Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Bitfury ASIC sales in EU and Europe - page 6. (Read 250465 times)

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
December 19, 2015, 12:48:35 PM
But in the same time first unit did an excellent ROI.
My 25 GHS starter kit delivered 1-st of Sept 2013 made 4-5 times ROI by the end of the year
Smiley
Also bought some chips and used assembly service for them 1-st gen
Got 3-4 times ROI

So  in fact all my bitfury based gear made ROI
Quite different times when ASICs fist came out back then, but that is good to hear they ROI'd so fast the first go round!

I think the only reason he "ROI'd" is because of the run up in Nov 2013.  He would have likely done waaaaayy better buying BTC In Sept and holding.

I got a september kit and more boards in november and made an ROI (paid with $120/BTC though). I cant recall the exact numbers but i think i spent like $2900 (~25BTC) and the return was $6000 (~16BTC) over something like 14 months of mining (i didnt sell many coins above $700) which is pretty good considering it ran more efficiently than even an undervolted S1

sure, BTC investment would have been a better faster return, but i view mining as a leveraged risk. Hardware i bought when BTC>$800 made ROI (or very close to) because the difficulty stagnated with the dropping price, whereas holding BTC would have been 40-60% losses during that time
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
December 19, 2015, 12:40:15 PM
The chip is crazy and amazing.
pics or it didn't happen  Cheesy

*picture of hashrate graph*.

Seriously guys, use some sense. They posted the first real life test results from an ENGINEERING SAMPLE and suddenly everyone is claiming they just deployed 100PH of them.

It wasn't my intention to claim such. I'd love to buy bitfury stuff again, but we are not in 2013 anymore and the chip has to be really incredible to make sense to sell it to the public.

Bitfury chips have been that way since gen1.

rev1 (55nm)(Sept 2013): 0.9-1.2w/GH, improved slightly by the first ASIC string for bicoin mining. Sold as a barebones miner that was easy to produce and could work without heavy/costly heatsinks. about 2x the efficiency of the competitors
rev2 (28nm)(Feb 2015): 0.2-0.3w/GH (4x gain), pretty much exclusively private deployment. about 2x the efficiency as the competitors
rev3 (16nm)(Feb 2016?): 0.05-0.07w/GH (4x gain), hopefully they sell to public

these guys have been the smartest group so far IMO, opting for high-density designs that run in string (less DC/DC components) and dont require heavy heatsinks, only a sparsely populated PCB. deployment to an immersion system would be fast for hardware like this, and the string design could allow operation from >12V power. I would not be surprised to see thier in-house hardware operating with 48VDC power supplies for density
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
December 19, 2015, 04:36:06 AM
If it is 20% better price USD/Ghs and 20-30% better in terms of W/ghs @ the wall and better Ghs/sq.mm in miner PCB than Bitmsin snd Avalon then there will be market for this for sure
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
December 19, 2015, 03:03:07 AM
The chip is crazy and amazing.
pics or it didn't happen  Cheesy

*picture of hashrate graph*.

Seriously guys, use some sense. They posted the first real life test results from an ENGINEERING SAMPLE and suddenly everyone is claiming they just deployed 100PH of them.

It wasn't my intention to claim such. I'd love to buy bitfury stuff again, but we are not in 2013 anymore and the chip has to be really incredible to make sense to sell it to the public.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
December 18, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
The chip is crazy and amazing.
pics or it didn't happen  Cheesy

*picture of hashrate graph*.

Seriously guys, use some sense. They posted the first real life test results from an ENGINEERING SAMPLE and suddenly everyone is claiming they just deployed 100PH of them.

yes, that was more (for at least 180Ph) due to "40MW energy efficient immersion cooling data center" launch: http://bitfury.com/content/3-press/2015-12-16-tbilisi-data-center-fact-sheet.pdf


now regarding the 16nm chip: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151216005453/en/BitFury-Announces-Mass-Production-Fastest-Effective-16nm

Quote
After rigorous testing, the new BitFury Chip has demonstrated outstanding computing capabilities. The design target was 40 gigahash per second with power efficiency of 0.06 joules per gigahash. On average, the measured power efficiency of tested engineering samples of the new BitFury Chip ranges from 0.055 joules per gigahash to 0.07 joules per gigahash, thus making the BitFury 16nm ASIC Chip the industry leader in energy efficiency.

In addition to its outstanding power efficiency, BitFury’s 16nm ASIC Chip can run with as low as 0.35V power supply voltage. The static part of the Chip can be functional at as low as 0.28V power supply voltage. This level of productivity was previously unattainable with existing silicon devices and existing silicon design methodologies, with transistors working in active mode, not slow sub-threshold. J / Gh metric in working modes starting from 55 Gh/s up to 180 Gh/s follows an almost linear relationship of 0.0011, while at 40 – 55 Gh/s measured slope converges to plateau.

Every BitFury 16nm Chip delivers a minimum of 100 gigahash per second of computing power. On average, the BitFury 16nm ASIC can compute in the range of as high as 140 gigahash per second using air cooling, and up to 184 gigahash per second using immersion cooling, which makes the BitFury custom-made silicon an absolute leader in computational efficiency per unit of silicon area.

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
December 18, 2015, 03:34:35 PM
The chip is crazy and amazing.
pics or it didn't happen  Cheesy

*picture of hashrate graph*.

Seriously guys, use some sense. They posted the first real life test results from an ENGINEERING SAMPLE and suddenly everyone is claiming they just deployed 100PH of them.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
December 18, 2015, 02:59:54 PM
With these chips I'll need some heating in my mine...
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
December 18, 2015, 01:11:42 PM
The chip is crazy and amazing.
pics or it didn't happen  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 250
December 18, 2015, 12:45:11 PM
Will be reopening the shop soon! The chip is crazy and amazing. Anyone interested in H-cards with 16nm chips?

I think people are more interested in all the non chip parts of this, power consumption can only sell people so far.
  • What will the estimated MOQ be? $1k, $10k, $100k etc.
  • Please don't announce preorders...
  • How much engagement we will get with the community which isn't done through a PR agency?
  • How will these be sold? Please don't say system integrators and please don't say by resellers, both of which have been a detriment to end users.
  • Are they going to be priced at remotely viable levels? I'm not one to comment on profitability usually but lets at least get in the ballpark.
  • When is SoonTM, cutting through the PR when are we actually expecting products?
  • Who is going to support sales and support? Bitmain currently has droves of people doing just that and I can't see the Head of Product Development sticking about to answer 200 emails a day.
  • Will you finally release or showcase previous designs (BF3500 etc) outside of NDA? It adds credibility and trust to consumers knowing what previous machines looked like. The last thing we saw were H-boards, which while sufficient at the time are a pretty outdated design.

I feel this - like many other previous announcements - are the diamond ring at the proposal. I just hope we don't get mistreated in the rest of the marriage.

Yes the h card may be an outdated design but it worked... with the specs of this chip it means 1 h card would almost hit 1th @ 60 ghs or easily above 1.5th per card on the high end (air). Hell I would take a 1-4 card setup over an s5 or s7 even if they had the same efficiency, yes a little wonkey but the scalability and quietness would win me over. The scalability would win IMO, alot of people dont want to or cant dump 5 btc for a rig designed like avalon, antminer ect nor want to be locked in at that much power draw (price per kwh also plays into it) but would like to run something current gen. I have 2 h card rigs stitting here that I turn on every so often, I could easily sleep next to these things..... newer gen chips in place of these, why yes please.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Bitcoin for the Charity :)
December 18, 2015, 07:47:55 AM
Will be reopening the shop soon! The chip is crazy and amazing. Anyone interested in H-cards with 16nm chips?

I think people are more interested in all the non chip parts of this, power consumption can only sell people so far.
  • What will the estimated MOQ be? $1k, $10k, $100k etc.
  • Please don't announce preorders...
  • How much engagement we will get with the community which isn't done through a PR agency?
  • How will these be sold? Please don't say system integrators and please don't say by resellers, both of which have been a detriment to end users.
  • Are they going to be priced at remotely viable levels? I'm not one to comment on profitability usually but lets at least get in the ballpark.
  • When is SoonTM, cutting through the PR when are we actually expecting products?
  • Who is going to support sales and support? Bitmain currently has droves of people doing just that and I can't see the Head of Product Development sticking about to answer 200 emails a day.
  • Will you finally release or showcase previous designs (BF3500 etc) outside of NDA? It adds credibility and trust to consumers knowing what previous machines looked like. The last thing we saw were H-boards, which while sufficient at the time are a pretty outdated design.

I feel this - like many other previous announcements - are the diamond ring at the proposal. I just hope we don't get mistreated in the rest of the marriage.

 We agree again time will tell how good it is  to buy them.

anyways a ROI would be great within that kind of invests
KNK
hero member
Activity: 692
Merit: 502
December 18, 2015, 07:47:16 AM
I was just about to express my doubts, about the technology scaling factor and the achieveable frequrencies around 0.4V with 16nm FinFETs, but your EDIT sounds much more feasible. Wink

Yeah sorry, the coffee stain wasn't dry enough yet Wink
full member
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
December 18, 2015, 06:56:11 AM
Quote
The design target was 40 gigahash per second with power efficiency of 0.06 joules per gigahash ...
... BitFury’s 16nm ASIC Chip can run with as low as 0.35V power supply voltage ...
... from 55 Gh/s up to 180 Gh/s follows an almost linear relationship of 0.0011, while at 40 – 55 Gh/s measured slope converges to plateau ...
... Every BitFury 16nm Chip delivers a minimum of 100 gigahash per second of computing power. On average, the BitFury 16nm ASIC can compute in the range of as high as 140 gigahash per second using air cooling, and up to 184 gigahash per second using immersion cooling

According to my crystal ball from last night and coffee stains from this morning ... some chip specs:
1. Minimum voltage for stable operation should be 0.4V and 10A for about 60Gh/s
2. Air cooled nominal power options: 0.45V and 10A  OR  0.5V and 14A  OR  0.6V and 12A with lower freq, if the internal oscillator is programmable and voltage dependant as in the 55nm chip
3. Immersion cooled power 0.65V and 20A

Some wild guesses and speculations about the internal structure:
Let's assume 4096 cores, because on the same die size at 16nm you can fit 4 times more. Using the same rolling cores (61+4 cicles) from the 55nm chip this gives 1GHz min working freq.
Then the nominal working frequency should be ~2GHz and up to 2.9GHz with immersion cooling

EDIT: Actually you can fit 16 times more (16*864=13824) and the frequency difference above is too big, so some other options:
 with 8192 cores the numbers are coming down to 500MHz min, 1GHz nominal and 1.45GHz ... still too big frequency difference
 with 10240 cores: 400MHz min, 800MHz nominal and 1.1GHz
 with 13824 cores: ~300MHz min, ~600MHz nominal and ~860Mhz ... seems normal, so that is more likely the case


I was just about to express my doubts, about the technology scaling factor and the achieveable frequrencies around 0.4V with 16nm FinFETs, but your EDIT sounds much more feasible. Wink
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
December 18, 2015, 06:34:55 AM
I personally hope that there is a chance if in fact bitfury will release the dev chip sales there will be again incentive for developers like intron or vs3 and we'll see again treads in this section about real hardware design .
Maybe then again this part of the forum will match it's point.
I'm sick and tired to read endless posts about Ant miner setups, paid reviews (hidden PR of overpriced mass produced Chinese HW), scams with Photoshop pictures  etc.
There are close to any HW and SW miner design treads around lately .

Make it a Christmas wish Wink
KNK
hero member
Activity: 692
Merit: 502
December 18, 2015, 05:07:53 AM
Quote
The design target was 40 gigahash per second with power efficiency of 0.06 joules per gigahash ...
... BitFury’s 16nm ASIC Chip can run with as low as 0.35V power supply voltage ...
... from 55 Gh/s up to 180 Gh/s follows an almost linear relationship of 0.0011, while at 40 – 55 Gh/s measured slope converges to plateau ...
... Every BitFury 16nm Chip delivers a minimum of 100 gigahash per second of computing power. On average, the BitFury 16nm ASIC can compute in the range of as high as 140 gigahash per second using air cooling, and up to 184 gigahash per second using immersion cooling

According to my crystal ball from last night and coffee stains from this morning ... some chip specs:
1. Minimum voltage for stable operation should be 0.4V and 10A for about 60Gh/s
2. Air cooled nominal power options: 0.45V and 10A  OR  0.5V and 14A  OR  0.6V and 12A with lower freq, if the internal oscillator is programmable and voltage dependant as in the 55nm chip
3. Immersion cooled power 0.65V and 20A

Some wild guesses and speculations about the internal structure:
Let's assume 4096 cores, because on the same die size at 16nm you can fit 4 times more. Using the same rolling cores (61+4 cicles) from the 55nm chip this gives 1GHz min working freq.
Then the nominal working frequency should be ~2GHz and up to 2.9GHz with immersion cooling

EDIT: Actually you can fit 16 times more (16*864=13824) and the frequency difference above is too big, so some other options:
 with 8192 cores the numbers are coming down to 500MHz min, 1GHz nominal and 1.45GHz ... still too big frequency difference
 with 10240 cores: 400MHz min, 800MHz nominal and 1.1GHz
 with 13824 cores: ~300MHz min, ~600MHz nominal and ~860Mhz ... seems normal, so that is more likely the case
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
December 17, 2015, 07:19:56 PM
But in the same time first unit did an excellent ROI.
My 25 GHS starter kit delivered 1-st of Sept 2013 made 4-5 times ROI by the end of the year
Smiley
Also bought some chips and used assembly service for them 1-st gen
Got 3-4 times ROI

So  in fact all my bitfury based gear made ROI
Quite different times when ASICs fist came out back then, but that is good to hear they ROI'd so fast the first go round!

I think the only reason he "ROI'd" is because of the run up in Nov 2013.  He would have likely done waaaaayy better buying BTC In Sept and holding.

about 120$ one bitcoin in the beginning of September 2013.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
December 17, 2015, 07:10:24 PM
But in the same time first unit did an excellent ROI.
My 25 GHS starter kit delivered 1-st of Sept 2013 made 4-5 times ROI by the end of the year
Smiley
Also bought some chips and used assembly service for them 1-st gen
Got 3-4 times ROI

So  in fact all my bitfury based gear made ROI
Quite different times when ASICs fist came out back then, but that is good to hear they ROI'd so fast the first go round!

I think the only reason he "ROI'd" is because of the run up in Nov 2013.  He would have likely done waaaaayy better buying BTC In Sept and holding.
legendary
Activity: 1174
Merit: 1001
December 17, 2015, 06:54:08 PM
But in the same time first unit did an excellent ROI.
My 25 GHS starter kit delivered 1-st of Sept 2013 made 4-5 times ROI by the end of the year
Smiley
Also bought some chips and used assembly service for them 1-st gen
Got 3-4 times ROI

So  in fact all my bitfury based gear made ROI
Quite different times when ASICs fist came out back then, but that is good to hear they ROI'd so fast the first go round!
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
December 17, 2015, 04:23:07 PM
But in the same time first unit did an excellent ROI.
My 25 GHS starter kit delivered 1-st of Sept 2013 made 4-5 times ROI by the end of the year
Smiley
Also bought some chips and used assembly service for them 1-st gen
Got 3-4 times ROI

So  in fact all my bitfury based gear made ROI
Pages:
Jump to: