Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More - page 6. (Read 211852 times)

member
Activity: 1201
Merit: 26
Thanks for TON. Can you please add ALPH too?
member
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0

Thank you for reply!
Yes, I'am using tripple mining Cheesy ETC+ZIL+TON (ezil.me)
There is no --eth_dag_cache=0 key present, but I've also tried to add it, and no result Sad Now trying to play with --eth_4g_max_alloc, but still no result.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
In v0.9.4 dual mining is super improved, TON+ETH is more stable, higher hashrate compared to previous versions and more shares (Hiveon +3/4%).

Kudos to the developers for the great job, it's good to see how skilled programmers can still add value to an almost perfect product 

 
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.59332215

Any solution for this problem?.. Sad

Did you activate compute mode on your RX570? And your TON hashrate is to high, this cause the low ETC performance also.
I tested it on 2x RX470 - without tweaking i get 29.5mh ETC and around 600mh on TON.

Ok i read your compute mode is on. I use the ETH config A160.


AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0
member
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Hi to all.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Sad Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.

Yeah, I'm having the same issue. Reducing the dual intensity does lower the TON hashrate, but doesn't do anything for the ETH hashrate. I guess we'll have to wait for fixes.

Hal
member
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
Hi to all.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Sad Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.

Sorry for a long post...
Code:
1)There is a fully automated tuning of TRM, no additional options defined, all the miner defaults:

[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU PCIe      CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct  TMem  FanPct  FanRpm  VDDC   Power  ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 0   01:00.0   32  1250    0      2050   48C   48C   48C   54.00%  2152    893 mV  98 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 1   02:00.0   32  1245    0      2015   47C   47C   47C   48.00%  1959    906 mV  99 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 2   03:00.0   32  1175    0      2000   49C   49C   49C   57.00%  1594    900 mV  89 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 3   06:00.0   32  1270    0      2050   49C   49C   49C   57.00%  2243    893 mV 100 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 4   07:00.0   36  1245    0      2025   47C   47C   47C   48.00%  1916    875 mV  98 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49]
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:03:18
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  0 [48C, fan 54%]      ethash: 3.951Mh/s, avg 3.252Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  1 [47C, fan 48%]      ethash: 4.022Mh/s, avg 3.690Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  2 [49C, fan 57%]      ethash: 3.849Mh/s, avg 3.190Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  3 [49C, fan 57%]      ethash: 745.1kh/s, avg 637.4kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  4 [47C, fan 48%]      ethash: 731.3kh/s, avg 625.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total                      ethash: 13.30Mh/s, avg 11.39Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] eu.ezil.me                 ethash: 13.14Mh/s, avg 11.17Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  0 [48C, fan 54%]      ton: 921.4Mh/s, avg 804.3Mh/s, pool 2.218Gh/s a:2 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  1 [47C, fan 48%]      ton: 917.9Mh/s, avg 796.6Mh/s, pool 1.111Gh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  2 [49C, fan 57%]      ton: 860.8Mh/s, avg 746.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  3 [49C, fan 57%]      ton: 967.8Mh/s, avg 774.7Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  4 [47C, fan 48%]      ton: 1.075Gh/s, avg 846.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total                      ton: 4.743Gh/s, avg 3.968Gh/s, pool 3.329Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 4.943Gh/s, avg 3.876Gh/s, pool 3.327Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2)Next step, I trying to set --dual_intensity=0.25 to get a 75% of GPU power directed to primary algo ETC
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU PCIe      CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct  TMem  FanPct  FanRpm  VDDC   Power  ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 0   01:00.0   32  1250    0      2050   44C   44C   44C   42.00%  1807    893 mV  68 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 1   02:00.0   32  1245    0      2015   42C   42C   42C   36.00%  1593    906 mV  80 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 2   03:00.0   32  1175    0      2000   44C   44C   44C   42.00%  1184    900 mV  70 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 3   06:00.0   32  1270    0      2050   43C   43C   43C   39.00%  1697    893 mV  79 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 4   07:00.0   36  1245    0      2025   42C   42C   42C   36.00%  1542    875 mV  75 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07]
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:07:49
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  0 [44C, fan 42%]      ethash: 710.2kh/s, avg 665.8kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  1 [42C, fan 36%]      ethash: 4.025Mh/s, avg 3.760Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  2 [44C, fan 42%]      ethash: 3.900Mh/s, avg 3.775Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  3 [43C, fan 39%]      ethash: 755.0kh/s, avg 711.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  4 [42C, fan 36%]      ethash: 740.6kh/s, avg 698.3kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total                      ethash: 10.13Mh/s, avg 9.610Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] eu.ezil.me                 ethash: 9.731Mh/s, avg 9.506Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  0 [44C, fan 42%]      ton: 475.4Mh/s, avg 449.9Mh/s, pool 1.329Gh/s a:3 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  1 [42C, fan 36%]      ton: 465.6Mh/s, avg 454.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  2 [44C, fan 42%]      ton: 436.0Mh/s, avg 422.8Mh/s, pool 443.5Mh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  3 [43C, fan 39%]      ton: 481.1Mh/s, avg 461.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  4 [42C, fan 36%]      ton: 538.5Mh/s, avg 525.1Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total                      ton: 2.397Gh/s, avg 2.313Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 2.268Gh/s, avg 2.283Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As you can see, the secondary algo hashrate goes down, but at the same time there is no increase of h/r in primary algo Sad
Any ideas, what I need to tune, to get the normal hashes, please?..
Thanks.
jr. member
Activity: 62
Merit: 2
Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?

Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s

31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate

maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.


Using win 11. Drivers are 19.1.1.  A little dated but has worked great for me with Polaris.  Using standard 1200/2150.  It works great on my other rig with a 5700 5600 and 580 mix. 
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?

Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s

31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate

maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.
jr. member
Activity: 62
Merit: 2
Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Dear dev,

Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..

They are working on it. Good things need time.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 1
Dear dev,

Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Dear Dev, please add 'pool.services.tonwhales.com:443' support to your sweet miner as soon as possible, please!
lolMiner sucks!
jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
TRM v0.9.2.1 eth+ton works good on Navi cards, much better than lolminer.
Still waiting for Vega and Polaris support.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great.  Anyone know if that's on the horizon?

Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:

--ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u . -p x --ton_end

Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"



Where you find this url stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 for the pool connection?
The connection is https://server1.whalestonpool.com or i am wrong?

EDIT:

https://pool.services.tonwhales.com

Teamredminer only supports 2 pools at the moment - stratum+tcp://ton.hashrate.to:4002 and stratum+tcp://pplns.toncoinpool.io:443/stratum


Test with my 6900xt - 61mh on ETH and 5gh/s on TON | lolminer - ETH 61mh and 3,75gh/s on TON

Yep, unsupported pool at the moment, working with ton.hashrate.to:4002.

I suppose I'll be paid by the pool on the TON wallet when payout is reached for ETH but not 100% sure
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great.  Anyone know if that's on the horizon?

Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:

--ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u . -p x --ton_end

Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"



Where you find this url stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 for the pool connection?
The connection is https://server1.whalestonpool.com or i am wrong?

EDIT:

https://pool.services.tonwhales.com

Teamredminer only supports 2 pools at the moment - stratum+tcp://ton.hashrate.to:4002 and stratum+tcp://pplns.toncoinpool.io:443/stratum


Test with my 6900xt - 61mh on ETH and 5gh/s on TON | lolminer - ETH 61mh and 3,75gh/s on TON
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great.  Anyone know if that's on the horizon?

Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:

--ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u . -p x --ton_end

Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"

jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
it would be nice if we can dual mining eth/etc + TON with TRM
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 1
I have couple question regarding using the TRM.

OS - Windows 10
AMD Driver version - 21.3.2
Mobo - Asrock BTC Pro v2.0
GPU - RX5700XT from different vendors
TRM version - 0.9.0

Some background here. I have 6 GPUs. If I only use 5 I can set the primary display using IGP on the mobo (in BIOS). But if I use 6 GPUs, the mobo wont post if I try to use IGP as primary display. So I am forced to use 5700XT for primary display when using 6 GPUs.

If I don't connect a display or dummy HDMI dongle, when I start TRM, the GPU 0, used as primary display, shows very low hashrate like below.

GPU  0 [33C, fan 43%]      ethash: 1.115Mh/s, avg 1.032Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0

Once I connect a display or use HDMI dongle, the GPU will start working but with two caveats. Is monitor or HDMI dongle required?  

1) Its hashrate is slightly lower than other GPUs - 56.2Mh (Primary GPU) vs 56.8Mh (Other GPU) in my case. Is this the correct behavior?
2) By default, TRM allocates 7GB vram for GPU 0. If I tried to allocate more vram using command option, the GPU 0 will be detected as dead soon after I start mining. This is correct behavior also?


member
Activity: 206
Merit: 20
I request devs to please add "option" to remove "NEW JOB RECEIVED" notification , it would be lot nicer and cleaner.
Pages:
Jump to: