Topic: [ANN] Fantom | CPU Mineable | DarkSend | Masternode | Tor+I2P | sMP Releasing Sn - page 36. (Read 77888 times)
November 11, 2015, 05:19:20 PM
November 11, 2015, 04:57:50 PM
November 11, 2015, 04:48:07 PM
I don't understand why you would want to ruin a perfectly good CPU mineable coin by changing the algorithm to something inferior. Keep it velvet!
November 11, 2015, 04:24:12 PM
Any news on exchange?
Still waiting for a response from 6 Exchanges
How can they add it if the compile doesn't work?
h::~WriteBatch()'
obj/market.o:(.rodata._ZTI20MarketDbBatchScanner[_ZTI20MarketDbBatchScanner]+0x10): undefined reference to `typeinfo for leveldb::WriteBatch::Handler'
obj/miner.o: In function `CreateNewBlock(CReserveKey&, bool, long*)':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
obj/rpcmining.o: In function `getblocktemplate(std::vector
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
obj/wallet.o: In function `CWalletTx::RelayWalletTransaction(std::string)':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
obj/wallet.o:/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: more undefined references to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' follow
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CTxDB::TxnBegin()':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:145: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CTxDB::ScanBatch(CDataStream const&, std::string*, bool*) const':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:199: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Iterate(leveldb::WriteBatch::Handler*) const'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:162: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Handler::~Handler()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:201: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CTxDB::TxnCommit()':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:153: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:156: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `init_blockindex(leveldb::Options&, bool, bool)':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:67: undefined reference to `leveldb::DB::Open(leveldb::Options const&, std::string const&, leveldb::DB**)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:69: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CTxDB::CTxDB(char const*)':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:75: undefined reference to `leveldb::Options::Options()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:31: undefined reference to `leveldb::Options::Options()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:33: undefined reference to `leveldb::NewLRUCache(unsigned long)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:34: undefined reference to `leveldb::NewBloomFilterPolicy(int)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:90: undefined reference to `leveldb::NewBloomFilterPolicy(int)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:107: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CTxDB::EraseTxIndex(CTransaction const&)':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:137: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Delete(leveldb::Slice const&)'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CTxDB::LoadBlockIndex()':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CBatchScanner::~CBatchScanner()':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:162: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Handler::~Handler()'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `CBatchScanner::~CBatchScanner()':
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.cpp:162: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Handler::~Handler()'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Write
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:114: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:119: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Read
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:84: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Read
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:84: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Write
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:114: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:119: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Read
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:84: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Write
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:114: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:119: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Read
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:84: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Write
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:114: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:119: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Write
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:114: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:119: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Write
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:114: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)'
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:119: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o: In function `bool CTxDB::Read
/home/test/fantom2/src/txdb-leveldb.h:84: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const'
obj/txdb-leveldb.o:(.rodata._ZTI13CBatchScanner[_ZTI13CBatchScanner]+0x10): undefined reference to `typeinfo for leveldb::WriteBatch::Handler'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile.unix:252: recipe for target 'fantomd' failed
make: *** [fantomd] Error 1
test@ubuntu:~/fantom2/src$
November 11, 2015, 11:42:34 AM
Polling ends in 24 Hours
November 11, 2015, 11:08:25 AM
Put up the poll
November 11, 2015, 10:39:46 AM
Any news on exchange?
Still waiting for a response from 6 Exchanges
November 11, 2015, 10:38:39 AM
Any news on exchange?
November 11, 2015, 08:57:50 AM
Hey! Why the Question Mark?
Also, TOR Integeration and FantomText Coming Out Soon.....
Also, TOR Integeration and FantomText Coming Out Soon.....
You didn't got that i wasn't doing exactly a question because we already know the answer....
I knew that, thus the stupid-a*s sentence which I written
November 11, 2015, 08:32:27 AM
Hey! Why the Question Mark?
Also, TOR Integeration and FantomText Coming Out Soon.....
Also, TOR Integeration and FantomText Coming Out Soon.....
You didn't got that i wasn't doing exactly a question because we already know the answer....
November 11, 2015, 08:30:12 AM
Hey! Why the Question Mark?
Also, TOR Integeration and FantomText Coming Out Soon.....
Also, TOR Integeration and FantomText Coming Out Soon.....
November 11, 2015, 08:16:57 AM
Why everyone say this coin will fall bcs its not
on exchanges yet.
Its just 9 days old. :-)
on exchanges yet.
Its just 9 days old. :-)
And it has 62 pages topic allready
well some was of a fight between duckyeah and the dev of another coin so let's say that are almost 50 the real pages of the topic dedicated to Fantom?
November 11, 2015, 08:16:07 AM
Why everyone say this coin will fall bcs its not
on exchanges yet.
Its just 9 days old. :-)
on exchanges yet.
Its just 9 days old. :-)
And it has 62 pages topic allready
November 11, 2015, 08:11:04 AM
Why everyone say this coin will fall bcs its not
on exchanges yet.
Its just 9 days old. :-)
on exchanges yet.
Its just 9 days old. :-)
November 11, 2015, 07:26:30 AM
Dev, maybe update the OP with any of suggested in topic logos?
I am currently designing an infographic for that
November 11, 2015, 04:20:44 AM
Dev, maybe update the OP with any of suggested in topic logos?
November 11, 2015, 04:16:27 AM
I have requested
- Poloniex
- YoBit
- C-CeX
- Bittrex
- BleuTrade
- BTer
- BTCPool
- Poloniex
- YoBit
- C-CeX
- Bittrex
- BleuTrade
- BTer
- BTCPool
November 11, 2015, 02:14:11 AM
The problem is the dev that isn't doing anything to add the coin to any exchange... this should raise a warning flag about the trust we could have to the coin
The problem is that code is having sum bugs and exchanges can't compile the wallet
Isnt that the same problem?
I've told them TIME AND AGAIN to install LibGMP
How about improving the code so that the github source code is top notch, no more experimental code and that everything works properly. You can then also make the installation instructions clear to install LibGMP as a dependency. The problem is that the installation instructions, maksehift makefile etc are all over the place and differs from github. Github should be able to stand on itself. No exchange wants to look all over the place to complete a puzzle of how to compile code. They want to go to github and get everything there including proper code.
Do this and everything will be sorted. Is it too much to ask these basic things? Your non-action to do these things are playing in the hands of your critics and if it remains like that much longer will prove that your critics are correct. Every day you do nothing reduces the chances significantly of this coin surviving.
Now go and fix the experimental code and productionalize it properly. (unless of course if you do not know how to) but then you should admit that here.
Getting on it,,,,
November 11, 2015, 02:10:29 AM
The problem is the dev that isn't doing anything to add the coin to any exchange... this should raise a warning flag about the trust we could have to the coin
The problem is that code is having sum bugs and exchanges can't compile the wallet
Isnt that the same problem?
I've told them TIME AND AGAIN to install LibGMP
How about improving the code so that the github source code is top notch, no more experimental code and that everything works properly. You can then also make the installation instructions clear to install LibGMP as a dependency. The problem is that the installation instructions, maksehift makefile etc are all over the place and differs from github. Github should be able to stand on itself. No exchange wants to look all over the place to complete a puzzle of how to compile code. They want to go to github and get everything there including proper code.
Do this and everything will be sorted. Is it too much to ask these basic things? Your non-action to do these things are playing in the hands of your critics and if it remains like that much longer will prove that your critics are correct. Every day you do nothing significantly reduces the chances of this coin surviving.
Now go and fix the experimental code and productionalize it properly. (unless of course if you do not know how to) but then you should admit that here. Also, unless course you had no intention from the start to improve experimental code and was just hoping to get a listing for obvious reasons - am I correct or am I wrong? Choice is yours but remember that actions speak louder than words.
November 11, 2015, 01:30:57 AM
Any cpu miner for this coin?
No cpu miner available but you can still solo mine it directly using the wallet console.
just type setgenerate true -1
Jump to: