Topic: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - V3 Hardfork on block 210000 - page 200. (Read 990744 times)

^Fucking spammers...

Ontopic: Is the clock attack still going on?

Spill the beans or stop talking FUD.

edit: Sure about Nanopool? I doubt they immediately attacked Pascal Lite and it's very easy to set the miner name.

edit2: Couldn't someone merge mine both coins?

Next time you want to bullshit get your facts straight.

PASC/BTC was never 30 Sats ever!!!

I was mining PASC pretty much from the start, the absolutely lowest it ever sold for was 500 Sats.

Really don't understand your post

Hello Pascal guys 

I am a Russian guy and maybe my English its not so good but I have very good skills to make money with guys who talk very

well English.

In fact, I am done with these Pascal gold miner (for me  ) and I want to share something ... important or not, I do not

know... maybe you Know!

Me and other few guys from the ''system'' we bought around 2,3 Millions Pascal , before to be listed on Poloniex,  We''ve

paid around 30 to max 70 Sat/coin. That''s good price, right? ) These coins are not useful and they will not be useful

never for something in tech  BUT they are Very good to make money, Millions in few days, for US   

Why I share something like that with u? I do not know, maybe because I like greedy people who make me rich , maybe I like

to make big money stake from nothing BUT I DO NOT LIKE what Poloniex do with their users . 70% from the total BTC volume on

Poloniex belongs to Poloniex, they just Pump and Dump every coin from the system. (just bots)

My Pascal coins are already in the system (Poloniex) and will make more much money for them.

Also they wanted to suspend my accounts (already did for few of them) because I made too much money, but finally we've made

an ''arrangement''.  I have many other accounts and they DO NOT KNOW IT      BTW Troll Moderators are very friendly

guys

Poloniex its the best place to make money but its unfair play for over 90% from their users.

Good Luck guys and Thanks Pascal coin for your short life 

PS: I know already the next coin that will be listed on Poloniex and we will see u there for a BIG trade, and will be a

money maker again For guys like me and Poloniex, of course 

Thats possible yes, but I think it's just a unwanted coincidence as they're driving up the diff for themselves as well.

I also think they run a bunch of nodes with clocks synced all the way up to bring the average difference much higher according to

  if Not IsValidTime(connection_ts) then begin
      DisconnectInvalidClient(false,'Invalid remote timestamp. Difference:'+inttostr(FLastKnownTimestampDiff)+' > '+inttostr(CT_MaxSecondsDifferenceOfNetworkNodes));
    end;

Albert tried to fix this issue with the above command but apparently back then the coin wasn't listed on any exchanges and nobody bothered to attack it.

You can't tell as you can set the block header to anything you like I could even just mine blocks with "Nanopool" if I would want to

Yeah those bastards screwed up the entire Pascal Lite coin launch. Right from the very beginning they kept doing that. And during the TEST launch they behaved and didn't do anything wrong so I assumed the network was good to go.

They also seem to have MASSIVE hashpower, I am getting at least 200-300 GPUs on my coin alone and since PascalCoin network is much larger they probably have another 500-1000 GPUs pointed at this coin. This isn't a small miner, its a farm the size of a warehouse.

So who is doing the hack is it Nanopool or that "PasYarYar" or "abc0000000" "pwallet"?

EDIT. Seems obviously its abc__________ since your block was rejected right after.

You are crazy good. Thank you for the pool too!

OK, there are several nodes sending valid blocks with higher timestamps:

02-02-2017 10:45:18.259 TID:F0977700 [Error] Disconecting 89.249.254.45:50962 > Invalid remote timestamp. Difference:227 > 180

Thus making my blocks "invalid" through to too "old" time even though my clock is correct:

02-02-2017 10:44:59.041 TID:F0977700 [Error] Invalid new block 59002: Invalid timestamp (New timestamp:1486028696 last timestamp (59001):1486028710)
02-02-2017 10:44:59.041 TID:F0977700 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Invalid timestamp (New timestamp:1486028696 last timestamp (59001):1486028710) payload:SUPRNOVAROXXXXXXXXXXXXRkmq4------- timestamp:1486028696 nonce:3038414114


What those guys exploit is an old bug which was fixed in bitcoin years ago. They send their blocks with a maximum "drift" ahead ..

Example:
It's now 11:30:00  and blockchain is at height 59000
Max Drift is 30 seconds

So they say they solved Block 59001 at 11:30:30 even though it's just 11:30:00 and now my pool finds the next block as 11:30:20 which is BEFORE 11:30:30 so the blockchain rejects the block and says "Nope, your clock is wrong (even though my clock is right!) and I reject your block because the block before was discovered later"...


We need the dev here to fix that..

take a look at bitcoin value history: coin can't be just solid stable.

it's natural to observe the dumps and pumps.

That looks very much like the clock-attack seen during the launch of Pascal Lite: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17704818

The miner sends a block with the timestamp being a minute or two in the future, the next block mined by someone else will likely have an invalid timestamp. It's bad design to let the client decide not to send the block...

Also those rogue nodes must be banned.

Why pascalcoin down?

There seems to be an attack going on ... I was ddosed and while I was ddosed I noticed blocks with "high" timestamps which subsequently reject my blocks with the correct time:

02-02-2017 10:27:10.151 TID:E5496700 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Invalid timestamp (New timestamp:1486027668 last timestamp (58999):1486027790) payload:SUPRNOVAROXXXXXXXXXXXXHXpLc/------ timestamp:1486027668 nonce:1303498590

I'm investigating what is actually going on exactly...

Frontend will be fine in a few moments, the DDoS ended.

Suprnova frontend ddos ?

Hi @digitalcoins,


Did you read the whitepaper ?
... understood it ?

Funny Question, maybe a chill of "DAO-Coin".

 

Is it theoretically possible to combine Pascal with something like smart-contracts? For smart contracts to be executed some blockchain indeed should exist, what if smart-contract will be PoS-like, so like some limited number of smart-contracts, if no stake on the contract, then it burns together with block?

Yes if a place can be created to trade accounts that would be good.

vrooom vrooom RX 470's on g1820 4gb ram win10, can be faster but running on single psu 1200w & getting decent speeds. just below to 1KW

I used this miner: https://pasc.suprnova.cc/sgminer-5.5.0-pascal-1-windows-amd64.zip

On intensity 21 the 6950 does 290MH/s, might go even higher on higher intensities and with some OC but my card gets really hot already. It would be great for solo mining (the clones) but sadly the only GPU miner that works for me in solo is the V2 that only does 50MH...