Author

Topic: ✅ [ANN] [ICO] ✅ PRE-SALE SOLD OUT - ACORN COLLECTIVE! ✅ MAIN SALE 26 MAY 2018 - page 148. (Read 251581 times)

sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 251
Today I faced an interesting article. Many people write that in the future such projects as Acorn will lose interest from the community due to the lack of startups and projects. I'm interested in your opinion, gentlemen.

We're lucky to live in an age of opportunity. Tomorrow an abstract young man will be ashamed to say that he has nowhere to get money for realize himself. And I absolutely disagree that projects like Acorn will not be able to find their audience.  I think that the problem should not be sought here.

A real problem is not in a quantity, but in a quality of the projects. I'm will not go far for examples, we are now in the branch where discuss ICO-projects. To understand what I'm writing, just go to this branch and update the page every minute. How quickly this topic will go down to the second page? And in all topics will "invest here".

"will lose interest" ? No. This will not happen.
Why Kickstarter and Indiegogo are still popular? They live long enough but always there are new projects on those platforms. Acorn is better. With good marketing it will be more used than other
The undoubted advantages of acorn can (and should) include the lack of fees and thoughtful structure of the project. Starting from the convenience of the token and ending with the fact that the token will be used by many people to participate in crowdfunding.
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.

And who do you think should determine that the project is “worthy”? It's crowdfunding, here everything is decided by the crowd.

I suggest 2 options: creation of a special commission or simply support projects selected by the team members at the expenses of the reserve fund. Such a mechanism can be implemented, right?
how do you imagine it? the maximum that they can do is introduce them to some kind of influential investor or place an advertising banner on their website.
FinShi Capital already tried to do what you offer and failed on it
As far as I know Acorn will place projects on its platform, even with little funding. As for the criteria for the selection of projects, I can say that Acorn has a professional team and a certain group of people will do it.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1166
Hello. If investors does not receive direct profit what is the use of supporting projects?
They get dividends but in case of crowdfunding, the process is very different from the traditional

Do the holders of Acorn tokens receive dividends? Where did you find this information? As far as I know, the project will not pay dividends.
It is not true. There was no official information about this from the Acorn team. Acorn weekly conducts different competitions.
By the way, yes, this week we are waiting for a new contest. prizes worthy.
Akorn shows itself well in promoting the project and interacting with subscribers.
Guys, dividends are not what makes you rich. The best investments on wall street are investments designed to grow, not dividends. So don't worry. Multiple profits on dividends still do not earn, but on growth is easy.

Well, that's only partially true what you say Wink As a bottom line you are right. However, high dividends attract investors who in turn push the price by buying shares. If you have a share that frequently yields high dividends, it's probably also a share that is experiencing a nice growth rate.
member
Activity: 324
Merit: 11
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.

And who do you think should determine that the project is “worthy”? It's crowdfunding, here everything is decided by the crowd.

I suggest 2 options: creation of a special commission or simply support projects selected by the team members at the expenses of the reserve fund. Such a mechanism can be implemented, right?

I am against various commissions, it will serve corruption, even if it is my choice - there is still some power over the decision.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
пpoeкт интepeceн и пoпyляpeн
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
Good afternoon. Where can I find a set of project rules? Or will it be developed closer to the launch of the platform?
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 308
Merit: 0
What requirements are set for platforms that can integrate with yours? I want to assess the entry barrier.
newbie
Activity: 122
Merit: 0
Acorn is a new generation crowdfunding platform which is solving the problems of crowdfunding.

https://medium.com/@Acorn.Collective/how-will-acorn-solve-amanis-crowdfunding-problem-610c4a36e3d0
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 100
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.

And who do you think should determine that the project is “worthy”? It's crowdfunding, here everything is decided by the crowd.

I suggest 2 options: creation of a special commission or simply support projects selected by the team members at the expenses of the reserve fund. Such a mechanism can be implemented, right?
how do you imagine it? the maximum that they can do is introduce them to some kind of influential investor or place an advertising banner on their website.
FinShi Capital already tried to do what you offer and failed on it

I previously suggested making it possible to vote for the project, a certain rating, what say?
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.

And who do you think should determine that the project is “worthy”? It's crowdfunding, here everything is decided by the crowd.

I suggest 2 options: creation of a special commission or simply support projects selected by the team members at the expenses of the reserve fund. Such a mechanism can be implemented, right?
how do you imagine it? the maximum that they can do is introduce them to some kind of influential investor or place an advertising banner on their website.
FinShi Capital already tried to do what you offer and failed on it
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.

And who do you think should determine that the project is “worthy”? It's crowdfunding, here everything is decided by the crowd.

I suggest 2 options: creation of a special commission or simply support projects selected by the team members at the expenses of the reserve fund. Such a mechanism can be implemented, right?
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.

And who do you think should determine that the project is “worthy”? It's crowdfunding, here everything is decided by the crowd.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.

But sometimes it is necessary to support worthy projects, especially if nobody pays attention to them.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?

Team members have repeatedly stated that Acorn activity is based on minimal interference.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
Hey. Will the platform employees be able to influence which projects will receive more funding?
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Today I faced an interesting article. Many people write that in the future such projects as Acorn will lose interest from the community due to the lack of startups and projects. I'm interested in your opinion, gentlemen.

We're lucky to live in an age of opportunity. Tomorrow an abstract young man will be ashamed to say that he has nowhere to get money for realize himself. And I absolutely disagree that projects like Acorn will not be able to find their audience.  I think that the problem should not be sought here.

A real problem is not in a quantity, but in a quality of the projects. I'm will not go far for examples, we are now in the branch where discuss ICO-projects. To understand what I'm writing, just go to this branch and update the page every minute. How quickly this topic will go down to the second page? And in all topics will "invest here".

"will lose interest" ? No. This will not happen.
Why Kickstarter and Indiegogo are still popular? They live long enough but always there are new projects on those platforms. Acorn is better. With good marketing it will be more used than other
These news are related to the fact that the downturn of the market and legislative regulation would greatly reduce the number of current startups, ICO, etc. I think this is nonsense, and Acorn will be necessary for the market.

Startups will always be, the main issue is legal regulation and screening of fraudulent projects. If the Acorn team succeeds in solving these problems, then I'm sure they will succeed.
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 100
Hello. How much money did you manage to collect at the preliminary stage of the ICO?

About 5 million dollars. Just as much as the team planned.
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
Hello. How much money did you manage to collect at the preliminary stage of the ICO?
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
Today I faced an interesting article. Many people write that in the future such projects as Acorn will lose interest from the community due to the lack of startups and projects. I'm interested in your opinion, gentlemen.

We're lucky to live in an age of opportunity. Tomorrow an abstract young man will be ashamed to say that he has nowhere to get money for realize himself. And I absolutely disagree that projects like Acorn will not be able to find their audience.  I think that the problem should not be sought here.

A real problem is not in a quantity, but in a quality of the projects. I'm will not go far for examples, we are now in the branch where discuss ICO-projects. To understand what I'm writing, just go to this branch and update the page every minute. How quickly this topic will go down to the second page? And in all topics will "invest here".

"will lose interest" ? No. This will not happen.
Why Kickstarter and Indiegogo are still popular? They live long enough but always there are new projects on those platforms. Acorn is better. With good marketing it will be more used than other
These news are related to the fact that the downturn of the market and legislative regulation would greatly reduce the number of current startups, ICO, etc. I think this is nonsense, and Acorn will be necessary for the market.
Jump to: