Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ 
Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 381. (Read 810079 times)
December 07, 2014, 03:50:59 PM
December 07, 2014, 03:16:18 PM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ 
December 07, 2014, 02:24:23 PM
WTF,https://betasharex.com/trade/SPR/BTC on hold AGAIN!!!!!!
betasharex REALLY sux! Time to move on to other exchanges.
December 07, 2014, 02:12:48 PM
WTF,https://betasharex.com/trade/SPR/BTC on hold AGAIN!!!!!!
December 07, 2014, 01:44:12 PM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ December 07, 2014, 01:38:29 PM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ December 07, 2014, 12:19:37 PM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ December 07, 2014, 11:56:08 AM
I agree that turning on the darkcoin features is great idea. The dev seems like a great dev though so I would like to see him improve on those features so we are even better than Darkcoin! Darkcoin has over 10 million market cap! We have true decentralization and a great dev. SPR could be worth millions too!
I've taken a degree of flak for posting here and supporting SPR, but people forget that open source is a two way street - there is plenty of room for both coins to grow, and persue related but not necessarily identical paths, and increasing the dev count and user base of the underlying code and concept will be beneficial to everyone IMO.
+1
December 07, 2014, 11:53:12 AM
I agree that turning on the darkcoin features is great idea. The dev seems like a great dev though so I would like to see him improve on those features so we are even better than Darkcoin! Darkcoin has over 10 million market cap! We have true decentralization and a great dev. SPR could be worth millions too!
I've taken a degree of flak for posting here and supporting SPR, but people forget that open source is a two way street - there is plenty of room for both coins to grow, and persue related but not necessarily identical paths, and increasing the dev count and user base of the underlying code and concept will be beneficial to everyone IMO.
December 07, 2014, 11:45:31 AM
I agree that turning on the darkcoin features is great idea. The dev seems like a great dev though so I would like to see him improve on those features so we are even better than Darkcoin! Darkcoin has over 10 million market cap! We have true decentralization and a great dev. SPR could be worth millions too!
December 07, 2014, 11:43:06 AM
Masternodes are eventually scheduled to receive 60% of the block reward with DRK, although I have my suspicions that that won't be the end of the matter, and shouldn't be, as mining via centralised pools is basically worthless as a security mechanism. With SPR though, where the miners are actually decentralised and thus provide a useful service, a 50-50 split would seem more equable.
Remember that mining and running Masternodes are not mutually exclusive, I and a lot of other DRK folk do both. Unless you have free electricity or Star Trek hardware though, running Masternodes is generally the more profitable of the two.
There are a whole bunch of variables involved, the economics of the two coins are not going to be identical, I'm sure if Mr Spread goes the MN route he'll adequately think through the various feedback loops.
Remember that mining and running Masternodes are not mutually exclusive, I and a lot of other DRK folk do both. Unless you have free electricity or Star Trek hardware though, running Masternodes is generally the more profitable of the two.
There are a whole bunch of variables involved, the economics of the two coins are not going to be identical, I'm sure if Mr Spread goes the MN route he'll adequately think through the various feedback loops.
December 07, 2014, 11:28:26 AM
I think Masternodes would be awesome for Spreadcoin. How many Spread would you need to run a MN, or is this to early to ask?
yes,masternodes are awesome ,but before that,availabilty and security are the first things to consider.BTW:Do masternode need any cost
You need a VPS to run masternodes as well so there is that monthly cost. However, masternodes would get a portion of each block's mined SPR. As such, masternodes should inherently be profitable to run.
They also cause the price of the coin to rise because people buy it to get masternodes and take those coins out of circulation.
December 07, 2014, 09:35:08 AM
I think Masternodes would be awesome for Spreadcoin. How many Spread would you need to run a MN, or is this to early to ask?
yes,masternodes are awesome ,but before that,availabilty and security are the first things to consider.BTW:Do masternode need any cost
), a random subset is chosen from the total each time, making them inherently orders of magnitude more secure from a purely numbers perspective than mining. December 07, 2014, 08:04:03 AM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ December 07, 2014, 07:47:57 AM
I think Masternodes would be awesome for Spreadcoin. How many Spread would you need to run a MN, or is this to early to ask?
yes,masternodes are awesome ,but before that,availabilty and security are the first things to consider.BTW:Do masternode need any cost
December 07, 2014, 07:38:47 AM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
already added~ December 07, 2014, 06:47:46 AM
I think Masternodes would be awesome for Spreadcoin. How many Spread would you need to run a MN, or is this to early to ask?
December 07, 2014, 06:22:59 AM
Mr. Spread, maybe you should contact c-cex about addition of SPR.
December 07, 2014, 05:54:31 AM
So only 20 million coin supply total over all the time? How many coins will be generated in the first year?
1st year - 3.27 million2nd year - 6 million (total)
3rd year - 8.44 million (total)
4th year - 10 million (total)
Yes, there will be 20 million coins total.
December 07, 2014, 04:45:10 AM
when can we trade SPR on c-cex??today?
Jump to: