Today i want to report a big cover-up going on at Localbitcoins, and predict it's demise in favor of smarter competitors.
Regarding this "reputation system":
As a new buyer i took time off from work and went to town today thinking i could give Localbitcoins a try.
I opened three trades, and was BLOWN OFF by three traders.
Being new, i didn't know how long i'm supposed to wait for responses, and ended up wasting hours that were taken directly from paid work i could have been doing otherwise. I did not bother to try and open a fourth trade as the sun was going down and i wanted to try get in a couple hours work so the day was not completely wasted.
Because the first trader that blew me off, USMC1991, did not bother to respond or state any personal policy that would exclude me, it took me a long time, two more mis-trades, to find out that prejudice against new buyers runs rampant at Localbitcoins. Not one of these prejudiced traders stated, in their advertising, that they will not do business with new traders.
While a trade is open, a buyer is restricted from opening other trades, if and when sellers refuse to respond, or respond with "cancel the trade. I need more reputation".
If you didn't know what was going on, you could end up wasting valuable time, especially if you are trying to move into bitcoin on a dip. You have to cancel prior attempts to buy, before you can move on.
On my second attempt, at least the seller messaged back, soon, "sorry. cancel. need more reputation".
Since this prejudice was news to me, i began to inquire.
Turns out the reason he wanted me to cancel is because his BTC was locked in escrow until the trade is resolved somehow either by completion or by cancel on the buyers side.
I demanded a good reason this seller would not sell, as i was standing with my cash next to a Wells Fargo, ready to deposit to whatever account # he sent. He tries his best to insult me, calling me "son", and telling me he does not need to explain his policy to me. Finally he admits its his policy he does not sell to new. Fine. Fair enough. But then i wanted to know why he did not state this policy, up front, in his advertising so that new buyers don't waste their time clicking on prejudiced sellers buttons. I started talking about logging negative feedback, while his text seemed to indicate that he thought his feedback could blow my feedback out of the water. Then he opened up a "dispute" with Localbitcoins to try to get them to get me to cancel the trade. So i cancelled it and went immediately to try to register negative feedback.
When i went to register negative feedback, lo and behold, there were no links available for me to do so.
So i opened a support ticket with Localbitcoins and found out this, that you can only leave feedback if:
"- Trade volume between you and your trading partner is more than 0.5 Bitcoin"This means if sellers ignore you and waste your time, you can't report it.
This means the feedback on Localbitcoins does not account for any trade closed by a cancel, or anything less than 0.5 BTC.
This must account for a large part of the volume (or no volume in case sellers are ignoring buyers) at Localbitcoins, hence, the coverup.
Furthermore, feedback power is reserved for whales who have done more than 50 BTC in volume. You can leave feedback regardless the trade is cancelled, or the trade is less than 0.5 BTC if:
"- The total trade volume of the person who is leaving feedback is more than 50 Bitcoin"This means the three sellers who blew me off today could leave negative feedback against me (if they are whales), but i can't leave feedback against them.
This means that if, as someone whose time they have wasted, I protest against this treatment, they could hit me, but i could not hit back.
This leads to something else i discovered, as i was blown off by yet another seller.
This third seller was trying to filter his buyers by conducting SMS text messaging outside of Localbitcoins, prior to the buyer opening up the trade. He wanted to know my username. So i gave him my username. No response. So once again, a seller is refusing to do business with a new buyer, and starts to waste my time. But through text messaging, i found out his motive: he is trying to keep "coin lockers" from locking up his coin in escrow before he has a chance to reject the new buyers.
Who are these "coin lockers"?
Given the censoring scenario i have described above, the "coin lockers" are people who are protesting sellers who won't sell to new buyers, ignore new buyers, waste new buyers time...and who are given no feedback outlet to let the public know what is going on here at Localbitcoins.
So in protest, they open trades, and lock up the BTC of the seller in escrow for the maximum amount of time.
Personally, i want to know who are all the sellers who won't sell to new buyers. As a new buyer, i want to boycott them forever, even after i become an established buyer with this elusive "reputation" we hear about.
I have suggested to Localbitcoins that they create another subcategory market for sellers that only want to sell to buyers with some established reputation. That way, new buyers don't have to waste their time clicking on their buttons, and can boycott them in the future.
I have also suggested Localbitcoins require such sellers to state their no-new-buyers policy clearly in their pre-sale stipulations (none of the three stated their policy), so our time is not wasted trying to to business with prejudiced sellers.
If Localbitcoins does nothing about this culture, then it's clear there is a systemic cover-up going on within their business model.
Finally, i suggest that people use this forum for new buyers to report any sellers they discover won't do business, either by ignoring new buyers, or blowing them off with insults.
The three sellers who blew me off yesterday were:
USMC1991 no response. $950
alhazim91 refusal. $300
(803)699-4674 asked for my username. I gave it. He ignored. $300. Can't remember his username so text# instead.