Massive dump @bittrex. Just letting the few people on here know.
We're back down to 11k.
We're back down to 11k.
116 and the sell side has responded. Hopefully some people managed to grab some coins
Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) - page 312. (Read 790393 times)
May 09, 2015, 06:11:46 AM
116 and the sell side has responded. Hopefully some people managed to grab some coins
May 09, 2015, 06:00:57 AM
Massive dump @bittrex. Just letting the few people on here know.
We're back down to 11k.
We're back down to 11k.
May 08, 2015, 09:04:47 PM
Might want to update the OP. It appears the only exchange that has SPR now is Bittrex. Not a good thing IMO.
You are right, I updated the OP.
May 08, 2015, 05:56:37 PM
Might want to update the OP. It appears the only exchange that has SPR now is Bittrex. Not a good thing IMO.
May 08, 2015, 02:56:51 PM
Getting slowly pickled in Vodka. If I post any crap later, please don't quote it so I can make appropriate deletions tomorrow 
May 08, 2015, 02:16:06 PM
I think it's better to make the limitation at a protocol level, IMHO it is just to have a healthier network.
Score will be in the protocol.
Amount of max allowed SN will also be controlled thru the protocol.
Ofcourse there will be a limiting factor on the side of your server's hardware.
Not well performing hardware will receive low score.
Otherwise you'll have a network with SN that will not be able to produce the asked service (or do it partially) ==> Unhappiness of the client of the service.
There will always be good and bad SNs,
and we will have a constant (deliberate) shutting down of SNs that don't behave well, (this could even include SNs that do everything right, but are nonetheless asked to improve themselves, because everybody else has improved...)
This is not unhealthy for the system, in the contrary it is where our health will come from.
If we constantly have nodes that are being shutdown and asked to register again when improved, it's like we keep our network fit by having it in a constant state of emergency.
Netflix and chaos monkey comes to mind:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/07/netflix-attacks-own-network-with-chaos-monkey-and-now-you-can-too/
May 08, 2015, 01:27:58 PM
quick question; is there some kind of reward for running a node ?
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
Assuming you mean 'masternodes', which we call servicenodes, then yes, but no details yet.
And will you still on the first idea of the dynamic SPR needed to create one?
(I guess yes as georgem was a big fan of this feature;) )
EDIT: also if I remember well on the first implementation of Mr Spread of "ServiceNode", it was possible to create various SN within the same wallet. If you can remove this feature : aka :1 server = one SN.
This was only possible because those first test nodes did practically nothing (no CPU and no RAM requirement, nothing!).
It's easy to install dozens of server nodes on one machine if they only run "empty" services.
Once services actually need ressources this is going to change immediately and drastically.
I expect that it will not be feasible to run more than one service node on one server (especially if it's a VPS)...
I think it's better to make the limitation at a protocol level, IMHO it is just to have a healthier network.
Otherwise you'll have a network with SN that will not be able to produce the asked service (or do it partially) ==> Unhappiness of the client of the service.
May 08, 2015, 01:26:00 PM
Farage? Joking, right?
Greens, mate. Vote to save all our daffodils.
Greens, mate. Vote to save all our daffodils.
I'm not joking, but you are
.........
Sorry, mate - I can't resist reminding you, now Farage has been given the red card.
LOL
Sad day for UKIP, however they did pull in over 3 million votes!
BTW, nice bounty on the bitcoin core implementation.
Can you also start one for SN's?
May 08, 2015, 12:53:21 PM
thanks all, got it up and running 
Might take a while for the blockchain to sync but welcome onboard!
May 08, 2015, 12:51:19 PM
thanks all, got it up and running
May 08, 2015, 12:46:46 PM
there's one thing missing in the guide; which port to open up in firewall?
41678
I'll get that changed in the guide
May 08, 2015, 12:32:18 PM
there's one thing missing in the guide; which port to open up in firewall?
41678
May 08, 2015, 12:28:50 PM
there's one thing missing in the guide; which port to open up in firewall?
May 08, 2015, 12:27:17 PM
quick question; is there some kind of reward for running a node ?
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
Assuming you mean 'masternodes', which we call servicenodes, then yes, but no details yet.
And will you still on the first idea of the dynamic SPR needed to create one?
(I guess yes as georgem was a big fan of this feature;) )
EDIT: also if I remember well on the first implementation of Mr Spread of "ServiceNode", it was possible to create various SN within the same wallet. If you can remove this feature : aka :1 server = one SN.
This was only possible because those first test nodes did practically nothing (no CPU and no RAM requirement, nothing!).
It's easy to install dozens of server nodes on one machine if they only run "empty" services.
Once services actually need ressources this is going to change immediately and drastically.
I expect that it will not be feasible to run more than one service node on one server (especially if it's a VPS)...
May 08, 2015, 12:14:52 PM
quick question; is there some kind of reward for running a node ?
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
Assuming you mean 'masternodes', which we call servicenodes, then yes, but no details yet.
And will you still on the first idea of the dynamic SPR needed to create one?
(I guess yes as georgem was a big fan of this feature;) )
EDIT: also if I remember well on the first implementation of Mr Spread of "ServiceNode", it was possible to create various SN within the same wallet. If you can remove this feature : aka :1 server = one SN.
May 08, 2015, 12:12:52 PM
quick question; is there some kind of reward for running a node ?
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
Assuming you mean 'masternodes', which we call servicenodes, then yes, but no details yet.
Sorry sdef2, I assumed you were referring to running a full spreadcoin node.
thanks. i might just fire up a vps for fun anyway with that guide that was posted earlier
May 08, 2015, 12:09:52 PM
Just for convenience of future reference:
Bitcoin Core Development Bounty: 15K SPR
Coins101: 5k SPR
Minerpage: 5k SPR
Stonehedge: 5k SPR
Bitcoin Core Development Bounty: 15K SPR
Coins101: 5k SPR
Minerpage: 5k SPR
Stonehedge: 5k SPR
and use my github for merge requests
I've updated my post. Cheers.
1k Spr from here for the bounty
May 08, 2015, 12:07:54 PM
quick question; is there some kind of reward for running a node ?
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
Assuming you mean 'masternodes', which we call servicenodes, then yes, but no details yet.
Sorry sdef2, I assumed you were referring to running a full spreadcoin node.
May 08, 2015, 12:06:16 PM
quick question; is there some kind of reward for running a node ?
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
(apart from supporting the network ofcourse)
Assuming you mean 'masternodes', which we call servicenodes, then yes, but no details yet.
May 08, 2015, 12:05:32 PM
I'll drop him a line.
Jump to: