Topic: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - V3 Hardfork on block 210000 - page 196. (Read 990783 times)

I saw blocks being found by nanopool and by ABC1.  That's what I'm saying.  Nice exploit guys!  

I do not like nanopul, but I passed on it until Supernova is not correct

he is nanopool.

You would say that because you were able to find some blocks..are you coordinating with nanopool?

Failure to suprnova
Supernova 59216, blockchain 59236

Not sure yet, I'm trying to figure that out.  Ocminer is usually pretty reputable every time I delt with him.  Suprnova is known to good reliability, but they always seem to be targeted with attacks trying to discredit them.  They run a great and honest service... Never an issue. 

Suprnova 4 hours running with no block. Who's really the bastard here? Nanopool?

LOl you do not understand the problem. If the blockchain is as vulnerable as this, expect no adoption whatsoever. The vulnerability is being taken advantage of. Fix it first.

Couldn't have said it better myself... I share the same sentiment. 

LOL the mining inflation is really low, still lots of potential left.  Most of the coins are on poloniex.com, but not of the sell order book.  Either someone big is holding for some reason, or who knows. 

Guys! Here is the plan: Take out all your sell orders. This way the price will go up from the pump itself. The price will sky rocket to the moon! 100k (as it used to be).

I really don't get the point of people like you saying that kind of sh***t. Do you think a coin will be perfect from the very first moment of it launch? Now it's time to improve and go on. If it will be a good or bad coin, the time will tell. By now it has done exactly what is supposed to do. All the coins have the same behavior when they are launched: they raise and they fall. Did you check the Monero history? what about ETH and ETC?

From this moment on, Pascal has a lot of work to be done and IMO it has a lot of potential.I am not an expert but I have done some research. Will it  give the same amount of money to the miners? of course not, but it will add some new concepts to the cryptocurrencies ecosystem: the account system is one of the best and, when it is improved, sending pascal between accounts will be very easy, more than with BTC, ETH, ETC, and whichever other crypto out there.

Of course the coin has some flaws but like ALL the coins it can be improved. If u want to make a wise decision, buy now, cause you will regret you didn't in some months. Oh, and yes, Poloniex made a lot of money, as it is doing it with BTC, and ETH, and ETC, and ALL the coins listen in the market. I think you have not realized something: the business here is not mining, is not trading, and is not even building your own coin, that's bullshit, the real good money is in having an exchange. They took their part of the cake, and as all in this digital world the coin will rise again, in less than 4 months. It needs to mature.

You don't like it, ok, but the time has not passed to make profits with this coin.

Have a great day man. Happy trading.

All our test rigs show the correct 6hr average hashrate with sgminer. Probably those people were using the old miner.

folk!!!
my wallet shows 59208 block
but suprnova pool shows 59186,
witch one is correct?

Except that the actual hashrate on the two pools differed using the same mining software and same hardware.

That's a problem thats been reported by more than one person in this thread.

Everyone's hashrate was higher on Suprnova. No one reported a higher hashrate on Nanopool.

20% reward for Vorksholk has been sent.
OpHash: 46E7000002000000010000003937303230333044453735363541303945304137

looks like the cat is out of the bag from no.5.

sounforge not working ? OP please update links for win downloads.

If block arrived with 30 secs in the future timestamp, Current block age will display 'negative seconds ago' on the daemon. Any node that will find nonce below of that 30 secs will be rejected but if that rouge node/or nodes sync to it finds the nonce he/them alone can be accepted. Only them can find the nonce for that timeframe. Clever but not playing fair.  A lot of blocks arrived with negative block age, some arrived as far as 2 minutes. Small miners are just wasting electricity if mining solo with this kind of deception.

1) We made the same code change, the latest release has, 3 hours ago already. Developer has written in email what did he do in the code.
2) Our servers properly synchronised and our block time is correct.
3) We don't make any DDOS attacks, but we DO have a DDOS protection.
4) "stealing hashrates" is an absurd thing, as you can not have the same effective hashrate on the pool side, as your miner shows. You lose some time to achieve work and to send it, have some % of invalid shares, miners pause mining on job changing (good ones do it quick, but still has a break).
The better miner works, the better connection is the closer your pool stats to the miner reports.

5) The REAL attack was shifting all the pool blocks timestamps to 30 seconds in the future, making it impossible for our pool to mine any blocks in next 30 second after Suprnova finds a block until we've applied the fix.