Topic: [ANN] [XTC] TileCoin| IoT (Internet of Things) bitcoin blockchain - ĐApp - page 64. (Read 286491 times)
November 13, 2014, 02:52:35 AM
Prices continued to decline , Dev, what are you doing ?
November 13, 2014, 02:43:00 AM
November 12-13, 2014 - Development Updates
I am up late/early depending on your time zone.
1.) Refactored TilePay enclosures with "Industrial Designer". Some tweaks for manufacturing. Cost effective savings.
2.) PCB board development - Authentication for signed data.
3.) Counterparty update for development: One of the major developments for the counterparty protocol has enabled additional functionality that we can use for TilePay,
pegged assets, distributed voting, decentralized storage, and really distributed apps of any kind.
[–]PhantomPhreakXCP 18 points 14 hours ago
Counterparty can now do anything that Ethereum can! Namecoin, SchellingCoin, pegged assets, distributed voting, decentralized storage, and really distributed apps of any kind.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2m32vz/counterparty_recreates_ethereums_smart_contract/
http://counterparty.io/news/counterparty-recreates-ethereums-smart-contract-platform-on-bitcoin/
4.) We also have the architecture that was missing from Counterparty - "true SPV support" for bitcoin transfer.
5.) We use the bitcoin blockchain as the most secure blockchain technology. Viacoin support will be added in the future because of the available bytes that can be added to a secure "scrypt" implementation.
6.) Lawyer meeting was focused on assignment of intellectual property and possible VC friendly business structures.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
I am up late/early depending on your time zone.
1.) Refactored TilePay enclosures with "Industrial Designer". Some tweaks for manufacturing. Cost effective savings.
2.) PCB board development - Authentication for signed data.
3.) Counterparty update for development: One of the major developments for the counterparty protocol has enabled additional functionality that we can use for TilePay,
pegged assets, distributed voting, decentralized storage, and really distributed apps of any kind.
[–]PhantomPhreakXCP 18 points 14 hours ago
Counterparty can now do anything that Ethereum can! Namecoin, SchellingCoin, pegged assets, distributed voting, decentralized storage, and really distributed apps of any kind.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2m32vz/counterparty_recreates_ethereums_smart_contract/
http://counterparty.io/news/counterparty-recreates-ethereums-smart-contract-platform-on-bitcoin/
4.) We also have the architecture that was missing from Counterparty - "true SPV support" for bitcoin transfer.
5.) We use the bitcoin blockchain as the most secure blockchain technology. Viacoin support will be added in the future because of the available bytes that can be added to a secure "scrypt" implementation.
6.) Lawyer meeting was focused on assignment of intellectual property and possible VC friendly business structures.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Continue to delay the wallet you will see 100
November 13, 2014, 02:30:04 AM
Continue to delay the wallet you will see 100
November 13, 2014, 02:25:35 AM
Hi statdude,
The concern from altcoinUK, was the original enclosure "prototype" for the IoT devices which I published. Very rough draft. The rough "prototype" validated the measurements that are required to make a full-fledged manufacturable ready product that protects the IoT devices. Obviously, this can and will change depending upon the use case for the IoT device.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9515776
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
：Please prop erly solving the most basic wallet ok The concern from altcoinUK, was the original enclosure "prototype" for the IoT devices which I published. Very rough draft. The rough "prototype" validated the measurements that are required to make a full-fledged manufacturable ready product that protects the IoT devices. Obviously, this can and will change depending upon the use case for the IoT device.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9515776
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Impressive response, although I'm still not sure what the prototype was for, can someone briefly explain IoT?
But I like the high goals for this coin by dev team. Good luck.
But I like the high goals for this coin by dev team. Good luck.
November 13, 2014, 02:10:00 AM
Hi statdude,
The concern from altcoinUK, was the original enclosure "prototype" for the IoT devices which I published. Very rough draft. The rough "prototype" validated the measurements that are required to make a full-fledged manufacturable ready product that protects the IoT devices. Obviously, this can and will change depending upon the use case for the IoT device.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9515776
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
The concern from altcoinUK, was the original enclosure "prototype" for the IoT devices which I published. Very rough draft. The rough "prototype" validated the measurements that are required to make a full-fledged manufacturable ready product that protects the IoT devices. Obviously, this can and will change depending upon the use case for the IoT device.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9515776
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Impressive response, although I'm still not sure what the prototype was for, can someone briefly explain IoT?
But I like the high goals for this coin by dev team. Good luck.
But I like the high goals for this coin by dev team. Good luck.
November 13, 2014, 01:58:41 AM
Impressive response, although I'm still not sure what the prototype was for, can someone briefly explain IoT?
But I like the high goals for this coin by dev team. Good luck.
But I like the high goals for this coin by dev team. Good luck.
November 13, 2014, 01:54:41 AM
Hi altcoinUK,
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
[/quote]I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Thanks！best coin 2014!
November 13, 2014, 01:48:14 AM
Hi altcoinUK,
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
And the pictures display an amateurish 3D printed enclosure. If the progress is manifested in very poorly designed 3D printed enclosure and the DEV feels that such picture must be published, in the meantime he has no idea why the transaction time is significant in real time hardware control, then I am worried about the direction of this project.
Seeing the quality the 3D printed enclosure this coin reminds me some high school project on Kickstarter at the early days when the quality control was not in place.
I posted a rough draft of the 3D printed "prototype" enclosure from our "Industrial Designer". This may look like an amateur attempt for what should be a professional enclosure for the IoT devices. This is not the case. This validates dimensions and usability/weather proofing techniques that need to be thought of at the very beginning.
When producing a final product, many stages of validation occur to reduce the final cost of output for a particular product that is manufactured.
It is absolutely necessary to produce a "prototype" prior to actually committing to manufacturing of the physical enclosure. Reduces risk and iterations that incur NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost.
On another specific note, we have a pcb that validates each IoT device on a mesh network using hardware that has cryptographically signed information.
Here is the "rough" draft board design.
What this does, is provide a more difficult way of attacking a mesh network versus attacking multiple sensors within the network with a chip signing mechanism.
You had asked about the time aspect of validation. If based on btc, there is a 10 minute delay...
When the Smart Contracts and Micro transactions functionalities are combined, this enables very fast data verification and validation with minimal bitcoin blockchain bloat.
If you have received quotes from other people in regards to time, I do not think they have asked you what type of IoT device that would exist in the mesh network to be able to respond accurately to your question.
In the case of our chip, it takes between 10-20 milliseconds to produce a signature that can be authenticated. Depending on the number of devices and their specific roles within the mesh network, this can vary considerably. We are working on datasheets that will accurately identify potential bottlenecks that pertain to the different type of devices and their roles in a mesh network for the IoT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
there is nothing real except some pictures...
And the pictures display an amateurish 3D printed enclosure. If the progress is manifested in very poorly designed 3D printed enclosure and the DEV feels that such picture must be published, in the meantime he has no idea why the transaction time is significant in real time hardware control, then I am worried about the direction of this project.
Seeing the quality the 3D printed enclosure this coin reminds me some high school project on Kickstarter at the early days when the quality control was not in place.
November 12, 2014, 10:37:15 PM
and tilepay.co 
November 12, 2014, 07:57:39 PM
Hi dev,
How about doing an AMA on reddit?
How about doing an AMA on reddit?
November 12, 2014, 07:57:34 PM
tilepay.org
November 12, 2014, 07:44:12 PM
I am glad to see more infrastructure being built around IoT.
We will see if/when they deliver.
I will be attending Wavefront IoT – Building Real Value Event November 17th, 2014 in Montreal.
http://www.wavefrontac.com/wavefront-events/iot-building-real-value/
If anyone wants to meet me, please PM me. We can set a time and location.
10X more crypto-tokens? Hmmm. Simple math to me. Would that make TileCoin a bargain?
I am confident we will be the first, because I know what is being completed and who is on the team.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
We will see if/when they deliver.
I will be attending Wavefront IoT – Building Real Value Event November 17th, 2014 in Montreal.
http://www.wavefrontac.com/wavefront-events/iot-building-real-value/
If anyone wants to meet me, please PM me. We can set a time and location.
10X more crypto-tokens? Hmmm. Simple math to me. Would that make TileCoin a bargain?
I am confident we will be the first, because I know what is being completed and who is on the team.
Regards,
ASIC-8Tile
Apparently from Canada, as he mentioned to be at a wavefront event there. You can always go and meet him there?
November 12, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
Anyone know who's the dev behind this coin? And their credentials? The coin source POD (http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/tilecoin-xtc/) doesn't provide much detail compared to CryptoAsian, which provides at the very least the country of origin and some sense of profession/skills/education.
go deep with google. it is not hard to find out your answer. legit dev. but we need outcomes of wallet, code review, dapp.
Seriously, does anyone have a specific link to something other than CoinSource that provides more detail (country of origin/profession/skills/education, etc.). Has this dev signed up to CryptoAsian POD?
CryptoAsian and any other POD is kind of joke. I mean you should track his post and google some info. it is very easy to find out his identity. do your home work. website, whois, the first post. I can't tell you more.
Edit: 8tile.com
November 12, 2014, 07:28:06 PM
Anyone know who's the dev behind this coin? And their credentials? The coin source POD (http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/tilecoin-xtc/) doesn't provide much detail compared to CryptoAsian, which provides at the very least the country of origin and some sense of profession/skills/education.
go deep with google. it is not hard to find out your answer. legit dev. but we need outcomes of wallet, code review, dapp.
Seriously, does anyone have a specific link to something other than CoinSource that provides more detail (country of origin/profession/skills/education, etc.). Has this dev signed up to CryptoAsian POD?
November 12, 2014, 05:37:24 PM
Anyone know who's the dev behind this coin? And their credentials? The coin source POD (http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/tilecoin-xtc/) doesn't provide much detail compared to CryptoAsian, which provides at the very least the country of origin and some sense of profession/skills/education.
go deep with google. it is not hard to find out your answer. legit dev. but we need outcomes of wallet, code review, dapp.
November 12, 2014, 03:03:23 PM
Anyone know who's the dev behind this coin? And their credentials? The coin source POD (http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/tilecoin-xtc/) doesn't provide much detail compared to CryptoAsian, which provides at the very least the country of origin and some sense of profession/skills/education.
Coinsource doesn't even check to see if the documents provided are forged or not. Their verification is worth nothing. November 12, 2014, 02:54:49 PM
Anyone know who's the dev behind this coin? And their credentials? The coin source POD (http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/tilecoin-xtc/) doesn't provide much detail compared to CryptoAsian, which provides at the very least the country of origin and some sense of profession/skills/education.
November 12, 2014, 10:39:34 AM
there is nothing real except some pictures...
And the pictures display an amateurish 3D printed enclosure. If the progress is manifested in very poorly designed 3D printed enclosure and the DEV feels that such picture must be published, in the meantime he has no idea why the transaction time is significant in real time hardware control, then I am worried about the direction of this project.
Seeing the quality the 3D printed enclosure this coin reminds me some high school project on Kickstarter at the early days when the quality control was not in place.
Hi my friend. Do not fall for Shitbay. Without any doubt, It is a scam masterminded by a Chinese I know very well. All they intend to do is selling all kinds of fancy features plus bithalo, which is sold around 30-50 btc. I hope XTC is not a scam, but by far it pissed off many investors. It is very clever to be tough to any devs in a shitstormed altcoin world. You know those pumping and scam groups very well I think. Shitbay is right from there.
sorry to spam this thread again.
Well I am not claiming that BitBay is a better coin than TileCoin at all, quite the opposite, I have been very critical in the BitBay thread. It's clear these coins, BitBay and TileCoin don't have the IoT solution,not even in conceptual level. Having said that, other features of the software could work, I am talking about IoT.
I fully agree with you about the issues in the P&D driven altcoin market.
November 12, 2014, 09:21:12 AM
there is nothing real except some pictures...
And the pictures display an amateurish 3D printed enclosure. If the progress is manifested in very poorly designed 3D printed enclosure and the DEV feels that such picture must be published, in the meantime he has no idea why the transaction time is significant in real time hardware control, then I am worried about the direction of this project.
Seeing the quality the 3D printed enclosure this coin reminds me some high school project on Kickstarter at the early days when the quality control was not in place.
Hi my friend. Do not fall for Shitbay. Without any doubt, It is a scam masterminded by a Chinese I know very well. All they intend to do is selling all kinds of fancy features plus bithalo, which is sold around 30-50 btc. I hope XTC is not a scam, but by far it pissed off many investors. It is very clever to be tough to any devs in a shitstormed altcoin world. You know those pumping and scam groups very well I think. Shitbay is right from there.
sorry to spam this thread again.
November 12, 2014, 09:15:21 AM
there is nothing real except some pictures...
And the pictures display an amateurish 3D printed enclosure. If the progress is manifested in very poorly designed 3D printed enclosure and the DEV feels that such picture must be published, in the meantime he has no idea why the transaction time is significant in real time hardware control, then I am worried about the direction of this project.
Seeing the quality the 3D printed enclosure this coin reminds me some high school project on Kickstarter at the early days when the quality control was not in place.
i am following Gagdetcoin also. I don't understand how they realize 1 second transaction and still set a wait and see approach.
We still don't know what kind of Dapp the dev is developing and transaction confirmation time matter or not. let's ask dev here or pm him.
Jump to: