Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More - page 6. (Read 211959 times)
March 06, 2022, 11:38:41 AM
Thanks for TON. Can you please add ALPH too?
March 06, 2022, 07:53:33 AM
AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command: --eth_dag_cache=0
You must delete the command: --eth_dag_cache=0
Thank you for reply!
Yes, I'am using tripple mining
ETC+ZIL+TON (ezil.me)There is no --eth_dag_cache=0 key present, but I've also tried to add it, and no result
Now trying to play with --eth_4g_max_alloc, but still no result. March 04, 2022, 06:23:56 PM
In v0.9.4 dual mining is super improved, TON+ETH is more stable, higher hashrate compared to previous versions and more shares (Hiveon +3/4%).
Kudos to the developers for the great job, it's good to see how skilled programmers can still add value to an almost perfect product
Kudos to the developers for the great job, it's good to see how skilled programmers can still add value to an almost perfect product
March 04, 2022, 06:30:00 AM
Did you activate compute mode on your RX570? And your TON hashrate is to high, this cause the low ETC performance also.
I tested it on 2x RX470 - without tweaking i get 29.5mh ETC and around 600mh on TON.
Ok i read your compute mode is on. I use the ETH config A160.
AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command: --eth_dag_cache=0
March 04, 2022, 06:26:14 AM
February 22, 2022, 07:44:15 PM
Hi to all.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo
Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.
Yeah, I'm having the same issue. Reducing the dual intensity does lower the TON hashrate, but doesn't do anything for the ETH hashrate. I guess we'll have to wait for fixes.
Hal
February 22, 2022, 05:15:34 PM
Hi to all.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.
Sorry for a long post...
As you can see, the secondary algo hashrate goes down, but at the same time there is no increase of h/r in primary algo
Any ideas, what I need to tune, to get the normal hashes, please?..
Thanks.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo
Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.
Sorry for a long post...
Code:
1)There is a fully automated tuning of TRM, no additional options defined, all the miner defaults:
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU PCIe CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct TMem FanPct FanRpm VDDC Power ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 0 01:00.0 32 1250 0 2050 48C 48C 48C 54.00% 2152 893 mV 98 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 1 02:00.0 32 1245 0 2015 47C 47C 47C 48.00% 1959 906 mV 99 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 2 03:00.0 32 1175 0 2000 49C 49C 49C 57.00% 1594 900 mV 89 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 3 06:00.0 32 1270 0 2050 49C 49C 49C 57.00% 2243 893 mV 100 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 4 07:00.0 36 1245 0 2025 47C 47C 47C 48.00% 1916 875 mV 98 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49]
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:03:18
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 0 [48C, fan 54%] ethash: 3.951Mh/s, avg 3.252Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 1 [47C, fan 48%] ethash: 4.022Mh/s, avg 3.690Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 2 [49C, fan 57%] ethash: 3.849Mh/s, avg 3.190Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 3 [49C, fan 57%] ethash: 745.1kh/s, avg 637.4kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 4 [47C, fan 48%] ethash: 731.3kh/s, avg 625.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total ethash: 13.30Mh/s, avg 11.39Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] eu.ezil.me ethash: 13.14Mh/s, avg 11.17Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 0 [48C, fan 54%] ton: 921.4Mh/s, avg 804.3Mh/s, pool 2.218Gh/s a:2 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 1 [47C, fan 48%] ton: 917.9Mh/s, avg 796.6Mh/s, pool 1.111Gh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 2 [49C, fan 57%] ton: 860.8Mh/s, avg 746.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 3 [49C, fan 57%] ton: 967.8Mh/s, avg 774.7Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 4 [47C, fan 48%] ton: 1.075Gh/s, avg 846.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total ton: 4.743Gh/s, avg 3.968Gh/s, pool 3.329Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 4.943Gh/s, avg 3.876Gh/s, pool 3.327Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)Next step, I trying to set --dual_intensity=0.25 to get a 75% of GPU power directed to primary algo ETC
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU PCIe CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct TMem FanPct FanRpm VDDC Power ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 0 01:00.0 32 1250 0 2050 44C 44C 44C 42.00% 1807 893 mV 68 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 1 02:00.0 32 1245 0 2015 42C 42C 42C 36.00% 1593 906 mV 80 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 2 03:00.0 32 1175 0 2000 44C 44C 44C 42.00% 1184 900 mV 70 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 3 06:00.0 32 1270 0 2050 43C 43C 43C 39.00% 1697 893 mV 79 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 4 07:00.0 36 1245 0 2025 42C 42C 42C 36.00% 1542 875 mV 75 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07]
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:07:49
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 0 [44C, fan 42%] ethash: 710.2kh/s, avg 665.8kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 1 [42C, fan 36%] ethash: 4.025Mh/s, avg 3.760Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 2 [44C, fan 42%] ethash: 3.900Mh/s, avg 3.775Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 3 [43C, fan 39%] ethash: 755.0kh/s, avg 711.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 4 [42C, fan 36%] ethash: 740.6kh/s, avg 698.3kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total ethash: 10.13Mh/s, avg 9.610Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] eu.ezil.me ethash: 9.731Mh/s, avg 9.506Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 0 [44C, fan 42%] ton: 475.4Mh/s, avg 449.9Mh/s, pool 1.329Gh/s a:3 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 1 [42C, fan 36%] ton: 465.6Mh/s, avg 454.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 2 [44C, fan 42%] ton: 436.0Mh/s, avg 422.8Mh/s, pool 443.5Mh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 3 [43C, fan 39%] ton: 481.1Mh/s, avg 461.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 4 [42C, fan 36%] ton: 538.5Mh/s, avg 525.1Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total ton: 2.397Gh/s, avg 2.313Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 2.268Gh/s, avg 2.283Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU PCIe CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct TMem FanPct FanRpm VDDC Power ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 0 01:00.0 32 1250 0 2050 48C 48C 48C 54.00% 2152 893 mV 98 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 1 02:00.0 32 1245 0 2015 47C 47C 47C 48.00% 1959 906 mV 99 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 2 03:00.0 32 1175 0 2000 49C 49C 49C 57.00% 1594 900 mV 89 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 3 06:00.0 32 1270 0 2050 49C 49C 49C 57.00% 2243 893 mV 100 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 4 07:00.0 36 1245 0 2025 47C 47C 47C 48.00% 1916 875 mV 98 W A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49]
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:03:18
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 0 [48C, fan 54%] ethash: 3.951Mh/s, avg 3.252Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 1 [47C, fan 48%] ethash: 4.022Mh/s, avg 3.690Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 2 [49C, fan 57%] ethash: 3.849Mh/s, avg 3.190Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 3 [49C, fan 57%] ethash: 745.1kh/s, avg 637.4kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 4 [47C, fan 48%] ethash: 731.3kh/s, avg 625.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total ethash: 13.30Mh/s, avg 11.39Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] eu.ezil.me ethash: 13.14Mh/s, avg 11.17Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 0 [48C, fan 54%] ton: 921.4Mh/s, avg 804.3Mh/s, pool 2.218Gh/s a:2 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 1 [47C, fan 48%] ton: 917.9Mh/s, avg 796.6Mh/s, pool 1.111Gh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 2 [49C, fan 57%] ton: 860.8Mh/s, avg 746.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 3 [49C, fan 57%] ton: 967.8Mh/s, avg 774.7Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU 4 [47C, fan 48%] ton: 1.075Gh/s, avg 846.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total ton: 4.743Gh/s, avg 3.968Gh/s, pool 3.329Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 4.943Gh/s, avg 3.876Gh/s, pool 3.327Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)Next step, I trying to set --dual_intensity=0.25 to get a 75% of GPU power directed to primary algo ETC
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU PCIe CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct TMem FanPct FanRpm VDDC Power ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 0 01:00.0 32 1250 0 2050 44C 44C 44C 42.00% 1807 893 mV 68 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 1 02:00.0 32 1245 0 2015 42C 42C 42C 36.00% 1593 906 mV 80 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 2 03:00.0 32 1175 0 2000 44C 44C 44C 42.00% 1184 900 mV 70 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 3 06:00.0 32 1270 0 2050 43C 43C 43C 39.00% 1697 893 mV 79 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 4 07:00.0 36 1245 0 2025 42C 42C 42C 36.00% 1542 875 mV 75 W A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07]
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:07:49
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 0 [44C, fan 42%] ethash: 710.2kh/s, avg 665.8kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 1 [42C, fan 36%] ethash: 4.025Mh/s, avg 3.760Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 2 [44C, fan 42%] ethash: 3.900Mh/s, avg 3.775Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 3 [43C, fan 39%] ethash: 755.0kh/s, avg 711.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 4 [42C, fan 36%] ethash: 740.6kh/s, avg 698.3kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total ethash: 10.13Mh/s, avg 9.610Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] eu.ezil.me ethash: 9.731Mh/s, avg 9.506Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 0 [44C, fan 42%] ton: 475.4Mh/s, avg 449.9Mh/s, pool 1.329Gh/s a:3 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 1 [42C, fan 36%] ton: 465.6Mh/s, avg 454.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 2 [44C, fan 42%] ton: 436.0Mh/s, avg 422.8Mh/s, pool 443.5Mh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 3 [43C, fan 39%] ton: 481.1Mh/s, avg 461.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU 4 [42C, fan 36%] ton: 538.5Mh/s, avg 525.1Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total ton: 2.397Gh/s, avg 2.313Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 2.268Gh/s, avg 2.283Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see, the secondary algo hashrate goes down, but at the same time there is no increase of h/r in primary algo
Any ideas, what I need to tune, to get the normal hashes, please?..
Thanks.
February 22, 2022, 10:05:32 AM
Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on. Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual mining. I get full ton hashrate however. Any experts?
Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?
Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s
31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate
maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.
Using win 11. Drivers are 19.1.1. A little dated but has worked great for me with Polaris. Using standard 1200/2150. It works great on my other rig with a 5700 5600 and 580 mix.
February 22, 2022, 08:34:07 AM
Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on. Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual mining. I get full ton hashrate however. Any experts?
Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?
Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s
31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate
maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.
February 21, 2022, 09:02:23 PM
Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on. Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual mining. I get full ton hashrate however. Any experts?
February 17, 2022, 05:32:14 AM
Dear dev,
Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..
Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..
They are working on it. Good things need time.
February 17, 2022, 05:28:24 AM
Dear dev,
Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..
Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..
February 14, 2022, 09:54:15 PM
Dear Dev, please add 'pool.services.tonwhales.com:443' support to your sweet miner as soon as possible, please!
lolMiner sucks!
lolMiner sucks!
February 13, 2022, 03:37:32 AM
TRM v0.9.2.1 eth+ton works good on Navi cards, much better than lolminer.
Still waiting for Vega and Polaris support.
Still waiting for Vega and Polaris support.
February 11, 2022, 08:54:12 AM
Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great. Anyone know if that's on the horizon?
Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:
--ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u
Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"
Where you find this url stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 for the pool connection?
The connection is https://server1.whalestonpool.com or i am wrong?
EDIT:
https://pool.services.tonwhales.com
Teamredminer only supports 2 pools at the moment - stratum+tcp://ton.hashrate.to:4002 and stratum+tcp://pplns.toncoinpool.io:443/stratum
Test with my 6900xt - 61mh on ETH and 5gh/s on TON | lolminer - ETH 61mh and 3,75gh/s on TON
Yep, unsupported pool at the moment, working with ton.hashrate.to:4002.
I suppose I'll be paid by the pool on the TON wallet when payout is reached for ETH but not 100% sure
February 11, 2022, 06:13:16 AM
Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great. Anyone know if that's on the horizon?
Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:
--ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u
Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"
Where you find this url stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 for the pool connection?
The connection is https://server1.whalestonpool.com or i am wrong?
EDIT:
https://pool.services.tonwhales.com
Teamredminer only supports 2 pools at the moment - stratum+tcp://ton.hashrate.to:4002 and stratum+tcp://pplns.toncoinpool.io:443/stratum
Test with my 6900xt - 61mh on ETH and 5gh/s on TON | lolminer - ETH 61mh and 3,75gh/s on TON
February 11, 2022, 05:58:11 AM
Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great. Anyone know if that's on the horizon?
Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:
--ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u
Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"
February 05, 2022, 02:51:19 AM
it would be nice if we can dual mining eth/etc + TON with TRM
January 08, 2022, 04:08:16 PM
I have couple question regarding using the TRM.
OS - Windows 10
AMD Driver version - 21.3.2
Mobo - Asrock BTC Pro v2.0
GPU - RX5700XT from different vendors
TRM version - 0.9.0
Some background here. I have 6 GPUs. If I only use 5 I can set the primary display using IGP on the mobo (in BIOS). But if I use 6 GPUs, the mobo wont post if I try to use IGP as primary display. So I am forced to use 5700XT for primary display when using 6 GPUs.
If I don't connect a display or dummy HDMI dongle, when I start TRM, the GPU 0, used as primary display, shows very low hashrate like below.
GPU 0 [33C, fan 43%] ethash: 1.115Mh/s, avg 1.032Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
Once I connect a display or use HDMI dongle, the GPU will start working but with two caveats. Is monitor or HDMI dongle required?
1) Its hashrate is slightly lower than other GPUs - 56.2Mh (Primary GPU) vs 56.8Mh (Other GPU) in my case. Is this the correct behavior?
2) By default, TRM allocates 7GB vram for GPU 0. If I tried to allocate more vram using command option, the GPU 0 will be detected as dead soon after I start mining. This is correct behavior also?
OS - Windows 10
AMD Driver version - 21.3.2
Mobo - Asrock BTC Pro v2.0
GPU - RX5700XT from different vendors
TRM version - 0.9.0
Some background here. I have 6 GPUs. If I only use 5 I can set the primary display using IGP on the mobo (in BIOS). But if I use 6 GPUs, the mobo wont post if I try to use IGP as primary display. So I am forced to use 5700XT for primary display when using 6 GPUs.
If I don't connect a display or dummy HDMI dongle, when I start TRM, the GPU 0, used as primary display, shows very low hashrate like below.
GPU 0 [33C, fan 43%] ethash: 1.115Mh/s, avg 1.032Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
Once I connect a display or use HDMI dongle, the GPU will start working but with two caveats. Is monitor or HDMI dongle required?
1) Its hashrate is slightly lower than other GPUs - 56.2Mh (Primary GPU) vs 56.8Mh (Other GPU) in my case. Is this the correct behavior?
2) By default, TRM allocates 7GB vram for GPU 0. If I tried to allocate more vram using command option, the GPU 0 will be detected as dead soon after I start mining. This is correct behavior also?
December 24, 2021, 08:06:27 AM
I request devs to please add "option" to remove "NEW JOB RECEIVED" notification , it would be lot nicer and cleaner.
Jump to: