Author

Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented - page 131. (Read 92456 times)

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 976
What could be a reason for using a mixer if everything is legit? Just curious

That's like asking what's the point of keeping your cash hidden in your wallet in your pocket instead of wearing it in a clear bag around your neck... if people know you have a large amount of cash, or are worth a bit, you become a target and potentially put yourself at risk for displaying your net worth. You don't want the world knowing how much you have on your person or in your bank account, so I'm sure you don't publish your bank account balance publicly.

Because of the nature of cryptocurrency and their open ledger process, mixers are a great way to provide privacy from potential hackers and scammers from making you a target by being able to see your balance or how much crypto you move. There's nothing illegal about wanting privacy.

I think a lot of people fail to realize that good ol' cash is still used on a daily basis for more illegal purposes than Bitcoin is.

Mixers don't promote illegal activities. They promote privacy. Nothing wrong with that!
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 523
Since you've mentioned about darknet and FBI, makes me wonder in which country was Chip Mixer established?
There are some exchanges that avoid US regulations about high taxes and decided to move out of the state, and there maybe there are some countries that have less strict rules.
I do not recommend to move the Chipmixer base, but as long as we do such fair business without illegal activities such as money laundering, then it should be fine.

The thing with anonymous mixers such as the late BitMixer and the current ChipMixer is that there is absolutely no way to tell if money is being laundered. The blockchain could be analyzed to find similar inputs or outputs that could relate back to money laundering, but nothing is really certain. The way ChipMixer works at least basically makes analyzing the transactions for relations impossible, which means that identifying this is practically impossible. In turn, this makes governments not like it since illegal activity *could* be happening but there is no way to prove it. Because of this, regulations may be created to limit mixing activity or classify it itself as flat out money laundering itself. So as you see it's not only about there existing illegal activity, but also the potential for it.

You're right, bitcoin couldn't be traced after mixed, and that's why Government could push another mixer to shut down, maybe.
There's no way to track down money laundering if they use bitcoin and cash to transact without using exchanges and bank services.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 4911
https://merel.mobi => buy facemasks with BTC/LTC
What could be a reason for using a mixer if everything is legit? Just curious

The most obvious reason for me is because i don't want anybody to know how much BTC i own exactly. Most people keep their private keys on a desktop, a hardware wallet or a paper wallet, but they still keep everything in their home.
If somebody would know you helt the private keys of addresses loaded with 100's of BTC in your home, they might get tempted to rob you...
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 911
fly or die
What could be a reason for using a mixer if everything is legit? Just curious

There are plenty of legal reasons to hide your wealth. First of all what you must tell the taxman is between you and the taxman, not public information (except in a couple of countries where you can know everything about every citizen).
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1007

ChipMixer, have you considered adding a warrant canary?
It would be good to have a "defense" against this type of thing, so your users can know if something happens.
After FBI operating child pornography website and darknet market Hansa for weeks, do you still believe warrant canaries? They do not play by the rules anymore.

Since you've mentioned about darknet and FBI, makes me wonder in which country was Chip Mixer established?
There are some exchanges that avoid US regulations about high taxes and decided to move out of the state, and there maybe there are some countries that have less strict rules.
I do not recommend to move the Chipmixer base, but as long as we do such fair business without illegal activities such as money laundering, then it should be fine.

The thing with anonymous mixers such as the late BitMixer and the current ChipMixer is that there is absolutely no way to tell if money is being laundered. The blockchain could be analyzed to find similar inputs or outputs that could relate back to money laundering, but nothing is really certain. The way ChipMixer works at least basically makes analyzing the transactions for relations impossible, which means that identifying this is practically impossible. In turn, this makes governments not like it since illegal activity *could* be happening but there is no way to prove it. Because of this, regulations may be created to limit mixing activity or classify it itself as flat out money laundering itself. So as you see it's not only about there existing illegal activity, but also the potential for it.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 523
If someone is afraid to be shut down from their servers by governments, I'd like to suggest hosting servers on decentralized domain services if there

Are any? or do we really need something like Bitcoin? being strong enough with enough network spread to render any government unable to shut down.

Another solution could be hosting servers on a country where US government, or any western governments couldn't reach like Iran.

Iran is not an option I guess, maybe in Panama or Hongkong are better. Not so sure about the regulations.

ChipMixer, have you considered adding a warrant canary?
It would be good to have a "defense" against this type of thing, so your users can know if something happens.
After FBI operating child pornography website and darknet market Hansa for weeks, do you still believe warrant canaries? They do not play by the rules anymore.

Since you've mentioned about darknet and FBI, makes me wonder in which country was Chip Mixer established?
There are some exchanges that avoid US regulations about high taxes and decided to move out of the state, and there maybe there are some countries that have less strict rules.
I do not recommend to move the Chipmixer base, but as long as we do such fair business without illegal activities such as money laundering, then it should be fine.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
What could be a reason for using a mixer if everything is legit? Just curious



Because privacy matters.

I'm just going to quote here the "Why should I mix my coins?" page from the recent closed BitMixer.

Why should I mix my coins?

While using bitcoins is an excellent way to make your purchases, donations, and p2p payments, without losing money through inflated transaction fees, transactions are never truly anonymous. Bitcoin activities are recorded and available publicly via the blockchain; a comprehensive database which keeps a record of bitcoin transactions.

All exchanges require the user to scan ID documents, and large transactions must be reported to the proper governmental authority. When you use Bitcoin to pay for goods and services, you will of course need to provide your name and address to the seller for delivery purposes.

This means that a third party with an interest in tracking your activities can use your visible balance and ID information as a basis from which to track your future transactions or to study previous activity. In short, you have compromised your security and privacy.

To avoid this, we recommend using a quality mixing service such as the one we provide to periodically exchange your bitcoins for different ones which cannot be associated with the original owner. In order to further enhance the security of your transactions we provide the opportunity to use two or more forward addresses as well as convenient time delays. In addition, we immediately delete all archival logs related to your transactions.
newbie
Activity: 107
Merit: 0
What could be a reason for using a mixer if everything is legit? Just curious
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
10 BTC is around $25,000. Mixing 200 BTC means mixing $500,000. Do you need to mix half a million in one transaction?
Not me, I wish I had the kind of money problems in which I need to mix half a million dollars Wink
I've read about 1000+ Bitcoins being mixed at once at BitMixer, so some people would use it.
sr. member
Activity: 456
Merit: 956
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935098
ChipMixer, have you considered adding a warrant canary?
It would be good to have a "defense" against this type of thing, so your users can know if something happens.
After FBI operating child pornography website and darknet market Hansa for weeks, do you still believe warrant canaries? They do not play by the rules anymore.

But if the level of traffic stays high for longer, you'll get back to normal, right?
As long as we can predict the demand, we can prepare enough chips.

If ChipMixer has - say - 100 Bitcoins, and someone wants to mix 200, it's nice to know up front that won't be possible.
Our current highest size chip is 4.096 BTC so our recommended max amount per mix session is under 10 BTC. If you send more, instead of one confirmation required, we require 6 confirmations. 10 BTC is around $25,000. Mixing 200 BTC means mixing $500,000. Do you need to mix half a million in one transaction?

If there is a demand, we can add 8BTC, 16BTC, 32BTC chips.

Also, if yesterday's ChipMixer users will get "newer" Bitcoins back, how do you guarantee they don't get their own Bitcoins back? Especially if you don't keep logs of who deposited which coins.
There is no guarantee, there is chance and receipt. Chance means that if you send 1 BTC out of 100 BTC pool, you have 1/100 chance to receive the same coins. Even if you would receive the same, there would be no proof they are the same. It is like throwing a dollar into cup of dollars. Even if you pick the same one, they are fungible and there is no difference whenever you pick any of them. Receipt is a signed proof you have received funds from ChipMixer.

Hopefully Chipmixer can try to clear the image of a bitcoin mixer, so that it is not only used for buying drugs and whatnot but rather protecting your privacy when using bitcoin which is obviously a public ledger.
How would you do that?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
ChipMixer, have you considered adding a warrant canary? Some people are speculating that BitMixer was under pressure to shut down by a government, given that they suggested Zerocoin and DASH, which aren't very good for privacy (especially Zerocoin - ZCash is a lot better), instead of the better alternatives.

It would be good to have a "defense" against this type of thing, so your users can know if something happens.

This seems like a good idea. Otherwise we have no idea whether or not user info is being shared with governments. Obviously if the government starts to bait users publicly nobody will use the service but if in secret data can be be misappropriated.

I'd say that bitmixer definitely shut down because there was an increasing amount of pressure from governments tracking them down, and obviously they are indeed the leading bitcoin mixer at the time.

Hopefully Chipmixer can try to clear the image of a bitcoin mixer, so that it is not only used for buying drugs and whatnot but rather protecting your privacy when using bitcoin which is obviously a public ledger.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Bitmixer was a massive outfit... If you read the closing down thread, Bitmixer claims their service was valued at 5-6 million... Shocked
I could sell the business for our competitors for $5-6M
BitMixer also says it mixed more than a million Bitcoins in 2016. At a minimum of 0.5% fee, that gives more than 5000 Bitcoin profit (minus costs of course). I didn't know mixing is such a big business.

First, due to unexpected amount of traffic, all prepared chips were withdrawn (there were not enough for this demand)
I've been wondering before, but I never asked: how much does ChipMixer have to work with? BitMixer had 2000+ Bitcoin at it's peak, with some very high volume customers. If ChipMixer has - say - 100 Bitcoins, and someone wants to mix 200, it's nice to know up front that won't be possible.
Also, if yesterday's ChipMixer users will get "newer" Bitcoins back, how do you guarantee they don't get their own Bitcoins back? Especially if you don't keep logs of who deposited which coins.
mk4
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 3817
🪸 NotYourKeys.org 🪸
ChipMixer, have you considered adding a warrant canary? Some people are speculating that BitMixer was under pressure to shut down by a government, given that they suggested Zerocoin and DASH, which aren't very good for privacy (especially Zerocoin - ZCash is a lot better), instead of the better alternatives.

It would be good to have a "defense" against this type of thing, so your users can know if something happens.

I wanted to ask this too. Are there risks of ChipMixer possibly closing out too due to possible issues with the government in the future?

About BixMixer suggesting Zerocoin and Dash, I have a feeling that they were paid to endorse those coins. That's just me though.
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~ Both markets were protected by Tor and yet servers were located and one of them was made honeypot. An owner of one of the markets had four luxury cars and lot of money so everybody was asking - why keep risking a good life to provide darknet service? BitMixer owners probably asked it themselves and the answer was - it is not worth it anymore.


it is always their own fault for slipping. they do all the security measures for their servers then they use same credentials for their emails in multiple places and leak a lot of their information. i believe that was how they caught them.
Pretty much.  They caught the guy from Alpha Bay because he used his personal email in a "welcome email" to new users of Alpha Bay back in 2014.  That email included his first name and year of birth, and the authorities later found that he'd used the email for a PayPal account.

The problem is that these markets never expect to get so big, nor do they have so much initial investment.  So often their owners and workers are careless in the early days and they give away information that the authorities can start using even years later.

ChipMixer doesn't have millions to put aside to prepare for an influx of users either, which would explain why they're concerned about the recent influx of traffic.
chips you will withdraw now will be created after deposit which is one of the reasons why ChipMixer gives more privacy than other mixers. In this case, due to traffic, we could not offer that to you.
But if the level of traffic stays high for longer, you'll get back to normal, right?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
my session disappeared after I restarted my computer in step 1 when I have already transferred bitcoins into deposit address, how can I restore my session with my token and deposit address?

I mailed and send private message to chipmixer but so far i have got no reply from this site, anyone can help will be appreciated.

legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 10505
~ Both markets were protected by Tor and yet servers were located and one of them was made honeypot. An owner of one of the markets had four luxury cars and lot of money so everybody was asking - why keep risking a good life to provide darknet service? BitMixer owners probably asked it themselves and the answer was - it is not worth it anymore.


it is always their own fault for slipping. they do all the security measures for their servers then they use same credentials for their emails in multiple places and leak a lot of their information. i believe that was how they caught them.
it is like the KickAssTorrent owner guy who was using coinbase for his bitcoin wallet and made purchases from iTunes IIRC!
HCP
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4314
Bitmixer was a massive outfit... If you read the closing down thread, Bitmixer claims their service was valued at 5-6 million... Shocked
I could sell the business for our competitors for $5-6M

The volume required to be generating that level of value is pretty massive. No doubt that volume is now being spread across the remaining mixers like ChipMixer. I am not surprised there was a "run" on the available stock of chips... A sad day for BTC and privacy, but a window of opportunity for ChipMixer! Wink

What I also expect to see is a sharp increase in the number of "scam" mixers popping up... outright scam sites AND "clone" scams... be careful, double check your URLs etc.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3282
ChipMixer, have you considered adding a warrant canary? Some people are speculating that BitMixer was under pressure to shut down by a government, given that they suggested Zerocoin and DASH, which aren't very good for privacy (especially Zerocoin - ZCash is a lot better), instead of the better alternatives.

It would be good to have a "defense" against this type of thing, so your users can know if something happens.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3408
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
The news is not that great for a few reasons.

First, due to unexpected amount of traffic, all prepared chips were withdrawn (there were not enough for this demand), which means that some of you may have received less chips and a voucher for a missing sum. If you are one of those, you can now use your voucher. Why is it bad? Because chips you will withdraw now will be created after deposit which is one of the reasons why ChipMixer gives more privacy than other mixers. In this case, due to traffic, we could not offer that to you.

Second, if your competition stops for an unknown reason then it is never a good sign. They say it was a change of heart. Probably not true. But they did not do an exit scam so that is not big lie.
Why BitMixer left? If you check the news, you know that two big darknet markets were shut down by police. Both markets were protected by Tor and yet servers were located and one of them was made honeypot. An owner of one of the markets had four luxury cars and lot of money so everybody was asking - why keep risking a good life to provide darknet service? BitMixer owners probably asked it themselves and the answer was - it is not worth it anymore.

Today was a bad day for online privacy and bitcoin users. Thank you BitMixer for your work, you will be missed.


Big time for Chipmixer is coming!
After closing Bitmixer you can now bite a really big piece of cake!
Lets hope we will not choke on that cake.

That was a really objective response, ChipMixer. I think there are many of us who believe that this was a blow to the community. Regardless of the reasons behind the decision, there is now a void that may take a while to fill.

Of much more concern will be what this means for (Bitcoin) online privacy, and how potent the weapons against it are becoming.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
-snip-
First of all, if you ever have any issues, it's better to contact ChipMixer support on [email protected]

Now, they made a post explaining why this may have happened just two posts above yours.
First, due to unexpected amount of traffic, all prepared chips were withdrawn (there were not enough for this demand), which means that some of you may have received less chips and a voucher for a missing sum. If you are one of those, you can now use your voucher. Why is it bad? Because chips you will withdraw now will be created after deposit which is one of the reasons why ChipMixer gives more privacy than other mixers. In this case, due to traffic, we could not offer that to you.

Sad to hear that this happened and some people may have had a bad first experience with ChipMixer. But imagine being flooded by all the users of your old biggest competitor... Problems can happen.



OP what details or proofs you needed I can provide and lets make that quick because my session might end in next 48 hours.
Even if they take some time to answer you and your session is close to expire (I doubt they will take that long), you can always extend your session while mixing.

Jump to: