Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 345. (Read 823858 times)

Output is halved today.!!

The price will go up!

Hawaii Standard Time?

thank you very much for your kindness advices............I come from Vietnam and I would highly appreciated your consultant

Good practice to be paranoid in cryptocurrency, anyways I can't really find evidence of it doing anything so far.

Either way I've switched to Epsylon3's build of ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80, I was going to compile it myself but too lazy to setup the environment on this machine: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20703817

I seem to be getting near identical 17 MH/s on ccminer-skunk-krnlx-80 (64-bit) versus 17.10 MH/s on skunksp-mod5_fixed (32-bit)

However I wonder if CUDA 7 32bit would perform a little better, versus CUDA 8 64bit for a GTX 1060 6GB.

Using the following bat parameter: ccminer-x64-80 -i 18 -d 0 -a skunk -o stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106 -u user.worker -p password --cpu-priority=3

Add -i 23 into your script

Agree 100%, paranoia is thick.   I've been using the shared spmod3 with zero issues and have netted pretty dang close to the number of coins to be expected.  Even if the miner is "tainted" and sending off 1-2% to a secret address, in the end it's better than forking over 0.05 or 0.1 BTC to buy the miner  

@ocminer, and everyone else who are on suprnova, in transaction page, which timezone is the date based on?

chainworks sigt pool


                    _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.04%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [23:11:53]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 43275.7            | Block:      29083 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 2500  | Estimated coins/day: 167.117                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:        1 | Shares: 10.25   | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  110.01MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 5.25    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   53.70MH/s|
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 5       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   56.22MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:55C | F:44% | P:266W | I: 26.0 | Core:1992Mhz |
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:56C | F:45% | P:270W | I: 26.0 | Core:1997Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[23:10:01]Mean netDiff: 31366.8        |
[23:10:04]Share: 08f58d86              |
[23:10:09]Share: 8ed4de14              |
[23:10:14]Mean netDiff: 31437.5        |
[23:11:13]Share: 391fb957              |
[23:11:18]Share: 7a4ec888              |
[23:11:24]Mean netDiff: 33107.1        |
[23:11:32]Share: e329ed95              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:xxx | Conn:0d 00:05:25 | Latency:190ms

Man ... I think you're all are beeing paranoid there is nothing wrong with this "pirated" miner imo
Getting less shares can happen, its not constant it has never been
Difficulty spikes and insane nethash are the mains reasons everyone getting less coins now
Whattomine can't handle these spikes, dont use this calculator its not trustable atm

this one is now only for nvidia's, im out with my amd cards 

I think I would generally agree with the view that a lot of the dumping is happening on an ongoing basis, so its not like the dumping will get a lot worse right at block 30,000 (when the reward halves).

Think of it this way: if I'm a miner who wants to dump, and it seems so "obvious" that the price will crash due to dumps right at block 30,000, then why would I wait until that block?  I would dump at 29,999.  But then, the next miner will think the price will crash at block 29,999, and dump at 29,998.  And so on, until the smart thing to do is just dump now.

Not every miner will follow this logic, which means there will still be some dumping at block 30,000.  But I don't think it will be as bad as people think.  And it should recover in the week or two that follows.  That may scare those of you looking to make a quick buck and get out, but that's okay, you'll make some short-term gains this week and we holders will make some long-term gains in the coming months/years.  There's room for everyone to get what they want.

In other news I'm trying to figure out if skunksp-mod5_fixed was tainted or not.

I have scanned skunksp-mod5_fixed.7z with kaspersky & windows defender (Windows 7) & neither has found anything, further system scans and rootkit scans found nothing on this system.

ccminer.exe - SHA256: c924fcb42c24fc6e0c8062055ad7a493fe9d0b9469c8efe8eebb642e95554ec3
ccminer64.exe - SHA256: 28443864b346eb6ab96a2e9c0155dddea818a3218988e4e6276de7c74d381a9a

However it's possible there is something here, if there is it could be mining some part to another pool in secret.

But I haven't really seen evidence of this so far.

I'll probably just compile ccminer-skunk-krnlx myself later: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/signatum-skunk-ccminer-krnlx-30mh-1070-525-mh-1080ti-freeopensource-2070862

If anyone wants to analyze this further, possibly with network tools and such, would be interesting to know, not sure if I will.

Nope.  The full listing is updated by the minute.  It's up to #92 now.

Lots of people are mining.  I've seen similar declines.  I was mining 8 per hour yesterday, 5.5 today.

These are all your dreams. There is no information about the location of the SIGT on the Bittrex, these are all rumors and your nubian speculation. I ask before writing about another exchange, to provide evidence.

Yeah, wait for it to finish syncing.

If it doesn't start after 5 minutes, close the wallet and do this:

1. Windows+r to open the "Run" command
2. Enter %appdata%
3. In the resulting Windows Explorer popup, go to Signatum
4. delete peers.dat
5. Re-open the wallet and wait 5-10 minutes

Anyone also faced the problem "Wallet out of sync"?

Market cap in currencies is in top 100

Don't invest money you cannot afford to lose.

I would personally never invest that much into a single alt-coin, but maybe you are rich or something and 10K is not much money? Then by all means.

I don't think any alt-coin is all that great for long term investment. I think stick to bitcoin, because if bitcoin fails petty much every alt-coin will fail as well (at least in short-term).

While I believe that signatum has a good potential to rise to 0.50-1.00+, of course nobody knows for sure. If enough big whales decide to cash out they can destroy the coin in a matter of hours and may take months if not years to show recovery if ever. It's probably not going to happen as it's not premined, but you never really know what others are thinking.

If you are a newbie start with a few hundred dollars maybe a thousand at the very most (if you can afford to lose it), if it goes x2-x3 within a year I'd say that's a good investment, if it goes much further than that's awesome, but never expect too much either as you will be disappointed.

Also don't forget the nature of cryptocurrency is extremely volatile, long term investment is better to do in real world with diversification & tax free accounts if possible, you don't get super rich but you typically won't lose out in the long term either.

Anyways good luck, if certain conditions are met in the next while than I do believe signatum will see success, but there is no guarantee.

its only 163 rank right now

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/signatum/