Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] RCHAIN - page 28. (Read 44422 times)

legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 03:04:11 PM
#48
This isnt an investment opportunity or ICO. It's a swap.

Everybody can see right through your obfuscations.  The computer you are using to spread this nonsense was paid for by me being a participant in the crowdsale.  I'm not happy that my money is being used by you to trick people.

I think people can make their own judgments. Synereo paid me not you. I was paid to do a very fair bit of marketing in the Netherlands and clear video work. That contract was signed by the CTO and CEO of Synereo. Amps were given to me most likely out of the AMP treasury so your fight is with them not me.

 Like Synereo Rchain will have its own wallets for community, marketing and technical development.

Perhaps you can get a job at Synereo at the Rchain.Coop (Nonprofit Entity) or Rchain Incubator (For profit Entity). There are plenty of chances to get involved in both projects. There is plenty of opportunities to work together.

I dont see how I am here tricking people either. All the documentation has been reviewed and scrutinized very deeply. A third party is handling the ERC20 contract etc.

The ONLY reason you're around here is because Greg felt sorry for you and insisted that you get over compensated.  Let's be honest.  Anything you did a monkey could do better.  You don't represent Synereo or RChain in a good light.  You have no training in anything.  Your education is pathetic.  You can't spell, and you don't use proper grammar.  Your videos are always messed up.  You're a joke.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Fall seven times, stand up eight.
January 11, 2017, 02:47:17 PM
#47
How many RCHAIN total suplays??? Any bounty for local translation sir???
I want reserve indonesian translations Cheesy

The Rhoc token supply is in parity with the AMP token supply. So I believe its 1 billion tokens.



So there would be 1 billion rchain tokens? What if synereo burns amps in near future ?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Fall seven times, stand up eight.
January 11, 2017, 02:35:00 PM
#46
I see... Dor and Greg promised Rchain, social layer, Special K and lots of things in return for our money. After they got the money, they divided the project, and now investors need to choose which part they prefer. Scammers!

Ideally, if they intended to be fair, each investor would have, at least, 1 AMP and 1 Rchain token (not to mention that two segregated projects are worse than a whole one as promised). Or a refund by Synereo.

Interesting observation.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 02:15:00 PM
#45
This isnt an investment opportunity or ICO. It's a swap.

Everybody can see right through your obfuscations.  The computer you are using to spread this nonsense was paid for by me being a participant in the crowdsale.  I'm not happy that my money is being used by you to trick people.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 02:06:06 PM
#44
You brought up the legalities I am asking you for your interpretation because I am not a lawyer.

The interpretation under the law is that Greg is at fault and will face legal and financial repercussions if Synereo LTD chooses to pursue him for damages.  If I was Synereo LTD's legal counsel, I would recommend that they act to protect their and their shareholder's interests.

Source?

Corporate Law

specifics.

Christian get off the computer and stop trying to convince people who can't afford to lose their money to hand it over to Greg in return for vague promises which he is incapable of fulfilling.  If you're too daft to see the writing on the wall and want "specifics", go ask any corporate attorney or judge.  You've stated before that you didn't invest anything into the crowdsale, so don't try to convince people that you have skin in the game and know what is best.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
January 11, 2017, 01:56:23 PM
#43
That's why so Synereo growing today. 20% it is great!!!
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
January 11, 2017, 01:53:09 PM
#42
You brought up the legalities I am asking you for your interpretation because I am not a lawyer.

The interpretation under the law is that Greg is at fault and will face legal and financial repercussions if Synereo LTD chooses to pursue him for damages.  If I was Synereo LTD's legal counsel, I would recommend that they act to protect their and their shareholder's interests.

Source?

Corporate Law

specifics.

interesting?!
Source
Specifics
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 01:42:27 PM
#41
You brought up the legalities I am asking you for your interpretation because I am not a lawyer.

The interpretation under the law is that Greg is at fault and will face legal and financial repercussions if Synereo LTD chooses to pursue him for damages.  If I was Synereo LTD's legal counsel, I would recommend that they act to protect their and their shareholder's interests.

Source?

Corporate Law
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
January 11, 2017, 01:39:16 PM
#40
You brought up the legalities I am asking you for your interpretation because I am not a lawyer.

The interpretation under the law is that Greg is at fault and will face legal and financial repercussions if Synereo LTD chooses to pursue him for damages.  If I was Synereo LTD's legal counsel, I would recommend that they act to protect their and their shareholder's interests.

Source?
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 01:35:22 PM
#39
You brought up the legalities I am asking you for your interpretation because I am not a lawyer.

The interpretation under the law is that Greg is at fault and will face legal and financial repercussions if Synereo LTD chooses to pursue him for damages.  If I was Synereo LTD's legal counsel, I would recommend that they act to protect their and their shareholder's interests.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 01:31:29 PM
#38
Its a shame you talk trash on Mexicans. It's a honorable to work 12 hours a day doing very hard physical labor with little pay. But to your point about intelligence, I also got accepted into the Navy intelligence program with top secret clearance promised right after A school. In order to join the navy you need a full nasis background check. So you can call the DOD if you have doubts.

I never said that there was anything wrong with being a "Mexican landscaper" as you put it.  I simply implied that is where your skill set lies, and that you have ZERO knowledge about much else.  I wouldn't put too much credence of your intelligence in the fact that the Navy accepted you into their "intelligence program with TOP SECRET clearance".  Anybody with any knowledge about the military knows that "TOP SECRET clearance" is the absolute bottom rung of the security clearance system.  The military is so hard pressed to get anyone into their ranks these days, especially the Navy, they'd take anyone they could trick into joining.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 01:20:51 PM
#37
Nobody knows the whole story of why Dor chose to oust Greg

Yeah, it's one of life's big mysteries.  Who would think when you commit malfeasance against Synereo LTD equity / AMP holders to extort money for your own independent company that you would get fired?  What a mindblower!
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 01:16:30 PM
#36
The fact of the matter is that Greg, who is now trying to collect funds for his version of "RChain", was fired from Synereo LTD for failing to deliver and malfeasance.  Greg is now attempting to steal Synereo LTD IP and gain monetary value from the work of others.  Greg would like you to believe that his version of "RChain" is the only one in development.  The truth is that Synereo LTD is continuing the development of RChain on its own with its own team without Greg.  Greg is angry over this and is committing multiple infractions for which he can be held legally liable.  There will never be any funding procured by him from David Otto or any other large, accredited investor, because of the legalities of Greg's situation.  Greg has stated previously that David Otto had agreed to give him a "blank check", but more recently has claimed that funding will ONLY come after the RChain ICO.  Of course, none of this is true.  Greg knows this and is taking advantage of the uninformed by attempting to convince them to give him their AMPs.  Greg is doing this because he knows the only money he will be able to get is the AMPs he collects off the naive.  Greg will never get $10M USD from anybody.  He will claim to "develop" his version of RChain until he runs out of your AMPs or he gets sued.  If you give Greg your money, you might as well go out into the street and set fire to them.  You will get no return on your investment.

Protip:  Don't listen to the imbecile "coininterview" aka Christian Pierson.  Christian is a chronic drug abuser who will soon be hauled out of his parent's house to jail by the DEA.  Greg is paying Christian to market RChain (Stop laughing!) even though Christian is completely and totally incompetent, has the IQ of a pickle, and his last job was in "Mexican landscaping", his words not mine.

There is no IP. The technology is open source.

Please inform us about the legalities of Greg's situation.

There is no ICO. Just a swap. There is a chance for a clear spilt here and now your bringing drama to this thread. You dont see me on synereo's thread do you?

Thank you also for being the first troll here really.. Speedy effort.

 I took a deliberate effort to divorce myself from the synereo thread after you publicly threatened me on the synereo forum.

You also spelled my name wrong. I reported you to the state police in chambersburg and fbi for threatening myself and my family on the synereo bitcointalk. https://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx . I do not use drugs and I am very reputable in the community in and outside of the Rchain project. I have way more invested in this project then yourself. You honestly need help.

I'd ask if you were high right now, but I already know the answer.  Sorry about the misspelling Christian Peirson.  I'd hate to have the police haul the wrong person off to jail for using illegal drugs.  Unfortunately for you, you uploaded several videos to Youtube of yourself talking and laughing about your illegal drug use and went on a very long rant on one of them about "mushrooms".  Video evidence is admissible in court.  I'm glad you called the Pennsylvania State Police.  They might go easy on you if you turn yourself in and plead stupidity.  I'd advise you to throw yourself at the mercy of the court.

As for your moronic claim that there is "no IP", you are again woefully misinformed.  Greg was an EMPLOYEE of Synereo LTD.  As an EMPLOYEE, everything Greg develops on company time or his own time that is in a related field is the sole property of Synereo LTD unless he received written consent from the company.  You have no background as to interpret the legalities of the situation and need to stick with things you know like shrubbery.
hero member
Activity: 2147
Merit: 518
January 11, 2017, 12:59:58 PM
#35
Chill out. This is not the first time u talk about Greg issues without proof of his involvement in this specific RCHAIN. He might be working on his own revision of it and retain the brand name after breakout with synereo while not being aware of any other projects with identical tickers that can exist independently of his own chain.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
January 11, 2017, 12:56:43 PM
#34
The fact of the matter is that Greg, who is now trying to collect funds for his version of "RChain", was fired from Synereo LTD for failing to deliver and malfeasance.  Greg is now attempting to steal Synereo LTD IP and gain monetary value from the work of others.  Greg would like you to believe that his version of "RChain" is the only one in development.  The truth is that Synereo LTD is continuing the development of RChain on its own with its own team without Greg.  Greg is angry over this and is committing multiple infractions for which he can be held legally liable.  There will never be any funding procured by him from David Otto or any other large, accredited investor, because of the legalities of Greg's situation.  Greg has stated previously that David Otto had agreed to give him a "blank check", but more recently has claimed that funding will ONLY come after the RChain ICO.  Of course, none of this is true.  Greg knows this and is taking advantage of the uninformed by attempting to convince them to give him their AMPs.  Greg is doing this because he knows the only money he will be able to get is the AMPs he collects off the naive.  Greg will never get $10M USD from anybody.  He will claim to "develop" his version of RChain until he runs out of your AMPs or he gets sued.  If you give Greg your money, you might as well go out into the street and set fire to it.  You will get no return on your investment.

Protip:  Don't listen to the imbecile "coininterview" aka Christian Pierson.  Christian is a chronic drug abuser who will soon be hauled out of his parent's house to jail by the DEA.  Greg is paying Christian to market RChain (Stop laughing!) even though Christian is completely and totally incompetent, has the IQ of a pickle, and his last job was in "Mexican landscaping", his words not mine.


Nobody knows the whole story of why Dor chose to oust Greg and keep all the money, knowing that many people invested partly or exclusively because of RChain and Greg's involvement. The code related to RChain is already in the public domain, and Dor was in agreement that it should be. I have not seen Dor say he is continuing to work on anything called RChain. I have seen him say the opposite, that he is looking for an existing blockchain on which to build the social network.

I'm not sure why you think you are an expert in the legalities of the situation, when even lawyers aren't sure.

Greg never said he had a blank check from Otto. Someone else said that it the Synereo Slack, but that was incorrect.

The rest of your speculations and ad hominems are not worth responding to.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 507
January 11, 2017, 12:51:15 PM
#33
I see... Dor and Greg promised Rchain, social layer, Special K and lots of things in return for our money. After they got the money, they divided the project, and now investors need to choose which part they prefer. Scammers!

Ideally, if they intended to be fair, each investor would have, at least, 1 AMP and 1 Rchain token (not to mention that two segregated projects are worse than a whole one as promised.

 There were about a month of negotiations before the project spilt publicly. The fact an agreement wasn't reached is mind blowing but I wouldn't say that constitutes a scam. A bait and switch isn't illegal. I do understand the frustration. I certainly would be freaking out if I was bag holding amps. But again the speculation is completely out of control of Synereo or Rchain.

The social layer (will have to be a dapp funded by the Rchain Incubator), Rchain and Special K is still being developed by the Coop. See this document here to: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BRN1it9X8JyfIFvqGfsK-y94R0Ask6f5ZVLdrE3zcRQ/edit

Synereo should be doing their own thing but they havent released anything on their youtube channel in 4 weeks. Their announcement according to dor will be on Jan 20th.

You also mentioned that two projects are worse than 1 whole promised. I can see your point but I would think its better to ultimately decentralize (spilt the project. if the founders are in disagreement etc).

I dont think you should do a 1-1 because dor, Anderson and other Synereo shareholders would own a large stake in the Rchain Network off the top making it very unfair. Thoughts? I think the distribution that vulcanize and the rchain team has come up with is very fair.



"The fact an agreement wasn't reached is mind blowing but I wouldn't say that constitutes a scam. A bait and switch isn't illegal"

If there was no agreement, but they reported themselves as a team, with no alert for this condition whatsoever, then a refund to 2CO investors would be the only solution.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
January 11, 2017, 12:40:39 PM
#32
The fact of the matter is that Greg, who is now trying to collect funds for his version of "RChain", was fired from Synereo LTD for failing to deliver and malfeasance.  Greg is now attempting to steal Synereo LTD IP and gain monetary value from the work of others.  Greg would like you to believe that his version of "RChain" is the only one in development.  The truth is that Synereo LTD is continuing the development of RChain on its own with its own team without Greg.  Greg is angry over this and is committing multiple infractions for which he can be held legally liable.  There will never be any funding procured by him from David Otto or any other large, accredited investor, because of the legalities of Greg's situation.  Greg has stated previously that David Otto had agreed to give him a "blank check", but more recently has claimed that funding will ONLY come after the RChain ICO.  Of course, none of this is true.  Greg knows this and is taking advantage of the uninformed by attempting to convince them to give him their AMPs.  Greg is doing this because he knows the only money he will be able to get is the AMPs he collects off the naive.  Greg will never get $10M USD from anybody.  He will claim to "develop" his version of RChain until he runs out of your AMPs or he gets sued.  If you give Greg your money, you might as well go out into the street and set fire to it.  You will get no return on your investment.

Protip:  Don't listen to the imbecile "coininterview" aka Christian Peirson.  Christian is a chronic drug abuser who will soon be hauled out of his parent's house to jail by the DEA.  Greg is paying Christian to market RChain (Stop laughing!) even though Christian is completely and totally incompetent, has the IQ of a pickle, and his last job was in "Mexican landscaping", his words not mine.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 507
January 11, 2017, 12:21:08 PM
#31
I see... Dor and Greg promised Rchain, social layer, Special K and lots of things in return for our money. After they got the money, they divided the project, and now investors need to choose which part they prefer. Scammers!

Ideally, if they intended to be fair, each investor would have, at least, 1 AMP and 1 Rchain token (not to mention that two segregated projects are worse than a whole one as promised). Or a refund by Synereo.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
January 11, 2017, 10:21:53 AM
#30
I don't get it, why swap AMP from Synereo over to this? Why not just do a BTC ICO? Is this coin a takeover of Synereo or something like that? I am interested but want to know more.

Why amp, exactly, notice that the swap ends on the 20th, when amp gets it's big announcement.
sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 425
January 11, 2017, 10:16:59 AM
#29
There is a very similar project in the market. What will happen to your differently?
Pages:
Jump to: