Topic: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 899. (Read 2006108 times)

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.
For example if you go back and kill hitler you save millions of people. But maybe the russians may have taken lead of the world and bombed usa with an atomic bomb and killed even more...

i agree with you
now vitalik is still very young and he made that decition but
is it good ?
the devs who did the dao should step forwart and say we are sorry we missed the hole that made it posible to steel
the hole should be closed and thats it
as i recall
on all this pages there is a line like
be careful joining means you can lose all
at least at the etherpage it was

o48o

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1168

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Timetravelling is so passé

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

Quote from: corather on June 19, 2016, 03:44:16 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

you dont have ether or dao ?

becoin

legendary

Activity: 3431

Merit: 1233

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 19, 2016, 04:22:02 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

Thats more or less true with a soft fork, but a hard fork, is like going back in time an change the law.
Example:

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique. The casino owner is bankruped and the stock is dropping by 50%. He and his stock owners decide to go back in time and change the casino rules, so that the one, that wins the 50 Million at this day doesn't have to be payed out. Fair?

But even the soft fork can be somehow discussable:
The winner won the 50 Million, that can only be payed out a month later. But the Casino owner closes the casino, and sets all escrow funds on hold.

In a casino, if you exploit to win, you're thrown out and blacklisted at every casino in town.

I thought it was a smart contract platform?
In a casino you have to have a lot of luck.
Welcome to eth casino. Good Luck!

lordoliver

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1020

expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:17:48 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 19, 2016, 04:16:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:15:10 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:10:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:17:48 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.

We're not going back in time, we're fixing a flaw of a new technique/program.

You cannot simply say "hey, this is anarchism, this is the free world, the attacker stole 50 mills because a human programmed something not 100% accurate." There will always be flaws in any kind of program which will always be fixed .. There will always be Versions and Revisions.. 1.0 -> 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3 etc...

This is consensus, this is democracy.

you go back in time... you just don't see it

OK then we go back in time - still doesn't change anything.. You don't understand what this is about.

and you are 100% sure, that you do?

Yes, but after all it doesn't matter as long as i'm with the consensus. (hint: this is what cryptos are all about)

We all know, that the consensus is not yet final. There are pers and cons, that have to be discussed. 90% of the people are manipulated by such discussions...
Thats why I want to make clear, that there ARE cons. Please make sure, that everyone notes them...

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: ocminer on June 19, 2016, 04:16:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:15:10 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:10:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

Quote from: ocminer on June 19, 2016, 04:16:21 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.

We're not going back in time, we're fixing a flaw of a new technique/program.

You cannot simply say "hey, this is anarchism, this is the free world, the attacker stole 50 mills because a human programmed something not 100% accurate." There will always be flaws in any kind of program which will always be fixed .. There will always be Versions and Revisions.. 1.0 -> 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3 etc...

This is consensus, this is democracy.

you go back in time... you just don't see it

OK then we go back in time - still doesn't change anything.. You don't understand what this is about.

and you are 100% sure, that you do?

Yes, but after all it doesn't matter as long as i'm with the consensus. (hint: this is what cryptos are all about)

Mrpumperitis

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1075

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHcLKrkwPLQ

Published on 18 Jun 2016

A live show recorded in the aftermath of the DAO's draining of funds by an unknown actor. In this show, Andreas M. Antonopoulos moderates a discussion with guests Pamela Morgan (attorney), Brian Klein (attorney) and Taylor Gerring (Ethereum Project co-founder), with live twitter Q&A and participation from the DAO slack channel.

lordoliver

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1020

expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:15:10 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:10:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:15:10 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.

We're not going back in time, we're fixing a flaw of a new technique/program.

You cannot simply say "hey, this is anarchism, this is the free world, the attacker stole 50 mills because a human programmed something not 100% accurate." There will always be flaws in any kind of program which will always be fixed .. There will always be Versions and Revisions.. 1.0 -> 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3 etc...

This is consensus, this is democracy.

you go back in time... you just don't see it

OK then we go back in time - still doesn't change anything.. You don't understand what this is about.

and you are 100% sure, that you do?

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:10:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.

We're not going back in time, we're fixing a flaw of a new technique/program.

You cannot simply say "hey, this is anarchism, this is the free world, the attacker stole 50 mills because a human programmed something not 100% accurate." There will always be flaws in any kind of program which will always be fixed .. There will always be Versions and Revisions.. 1.0 -> 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3 etc...

This is consensus, this is democracy.

you go back in time... you just don't see it

OK then we go back in time - still doesn't change anything.. You don't understand what this is about.

lordoliver

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1020

expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:10:21 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 04:10:21 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.

We're not going back in time, we're fixing a flaw of a new technique/program.

You cannot simply say "hey, this is anarchism, this is the free world, the attacker stole 50 mills because a human programmed something not 100% accurate." There will always be flaws in any kind of program which will always be fixed .. There will always be Versions and Revisions.. 1.0 -> 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3 etc...

This is consensus, this is democracy.

you go back in time... you just don't see it

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

The point is, that we are not allowed to go back in time, just because we can. You always have side effects you don't foresee.

We're not going back in time, we're fixing a flaw of a new technique/program.

You cannot simply say "hey, this is anarchism, this is the free world, the attacker stole 50 mills because a human programmed something not 100% accurate." There will always be flaws in any kind of program which will always be fixed .. There will always be Versions and Revisions.. 1.0 -> 1.1 -> 1.2 -> 1.3 etc...

This is consensus, this is democracy.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

The person who complains about the fork is the same one who loves sausages but can't hold his lunch after he sees how they're made.

6436346346

sr. member

Activity: 355

Merit: 250

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM

This seems pretty simple to me.
Decentralized crypto-currencies are all about consensus.
Vitalik suggested a hard fork rollback.
The majority seem to want it...that's consensus!

Now roll it back.

Note - I was not affected by this DAO/ETH situation.

You go into the casino and win legally 50 Million with a new technique.

Not the true story, true story:

A crew of people invest 150 Million into a new casino with all new technique, someone finds a flaw in the code and cheats out 50 Million of the casino...

What to do ? Of course roll back, fix the code, and "restart" the new technique casino...

You didn't understand the image... the new technique was not the blockchain... but the different call of the contract by the attacker...

That still doesn't change anything on the situation

Not sure adding a transaction blacklist incase it happens again was the smartest move

https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/2715/commits/4fca3a7c4cb193b505cf9ba57b42c66adbd37868

Now they can do this whenever a smart contract does not do what the contract dev expected, seem dangerous to me

lordoliver

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1020

expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: lordoliver on June 19, 2016, 03:17:31 AM