lol..
Ever heard of testnet, guys ?
Hint: Compare the CheckTransaction() functions
have fun 
Topic: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup - page 149. (Read 663229 times)
September 30, 2017, 05:47:02 PM
Looks like found blocks with the hacked-together patched 0.13' version make 0.8' versions crash..
lol..
Ever heard of testnet, guys ?
Hint: Compare the CheckTransaction() functions have fun
lol..
Ever heard of testnet, guys ?
Hint: Compare the CheckTransaction() functions
have fun 
September 30, 2017, 05:46:55 PM
MPH is down for over 30 min!
September 30, 2017, 05:29:54 PM
Brucelats,One more big issue with Zcoin is that more than 70% of hashrate is concentrated on MPH, highly centralized network
Yeah i noticed it. Although Zcoin will release their own pool soon, so that will be great. Their pool should work like a charm. But i am worried about botnets... I hope diff get resolved fast.
September 30, 2017, 04:56:53 PM
Brucelats,One more big issue with Zcoin is that more than 70% of hashrate is concentrated on MPH, highly centralized network
September 30, 2017, 04:53:09 PM
Difficulty has jumped on ~35% just in one moment. WTF?
F**ng botnets?
30+Gh/40% of hashrate mining on private pool. seems to be botnet?
F**ng botnets?
30+Gh/40% of hashrate mining on private pool. seems to be botnet?
I am wondering the same... why diff jumped so high? Can we get official explanation? Why is this happening? I mean ok it happened but how can we predict such things and prepare and adapt... like how are we gonna mine some coin, invest our time in it and our funds and it's so RANDOM??? lol
September 30, 2017, 04:03:30 PM
Difficulty has jumped on ~35% just in one moment. WTF?
F**ng botnets?
30+Gh/40% of hashrate mining on private pool. seems to be botnet?
F**ng botnets?
30+Gh/40% of hashrate mining on private pool. seems to be botnet?
September 30, 2017, 03:21:49 PM
Same. Used ccminer posted by Zcoin, got 20 Mh from 6 1080TI but have 18 Mh on MPH.
September 30, 2017, 02:48:37 PM
Good afternoon. I use the autotranslator.
I use CCminer 2.2.1 tpruvot. In a CCminer at me 16.5 MH/s but on zcoin.miningpoolhub.com in dashborde show at most 10 MH/s..... Why?
I use CCminer 2.2.1 tpruvot. In a CCminer at me 16.5 MH/s but on zcoin.miningpoolhub.com in dashborde show at most 10 MH/s..... Why?
September 30, 2017, 02:02:52 PM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not? 
close to 7200 kH/s for me with 6x1060 How did you attain this?
Posted by Zcoin : "Use binaries at own risk but I tested the miner and it seems okay and he did a pull request with the requested modification.
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/pull/24
ccminer 2.2.1 x64 cuda 9: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz5n9rB3aWeYYlpSVklUTTVIWGc
ccminer 2.2.1 x86 cuda 9: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz5n9rB3aWeYaHZ1c0U1a3VGYkk". Let us know if that improved your hash rate
1070s & 1080s
September 30, 2017, 01:48:56 PM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not?
close to 7200 kH/s for me with 6x1060 How did you attain this?
Posted by Zcoin : "Use binaries at own risk but I tested the miner and it seems okay and he did a pull request with the requested modification.
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/pull/24
ccminer 2.2.1 x64 cuda 9: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz5n9rB3aWeYYlpSVklUTTVIWGc
ccminer 2.2.1 x86 cuda 9: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz5n9rB3aWeYaHZ1c0U1a3VGYkk". Let us know if that improved your hash rate
I'm using it now, I have 6900 k/h. 6*1060
September 30, 2017, 01:26:59 PM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not?
close to 7200 kH/s for me with 6x1060 How did you attain this?
Posted by Zcoin : "Use binaries at own risk but I tested the miner and it seems okay and he did a pull request with the requested modification.
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/pull/24
ccminer 2.2.1 x64 cuda 9: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz5n9rB3aWeYYlpSVklUTTVIWGc
ccminer 2.2.1 x86 cuda 9: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz5n9rB3aWeYaHZ1c0U1a3VGYkk". Let us know if that improved your hash rate
September 30, 2017, 01:23:58 PM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not?
close to 7200 kH/s for me with 6x1060 How did you attain this?
September 30, 2017, 01:22:18 PM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not?
close to 7200 kH/s for me with 6x1060 September 30, 2017, 01:20:57 PM
Why difficulty jumped from 7200 to 9400 all of a sudden? 1 block was 7200 and next one 9400 
+1 I saw that block number 54348 jumped from 7281.6 to 9586.1, why?
because almost all the coins are developed by a bunch of teenagers. There are pictures with acne in some of them. No professional teams behind.
September 30, 2017, 12:12:05 PM
Why difficulty jumped from 7200 to 9400 all of a sudden? 1 block was 7200 and next one 9400
+1 I saw that block number 54348 jumped from 7281.6 to 9586.1, why?
because almost all the coins are developed by a bunch of teenagers. There are pictures with acne in some of them. No professional teams behind.
Newbie spreading FUD, nothing new in this forums... please go away from this post and start eating ur doritos.
September 30, 2017, 12:07:37 PM
Why difficulty jumped from 7200 to 9400 all of a sudden? 1 block was 7200 and next one 9400
+1 I saw that block number 54348 jumped from 7281.6 to 9586.1, why?
because almost all the coins are developed by a bunch of teenagers. There are pictures with acne in some of them. No professional teams behind.
September 30, 2017, 11:46:35 AM
Why difficulty jumped from 7200 to 9400 all of a sudden? 1 block was 7200 and next one 9400
+1 I saw that block number 54348 jumped from 7281.6 to 9586.1, why?
September 30, 2017, 11:24:28 AM
Why difficulty jumped from 7200 to 9400 all of a sudden? 1 block was 7200 and next one 9400
September 30, 2017, 10:21:41 AM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not?
It's not bad https://whattomine.com/coins/175-xzc-lyra2z You can calculate profitability here.
Thank you. The calculator I found. Just decided to check, suddenly 1060 give even more.
September 30, 2017, 09:52:00 AM
Hm, 1060*6 get 6000 kH/s. It's good or not?
It's not bad https://whattomine.com/coins/175-xzc-lyra2z You can calculate profitability here.
Jump to: