When we started smallest ChipMixer chip (1 mBTC) was worth $1.5.
Today Bitcoin price reached $10,000 which makes the smallest ChipMixer chip (1 mBTC) worth $10.
Should we introduce smaller chips?
Smaller chips would be good, especially if someone wants to pay someone by giving a voucher. At the moment you can't pay $15, it's either $10 or $20.Today Bitcoin price reached $10,000 which makes the smallest ChipMixer chip (1 mBTC) worth $10.
Should we introduce smaller chips?
But: Bitcoin fees only got higher. If you want to using a 1 mBTC chip to make a transaction, you currently need to pay about 0.4 mBTC on fees. You can pay less, and sometimes that's even enough, but fees have been much higher too.
A 0.5 mBTC chip is useless if you have to pay 80% in fees to spend it.
Yes, smaller chips would be nice, but only as vouchers 0.5 mBTC (unredeemable for 0.5 mBTC chip)
people can keep 0.5 mBTC temporarily so that they can use it as off-chain payment or combine to get 1 mBTC chip or higher
so ChipMixer doesn't really need to generate address for 0.5 mBTC, only deals them in vouchers systematically
in a way people would start accumulating bitcoins by redeeming small vouchers into big one
which eventually they will convert into ChipMixer chips, this will sound like unintended feature of ChipMixer becoming as a wallet
though I think it will attract more users to the site which also might create new problems for ChipMixer
. Chipmixer's voucher allows us to connect many deposits and withdraw it at once, a bigger output which harder to link. Another thing to note is "withdraw fees" as bigger transaction require a bigger fee to be confirmed, which mean the payment amount reduced automatically. 
Sorry for my stupidity.
