Mr. Spread, from here out, my suggestion would be for you to ignore the trolls. Spreadcoin threatens a lot of established coins and as such, people are going to FUD. It's actually a sign that a coin is beginning to mature.
That suggestion actually goes for everyone, but I realize that's not going to be the case. I personally have better things to do than respond to trolls (people with legit, hard questions are not trolls for the record, sometimes people get the two mixed up). If you have time to respond to trolls, seriously, get a hobby.
None of this matters. All that matters from here is whether masternode implementation is successful. If it is (keep in mind there will be bugs that will need to be worked out) then we'll be laughing at the people who sold at these levels.
You full of shit.
I looked through some of your previous posts. Same shit different coin.
I'll stick with Darkcoin and its developer, Evan Duffield, rather than invest in this clone.
Thanks though.
I'm thoroughly enjoying the fact that the price of DRK does not currently reflect that we are near open source AND will likely have instant transactions.
The buy opportunities of the last few weeks will likely never be seen again. I hope most of you were strong enough to hold or better yet, continue to accumulate.
As an investor in Darkcoin, I have invested in Evan first and foremost. As I always say, "You invest in the developer, not the coin".
With that said, I must admit, I lightened my position quite a few times as enforcement issues and some other problems arose. It's not a matter of not believing in Evan, I did believe he would fix the issues at some point, but I also understood that the probability the value of DRK would suffer in the meantime was rather high.
As Evan worked to fix these issues, other changes were made, such as the gradual increase of DRK payouts to masternodes which makes masternodes that much more valuable. Those increases are coded as such:
if(nHeight > 158000) ret += blockValue / 20; //25.0% - 2014-10-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*1)) ret += blockValue / 20; //30.0% - 2014-11-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*2)) ret += blockValue / 20; //35.0% - 2014-12-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*3)) ret += blockValue / 40; //37.5% - 2015-01-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*4)) ret += blockValue / 40; //40.0% - 2015-02-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*5)) ret += blockValue / 40; //42.5% - 2015-03-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*6)) ret += blockValue / 40; //45.0% - 2015-04-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*7)) ret += blockValue / 40; //47.5% - 2015-05-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*9)) ret += blockValue / 40; //50.0% - 2015-07-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*11)) ret += blockValue / 40; //52.5% - 2015-09-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*13)) ret += blockValue / 40; //55.0% - 2015-11-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*15)) ret += blockValue / 40; //57.5% - 2016-01-23
if(nHeight > 158000+((576*30)*17)) ret += blockValue / 40; //60.0% - 2016-03-23
There was a time when DRK had a marketcap of over $60,000,000. This was prior to Darksend being open source and audited by a security expert, prior to the very recent successful masternode payment enforcement, prior to the new payout schedule for masternodes, and prior to what is likely to be a successful rollout of InstantX. This was also prior to the hacking of very popular BTC mixers and other recent events that have caused people to begin to think about DRK as a payment method and the resulting publicity.
There was good cause for DRK to have a marketcap of $60,000,000 and there was good cause for it to drop back down. The good cause for the drop is no longer an issue yet there are a host of new, positive fundamentals at play. All of these new fundamentals are slowly being priced into the coin.
In my opinion, once they are properly priced into the coin, we will be at a new all time high.