Skipping bad nodes
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114289/nem-technical-reference-introduces-reputation-enhanced-proof-of-importance
Interesting.
DASH uses collateral payments to fine nodes. Maybe a 3 strikes and your fined approach? I like the simplicity of instant collateral fines, plus a traffic light warning system if your node is not up to scratch.
Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) - page 302. (Read 790417 times)
May 18, 2015, 02:02:28 PM
May 18, 2015, 01:17:10 PM
Andreas talks about decentralization and gives Ripple a good kick in the nuts
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/lets-talk-bitcoin-213-undertow
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/lets-talk-bitcoin-213-undertow
May 18, 2015, 01:06:23 PM
Interesting discussion about what "Decentralized" means 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11412359
Quote from: illodin on Today at 09:32:46 AM
Quote from: sdmathis on Today at 08:07:30 AM
Most crypto is not decentralized though. Most coins are controlled by the developer or a foundation who can be held responsible. True decentralization in crypto is very rare.
When you say "controlled", what exactly do you mean by that?
"Controlled" probably means that if the dev pulls out, the coin fails.
Decentralized means nobody is in control and the coin transactions basically "runs itself" like SpreadCoin (SPR) does https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-spreadcoin-decentralize-everything-decentralized-blockexplorer-coming-1045373
UPDATE: well, perhaps not so interesting, it could have been
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11412359
Quote from: illodin on Today at 09:32:46 AM
Quote from: sdmathis on Today at 08:07:30 AM
Most crypto is not decentralized though. Most coins are controlled by the developer or a foundation who can be held responsible. True decentralization in crypto is very rare.
When you say "controlled", what exactly do you mean by that?
"Controlled" probably means that if the dev pulls out, the coin fails.
Decentralized means nobody is in control and the coin transactions basically "runs itself" like SpreadCoin (SPR) does https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-spreadcoin-decentralize-everything-decentralized-blockexplorer-coming-1045373
UPDATE: well, perhaps not so interesting, it could have been
May 18, 2015, 08:32:58 AM
I don't have any Gridcoins, nor do I intend to get any.
But this caught my attention:
.....
- Client Side AES-256 Encryption
- Deposit, Withdraw, 2-FA Authentication
...
Please explain, show screenshots.
Thanks.
The client side AES-256 encryption is written in javascript on the node.js framework. We make use of the Stanford Javascript Crypto Library heavily and the code will be made available at a later date. For the moment, we have spent alot of time writing this so we're not giving this out to the public domain just yet.
Deposit Withdraw can be seen in these set of screenshots http://imgur.com/21yBG3t,tzfj5j8,tFGpZPs,7poXyLB,HJwvjRB,QEyYt37,ybpH6Q3,TBBhVmI#0
2-FA can be seen http://imgur.com/Sj0FJ9X
2FA has been raised a few times now.
DASH are doing some R&D to look at 2FA directly on the blockchain. This will be useful for all sorts of things.
As this is in the public domain (as above from Grid), I know that there are a few projects looking at 2FA.
But this caught my attention:
.....
- Client Side AES-256 Encryption
- Deposit, Withdraw, 2-FA Authentication
...
Please explain, show screenshots.
Thanks.
The client side AES-256 encryption is written in javascript on the node.js framework. We make use of the Stanford Javascript Crypto Library heavily and the code will be made available at a later date. For the moment, we have spent alot of time writing this so we're not giving this out to the public domain just yet.
Deposit Withdraw can be seen in these set of screenshots http://imgur.com/21yBG3t,tzfj5j8,tFGpZPs,7poXyLB,HJwvjRB,QEyYt37,ybpH6Q3,TBBhVmI#0
2-FA can be seen http://imgur.com/Sj0FJ9X
2FA has been raised a few times now.
DASH are doing some R&D to look at 2FA directly on the blockchain. This will be useful for all sorts of things.
As this is in the public domain (as above from Grid), I know that there are a few projects looking at 2FA.
May 18, 2015, 07:03:26 AM
Please tell me you guys understand this: (from spreadcointalk)
Now, will this work to stop pools?
My original idea is this:
The blocks that people find do not have any relation to their private key.
This means that if you are mining on a pool and you find a block, you can switch the pool's address out with yours and they wouldn't know.
We would then needmasternodes servicenodes to confirm the block was mined to your address to prevent other miners from taking the block you mined and switching your address with theirs and redistributing it to the network.
From: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43.msg1335#msg1335The blocks that people find do not have any relation to their private key.
This means that if you are mining on a pool and you find a block, you can switch the pool's address out with yours and they wouldn't know.
We would then need
Now, will this work to stop pools?
May 18, 2015, 06:51:20 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Messages in the blockchain have already been done, maybe look at CLAMs source.
Isn't that what bitcoin allows you to do as well but the part of the address still has the random number and letters for e.g SKETCHERx435bd34jk320m6vu9d
I've even seen the word DANK at the start of an address hahaha
Edit: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91.0
May 18, 2015, 06:50:38 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Messages in the blockchain have already been done, maybe look at CLAMs source.
Isn't that what bitcoin allows you to do as well but the part of the address still has the random number and letters for e.g SKETCHERx435bd34jk320m6vu9d
I've even seen the word DANK at the start of an address hahaha
it sounds like a great many things have already been implemented ...
they are more structural things than applications - which servicenodes are built for ... is that correct? ...
#crysx
May 18, 2015, 06:50:00 AM
Upon re-reading your re-edit I had a spark in my head and Mangocoinz allows you to send/recieve to usernames as an address because usernames are the address'
May 18, 2015, 06:48:11 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily)
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily)
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
o nooo ... there is that word again ... masterno...
...#crysx
hehehe ...
all good mate ...
we are all getting used to it ...
#crysx
May 18, 2015, 06:46:07 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Messages in the blockchain have already been done, maybe look at CLAMs source.
Isn't that what bitcoin allows you to do as well but the part of the address still has the random number and letters for e.g SKETCHERx435bd34jk320m6vu9d
I've even seen the word DANK at the start of an address hahaha
May 18, 2015, 06:43:27 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Messages in the blockchain have already been done, maybe look at CLAMs source.
Also is blockchain bloat an issue?
May 18, 2015, 06:41:11 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Messages in the blockchain have already been done, maybe look at CLAMs source.
May 18, 2015, 06:40:49 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily)
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily)
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
o nooo ... there is that word again ... masterno...
...#crysx
May 18, 2015, 06:39:30 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily)
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use masternodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily)
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
o nooo ... there is that word again ... masterno...
...#crysx
May 18, 2015, 06:36:42 AM
Heres an idea for servicenodes:
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use servicenodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
Users can send their coins to a userid. We can then limit the amount of userid's to 1 per ip and use servicenodes to check if more are allocated. If so they will be removed.
If we let people send to a userid, then we need to let people add some text to their transaction (stored on masternodes temporarily) so that they know what it was for.
Eg.
13/05/15 @ 8:01 am: Work Payment | 5 spr | From: spreadcointalk.org
14/05/15 @ 7:56 pm: BCT sucks, plz help me run the site. | 0.05 spr | From: theymos
17/05/15 @ 6:00 pm: ROI from FREESPR.COM, WE NO SCAM| 0.00000001 spr | From: FreeSPR.com
Lol, the new BCT forum was supposed to be finished by now.
May 17, 2015, 06:45:13 PM
Tipping music rights owners:
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114270/the-peaceful-solution-to-music-piracy-is-a-bitcoin-tipping-culture
Minerpage came up with an interesting and sort of similar approach to pay rights owners using the servicenode network.
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114270/the-peaceful-solution-to-music-piracy-is-a-bitcoin-tipping-culture
Minerpage came up with an interesting and sort of similar approach to pay rights owners using the servicenode network.
May 17, 2015, 04:23:42 PM
Q-
Will the end of this month still bring servicenode testing?
If so, should we open a thread on spreadcointalk.org with basic direction on how to join testing?
Eg,
How to boot spreadcoin(testnet) and safely separate 'testnet' files and 'mainnet' files.
A guide on how to configure a testnet .conf.
We're going to need as many people as possible testing, and a guide on how to do the most basic things needed to help
with testing should come in handy.
I could open the thread but am not the most clued up on spreadcoin testnet
Will the end of this month still bring servicenode testing?
If so, should we open a thread on spreadcointalk.org with basic direction on how to join testing?
Eg,
How to boot spreadcoin(testnet) and safely separate 'testnet' files and 'mainnet' files.
A guide on how to configure a testnet .conf.
We're going to need as many people as possible testing, and a guide on how to do the most basic things needed to help
with testing should come in handy.
I could open the thread but am not the most clued up on spreadcoin testnet
May 17, 2015, 04:08:21 PM
@georgem - Question - Will there be an FPGA release for this coin or are we going to stay GPU?
Thanks - pokeytex
Thanks - pokeytex
I think we will sooner see an FPGA release for X11 coins, before we will see FPGA in SpreadX11.
May 17, 2015, 04:07:36 PM
^Why has it taken you so long to get into crypto dev mode?
You're obviously very good at it.
You're obviously very good at it.
I had wrong priorities for much too long!
(mining and trading, instead of learning and developing)
May 17, 2015, 02:34:02 PM
@georgem - Question - Will there be an FPGA release for this coin or are we going to stay GPU?
Thanks - pokeytex
Thanks - pokeytex
Jump to: