This really does look ugly. I don't see how anyone could expect higher prices right now. COnsidering all that is going on in bitcoinland, i'd say we have enough to say that lower prices are more probable than higher prices at this point. If i had to give a figure, say 65%.
I am a regular reader of forums here (bitcointalk) and bitcoinmarkets on reddit and can comfortably say, sentiment has turned since the times of Greece when everyone was yelling moon. Now, i would characterize it as ambivalence with uncertainty on what will happen next. The kind of ambivalence that required a breach of maajor support level to shift to full mode bearish. That level, i suspect is $200. That is the level to watch now as we drag gradually towards it.
Even ranges never last long (200 -300) and at some point a decision will have to be made. It is my opinion that we are drawing nearer to that decision point.
You're missing a key factor surrounding the overall sentiment.
People don't yell "THE SKY IS FALLING" and mean it before they first sold.
"Be greedy when others are fearful." - Warren Buffett
Being greedy when others just start being fearful is going to get you bull trapped, or even rekt if you try to catch a falling knife with a leveraged limit.
That's why I moved my funds from trading to exchange, so I can buy this local bottom (should test again in 3-4 days) without such risk.
After the Silk Road panic there was no secondary test, just a brief higher low. Consider at which point of the price cycle this is happening. The volume signature of this crash is low when compared to January. That would indicate there's not much more supply below $200 to be had--a classic shakeout/bear trap to end accumulation.
History doesn't repeat itself. This would not happen again exactly for this reason. Can we stop comparing what happened previously and expect the same/similar to happen? It is a different market with different variables now.
"The volume signature of this crash is low when compared to January. That would indicate there's not much more supply below $200 to be had--a classic shakeout/bear trap to end accumulation."
debatable. crash happened too fast ie flash. A gradual grind to sub- 200 would exhibit different market behaviour IMO
A lot of people will disagree with you.
If you study historical charts of stocks, bonds and commodities they exhibit randomness, yes, but the structures do repeat and are always from the same playbook--a playbook of how humans react to price action. The fact that this doesn't change is why markets peak and crash similarly over and over again throughout history. The names and players may change, but the principles of speculation do not.
I do not deny that history repeats itself. It does in the sense that panic = panic, fear = fear and greed = greed and so forth. So, by that measure, markets are cycles of greedd, fear, excitement, panic, indecision and whatever else is in between.
However, these are relative degrees in that, 2007 fear is not necessary 2015 fear in absolute terms. Sure, both are instances of fear, but if a number were to be assigned to each, they would be varying degrees of fear. This was my point.
So, looking at charts and saying, ""After the Silk Road panic there was no secondary test, just a brief higher low"" a secondary test? a higher lower? This is a different time and the market is 'different'. If it took 2 higher lowers to capitulate last time, it might take 3 of 4 this time. That's not to say there is no fear this time, just that it takes more to attain the level of fear required to call a bottom , A BOTTOM.