[ANN] CureCoin 2.0 is live - Mandatory Update is available now - DEC 2018 - page 66.

JnX3000

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: BTCTT on June 07, 2016, 04:38:37 PM

1. They are incompetent
2. They are thief
3. They releasing something soon

Take your pick but I'm betting on number 1!

Quote from: BTCTT on June 14, 2016, 05:16:53 AM

Another failure in the long list of crypto bust. I just hope it was not an organised scam like soooo many other out there...

If it would just have been a scam they wouldn't have bothered coding all the Quantum Computing Resistant stuff for CC2.0...

While I agree they should keep us updated from time to time, it's sad people are so quick at insulting them Sad

I also keep my coins. In the worst case I've just helped F@H and in the best case (they release a decentralized quantum resistant version of the coin that will get popular) well... we'll see Cheesy

BTCTT

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

Quote from: JnX3000 on June 13, 2016, 05:22:47 PM

Quote from: SalimNagamato on June 12, 2016, 05:47:37 AM

what about proof that POW+POS is secure as POW ?

Anyway, in my opinion the main problem with CC2 is the need for certification authorities.
The great revolution and success of Blockchain technology (Bitcoin...) is that you don't need to trust a person, a company, an organization or an administration. You just need to trust the algorithm. This lack of third party ranks #1-#3 on many lists about Blockchain advantages.

Putting in place certification authorities (to remove POW) for CC2 goes against one of the main goals of Blockchain technology...

I agree with you they haven't found anything to remove the problem of centralisation. However, I believe that if they had shown some consistency in their handling of the launch etc. people would have support them because it's about charity.

Unfortunately they have failed to reassure investors and supporters... I'll keep my coins because it is too late to sell but I can't say I'm not disappointed in their behaviour.

Another failure in the long list of crypto bust. I just hope it was not an organised scam like soooo many other out there...

JnX3000

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: SalimNagamato on June 12, 2016, 05:47:37 AM

what about proof that POW+POS is secure as POW ?

Anyway, in my opinion the main problem with CC2 is the need for certification authorities.
The great revolution and success of Blockchain technology (Bitcoin...) is that you don't need to trust a person, a company, an organization or an administration. You just need to trust the algorithm. This lack of third party ranks #1-#3 on many lists about Blockchain advantages.

Putting in place certification authorities (to remove POW) for CC2 goes against one of the main goals of Blockchain technology...

SalimNagamato

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Quote from: JnX3000 on June 12, 2016, 05:35:56 AM

Quote from: SalimNagamato on May 28, 2016, 11:11:50 AM

will be good if the dev. team at least reply our posts... and community to agree about a change and the POS parameters
I can help with testing the POS 3 forking

something like:

POS 3.0, no POW
block time 60 seconds
POS reward static 0.25 CURE (or other amount) + foundation reward to dev's wallet for Folding distribution: 5 CURE, halve every 4 years (to make 7488 CURE daily).
and then dev. can send the current premine to a burning address

Has it been 100% proven that POS 3.0 without POW is as secure as POS + POW???

i guess it wasn't
what about proof that POW+POS is secure as POW ?
we can make it POW+POS. but a faster chain
or ask exchanges to allow deposits with 1 confimation ? because curecoin is sometimes slow chain than bitcoin's

JnX3000

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: SalimNagamato on May 28, 2016, 11:11:50 AM

will be good if the dev. team at least reply our posts... and community to agree about a change and the POS parameters
I can help with testing the POS 3 forking

something like:

POS 3.0, no POW
block time 60 seconds
POS reward static 0.25 CURE (or other amount) + foundation reward to dev's wallet for Folding distribution: 5 CURE, halve every 4 years (to make 7488 CURE daily).
and then dev. can send the current premine to a burning address

Has it been 100% proven that POS 3.0 without POW is as secure as POS + POW???

SalimNagamato

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cryptonit on June 01, 2016, 07:29:39 PM

Quote from: SalimNagamato on May 28, 2016, 11:11:50 AM

will be good if the dev. team at least reply our posts... and community to agree about a change and the POS parameters
I can help with testing the POS 3 forking

something like:

POS 3.0, no POW
block time 60 seconds
POS reward static 0.25 CURE (or other amount) + foundation reward to dev's wallet for Folding distribution: 5 CURE, halve every 4 years (to make 7488 CURE daily).
and then dev. can send the current premine to a burning address

this is the right mindset

that doesnt mean dead for CC2

but it mean they have a half or even a full year more time
while cc itself runs in a much better shape

exactly, it means an up-to-date fast CC1 and more trust-able distribution
still no word from the dev. team about this suggestion

of course no need to rush, but need to discuss and decide, and get more ideas

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: ie007cheung on June 08, 2016, 11:13:45 AM

Quote from: BTCTT on June 07, 2016, 04:38:37 PM

Quote from: merc84 on June 07, 2016, 05:58:38 AM

So obliviously the beta doesn't work as intended due to sync issues, but then why do we hear nothing for month/s? I don't think its too much to ask for an update once a month?!???

1. They are incompetent
2. They are thief
3. They releasing something soon

Take your pick but I'm betting on number 1!

I'd pick number 1 too... just hope it's not number 2.

not so harsh

1. could be also "they are slow"

and slow could have reasons like
small team
aim high (very complicated and new codebase)
have a real life beside crypto
changed major parts of design which need restart in a early stage

ie007cheung

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: BTCTT on June 07, 2016, 04:38:37 PM

Quote from: merc84 on June 07, 2016, 05:58:38 AM

So obliviously the beta doesn't work as intended due to sync issues, but then why do we hear nothing for month/s? I don't think its too much to ask for an update once a month?!???

1. They are incompetent
2. They are thief
3. They releasing something soon

Take your pick but I'm betting on number 1!

I'd pick number 1 too... just hope it's not number 2.

BTCTT

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

Quote from: merc84 on June 07, 2016, 05:58:38 AM

So obliviously the beta doesn't work as intended due to sync issues, but then why do we hear nothing for month/s? I don't think its too much to ask for an update once a month?!???

1. They are incompetent
2. They are thief
3. They releasing something soon

Take your pick but I'm betting on number 1!

merc84

hero member

Activity: 799

Merit: 1000

So obliviously the beta doesn't work as intended due to sync issues, but then why do we hear nothing for month/s? I don't think its too much to ask for an update once a month?!???

n0gard

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 10

BTC|Waves

Quote from: Hippie Tech on June 05, 2016, 09:17:58 AM

what a pity Cry

Hippie Tech

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1001

All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: SalimNagamato on May 28, 2016, 11:11:50 AM

will be good if the dev. team at least reply our posts... and community to agree about a change and the POS parameters
I can help with testing the POS 3 forking

something like:

POS 3.0, no POW
block time 60 seconds
POS reward static 0.25 CURE (or other amount) + foundation reward to dev's wallet for Folding distribution: 5 CURE, halve every 4 years (to make 7488 CURE daily).
and then dev. can send the current premine to a burning address

this is the right mindset

that doesnt mean dead for CC2

but it mean they have a half or even a full year more time
while cc itself runs in a much better shape

SalimNagamato

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

will be good if the dev. team at least reply our posts... and community to agree about a change and the POS parameters
I can help with testing the POS 3 forking

something like:

POS 3.0, no POW
block time 60 seconds
POS reward static 0.25 CURE (or other amount) + foundation reward to dev's wallet for Folding distribution: 5 CURE, halve every 4 years (to make 7488 CURE daily).
and then dev. can send the current premine to a burning address

Quote from: GTTIGER on May 28, 2016, 10:34:01 AM

Have you offered to help CC?

Quote from: SalimNagamato on May 27, 2016, 01:24:47 AM

updates ?

please answer to one of the suggestions here
to move to POS 3.0, and require only hardfork avoiding swap

the SigmaX instead of few weeks taking already few months
faster chain with POS 3.0 might be very good

I am starting to think to start my own folding@home coin if nothing is advancing Wink

when price was high, Folders could not send the coins to exchanges... because of slow chain (half day already to send to bittrex with 20 confirmations)

GTTIGER

sr. member

Activity: 527

Merit: 250

Have you offered to help CC?

Quote from: SalimNagamato on May 27, 2016, 01:24:47 AM

updates ?

please answer to one of the suggestions here
to move to POS 3.0, and require only hardfork avoiding swap

the SigmaX instead of few weeks taking already few months
faster chain with POS 3.0 might be very good

I am starting to think to start my own folding@home coin if nothing is advancing Wink

when price was high, Folders could not send the coins to exchanges... because of slow chain (half day already to send to bittrex with 20 confirmations)

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1010

Quote from: cryptonit on May 19, 2016, 03:54:03 AM

sign of a relaxed or dead community

We're not dead. We have the cure. Just relaxing sir. Wink

SalimNagamato

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

updates ?

please answer to one of the suggestions here
to move to POS 3.0, and require only hardfork avoiding swap

the SigmaX instead of few weeks taking already few months
faster chain with POS 3.0 might be very good

I am starting to think to start my own folding@home coin if nothing is advancing Wink

when price was high, Folders could not send the coins to exchanges... because of slow chain (half day already to send to bittrex with 20 confirmations)

ie007cheung

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: mekar sari on May 13, 2016, 07:40:16 AM

GiveAway retweet not pay, giveaway scam???
https://twitter.com/CureCoin_Team/status/730588523774906368

They said random amount. Perhaps it means any amount including 0. Wink

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

lol just dedected this posting was in wrong thread sorry

its a sign of a relaxed or dead community that no one did complain about off-topic

BTCTT

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

tks for keeping us up to date

Huh

Topic: [ANN] CureCoin 2.0 is live - Mandatory Update is available now - DEC 2018 - page 66. (Read 696267 times)