Guys any private investors? only 1.7 kk raised so far?
Presale has just begun, the ICO stage is yet to come. Acorn has collected over 1.7 kk $ in just a few days, which is a great result. I am sure softcap will be reached soon
Topic: ✅ [ANN] [ICO] ✅ PRE-SALE SOLD OUT - ACORN COLLECTIVE! ✅ MAIN SALE 26 MAY 2018 - page 193. (Read 251544 times)
February 09, 2018, 06:22:50 PM
February 09, 2018, 02:42:50 PM
There are approximately three types of projects that automatically deserve my attention to them: 1) These are financial projects - they are understandable, the technology provides transparency, if everything is clear with the road map and the team - you can safely invest; 2) This is a map - why cards? Because with so many owners of crypto currency - they all need; 3) These are projects like Acorn - because they themselves contain a lot of other projects.
probably new blockchains and technical protocols? have Youseen, already advertised blockchain 4.0.
February 09, 2018, 01:41:22 PM
There are approximately three types of projects that automatically deserve my attention to them: 1) These are financial projects - they are understandable, the technology provides transparency, if everything is clear with the road map and the team - you can safely invest; 2) This is a map - why cards? Because with so many owners of crypto currency - they all need; 3) These are projects like Acorn - because they themselves contain a lot of other projects.
February 09, 2018, 01:33:26 PM
On hacked.com came a fresh review of Acorn, in which the author brought all the arguments for and against:
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
Very strict evaluation. Maybe well-deserved. After all, Acorn is just beginning its journey. As stressed hacked, Acorn has an excellent team and good advisers - and this is the core of the whole project."
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
Given the fact that hacked.com doesn't advertise projects and doesn't receive money from ICO teams, but does reviews on a paid subscription, I don't consider that 4 isn't a low score. You just need to know that 6/10 is the maximum score which they put for only some projects. A 4/10 is a very good score for their internal ranking system. Even 1/10 is a positive assessment for them, because a huge number of projects receive negative assessments.
February 09, 2018, 01:24:23 PM
I believe this project has potential since crowdfunding is on the spot at the moment.
yeah, especially for blockchain sphere, highly demanded and actual. 
February 09, 2018, 01:14:43 PM
Guys any private investors? only 1.7 kk raised so far?
Presale has just begun, the ICO stage is yet to come. Acorn has collected over 1.7 kk $ in just a few days, which is a great result. I am sure softcap will be reached soonIf softcap has been achieved in a short time, usually for hardcap will take a long time.
February 09, 2018, 12:53:10 PM
I believe this project has potential since crowdfunding is on the spot at the moment.
February 09, 2018, 12:49:11 PM
Guys any private investors? only 1.7 kk raised so far?
Presale has just begun, the ICO stage is yet to come. Acorn has collected over 1.7 kk $ in just a few days, which is a great result. I am sure softcap will be reached soonIf softcap has been achieved in a short time, usually for hardcap will take a long time.
February 09, 2018, 12:43:28 PM
Guys any private investors? only 1.7 kk raised so far?
Presale has just begun, the ICO stage is yet to come. Acorn has collected over 1.7 kk $ in just a few days, which is a great result. I am sure softcap will be reached soon 
February 09, 2018, 11:23:31 AM
+4 is a good result or not? I think the hacked underestimates this project.
Lol, they want me pay for their scammy analysis... they set ratings and then if you want learn more about criteria for evaluation you should pay ....
The guys did an excellent business. They sell their opinion unsupported by analytics.
February 09, 2018, 10:14:05 AM
Guys any private investors? only 1.7 kk raised so far?
February 09, 2018, 08:47:19 AM
Looking promising, I'll be following you guys! Good luck! 
February 09, 2018, 08:42:41 AM
On hacked.com came a fresh review of Acorn, in which the author brought all the arguments for and against:
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
Yes at some point I have also asked how the project can suatain growth with free funding. However, all is possible. If the team proves it committment to the community then it will gain trust and thus could help to venture out the project. And along the way, changes can be adopted and implemented essentially geared towards the steady growth of the project.
February 09, 2018, 07:38:21 AM
We are now a Gold listing on CoinSchedule. Be sure to check us out!
https://www.coinschedule.com/icos/e2177/acorn-collective-pre-sale.html
https://www.coinschedule.com/icos/e2177/acorn-collective-pre-sale.html
February 09, 2018, 07:10:53 AM
In my opinion, the project is underestimated, the estimate is understated by hacked.com. I think that perhaps it will be revised in the future, such cases have happened.
February 09, 2018, 06:25:03 AM
On hacked.com came a fresh review of Acorn, in which the author brought all the arguments for and against:
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
A description of the analysis of a project like this - spitting in the direction of the project. They have all the review and evaluation of the projects consist of one or two sentences? Their technical analysis of cryptocurrencies is also sometimes surprising.
February 09, 2018, 04:24:06 AM
On hacked.com came a fresh review of Acorn, in which the author brought all the arguments for and against:
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
Interesting assessment. I will not say that I absolutely agree. For example, the inexperience of the team and "-3" for it. That's not right in my opinion. The team's experience is quite difficult to understand objectively. The same Slavik Buterin was also inexperienced when Ethereum was created. "
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
February 09, 2018, 01:02:53 AM
On hacked.com came a fresh review of Acorn, in which the author brought all the arguments for and against:
"
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
Very strict evaluation. Maybe well-deserved. After all, Acorn is just beginning its journey. As stressed hacked, Acorn has an excellent team and good advisers - and this is the core of the whole project. "
Risks
No product yet. The MVP platform won’t be available until Q2 or Q3 of 2018. Even though the team states they have ventures ready to use it, it’s unclear how legitimate they are and whether they’ll value what the team produces. (-4)
Inexperienced team. The founders don’t have crowdfunding or blockchain experience – the two things the platform revolves around. (-3)
Risky revenue model. A major part of their mid-term revenue strategy is in the Project Incentive Fund and Operations Fund. Banking on a 5%-10% annual return for the Operations Fund is foolish. The Project Incentive Fund is great to get those first users on the platform, but it’s not certain that they’ll stay once the incentives are gone. (-3)
Growth Potential
Good advisor support. The company has a large group of advisors with the skills to help fill the gaps of the management team. (+3)
Untapped market. Acorn is clearly targeting a market that’s vastly underserved. Using this strategy, they could enter the crowdfunding space without having to compete against the big guys. (+6)
Multiple revenue streams. The team seems to be utilizing a “shotgun approach” for their revenue. Testing out different strategies could work well in the beginning and allow them to focus on the most profitable ones as they grow. (+5)
Disposition
Acorn scores +4 out of 10. The platform brings a few novel ideas to the crowdfunding space but their good intentions could be their downfall. It’s rare that you see a company that doesn’t have profit as a primary motive succeed. I’m not saying that it’s not possible – just rare.
The project may have a better chance of success if they narrow in their focus in both their overall company mission and the revenue model they use to get there."
February 08, 2018, 07:52:47 PM
+4 is a good result or not? I think the hacked underestimates this project.
Lol, they want me pay for their scammy analysis... they set ratings and then if you want learn more about criteria for evaluation you should pay ....
February 08, 2018, 07:03:48 PM
https://cointelegraph.com/ico-calendar/the-acorn-collective
We have been listed on Cointelegraph's ICO Calendar. Be sure to check us out!
Good job. You show nice balance between working on your project and marketing! Keep do what you do and it will bring results! We have been listed on Cointelegraph's ICO Calendar. Be sure to check us out!
Jump to: