[ANN] CureCoin 2.0 is live - Mandatory Update is available now - DEC 2018 - page 96.

cygnusxi

sr. member

Activity: 397

Merit: 251

CureCoin Lead Dev

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 07, 2014, 08:24:47 AM

this coin needs some serious promotion.

To quote some guy who ran a IC manufacturing co in the 80's " there will never be a need for a PC in every house "

Takes time for potential to sink in, see the following

Topic: Curecoin Petaflops crushes all of Boinc during launch still 2x faster then grid

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/curecoin-petaflops-crushes-all-of-boinc-during-launch-still-2x-faster-then-grid-885920

Topic: Fold for Curecoins with AMD GPU based Linux farm? New AMD drivers F@H friendly <- see foldingforum.org and search core17 for linux vs ocore poll to see more, and guess what team they were referring to Wink

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/fold-for-curecoins-with-amd-gpu-based-linux-farm-new-amd-drivers-fh-friendly-885864

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

this coin needs some serious promotion.

cygnusxi

sr. member

Activity: 397

Merit: 251

CureCoin Lead Dev

Updated pools and status links in OP

Pools
Mining pool : http://ispace.co.uk/coindetails/?coin=cure << new var diff pool
Mining pool : http://cure.hardcoreminers.com
Mining pool : http://cure.cryptopools.com/
Mining pool : https://cure.united-miners.com/
Mining pool : https://www.minep.it/pool/cur/
Mining pool : http://betahash.com/getting_started - offline?
Mining pool : http://pool.terahashers.com/ - offline?

cygnusxi

sr. member

Activity: 397

Merit: 251

CureCoin Lead Dev

Quote from: URSAY on December 02, 2014, 12:22:51 PM

Why not add a link to the Mac wallet?

Updated in OP
Mac OS Wallet:
http://1.curecoinmirror.com/curecoin-Qt.dmg
http://2.curecoinmirror.com/curecoin-Qt.dmg
http://3.curecoinmirror.com/curecoin-Qt.dmg

Also see https://www.curecoin.net/index.php/knowledge-base/16-knowledge-base/resources/20-where-can-i-get-a-curecoin-wallet

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1010

Why not add a link to the Mac wallet?

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

nice, I was waiting for that, thank you!

cygnusxi

sr. member

Activity: 397

Merit: 251

CureCoin Lead Dev

New block explorer for Curecoin

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cure/ - updated in OP.

Ill be checking the pools list and adding some more up to date info on OP, for now most things curecoin its best to visit https://curecoin.net/ or https://curecoin.net/forum

The old forum at curecoin.us is being moved to https://curecoin.net/forum and soon will be a permanent redirect to the new forum.

Dont forget to check out our progress in all time folding@home efforts, closing in on rank #4! While the price may not currently be what your cryptocurrency dream is, the research is still huge Wink

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_summary.php?s&t=224497

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_list.php?s=

jm1978

member

Activity: 114

Merit: 10

Hi! Im looking for the block explorer of CureCoin but i dont find it. Maybe someone can put me on the right direction? The address in the OP does not work. Thanks in advance

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1010

Quote from: cryptoconomist on November 26, 2014, 02:14:40 PM

Unfortunately this coin is slowly dying....

Please dev. hurry up with the cc 2.0 before it is too late

At the very least, update the OP with current info or give a community member the power to do so? Please?

cryptoconomist

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Unfortunately this coin is slowly dying....

Please dev. hurry up with the cc 2.0 before it is too late

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: defaced on November 15, 2014, 10:19:42 AM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:08:49 PM

Quote from: defaced on November 14, 2014, 01:01:44 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 07, 2014, 09:55:29 PM

Quote from: cryptoconomist on November 06, 2014, 01:12:56 PM

Any news dev.

How are we getting along on the cc 2.0?

Going great! This weekend I'm finalizing the code for Merkle signatures (including the certificates used for folding mintage), and hopefully wrapping up the specs of the transaction formatting. The Curecoin 2.0 transaction system is fairly basic at this point.

On the in-progress list:
Blockchain database (need to optimize for performance and storage space)
Certificate formatting (this is more of just a final approval on the existing specifications we discussed months ago)
P2P Networking (a fair amount to do here)
GUI

Then the upcoming list (all of which are non-essential items which can be added later, but would be nice at launch):
-Light merchant 'scripting? not even.' language: Can tell daemon to perform job x upon completion of condition y
->Example 1: Send "x8cmeob" to 192.168.0.12 when

receives 8 CUR
->Example 2: Append "x8cmeob" to file "transactions.txt" when

receives 8 CUR
-Basic accounting features built-into GUI wallet (group addresses into an account, produce transaction records for a given account, etc.)
-Some indication/measure of network health and connection quality

Curecoin 2.0 will be cross-platform at launch, with a compiled binary available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X.

For anyone interested in the practicality of Merkle signatures for a cryptocurrency network, an address capable of signing 8192 transactions takes around 3 seconds to generate on modern hardware using one core. People will be able to choose what capacity address they would like to use. More capacious (more possible transaction signatures) take longer to generate. Lowest possible will likely be 4096 transactions, with the highest being either 32768 or 65535. 4096 will be far more than 99.99% of use cases. Signature verification takes a trivial amount of time. Signatures are small enough in size to not produce blockchain bloat. Private keys require less than a megabyte each.

Sounds awesome man, anychance the source for folding pools will be released? I'd really like to get franko folders back up and going since ive got so many frk now to fund it.

On official cc2.0 release, we'll be helping with getting third-party pools set up, and pool mining will be built into the certificate format

, and if everything goes according to plan we'll have some very rudimentary java source code for a pool backend, or at the very least a very detailed guide that a capable programmer could use to build a pool, with all the protocol information required. If you're talking about the cc1.0-style pool, I'd be more than happy to help you with setting up the payment backend to start rewarding people for folding with Frankos

yea CC1.0 is completly fine and if there is anything i can do to help with cc2 just let me know. Ive been a believer of this project since its inception.

Thank you! Sent you a PM with some more information, let me know where you want to go from there.

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: pallas on November 15, 2014, 09:54:31 AM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:16:16 PM

Quote from: pallas on November 14, 2014, 07:10:17 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:07:15 PM

Quote from: pallas on November 10, 2014, 05:08:49 AM

I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet.
But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?

This is really odd, does it show as confirmed in listtransactions?

"account" : "",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : xxx,
"confirmations" : 1435,
"generated" : true,
"blockindex" : 1,

Wow, that's a mystery. If you do "gettransaction txid" (replacing txid with the txid of that transaction) and then dump the private key (dumpprivkey address) replacing address with the address receiving the coins in the transaction, then import that on another wallet, does the transaction appear properly?

I'll try importing the privkey on another wallet, but for now some more info:

- the address is the same where I receive the folding payouts, i.e. the only one having transaction
- there is just another address in the wallet but with no activity
- I've tried both repairwallet and -rescan without success

Oh, now that's very odd. It might be an orphaned PoS block that the wallet didn't recognize properly, though it would seem -rescan would fix that issue...
Perhaps redownloading the blockchain would help, but that's a stretch.

If you PM me some details about the transaction, I can send you some curecoin to make up for it

defaced

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1011

Franko is Freedom

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:08:49 PM

Quote from: defaced on November 14, 2014, 01:01:44 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 07, 2014, 09:55:29 PM

Quote from: cryptoconomist on November 06, 2014, 01:12:56 PM

Any news dev.

How are we getting along on the cc 2.0?

Going great! This weekend I'm finalizing the code for Merkle signatures (including the certificates used for folding mintage), and hopefully wrapping up the specs of the transaction formatting. The Curecoin 2.0 transaction system is fairly basic at this point.

On the in-progress list:
Blockchain database (need to optimize for performance and storage space)
Certificate formatting (this is more of just a final approval on the existing specifications we discussed months ago)
P2P Networking (a fair amount to do here)
GUI

Then the upcoming list (all of which are non-essential items which can be added later, but would be nice at launch):
-Light merchant 'scripting? not even.' language: Can tell daemon to perform job x upon completion of condition y
->Example 1: Send "x8cmeob" to 192.168.0.12 when

receives 8 CUR
->Example 2: Append "x8cmeob" to file "transactions.txt" when

receives 8 CUR
-Basic accounting features built-into GUI wallet (group addresses into an account, produce transaction records for a given account, etc.)
-Some indication/measure of network health and connection quality

Curecoin 2.0 will be cross-platform at launch, with a compiled binary available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X.

For anyone interested in the practicality of Merkle signatures for a cryptocurrency network, an address capable of signing 8192 transactions takes around 3 seconds to generate on modern hardware using one core. People will be able to choose what capacity address they would like to use. More capacious (more possible transaction signatures) take longer to generate. Lowest possible will likely be 4096 transactions, with the highest being either 32768 or 65535. 4096 will be far more than 99.99% of use cases. Signature verification takes a trivial amount of time. Signatures are small enough in size to not produce blockchain bloat. Private keys require less than a megabyte each.

Sounds awesome man, anychance the source for folding pools will be released? I'd really like to get franko folders back up and going since ive got so many frk now to fund it.

On official cc2.0 release, we'll be helping with getting third-party pools set up, and pool mining will be built into the certificate format

, and if everything goes according to plan we'll have some very rudimentary java source code for a pool backend, or at the very least a very detailed guide that a capable programmer could use to build a pool, with all the protocol information required. If you're talking about the cc1.0-style pool, I'd be more than happy to help you with setting up the payment backend to start rewarding people for folding with Frankos

yea CC1.0 is completly fine and if there is anything i can do to help with cc2 just let me know. Ive been a believer of this project since its inception.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:16:16 PM

Quote from: pallas on November 14, 2014, 07:10:17 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:07:15 PM

Quote from: pallas on November 10, 2014, 05:08:49 AM

I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet.
But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?

This is really odd, does it show as confirmed in listtransactions?

"account" : "",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : xxx,
"confirmations" : 1435,
"generated" : true,
"blockindex" : 1,

Wow, that's a mystery. If you do "gettransaction txid" (replacing txid with the txid of that transaction) and then dump the private key (dumpprivkey address) replacing address with the address receiving the coins in the transaction, then import that on another wallet, does the transaction appear properly?

I'll try importing the privkey on another wallet, but for now some more info:

- the address is the same where I receive the folding payouts, i.e. the only one having transaction
- there is just another address in the wallet but with no activity
- I've tried both repairwallet and -rescan without success

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: pallas on November 14, 2014, 07:10:17 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:07:15 PM

Quote from: pallas on November 10, 2014, 05:08:49 AM

I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet.
But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?

This is really odd, does it show as confirmed in listtransactions?

"account" : "",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : xxx,
"confirmations" : 1435,
"generated" : true,
"blockindex" : 1,

Wow, that's a mystery. If you do "gettransaction txid" (replacing txid with the txid of that transaction) and then dump the private key (dumpprivkey address) replacing address with the address receiving the coins in the transaction, then import that on another wallet, does the transaction appear properly?

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 14, 2014, 07:07:15 PM

Quote from: pallas on November 10, 2014, 05:08:49 AM

I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet.
But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?

This is really odd, does it show as confirmed in listtransactions?

"account" : "",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : xxx,
"confirmations" : 1435,
"generated" : true,
"blockindex" : 1,

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: defaced on November 14, 2014, 01:01:44 PM

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 07, 2014, 09:55:29 PM

Quote from: cryptoconomist on November 06, 2014, 01:12:56 PM

Any news dev.

How are we getting along on the cc 2.0?

Going great! This weekend I'm finalizing the code for Merkle signatures (including the certificates used for folding mintage), and hopefully wrapping up the specs of the transaction formatting. The Curecoin 2.0 transaction system is fairly basic at this point.

On the in-progress list:
Blockchain database (need to optimize for performance and storage space)
Certificate formatting (this is more of just a final approval on the existing specifications we discussed months ago)
P2P Networking (a fair amount to do here)
GUI

Then the upcoming list (all of which are non-essential items which can be added later, but would be nice at launch):
-Light merchant 'scripting? not even.' language: Can tell daemon to perform job x upon completion of condition y
->Example 1: Send "x8cmeob" to 192.168.0.12 when

receives 8 CUR
->Example 2: Append "x8cmeob" to file "transactions.txt" when

receives 8 CUR
-Basic accounting features built-into GUI wallet (group addresses into an account, produce transaction records for a given account, etc.)
-Some indication/measure of network health and connection quality

Curecoin 2.0 will be cross-platform at launch, with a compiled binary available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X.

For anyone interested in the practicality of Merkle signatures for a cryptocurrency network, an address capable of signing 8192 transactions takes around 3 seconds to generate on modern hardware using one core. People will be able to choose what capacity address they would like to use. More capacious (more possible transaction signatures) take longer to generate. Lowest possible will likely be 4096 transactions, with the highest being either 32768 or 65535. 4096 will be far more than 99.99% of use cases. Signature verification takes a trivial amount of time. Signatures are small enough in size to not produce blockchain bloat. Private keys require less than a megabyte each.

Sounds awesome man, anychance the source for folding pools will be released? I'd really like to get franko folders back up and going since ive got so many frk now to fund it.

On official cc2.0 release, we'll be helping with getting third-party pools set up, and pool mining will be built into the certificate format

, and if everything goes according to plan we'll have some very rudimentary java source code for a pool backend, or at the very least a very detailed guide that a capable programmer could use to build a pool, with all the protocol information required. If you're talking about the cc1.0-style pool, I'd be more than happy to help you with setting up the payment backend to start rewarding people for folding with Frankos

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: pallas on November 10, 2014, 05:08:49 AM

I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet.
But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?

This is really odd, does it show as confirmed in listtransactions?

defaced

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1011

Franko is Freedom

Quote from: Vorksholk on November 07, 2014, 09:55:29 PM

Quote from: cryptoconomist on November 06, 2014, 01:12:56 PM

Any news dev.

How are we getting along on the cc 2.0?

Going great! This weekend I'm finalizing the code for Merkle signatures (including the certificates used for folding mintage), and hopefully wrapping up the specs of the transaction formatting. The Curecoin 2.0 transaction system is fairly basic at this point.

On the in-progress list:
Blockchain database (need to optimize for performance and storage space)
Certificate formatting (this is more of just a final approval on the existing specifications we discussed months ago)
P2P Networking (a fair amount to do here)
GUI

Then the upcoming list (all of which are non-essential items which can be added later, but would be nice at launch):
-Light merchant 'scripting? not even.' language: Can tell daemon to perform job x upon completion of condition y
->Example 1: Send "x8cmeob" to 192.168.0.12 when

receives 8 CUR
->Example 2: Append "x8cmeob" to file "transactions.txt" when

receives 8 CUR
-Basic accounting features built-into GUI wallet (group addresses into an account, produce transaction records for a given account, etc.)
-Some indication/measure of network health and connection quality

Curecoin 2.0 will be cross-platform at launch, with a compiled binary available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X.

For anyone interested in the practicality of Merkle signatures for a cryptocurrency network, an address capable of signing 8192 transactions takes around 3 seconds to generate on modern hardware using one core. People will be able to choose what capacity address they would like to use. More capacious (more possible transaction signatures) take longer to generate. Lowest possible will likely be 4096 transactions, with the highest being either 32768 or 65535. 4096 will be far more than 99.99% of use cases. Signature verification takes a trivial amount of time. Signatures are small enough in size to not produce blockchain bloat. Private keys require less than a megabyte each.

Sounds awesome man, anychance the source for folding pools will be released? I'd really like to get franko folders back up and going since ive got so many frk now to fund it.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: pallas on November 10, 2014, 05:08:49 AM

I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet.
But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?

BUMP
now more than 1000 confirmations, but still not in the balance.
lost coins?

Topic: [ANN] CureCoin 2.0 is live - Mandatory Update is available now - DEC 2018 - page 96. (Read 696254 times)