Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 90. (Read 877859 times)
March 12, 2015, 10:50:50 AM
My PC is Windows8 with graphics card intel 2500, cpuminer could not be opened. please help me
December 31, 2014, 03:17:05 PM
Last night I read through the OpenCL manual and AMD optimization guides...
4x 280x 1020MHz GpuClock / 1499 Memclock
Catalyst 14.4 driver with 14.6 CL files in the sgminer folder
and a few modifications to that slow ass Nicehash neoscrypt.cl file
1440 Kh/s using 720Watts at the wall, undervolted at 1.025V
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx2VQJcXD3ISdkJHNkZPS2lQUk0/view?usp=sharing
fastkdf is slow. Byte alignment improves things.
Decent. You still need to improve the main SMix calls to really get things going, though.
March 11, 2015, 10:34:50 PM
WOW! how did you get such a speed? Where can I get a miner? OO https://ottrbutt.com/miner/whirlpoolxwolf-03082015.png
That's mine.
March 11, 2015, 08:35:25 PM
Maybe if someone sings Wolf a pretty song 
March 11, 2015, 05:14:52 PM
are there any modded kernels out for whirlpoolx ?
March 11, 2015, 02:08:10 PM
WOW! how did you get such a speed? Where can I get a miner? OO https://ottrbutt.com/miner/whirlpoolxwolf-03082015.png
yep March 11, 2015, 01:29:19 PM
WOW! how did you get such a speed? Where can I get a miner? OO https://ottrbutt.com/miner/whirlpoolxwolf-03082015.png
December 31, 2014, 12:13:01 AM
Any suggestions for my 290x Neoscrypt settings? Not sure what I am doing wrong to get such crap results. Also how are my 7970/7950 speeds? Running sgminer 5.1.0-dev. Maybe I am using a crap bin or neoscrypt.cl?
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
That's pretty good for the stock miner.
Really? 7970 outpacing the 290x. Sucks for me at least it seems that Neoscrypt is dying off in terms of profitability so hopefully x11 or x13 go back up.
290X can get a little higher, but not much more than the 7970.
Any suggestions on settings?
I don't use that one, but a 1500 memclock would probably help.
I will give that a try. Do you have a link to the newest neoscrypt.cl you released? Is it the same one implemented into 5.1.0-dev?
Edit: 1500 memory hit 302k. Btw I am running sgminer-5.1-dev-2014-11-13-win32 any reason to get a newer one?
It's the same one in 5.1.0 - you shouldn't need a newer SGMiner.
March 11, 2015, 12:03:08 PM
March 11, 2015, 11:29:23 AM
Heh, I updated my build with the Lyre2RE and Whirlpool files... Both algos crash immediately on 270x.
:S
Revert back to 13.12 or whatever it was catalyst?
Not sure why but when I tried to use sgminer-dev version on lyra2re it would build a kernel but gave me a gpu disabled error.:S
Revert back to 13.12 or whatever it was catalyst?
The version I already had in my build still works fine though.
Also I am on 14.6 drivers.
December 30, 2014, 11:36:08 PM
Any suggestions for my 290x Neoscrypt settings? Not sure what I am doing wrong to get such crap results. Also how are my 7970/7950 speeds? Running sgminer 5.1.0-dev. Maybe I am using a crap bin or neoscrypt.cl?
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
That's pretty good for the stock miner.
Really? 7970 outpacing the 290x. Sucks for me at least it seems that Neoscrypt is dying off in terms of profitability so hopefully x11 or x13 go back up.
290X can get a little higher, but not much more than the 7970.
Any suggestions on settings?
I don't use that one, but a 1500 memclock would probably help.
March 11, 2015, 10:34:44 AM
I can't seem to be able to change voltages on my Sapphire r290xs/r290s via config file in order for SGminer to automatically change clocks/voltages when switching kernel. I'm using the following switch: "gpu-vddc" : "1.25" and would like to add that I can change voltages in Afterburner just fine.
Thanks in advance for any input!
Thanks in advance for any input!
This is a problem with the AMD drivers. Voltage changing does not work on any gpu. It has probably worked at some point, perhaps in the 12.x catalyst.. But does not work in any 13.x or 14.x driver.
Afterburner talks with the hardware directly, bypassing the AMD drivers. This is not very clean, but seems to work fine.
March 11, 2015, 10:17:27 AM
Heh, I updated my build with the Lyre2RE and Whirlpool files... Both algos crash immediately on 270x.
:S
Revert back to 13.12 or whatever it was catalyst?
:S
Revert back to 13.12 or whatever it was catalyst?
December 30, 2014, 11:02:00 PM
Any suggestions for my 290x Neoscrypt settings? Not sure what I am doing wrong to get such crap results. Also how are my 7970/7950 speeds? Running sgminer 5.1.0-dev. Maybe I am using a crap bin or neoscrypt.cl?
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
That's pretty good for the stock miner.
Really? 7970 outpacing the 290x. Sucks for me at least it seems that Neoscrypt is dying off in terms of profitability so hopefully x11 or x13 go back up.
290X can get a little higher, but not much more than the 7970.
March 11, 2015, 01:02:09 AM
can any1 pls tell me why all newer version of sgminer crash instantly?
on one PC working fine, on other crash instantly when I opet .bat file
thanks
on one PC working fine, on other crash instantly when I opet .bat file
thanks
March 11, 2015, 12:40:50 AM
I can't seem to be able to change voltages on my Sapphire r290xs/r290s via config file in order for SGminer to automatically change clocks/voltages when switching kernel. I'm using the following switch: "gpu-vddc" : "1.25" and would like to add that I can change voltages in Afterburner just fine.
Thanks in advance for any input!
Thanks in advance for any input!
December 30, 2014, 10:38:44 PM
Any suggestions for my 290x Neoscrypt settings? Not sure what I am doing wrong to get such crap results. Also how are my 7970/7950 speeds? Running sgminer 5.1.0-dev. Maybe I am using a crap bin or neoscrypt.cl?
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
290x = 291kh/s (1100mhz core / 1450mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 13 -g 2 --worksize 96
7970 = 322kh/s (1100mhz core / 1600mhz memory)
7950 = 272kh/s (1000mhz core / 1500mhz memory)
--thread-concurrency 8192 --xintensity 3 -g 2 --worksize 64
I seem to get great results if using xI of 3 or 2 without using TC and a worksize of 64, but I get constant HW errors. As soon as I add TC then no more HW errors, but speeds drop hard.
That's pretty good for the stock miner.
March 10, 2015, 03:50:41 AM
Still no lyre2re in the main git.
Don't know why lyra2re isn't in the sgminer-dev master branch...It is in my fork though.
lyra2re added just now
March 09, 2015, 08:33:35 PM
Still no lyre2re in the main git.
Don't know why lyra2re isn't in the sgminer-dev master branch...It is in my fork though.
Checking it out because of this, lol.
March 09, 2015, 01:16:05 PM
Still no lyre2re in the main git.
Don't know why lyra2re isn't in the sgminer-dev master branch...It is in my fork though.
Jump to: