly to alter the voting population of the USA by November. Not even mention the access to cheap labor big companies expect from immigrants.
The border situation and the wars abroad being keep by the support of the United States treasury and taxpayer dollars, sure, those are topics which many people will keep in mind when comes to voting. However, I believe they are other topics and issues which will take a good percentage of importance on the mind of the people when the time to vote comes. Or are you implying the average Republican politician is supposed to ignore the recent changes there have been with comes to the suppression of the reproductive rights of women in the States, or the growing dangerous rethoric within the American society, in which immigrants are labeled like vermin and mentally sick ones who are being shipped from all round the world?
There are both issues and problems which hurt and benefit opposing parties at the same time, Republicans ignoring those won't help their cause, in the same manner democrats won't get any support from ignoring the border situation.
There are both issues and problems which hurt and benefit opposing parties at the same time, Republicans ignoring those won't help their cause, in the same manner democrats won't get any support from ignoring the border situation.
Democrats are very clever. Illegal immigrants are not just "immigrants". They are invaders shipped in by the Democrat Party to increase their vote base. And that is exactly the reason why the states along the border (Arizona, Nevada, Texas.etc) has seen a rapid decrease in support for the Dems. Now the Democrats wants to include illegal aliens in census, so that they can inflate the population in deep-blue states such as California and thereby increase the number of House seats there.
Trump has been attacking Biden in all types of issues concerning the Biden administration. However yes, the cryptospace appears to be becoming an important platform of argument where a candidate can either be pro or anti crypto. I wish Trump will not make himself look ignorant because crypto is a very complicated topic. One correct argument for you might be an incorrect argument for another.
Trump is a businessman and he understands cryptocurrency. On the other hand, Joe Biden is a 81-year old career politician, who is driven by his left-wing policies. When Trump was the president (2017-2021), the policies were much more friendly towards the cryptocurrency users. And I hope that it will be the case, in case he wins the elections later this year. BTW, crypto is not one of the hot topics for this year's election. The priority topic is going to be the border situation, followed by Ukraine war.
The border situation and the wars abroad being keep by the support of the United States treasury and taxpayer dollars, sure, those are topics which many people will keep in mind when comes to voting. However, I believe they are other topics and issues which will take a good percentage of importance on the mind of the people when the time to vote comes. Or are you implying the average Republican politician is supposed to ignore the recent changes there have been with comes to the suppression of the reproductive rights of women in the States, or the growing dangerous rethoric within the American society, in which immigrants are labeled like vermin and mentally sick ones who are being shipped from all round the world?
There are both issues and problems which hurt and benefit opposing parties at the same time, Republicans ignoring those won't help their cause, in the same manner democrats won't get any support from ignoring the border situation.
Trump has been attacking Biden in all types of issues concerning the Biden administration. However yes, the cryptospace appears to be becoming an important platform of argument where a candidate can either be pro or anti crypto. I wish Trump will not make himself look ignorant because crypto is a very complicated topic. One correct argument for you might be an incorrect argument for another.
Trump is a businessman and he understands cryptocurrency. On the other hand, Joe Biden is a 81-year old career politician, who is driven by his left-wing policies. When Trump was the president (2017-2021), the policies were much more friendly towards the cryptocurrency users. And I hope that it will be the case, in case he wins the elections later this year. BTW, crypto is not one of the hot topics for this year's election. The priority topic is going to be the border situation, followed by Ukraine war.
Well. It seems Joe Biden has already switched from the defensive to a full offensive tactics and has openly called Trump out and ask for two debates in national television. Trump replied by accepting the challenge, let us see if he actually shows off and both debate face to face.
We must watch these debates, specially if we have stakes on either candidate winning this election, depending on what happens in these debates, the odds of both candidates could dramatically change in detriment of one of them and helping the other. I am personally planning to see I can monitor the debate live and also keep a tab on Stake with the odds summary on both Trump and Biden.
I am not expecting to see Kennedy showing off in neither of those debated and if he tries to, Trump will not go. Even though Kennedy is relatively irrelevant for the outcome of the election, ironically he can decide the winner by spoiling the chances of either Biden of Trump...
We must watch these debates, specially if we have stakes on either candidate winning this election, depending on what happens in these debates, the odds of both candidates could dramatically change in detriment of one of them and helping the other. I am personally planning to see I can monitor the debate live and also keep a tab on Stake with the odds summary on both Trump and Biden.
I am not expecting to see Kennedy showing off in neither of those debated and if he tries to, Trump will not go. Even though Kennedy is relatively irrelevant for the outcome of the election, ironically he can decide the winner by spoiling the chances of either Biden of Trump...
Just in, Former president Trump openly attacked the Biden Administration's based on the policies it has been following against crypto and called for crypto fans to vote for him:
https://fxtwitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1788373884418294072
This is such an interesting development. I would assume Trump has been following everything happening in crypto and to an extent had also been personally affected given he released NFT projects. I wonder if the Biden campaign will give in to respond given their up to now total disregard of crypto investors.
https://fxtwitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1788373884418294072
This is such an interesting development. I would assume Trump has been following everything happening in crypto and to an extent had also been personally affected given he released NFT projects. I wonder if the Biden campaign will give in to respond given their up to now total disregard of crypto investors.
Trump has been attacking Biden in all types of issues concerning the Biden administration. However yes, the cryptospace appears to be becoming an important platform of argument where a candidate can either be pro or anti crypto. I wish Trump will not make himself look ignorant because crypto is a very complicated topic. One correct argument for you might be an incorrect argument for another.
Not like things got bad during this period or the previous one, presidents may interact with crypto situation a bit, but neither Trump nor Biden could be considered smart enough to understand what crypto is. Some people may tell them, but I bet they will forget about it in 15 minutes max, one of them completely ignores, the other makes some money scamming people via crypto world.
Trump has done some NFT stuff, I am telling you that he didn't even know what NFT means, he just wanted money for campaign. If anyone votes for either of them for their crypto stance, you must be naive and I pity you, neither cares about you. In fact, for ANY reason if you vote for either of them because you think they care about the people? You must be born yesterday.
Trump has done some NFT stuff, I am telling you that he didn't even know what NFT means, he just wanted money for campaign. If anyone votes for either of them for their crypto stance, you must be naive and I pity you, neither cares about you. In fact, for ANY reason if you vote for either of them because you think they care about the people? You must be born yesterday.
Trump has historically talked down to crypto and always pointed to USD as the global reserve currency. It wasn't until the NFT Craze when Donald made his famous NFT collection, then he did a second one, and now he is saying all these good things about embracing crypto. I wonder if that topic will be mentioned in the upcoming debates. Speaking of the debates, does anyone want to place a wager that a fly will perch itself atop Biden's bald head again on national TV?! hahahahaha I'll also place a bet on him saying something completely barbaric that makes zero sense and sounds like he has dementia.... Any takers? LMAO
The only 2 choices will be Biden and trump I don't know why anyone would drop bets on other people. Third party has been unsuccessful for centuries lol. Kind of shocked trump has better odds than Joey B. Can't bet on this one no clue how the outcome will be and have no vested interest in hoping one way or another on this based on a bet.
Why the hell all these bastard's are only option ? It feels like a setup for a country fail into war because of a extreme right and left values. These candidates are worthless and embarrassing to younger Americans that out the old ones. Why don't get a choice this time?
If Biden actually won another term we could call it "Weekend at Bernie's 2" LMAO-FJB!
Not like things got bad during this period or the previous one, presidents may interact with crypto situation a bit, but neither Trump nor Biden could be considered smart enough to understand what crypto is. Some people may tell them, but I bet they will forget about it in 15 minutes max, one of them completely ignores, the other makes some money scamming people via crypto world.
Trump has done some NFT stuff, I am telling you that he didn't even know what NFT means, he just wanted money for campaign. If anyone votes for either of them for their crypto stance, you must be naive and I pity you, neither cares about you. In fact, for ANY reason if you vote for either of them because you think they care about the people? You must be born yesterday.
Trump has done some NFT stuff, I am telling you that he didn't even know what NFT means, he just wanted money for campaign. If anyone votes for either of them for their crypto stance, you must be naive and I pity you, neither cares about you. In fact, for ANY reason if you vote for either of them because you think they care about the people? You must be born yesterday.
Well. To be fair, a politician does not need to know how cryptocurrency works exactly in order for them to implement positive legistation for those who are holders of BTC or alternative currencies. For example, I don't think the president of El Salvador is completely informed on how Bitcoin actually works (he definitely knows more than Biden and Trump, though).
By the way, in the case of NTFs and Trump, I believe what actually happened is that Trump got contacted by some people in the United States who were the ones truly behing the minting and the coding of those NTFs, for them to make more money out of them, they decided to pay a good amount of money for Trump to advertise those NTFs and give a façade of those tokens being 100% official and having the backing of Trump, personally. So I don't think he was not as involved as we assume in the creation or even in the idea of those NFTs, he just sold himself as mean to do advertisement.
Not like things got bad during this period or the previous one, presidents may interact with crypto situation a bit, but neither Trump nor Biden could be considered smart enough to understand what crypto is. Some people may tell them, but I bet they will forget about it in 15 minutes max, one of them completely ignores, the other makes some money scamming people via crypto world.
Trump has done some NFT stuff, I am telling you that he didn't even know what NFT means, he just wanted money for campaign. If anyone votes for either of them for their crypto stance, you must be naive and I pity you, neither cares about you. In fact, for ANY reason if you vote for either of them because you think they care about the people? You must be born yesterday.
Trump has done some NFT stuff, I am telling you that he didn't even know what NFT means, he just wanted money for campaign. If anyone votes for either of them for their crypto stance, you must be naive and I pity you, neither cares about you. In fact, for ANY reason if you vote for either of them because you think they care about the people? You must be born yesterday.
If you look into the news, Trump has been doing many things to prop up his crypto stance recently. It's a fact that he's making many such statements. Other times as an attack against Biden and more often saying that he's going to make positive legislative changes for crypto.
Does this mean anything though? Will Trump just repeal AML regulations and fire everyone from the relevant authorities? I think not. Trump in the end is a systemic politician. So much for him being anti establishment, but he's just with the establishment although just a different set of establishment people.
I don't think Trump will do anything to prop up crypto over traditional financial markets, banks etc. It's easy to attack Biden given the vast amount of SEC actions. But what was trump going to do? Let every crypto Ponzi scheme like FTX run amock without making US law stricter? Dunno but it sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.
Does this mean anything though? Will Trump just repeal AML regulations and fire everyone from the relevant authorities? I think not. Trump in the end is a systemic politician. So much for him being anti establishment, but he's just with the establishment although just a different set of establishment people.
I don't think Trump will do anything to prop up crypto over traditional financial markets, banks etc. It's easy to attack Biden given the vast amount of SEC actions. But what was trump going to do? Let every crypto Ponzi scheme like FTX run amock without making US law stricter? Dunno but it sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.
I have a pretty good idea of what Trump is going to do if he manages to become the president of the United States again, he will basically do what he always does and he is very good at: cutting taxes.
He wobt tackle against regulation, Know your Client or Anti Money Laundering, because Trump is not much of a libertarian, he is more authoritarian and in his eyes it is convenient those laws continue to exist and thrive in the long term.
In the other hand, when he was not still convinced about cryptocurrency he went into effectively cutting taxes to the richest people and the high income citizens of the country. He will do the same when comes to Bitcoin and alternative currencies companies, he will rule out the incoming 30% tax on miners and allow people to keep their rewards, that would be (ironically) good enough for Trump to win the favor of an interesting percentage of people who is pro-Bitcoin. Specially those how want to the hashrate to stay within the USA and avoid miners to move to other countries looking for less taxes and cheaper energy.
If you look into the news, Trump has been doing many things to prop up his crypto stance recently. It's a fact that he's making many such statements. Other times as an attack against Biden and more often saying that he's going to make positive legislative changes for crypto.
Does this mean anything though? Will Trump just repeal AML regulations and fire everyone from the relevant authorities? I think not. Trump in the end is a systemic politician. So much for him being anti establishment, but he's just with the establishment although just a different set of establishment people.
I don't think Trump will do anything to prop up crypto over traditional financial markets, banks etc. It's easy to attack Biden given the vast amount of SEC actions. But what was trump going to do? Let every crypto Ponzi scheme like FTX run amock without making US law stricter? Dunno but it sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.
Does this mean anything though? Will Trump just repeal AML regulations and fire everyone from the relevant authorities? I think not. Trump in the end is a systemic politician. So much for him being anti establishment, but he's just with the establishment although just a different set of establishment people.
I don't think Trump will do anything to prop up crypto over traditional financial markets, banks etc. It's easy to attack Biden given the vast amount of SEC actions. But what was trump going to do? Let every crypto Ponzi scheme like FTX run amock without making US law stricter? Dunno but it sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.
To be honest, I don't expect Trump to repeal all the AML regulations. That said, I am not sure whether the cryptocurrency industry is asking to repeal such regulations. What we want is a regulated economy, but with no demonization or unfair harassment. Officials from Biden administration try to portray cryptocurrency as something really bad. For them crypto is the tool of online criminals and terrorists. And I am sure that this scenario will change once Trump takes over as the POTUS sometime later this year.
If you look into the news, Trump has been doing many things to prop up his crypto stance recently. It's a fact that he's making many such statements. Other times as an attack against Biden and more often saying that he's going to make positive legislative changes for crypto.
Does this mean anything though? Will Trump just repeal AML regulations and fire everyone from the relevant authorities? I think not. Trump in the end is a systemic politician. So much for him being anti establishment, but he's just with the establishment although just a different set of establishment people.
I don't think Trump will do anything to prop up crypto over traditional financial markets, banks etc. It's easy to attack Biden given the vast amount of SEC actions. But what was trump going to do? Let every crypto Ponzi scheme like FTX run amock without making US law stricter? Dunno but it sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.
Does this mean anything though? Will Trump just repeal AML regulations and fire everyone from the relevant authorities? I think not. Trump in the end is a systemic politician. So much for him being anti establishment, but he's just with the establishment although just a different set of establishment people.
I don't think Trump will do anything to prop up crypto over traditional financial markets, banks etc. It's easy to attack Biden given the vast amount of SEC actions. But what was trump going to do? Let every crypto Ponzi scheme like FTX run amock without making US law stricter? Dunno but it sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.
Just in, Former president Trump openly attacked the Biden Administration's based on the policies it has been following against crypto and called for crypto fans to vote for him:
https://fxtwitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1788373884418294072
This is such an interesting development. I would assume Trump has been following everything happening in crypto and to an extent had also been personally affected given he released NFT projects. I wonder if the Biden campaign will give in to respond given their up to now total disregard of crypto investors.
https://fxtwitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1788373884418294072
This is such an interesting development. I would assume Trump has been following everything happening in crypto and to an extent had also been personally affected given he released NFT projects. I wonder if the Biden campaign will give in to respond given their up to now total disregard of crypto investors.
Wow!!! This is big actually. There is no doubt that during Trump administration the regime was much more friendly to crypto, compared to what we are having during the last 3-4 years. Anyway, Trump is a businessman and he knows a lot about cryptocurrency. On the other hand Biden is a 81 year old with dementia who has no idea of what crypto is. During Biden's term as the POTUS, it will be people like Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen who design the laws and policies dealing with cryptocurrency.
Both Joe Biden and Donald Trump are political and economical dinos who may have a very rough time trying to understand the benefits of Bitcoin and the alternative currencies for the average people, they grew up and built their fortune in an era where centralization has a monopoly on all the banking and money wiring systems on the planet, to them Bitcoin and blockchains may not have much sense to exist.
Though. unlike Biden, Trump is willing to learn a little bit on those topics if that benefits him politically and economically... as a republican, he is not so interested in reducing the carbon footprint of his country and he do not mind miners of Bitcoin to use fossil fuels to mine and secure the network, Biden does and because of how misinformed Biden is, he wrongly assumes Bitcoin mining is a synonym of contamination and pollution, then in reality all of it can be done with renewables.
By the way, is there any way to check this video was actually done in a speech or event being held by Trump and not the result of some tools of artificial intelligence and deep fakes, just asking...
Jump to: