[ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 164.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:05:48 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:02:44 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:00:21 PM

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "2",

I worked off of yours, I'm pretty sure my X11 is in the ballpark of 35.20% faster. X13 around 38.51%, and X15 about 42.87%.

with mine you should get 5.2mh/s on x11 with 290 (stock clocks) and 6.2mh/s on 290x (oc to 1040/1375)

What about 280X?

EDIT: I cloned the develop branch of your repo - is this a joke? 4.55MH/s on X11 on my 290X, tops. It's at 1000/1500.

EDIT2: Though I am liking the xI 64 - getting 6.14MH/s almost on my 290X, 1000/1500.

Elun

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: badman74 on September 15, 2014, 09:43:56 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 09:03:43 PM

280X above 5.75MH/s with new settings!

EDIT: Actually, 5.8MH+ sustained with a clock bump.

I really would like to see what you did the the darkcoin kernel to get those hash rates, maybe I could incorporate the speedups in the other kernels as well.
Unfortunately I don't know enough to build the kernels myself without at least something to dissect, even then it doesn't always work for me.

I think He will not share his code to public soon. And He will be right. Because, what he will get from it? I think that will be only higher hashrates and diff in the networks.

badman74

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 09:03:43 PM

280X above 5.75MH/s with new settings!

EDIT: Actually, 5.8MH+ sustained with a clock bump.

I really would like to see what you did the the darkcoin kernel to get those hash rates, maybe I could incorporate the speedups in the other kernels as well.
Unfortunately I don't know enough to build the kernels myself without at least something to dissect, even then it doesn't always work for me.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:00:21 PM

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "2",

I worked off of yours, I'm pretty sure my X11 is in the ballpark of 35.20% faster. X13 around 38.51%, and X15 about 42.87%.

EDIT: xI 64 is better, though - 4.97MH/s to 4.98MH/s on X11 (280X).

qwep

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 07:23:02 AM

Quote from: poiuty on September 15, 2014, 06:14:44 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 05:23:29 AM

Quote from: poiuty on September 15, 2014, 02:03:19 AM

Wolf0, wow!
how much hashrate on 290 with your kernel fix?

Don't have a 290, but here, the GPUs are, in order from 0 - 3, a 270X, 290X, 7950, and a 280X. It's nsfw, as always: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11localrigwolf.png

What settings do you use for 270?

get 3Mh/s

Quote

"kernel": "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "102",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"gpu-engine" : "1250",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-fan" : "35-85",

With xintensity -> 64 slightly less than 102

Please, share your kernel fix Wink

That engine clock is pretty high... I'm running 1165/1500.

Please, share your miner

qwep

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Quote from: poiuty on September 15, 2014, 06:14:44 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 05:23:29 AM

Quote from: poiuty on September 15, 2014, 02:03:19 AM

Wolf0, wow!
how much hashrate on 290 with your kernel fix?

Don't have a 290, but here, the GPUs are, in order from 0 - 3, a 270X, 290X, 7950, and a 280X. It's nsfw, as always: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11localrigwolf.png

What settings do you use for 270?

get 3Mh/s

Quote

"kernel": "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "102",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"gpu-engine" : "1250",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-fan" : "35-85",

With xintensity -> 64 slightly less than 102

Please, share your kernel fix Wink

+1

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

Won't help - I modified the kernels for X11, X13, and X15.

poiuty

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 05:23:29 AM

Quote from: poiuty on September 15, 2014, 02:03:19 AM

Wolf0, wow!
how much hashrate on 290 with your kernel fix?

Don't have a 290, but here, the GPUs are, in order from 0 - 3, a 270X, 290X, 7950, and a 280X. It's nsfw, as always: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11localrigwolf.png

What settings do you use for 270?

get 3Mh/s

Quote

"kernel": "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "102",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"gpu-engine" : "1250",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-fan" : "35-85",

With xintensity -> 64 slightly less than 102

Please, share your kernel fix Wink

qwep

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 05:23:29 AM

Quote from: poiuty on September 15, 2014, 02:03:19 AM

Wolf0, wow!
how much hashrate on 290 with your kernel fix?

Don't have a 290, but here, the GPUs are, in order from 0 - 3, a 270X, 290X, 7950, and a 280X. It's nsfw, as always: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11localrigwolf.png

Can your miner

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

qwep

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 15, 2014, 12:33:40 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:44:45 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:41:11 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:07:58 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:05:48 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:02:44 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:00:21 PM

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "2",

I worked off of yours, I'm pretty sure my X11 is in the ballpark of 35.20% faster. X13 around 38.51%, and X15 about 42.87%.

with mine you should get 5.2mh/s on x11 with 290 (stock clocks) and 6.2mh/s on 290x (oc to 1040/1375)

What about 280X?

EDIT: I cloned the develop branch of your repo - is this a joke? 4.55MH/s on X11 on my 290X, tops. It's at 1000/1500.

EDIT2: Though I am liking the xI 64 - getting 6.14MH/s almost on my 290X, 1000/1500.

use the master branch... although it shouldnt be too different
i get 5.8 to 5.9mh/s on my 290x with 1040/1375 and I 16
and 6.18 to 6.2mh/s with xI 64
edit: my mods arent on the develop branch anymore as i started over with the 5.0.0 update

All right, I'll give it a shot later. Getting 6.15 with mine on 290X now, at 1000/1500, so still not bad.

Checked out your darkcoin-mod.cl, and didn't see too much of a difference between it and sgminer's dev branch, but I'll try it later. In the meantime, I completely rewrote one hash - now getting 5.5MH/s out of my 280X Cheesy

that publish it your miner or kernels

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 07:35:05 PM

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

Won't help - I modified the kernels for X11, X13, and X15.

Where can we find your kernels?

poiuty

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Wolf0, wow!
how much hashrate on 290 with your kernel fix?

badman74

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:07:58 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:05:48 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:02:44 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:00:21 PM

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "2",

I worked off of yours, I'm pretty sure my X11 is in the ballpark of 35.20% faster. X13 around 38.51%, and X15 about 42.87%.

with mine you should get 5.2mh/s on x11 with 290 (stock clocks) and 6.2mh/s on 290x (oc to 1040/1375)

What about 280X?

EDIT: I cloned the develop branch of your repo - is this a joke? 4.55MH/s on X11 on my 290X, tops. It's at 1000/1500.

EDIT2: Though I am liking the xI 64 - getting 6.14MH/s almost on my 290X, 1000/1500.

use the master branch... although it shouldnt be too different
i get 5.8 to 5.9mh/s on my 290x with 1040/1375 and I 16
and 6.18 to 6.2mh/s with xI 64
edit: my mods arent on the develop branch anymore as i started over with the 5.0.0 update

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: bigblind on September 12, 2014, 12:25:01 PM

how much should R9290 usually be hitting?

No idea, but if they go up, then down a lot, it usually means throttling, or they're too hot.

badman74

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 08:02:44 PM

Quote from: badman74 on September 14, 2014, 08:00:21 PM

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "2",

I worked off of yours, I'm pretty sure my X11 is in the ballpark of 35.20% faster. X13 around 38.51%, and X15 about 42.87%.

with mine you should get 5.2mh/s on x11 with 290 (stock clocks) and 6.2mh/s on 290x (oc to 1040/1375)

badman74

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: Zawamiya on September 14, 2014, 07:26:46 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config (5.2mh/s on 290, 6.2mh/s on 290x)

"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "2",

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Zawamiya

hero member

Activity: 526

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wolf0 on September 14, 2014, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 14, 2014, 06:47:01 AM

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. Grin

EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now.

care to share your config?

hellyeahent

sr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 250

Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?

Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 164. (Read 877859 times)