I'm little surprised that the Eth overloads don't entertain some sort of "hack the DAO" contest".
They spread some thousands of eth among different structured DAO's and have the outside world hack away. The reward being the monies in the various DAO's. The DAO amounts could be scaled in accordance to some sort of difficulty metric.
Topic: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 896. (Read 2006108 times)
Now is the best time to buy a.., yesterday, all the gift was.. a few days will be entered softform and gradually improving. I think the team hacker works primarily on large shorts, and on several exchanges, and their task is to push the market down as much as possible, they started to short with 2800k. However, after solving the problem with steal ether the cause of the fall neytralizuya, because they might hurry.. look.. don't know will they be able to push the market or not, there are a maximum of 5 days. I try to combine the largest holders of air and bits for the purpose of deduction of the market, to avoid the collapse. It is useless. Remember, after a good decision will be made by the network, the rate can soar above 2000-2500к at the same rate as it fell faster. If you are ideological fan of Ethereum, try to support the ETH.
it has a major security flaw. so shut it down and start again. give back the invested eth and stop him in his tracks
The plan is to close down the DAO according the Stephen Tual. All the Etherum will be given back to the investors.
If the plan work as planned, mass media might wrote it as a successful defence against "hack or theft" and in turn increase the perception of ethereum. offcourse most ppl here might have different perception.
btw i just remember why dont we have testnet Dao ?
it has a major security flaw. so shut it down and start again. give back the invested eth and stop him in his tracks
The plan is to close down the DAO according the Stephen Tual. All the Etherum will be given back to the investors.
eth 舞弊
卖
卖
虽然DAO被盗，我还是继续看好以太
yeh i can read and that tells me a whole lot. try explaining why?
before any discussions please see this first:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHcLKrkwPLQ&feature=youtu.be
it's too complicated to repeatedly explain it...
yeh i can read and that tells me a whole lot. try explaining why?
so shut it down and start again.
can you read? you can not shut it down.
it has a major security flaw. so shut it down and start again. give back the invested eth and stop him in his tracks
i don't know much about DAO or what has really happened but as i understand it, the hack was on DAO which will then be converted to eth in 27 days?
if thats so, why not just shut the DAO down and unlink it to eth so that the thief can't get hold of the eth???
that way he gets nothing and the eth investors don't lose out
if thats so, why not just shut the DAO down and unlink it to eth so that the thief can't get hold of the eth???
that way he gets nothing and the eth investors don't lose out
you cant just "shut down" the DAO. that's the whole point of decentralized apps!
so dao is still being drained. take eth away from the dao before he can change his tokens into eth???
i don't know much about DAO or what has really happened but as i understand it, the hack was on DAO which will then be converted to eth in 27 days?
if thats so, why not just shut the DAO down and unlink it to eth so that the thief can't get hold of the eth???
that way he gets nothing and the eth investors don't lose out
if thats so, why not just shut the DAO down and unlink it to eth so that the thief can't get hold of the eth???
that way he gets nothing and the eth investors don't lose out
Why is everyone ignoring the fact ETH has just added a blacklist to the currency as some kind of "fix" to a 3rd party smart contract.
Are people really that naïve to think that this blacklist wont be exploited by political of financial bodies.
Why is ETH even getting involved in a 3rd party software bug, especially with something as controversial as a hardfork.
Now every smart contract developer can ignore BASIC UNIT TESTING and just deploy contracts cause if anything goes wrong the ETH centralized network will just add that contract to their blacklist too.
thats my point too Are people really that naïve to think that this blacklist wont be exploited by political of financial bodies.
Why is ETH even getting involved in a 3rd party software bug, especially with something as controversial as a hardfork.
Now every smart contract developer can ignore BASIC UNIT TESTING and just deploy contracts cause if anything goes wrong the ETH centralized network will just add that contract to their blacklist too.
thats not what i expected from ether
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHcLKrkwPLQ
Published on 18 Jun 2016
A live show recorded in the aftermath of the DAO's draining of funds by an unknown actor. In this show, Andreas M. Antonopoulos moderates a discussion with guests Pamela Morgan (attorney), Brian Klein (attorney) and Taylor Gerring (Ethereum Project co-founder), with live twitter Q&A and participation from the DAO slack channel.
Published on 18 Jun 2016
A live show recorded in the aftermath of the DAO's draining of funds by an unknown actor. In this show, Andreas M. Antonopoulos moderates a discussion with guests Pamela Morgan (attorney), Brian Klein (attorney) and Taylor Gerring (Ethereum Project co-founder), with live twitter Q&A and participation from the DAO slack channel.
its a very good debate......
this debade shows very well that exist a lot of confuse in the law ,its very complicated(( every state have different laws,the white paper is not so white e.t.c )) and will take months (( if ))to resolve this dispute.....
Thats really a good one. Its not that clear, like everone here wants it to be...
Fix is here:
https://github.com/ethcore/parity/commit/42478add648f2f44670c3859044d725171a33068#diff-0a229ee5988e1a97f1bb37dbb2f7028dR106
Starting from Block 1760000 which should be in around 4 days from now...
It yet has to be merged & approved though (consensus...)
https://github.com/ethcore/parity/commit/42478add648f2f44670c3859044d725171a33068#diff-0a229ee5988e1a97f1bb37dbb2f7028dR106
Starting from Block 1760000 which should be in around 4 days from now...
It yet has to be merged & approved though (consensus...)
Man. What a fiasco... Makes me wonder if its an inside job.
A Call for a Temporary Moratorium on The DAO
http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/05/27/dao-call-for-moratorium/
After this report,why they didn't shut down all the project immediately and put all the funds in cold?
http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/05/27/dao-call-for-moratorium/
After this report,why they didn't shut down all the project immediately and put all the funds in cold?
It's the same attack scheme like the last - as there are lots of instructions on the internet in the meanwhile to drain funds from the DAO - expect much more attacks shortly as long as the DAO is not fixed.
Nothing new...
Nothing new...
this seems to be getting worse by the minute then;....
Why ? It's the same shit as before, just someone else copied the attack (or maybe its the same guy again)... Even you could drain the DAO if you google for a few minutes
So why do not you do it to protect the DAO community? I am quite confused, why didnot the Eth developers do that?
Hmm thats actually a brilliant idea, why not drain it to protect the rest
As I think they'll fix it by soft/hardforking it will probably be pointless doing it, but hey.. It's sunday.. spare time...
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1010
Professional Native Greek Translator (2000+ done)
I ask this off topic question here, because Ethereum is supported by Jaxx-wallet. I do not know where else I could ask about it.
So. Few questions of Linux 64-bit Jaxx-wallet. Every time I create new wallet from the Jaxx-v1.0.3-linux-x64.tar.gz file, the wallet creates the same mnemonic seed. It does this also when I delete the old wallet before I create the new one. It creates the same seed even when I download the Jaxx-v1.0.3-linux-x64.tar.gz file again and create a new wallet from it.
So the seed is I gues stored somewhere, and the Jaxx-v1.0.3-linux-x64.tar.gz checks it and creates the same seed again.
How that can be avoided?
So. Few questions of Linux 64-bit Jaxx-wallet. Every time I create new wallet from the Jaxx-v1.0.3-linux-x64.tar.gz file, the wallet creates the same mnemonic seed. It does this also when I delete the old wallet before I create the new one. It creates the same seed even when I download the Jaxx-v1.0.3-linux-x64.tar.gz file again and create a new wallet from it.
So the seed is I gues stored somewhere, and the Jaxx-v1.0.3-linux-x64.tar.gz checks it and creates the same seed again.
How that can be avoided?
just dont tell me that there is another bug with priv keys
Jump to: