Hey all.
An update on the token sale progress: Over 280 million XT sold as of today 🚀
We're offering up to 50% BONUS on your next XT purchase, using code MOON50 (as long as the purchase is made in the next 48 hours).
Click here to use the bonus.
More token sale and product updates on our blog!
Topic: [ANN] xxxxx (Read 175980 times)
I and most people do not trust Wcx anymore. Dirty marketing program. Change rules to deceive marketing participants. continue to introduce the program to entice more participants to cheat more people!
@hamnchess, I would politely request that you stop this "reverse trolling" of sorts, that you are doing.
You may not believe that this ICO is a scam. That is your right to believe that, personally.
Others do not have to share those beliefs.
You say if people referred "spam and shit people", you aren't allowed to complain.
Now hold on a second. The referrals were not required to make a purchase. They were required to verify their email. That is the issue here.
The change in the rules, not the quality of the people signing up.
Just because the exchange works, doesn't mean WCX has not deceived all of the people creating referrals.
Just because the CEO is smart and intelligent doesn't make WCX honest, regarding the policy change.
Just because purchasing XT works like a charm doesn't mean that WCX did not change the rules half way through the game.
Just because KYC is easy doesn't mean that it was specified as required at the start of the ICO.
Just because support answers quickly doesn't mean that WCX has acted honestly regarding referrals.
Just because the telegram channel is "transparent" doesn't mean that the rules weren't changed after everyone put in all the work.
Here is these peoples' argument. (If I may be so bold as to speak for others).
It isn't right, nor fair, to change a contract once one side is done with their obligation. None of the referrers got a say in the new policy. So they did all of the marketing work for WCX, and now that the rules have changed, are going to get only a fraction of what they were originally promised.
You come in here calling those who disagree with you "idiots", and "beggars". That is not polite discourse, and is doing neither you, nor WCX any help.
As to your secondary questions:
They might be continuing to work because they are STILL seeking more money for their ICO.
Their releasing a fully functional exchange has nothing to do with their integrity on the aspect of referrals.
How could it be a scam? Plenty of fully functional exchanges ended up scamming. Does Mt Gox ring a bell?
Just because people do not share your view of a certain ICO does not make them stupid, beggars, or uninformed.
I believe that the measure was put into place solely for the purpose of limiting the amount that WCX has to pay out. Which is not as per the original agreement.
You are welcome to disagree, but let's keep the conversation somewhat civil. Neither side looks good when they resort to vulgarity, or
namecalling, regardless of how disappointed they are.
You may not believe that this ICO is a scam. That is your right to believe that, personally.
Others do not have to share those beliefs.
You say if people referred "spam and shit people", you aren't allowed to complain.
Now hold on a second. The referrals were not required to make a purchase. They were required to verify their email. That is the issue here.
The change in the rules, not the quality of the people signing up.
Just because the exchange works, doesn't mean WCX has not deceived all of the people creating referrals.
Just because the CEO is smart and intelligent doesn't make WCX honest, regarding the policy change.
Just because purchasing XT works like a charm doesn't mean that WCX did not change the rules half way through the game.
Just because KYC is easy doesn't mean that it was specified as required at the start of the ICO.
Just because support answers quickly doesn't mean that WCX has acted honestly regarding referrals.
Just because the telegram channel is "transparent" doesn't mean that the rules weren't changed after everyone put in all the work.
Here is these peoples' argument. (If I may be so bold as to speak for others).
It isn't right, nor fair, to change a contract once one side is done with their obligation. None of the referrers got a say in the new policy. So they did all of the marketing work for WCX, and now that the rules have changed, are going to get only a fraction of what they were originally promised.
You come in here calling those who disagree with you "idiots", and "beggars". That is not polite discourse, and is doing neither you, nor WCX any help.
As to your secondary questions:
They might be continuing to work because they are STILL seeking more money for their ICO.
Their releasing a fully functional exchange has nothing to do with their integrity on the aspect of referrals.
How could it be a scam? Plenty of fully functional exchanges ended up scamming. Does Mt Gox ring a bell?
Just because people do not share your view of a certain ICO does not make them stupid, beggars, or uninformed.
I believe that the measure was put into place solely for the purpose of limiting the amount that WCX has to pay out. Which is not as per the original agreement.
You are welcome to disagree, but let's keep the conversation somewhat civil. Neither side looks good when they resort to vulgarity, or
namecalling, regardless of how disappointed they are.
The article is very complete and concise!!!
dirty marketing program!!!!
keep away from it
@wcxofficial, my apologies for not responding sooner.
I have one more question, which I would appreciate being answered.
Why is KYC not a requirement to trade on your platform, if it is required in order to claim referral link tokens?
I would greatly appreciate you highlighting the difference(s) there.
It certainly appears that if it was required in one instance, it would be a requirement for the other as well.
Thank you.
I have one more question, which I would appreciate being answered.
Why is KYC not a requirement to trade on your platform, if it is required in order to claim referral link tokens?
I would greatly appreciate you highlighting the difference(s) there.
It certainly appears that if it was required in one instance, it would be a requirement for the other as well.
Thank you.
KYC is not required to trade between digital currencies like BTC or ETH. When fiat is introduced, it will be required. For digital currencies that may be considered securities in some jurisdictions, it will also likely be required.
For XT, the requirement is both regulatory and also to check that referrals are actual people (not spam or duplicates or self-referrals). This is important because we need to make sure XT are distributed fairly to real people.
Hey guys, please let us keep this conversation healthy and civil. Please let us not trade insults or we will be obliged to lock this topic again.
We are of course open to positive and negative feedback, but please no trolling or labeling or pie-in-the-sky statements. If you have feedback for us, our communication style, or any other way we're doing things, we're all ears.
Thanks! –Arno
We are of course open to positive and negative feedback, but please no trolling or labeling or pie-in-the-sky statements. If you have feedback for us, our communication style, or any other way we're doing things, we're all ears.
Thanks! –Arno
ATTENTION: easyrimka is a troll. HE IS LIKELY PAID TO SAY NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT WCX.
Notice how he actively promotes competing exchanges in his signature.
Notice how he never has any logical argument to prove his point. He says "scam" then leaves. He is the only one saying this.
I have proven many times, through logical arguments, that WCX is real and legitimate. They have a working exchange, full linkedin profiles, open communication through their support and Telegram group, raised many millions, .... What more do you want? A blowjob from the CEO?
Have you used WCX exchange? It works perfect. I deposited, traded, and withdrew.
Have you listened to their CEO? Smart, intelligent. Plans are clear for the company.
Have you tried buying XT? Works like a charm.
Have you tried KYC? I got verified after 5 days.
Have you tried their support? All my queries were answered in less than 1 day.
Have you chatted in the WCX telegram? Admin is there, transparent, friendly, answering questions.
So... what is your argument?
Of course, trolls will always say it is not so. Look at the trolls on the Bitfinex thread, or on the Coinbase topics. To this day, while those companies are multi billion dollar companies, still, trolls who live in their mother's basement still say these companies are a "scam". Ah. The pleasure of the Internet.
/ignore trolls
Notice how he actively promotes competing exchanges in his signature.
Notice how he never has any logical argument to prove his point. He says "scam" then leaves. He is the only one saying this.
I have proven many times, through logical arguments, that WCX is real and legitimate. They have a working exchange, full linkedin profiles, open communication through their support and Telegram group, raised many millions, .... What more do you want? A blowjob from the CEO?
Have you used WCX exchange? It works perfect. I deposited, traded, and withdrew.
Have you listened to their CEO? Smart, intelligent. Plans are clear for the company.
Have you tried buying XT? Works like a charm.
Have you tried KYC? I got verified after 5 days.
Have you tried their support? All my queries were answered in less than 1 day.
Have you chatted in the WCX telegram? Admin is there, transparent, friendly, answering questions.
So... what is your argument?
Of course, trolls will always say it is not so. Look at the trolls on the Bitfinex thread, or on the Coinbase topics. To this day, while those companies are multi billion dollar companies, still, trolls who live in their mother's basement still say these companies are a "scam". Ah. The pleasure of the Internet.
/ignore trolls
It doesn't matter whether or not referred users *can* do KYC.
That was *not* part of the original agreement.
Both parties need to follow the *original* agreement, right?
The thing is original agreement changed when SEC started chasing ICOs and crypto projects last year. Now you have to comply with SEC rules or risk getting cease and desist letter. I kinda understand your point, but what do you expect from them? To put whole project at risk just to pay some referrals? Lets be serious, they won't do that.
I would agree with you completely.
But they do not require KYC to trade on their platform. Only to claim the tokens.
If it is required to do KYC to claim a token, wouldn't it be just as important for actually trading, and dealing in what could presumably be considered securities?
If they had required it for all parties across the board, I would have been (still unhappy), but fine with it.
But it isn't about compliance, because then traders would be required to do it as well.
Nope. This is about not paying out, because they don't want to pay out.
***************************
***************************
And @hamnchess. Might want to consider posting on another board soon, to look less obvious.
You've posted 98? times on this forum, and been active since August. 100% of your posts have been on this board.
Seems a bit odd, for somebody who in posts claimed to be fairly fluent in ICOs, and to have invested over 25K USD in this project, alone.
You'd think you would at least have a few other favorite projects.
he is just another scammer from the dev team or just a fool
It doesn't matter whether or not referred users *can* do KYC.
That was *not* part of the original agreement.
Both parties need to follow the *original* agreement, right?
The thing is original agreement changed when SEC started chasing ICOs and crypto projects last year. Now you have to comply with SEC rules or risk getting cease and desist letter. I kinda understand your point, but what do you expect from them? To put whole project at risk just to pay some referrals? Lets be serious, they won't do that.
I would agree with you completely.
But they do not require KYC to trade on their platform. Only to claim the tokens.
If it is required to do KYC to claim a token, wouldn't it be just as important for actually trading, and dealing in what could presumably be considered securities?
If they had required it for all parties across the board, I would have been (still unhappy), but fine with it.
But it isn't about compliance, because then traders would be required to do it as well.
Nope. This is about not paying out, because they don't want to pay out.
***************************
***************************
And @hamnchess. Might want to consider posting on another board soon, to look less obvious.
You've posted 98? times on this forum, and been active since August. 100% of your posts have been on this board.
Seems a bit odd, for somebody who in posts claimed to be fairly fluent in ICOs, and to have invested over 25K USD in this project, alone.
You'd think you would at least have a few other favorite projects.
I want to warn everyone. This ico seems scam as hell.
Don't participate it. And don't enter their kyc bullshit. They may probably steal your information and sell. Wcx is very shady.
Don't participate it. And don't enter their kyc bullshit. They may probably steal your information and sell. Wcx is very shady.
dont worry , hamcheese is here to convince you wcx is legit lol :DDD
I want to warn everyone. This ico seems scam as hell.
Don't participate it. And don't enter their kyc bullshit. They may probably steal your information and sell. Wcx is very shady.
Don't participate it. And don't enter their kyc bullshit. They may probably steal your information and sell. Wcx is very shady.
@wcxofficial, my apologies for not responding sooner.
I have one more question, which I would appreciate being answered.
Why is KYC not a requirement to trade on your platform, if it is required in order to claim referral link tokens?
I would greatly appreciate you highlighting the difference(s) there.
It certainly appears that if it was required in one instance, it would be a requirement for the other as well.
Its really bullshit, and your are just lying scammers.I have one more question, which I would appreciate being answered.
Why is KYC not a requirement to trade on your platform, if it is required in order to claim referral link tokens?
I would greatly appreciate you highlighting the difference(s) there.
It certainly appears that if it was required in one instance, it would be a requirement for the other as well.
You should ask KYC before the start of referral bounty, not after the end of campain.
Why you are changing rules? If you scammed the referrals, after you can scam investors easy.
I have near 500 referred people and only few of them will send KYC.
i will ask all those 500 people to post that your project is a SCAM, so you can not scam other people in future.
"If you referred real people.. they will kyc." otherwise your referrals are useless and just a tax on the token supply..
Are you dumb? Do you not have a head to think like normal people? Autism perhaps?
Do you really believe what you just said? Do you think the hundreds of referred "real people" will just be willing to give their IDs and waste their time for 500XT?..
It is honestly easier to get fake and self made accounts verified than real ones.
I mean if the people you referred won't even KYC or use the exchange, what use are they. Why do you deserve to get precious tokens for referring useless / inactive users?
That is not what I said. You have a tendency to run away from the point. I believe anyone can tell why.
the return of the dumb idiot, you are showing to everybody that you are an idiot, you have no argument. but i understand you , you buy some sh***tcoin and you want to recover. Sad life. but i think that everybody know that WCX is just a waste of time.
Oh yes such a waste of time, everybody knows... so much waste of time that they raised $16million, plus $10 million in the past two weeks, plus have 100,000 KYC applications and 100 million volume daily on the exchange. Lol but no, everybody knows WCX is a waste of time. how dumb can one get, trollrimka, I wonder...
What do people usually respond to trolls like this guy 😂😂 I guess /ignore
People on this thread are really misinformed. Either they're not following the project and just posting things out of their own ass, or simply trolling.
Did... you even try to join the Telegram group? The admin is there pretty much all day answering questions.
They recently published the X Token contract on etherscan - the code (max supply, burn function, etc.) is available for everyone to read: https://etherscan.io/token/0x282ee54f8ecda53d6bb77df4a4134738375a0664
You... know the exchange is live and people are depositing and trading, right?
If you're "angry" that you referred fake people and now you want to claim X Tokens for those fake people - give me a break. They should not waste XT on fake referrals, or airdrops to fake people.
Quote
Near 0 communication during ICO (or more exactly ICOs)
Did... you even try to join the Telegram group? The admin is there pretty much all day answering questions.
They recently published the X Token contract on etherscan - the code (max supply, burn function, etc.) is available for everyone to read: https://etherscan.io/token/0x282ee54f8ecda53d6bb77df4a4134738375a0664
Quote
still not sure you exist
You... know the exchange is live and people are depositing and trading, right?
If you're "angry" that you referred fake people and now you want to claim X Tokens for those fake people - give me a break. They should not waste XT on fake referrals, or airdrops to fake people.
the return of the dumb idiot, you are showing to everybody that you are an idiot, you have no argument. but i understand you , you buy some sh***tcoin and you want to recover. Sad life. but i think that everybody know that WCX is just a waste of time.
It doesn't matter whether or not referred users *can* do KYC.
That was *not* part of the original agreement.
Both parties need to follow the *original* agreement, right?
The thing is original agreement changed when SEC started chasing ICOs and crypto projects last year. Now you have to comply with SEC rules or risk getting cease and desist letter. I kinda understand your point, but what do you expect from them? To put whole project at risk just to pay some referrals? Lets be serious, they won't do that.
People on this thread are really misinformed. Either they're not following the project and just posting things out of their own ass, or simply trolling.
Did... you even try to join the Telegram group? The admin is there pretty much all day answering questions.
They recently published the X Token contract on etherscan - the code (max supply, burn function, etc.) is available for everyone to read: https://etherscan.io/token/0x282ee54f8ecda53d6bb77df4a4134738375a0664
You... know the exchange is live and people are depositing and trading, right?
If you're "angry" that you referred fake people and now you want to claim X Tokens for those fake people - give me a break. They should not waste XT on fake referrals, or airdrops to fake people.
Quote
Near 0 communication during ICO (or more exactly ICOs)
Did... you even try to join the Telegram group? The admin is there pretty much all day answering questions.
They recently published the X Token contract on etherscan - the code (max supply, burn function, etc.) is available for everyone to read: https://etherscan.io/token/0x282ee54f8ecda53d6bb77df4a4134738375a0664
Quote
still not sure you exist
You... know the exchange is live and people are depositing and trading, right?
If you're "angry" that you referred fake people and now you want to claim X Tokens for those fake people - give me a break. They should not waste XT on fake referrals, or airdrops to fake people.
By the way the most probable end to this story for me is that i will try KYC under false identity, sell token and leave.
Jump to: